Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3
Let's wait for our US based colleagues to wake up and have a cup of coffee or two... > Am 13.11.2019 um 14:01 schrieb Steffen : > > What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ? > > Steffen > > >> Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing >> het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen : >>> >>> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". >>> >>> I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, >>> tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. >>> >>> The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl >>> stapling. Also I like the mod_status information. >>> >>> Tested /branches/v2.2.3 intensive and running in production, no issues >>> seen. >> >> +1 from me as well. >> >>> I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877 >>> They are just to make it a little more user-friendly. >> >> Still on my list. >> >>> Thanks! Stephan >>> >>> Steffen >>> >>> >>> >> >
Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3
What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ? Steffen > Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing > het volgende geschreven: > >> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen : >> >> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". >> >> I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, >> tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. >> >> The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl >> stapling. Also I like the mod_status information. >> >> Tested /branches/v2.2.3 intensive and running in production, no issues seen. > > +1 from me as well. > >> I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877 >> They are just to make it a little more user-friendly. > > Still on my list. > >> Thanks! Stephan >> >> Steffen >> >> >> >
Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3
> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen : > > > > > +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". > > I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, > tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. > > The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. > Also I like the mod_status information. > > Tested /branches/v2.2.3 intensive and running in production, no issues seen. +1 from me as well. > I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877 > They are just to make it a little more user-friendly. Still on my list. > Thanks! Stephan > > Steffen > > >
Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3
+1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. Also I like the mod_status information. Tested /branches/v2.2.3 intensive and running in production, no issues seen. I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877 They are just to make it a little more user-friendly. Thanks! Stephan Steffen
