Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Stefan Eissing]

> Am 03.07.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
> 
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
 On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing 
 mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
   I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
   through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought 
 the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
 We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
  * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
. mod_proxy_http2
. mod_lua
. documentation
. non-Unix build
. non-Unix, single-platform code
>>> 
>>> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update 
>>> STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked 
>>> as experimental?)
>>> 
>> 
>> +1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)
> 
> +1

+1

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Yann Ylavic]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing 
>>> mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
>>>I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
>>>through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought 
>>> the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
>>> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>>>   * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
>>> . mod_proxy_http2
>>> . mod_lua
>>> . documentation
>>> . non-Unix build
>>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>>
>> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update 
>> STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked 
>> as experimental?)
>>
>
> +1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)

+1

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:40 PM, Christophe Jaillet 
>  wrote:
> 
> Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing > > wrote:
>>I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
>>through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. I basically thought 
>> the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
>> We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;
>>   * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
>> . mod_proxy_http2
>> . mod_lua
>> . documentation
>> . non-Unix build
>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update 
> STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module marked 
> as experimental?)
> 

+1 (for CTR for both mod_md *as well as* any module marked experimental)

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Christophe Jaillet]

Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing 
mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:


I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer. 



I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;

   * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
     . mod_proxy_http2
     . mod_lua
     . documentation
     . non-Unix build
     . non-Unix, single-platform code


I don't have a strong opinion about it, that's why I proposed to update 
STATUS to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe even for any module 
marked as experimental?)


A grep in 2.4.x, shows the following modules marked as Experimental:
mod_allowmethods.xml:Experimental
mod_dialup.xml:Experimental
mod_echo.xml:Experimental
mod_example_hooks.xml:Experimental
mod_file_cache.xml:Experimental
mod_heartbeat.xml:Experimental
mod_heartmonitor.xml:Experimental
mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.xml:Experimental
mod_log_debug.xml:Experimental
mod_lua.xml:Experimental
mod_privileges.xml:Experimental
mod_sed.xml:Experimental
mod_session_crypto.xml:Experimental

I suspect, that some should not be marked as Experimental anymore.


mod_md and mod_proxy_http2 don't have an Experimental status, only a 
red-lined warning at the beginning of its doc.




Maybe something should be added in the module list to easily spot the 
one with an Experimental status and a note explaining what this mean. 
(i.e., if I'm correct, the code is considered as stable, but its 
implementation and/or API and/or directives are subject to change in 
future release)


CJ

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[William A Rowe Jr]

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing  wrote:

> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.


I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
We aught to adjust this to reflect the eventual consensus;

  * Current exceptions for RTC for this branch:
. mod_proxy_http2
. mod_lua
. documentation
. non-Unix build
. non-Unix, single-platform code

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Stefan Eissing]

I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go through the 
votes. Just let me know what you prefer. 

> Am 29.06.2018 um 21:31 schrieb Christophe Jaillet 
> :
> 
>> Le 29/06/2018 à 13:53, ic...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: icing
>> Date: Fri Jun 29 11:53:50 2018
>> New Revision: 1834671
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834671=rev
>> Log:
>> On the 2.4.x branch:
>> backport of current mod_md version and documentation.
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_crypt.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_json.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_version.h
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md_config.c
> 
> Hi,
> 
> according to 2.4.x/STATUS, mod_md is not CTR.
> Maybe, STATUS should be updated to add an exception for mod_md? (or maybe 
> even for any module marked as experimental?)
> Otherwise, this should go through STATUS first.
> 
> CJ

Re: svn commit: r1834671 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml modules/md/md_crypt.c modules/md/md_json.c modules/md/md_version.h modules/md/mod_md.c modules/md/mod_md_c

[Christophe Jaillet]

Le 29/06/2018 à 13:53, ic...@apache.org a écrit :

Author: icing
Date: Fri Jun 29 11:53:50 2018
New Revision: 1834671

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834671=rev
Log:
On the 2.4.x branch:

backport of current mod_md version and documentation.


Modified:
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_md.xml
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_crypt.c
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_json.c
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/md_version.h
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c
 httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md_config.c



Hi,

according to 2.4.x/STATUS, mod_md is not CTR.
Maybe, STATUS should be updated to add an exception for mod_md? (or 
maybe even for any module marked as experimental?)

Otherwise, this should go through STATUS first.

CJ