> On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:14 PM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
> 
> Author: jailletc36
> Date: Mon Oct 14 19:14:04 2019
> New Revision: 1868456
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1868456&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a note
> 
> Modified:
>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1868456&r1=1868455&r2=1868456&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Oct 14 19:14:04 2019
> @@ -178,6 +178,11 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>       trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1867183
>       2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1867183 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
>       +1: jim
> +      jailletc36: -0
> +                  I don't think that the #pragma black magic is of any help 
> with GCC 
> +                  and jim seems to still have problem with clang and 
> comments with //.
> +                  See discussion at:
> +                  
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/628cc54a1a345cb773d8e1be0639f8e75d2b481cf89232051c83b787@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E


The problem still exists because this is NOT back ported yet. With this back 
port, the problem goes away.

Reply via email to