Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-08 Thread Issac Goldstand
Sam Carleton wrote:
 On 3/27/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 3/27/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   More importantly,  lets say my module is called mod_coolapp and
 when I
   have it installed, you get to it at /coolapp.  I want /coolapp to be
   the equivalent to the index.php and then have say,
 /coolapp/images be
   the same as imageHandler.php.  Is there any trick to knowing which
   page is being requested or is it simply a matter of doing a string
   compare to see if the first part of the string passed the actual URL
   (/coolapp/) is images?
  
  You're going to want to parse/compare the string.  The Right Way(tm)
  to do this would probably be during the translate_name or possibly
  map_to_storage hooks to separate the URI mapping logic from the actual
  response processing logic.

 You totally lost me with the translate_name and map_to_storage, I
 will have to do some reading on it.

 Issac,

 I am not exactly sure how I would leverage either the translate_name
 hook or map_to_storage hook.  The best I can figure is that I should
 hook translate_name and this is the translation:

 /coolapp?params -- /coolapp?type=indexparams

 /coolapp/images?params -- /coolapp?type=imageparams

 Do I have the right idea?

 Sam
Yes, it's the correct direction, but if you're just going to mangle the
query string, you could just as easily do it with mod_rewrite.   The
only reason you'd need to code anything in your own module is if you
want to, say, guarantee that params contains a valid image file before
continuing the request chain; in such a scenario, you'd add a handler to
map_to_storage which does at least a partial parsing of params and
checks that the requested image exists, and if not aborts with a 404 error.

  Issac


Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-08 Thread Issac Goldstand
Sam Carleton wrote:
 On 4/4/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 3/27/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 3/27/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
More importantly,  lets say my module is called mod_coolapp and
 when I
have it installed, you get to it at /coolapp.  I want /coolapp
 to be
the equivalent to the index.php and then have say,
 /coolapp/images be
the same as imageHandler.php.  Is there any trick to knowing which
page is being requested or is it simply a matter of doing a
 string
compare to see if the first part of the string passed the
 actual URL
(/coolapp/) is images?
   
   You're going to want to parse/compare the string.  The Right
 Way(tm)
   to do this would probably be during the translate_name or possibly
   map_to_storage hooks to separate the URI mapping logic from the
 actual
   response processing logic.
 
  You totally lost me with the translate_name and map_to_storage, I
  will have to do some reading on it.

 Issac,

 I am not exactly sure how I would leverage either the translate_name
 hook or map_to_storage hook.  The best I can figure is that I should
 hook translate_name and this is the translation:

 /coolapp?params -- /coolapp?type=indexparams

 /coolapp/images?params -- /coolapp?type=imageparams

 Do I have the right idea?

 I have been trying to move forward with the assumption that I am on
 the right track and continue to run unknowns.  How do I identify
 coolapp as the location?  In other words, I have this in my
 httpd.conf:

 Location /coolapp
SetHandler my_cool_app
 /Location

 Inside of the translate_name hook, how do I go about determining that
 /coolapp is the location?

 Sam
You can't via the normal methods.  The Location is only mapped
*after* translate_name (and map_to_storage, IIRC,) run.  If you need to
know this anyway, you'll need to do string comparisons on r-uri and friends

  Issac


Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-06 Thread Sam Carleton

On 4/6/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:51:52 -0400
Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 (for now, assume that the whole
 application will be in the apache module.)

That assumption seems fundamentally flawed.  A substantial
and complex application will be built from a number of modules,
and is likely to mix preexisting components with new ones.
If you're thinking of all your work being one module, then
you need to take a step back and review it.

A good startingpoint is one module per task.  How many tasks
does your application comprise?  How many of those tasks can
be accomplished using existing modules?

It's also of course a valid approach to mix-and-match modules
with other components such as scripts and backends.  But I
guess you see that as an intermediate stage in your work.


Nick,

I think I forgot to mention in the last post that what I am working on
is a packaged solution with a GUI frontend.  There are going to be two
different distributions, the first will be installing apache and all
the needed components with the GUI to run on one machine, the pro
version will have the apache piece install on another machine,
possibly a preexisting apache server.

As I said before, I am completely, 100% open to how I should implement
this whole application, I just don't want to get carried away using a
million different technologies because it will make it that much
harder to put together an install;)  My goal is a one click install!

I have been thinking of keeping the HTML piece in PHP.  It sounds like
you agree that is a logical approach, correct?

Sam


Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-05 Thread Graham Dumpleton

On 05/04/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 4/5/07, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 05/04/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I have one module that does a few different things.
 
  1: create a index html document of images
  2: create a page html document of one image (when user clicks on an
  image in the index)
  3: Handle the image request that are in the HTML of #1 and #2 and send
  out all the images.
 
  Right now I have it all written in PHP, there is a index.php for #1
  and #2 and an imageHandler.php for #3.  I am trying to understand the
  best way to separate this logic within my one module.  Someone else
  suggested I look at hooking translate_name.
 
  I found my answer to how to determine the location, so I have been
  playing with it since my post and when I set the r-filename =
  images; and return OK, I get a 403 Forbidden.

 Probably because you haven't allowed Apache access to the images
 directory. Ie., you still need to have something like:

For starters, the objective is to do away with the PHP code
altogether, I don't think I will do that in the first round, just
replace the image handler, but I am thinking long term;)

The way I have it configured is this:

Location /coolapp
SetHandler mod_my_cool_app
Location

I don't understand your comment about not allowing Apache access to
the images directory, for starters, from the perspective of Apache,
there isn't an images directory, it is elsewhere on the machine that
Apache does not have and will not have access to, it is a security
thing.

But I don't think that is really relevant to the problem.  When I type
in /coolapp/images in a browser, my module does get called and the URI
is /coolapp/images, why is it when I simply set the request's filename
(r-filename) to images I get a 403?  Apache did not have a problem
with /coolapp/images, why would it have a problem with
/coolapp/images/images?  Or does filename mean something different?


In a translate name handler, if you assign to r-filename then the map
to storage phase will still kick in and ensure that Apache has access
to whatever you set r-filename to. Thus, you still need a Directory
directive corresponding to the physical location you set r-filename
to that marks it as accessible. The translate name handler, unless you
also override map to storage handler to work around it, is not really
for setting the target to a virtual resource.

I could try and suggest other approaches, but don't really grasp how
you want all this to work so would just probably going around in
circles. If in the first instance all you want to do is rewrite URLs
to give a different view to the clients, I still suggest you at least
first use mod_rewrite to produce what you want. I know you don't want
to use mod_rewrite in the long run, but being able to see a set of
mod_rewrite rules that demonstrate exactly what you want makes it
easier for anyone to understand as it is clearer than some English
description.

Graham


As I have told others on this wonderful mailing list, my 12+ years of
software development have been in GUI development, not web.  I have
always played with web stuff, but this is my first serious web project
and it is for my own new company!

Ultimately I am trying to figure out, within the world of Apache
modules, what is the best way to distinguish between the different
general flow paths in my module.  One being to generate HTML and the
other to generate images.  To the end user, I would like the URI for
pages to simply be location/ and the URI for the images to be
location/images.

As it stands right now, I am thinking the easiest way is to simply
check to see if the URI is location or location/images inside of
the main handler.  Someone else said that the right way to do it is to
do this checking in the translate_name hook.  Unless I am able to be
enlightened, which is questionablegrin, I think I will do it the
first way:(

Sam



Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-05 Thread Sam Carleton

On 4/5/07, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a translate name handler, if you assign to r-filename then the map
to storage phase will still kick in and ensure that Apache has access
to whatever you set r-filename to. Thus, you still need a Directory
directive corresponding to the physical location you set r-filename
to that marks it as accessible. The translate name handler, unless you
also override map to storage handler to work around it, is not really
for setting the target to a virtual resource.


Thank you, that does make sense.


I could try and suggest other approaches, but don't really grasp how
you want all this to work so would just probably going around in
circles. If in the first instance all you want to do is rewrite URLs
to give a different view to the clients, I still suggest you at least
first use mod_rewrite to produce what you want. I know you don't want
to use mod_rewrite in the long run, but being able to see a set of
mod_rewrite rules that demonstrate exactly what you want makes it
easier for anyone to understand as it is clearer than some English
description.


Graham,

Here is my problem:  I have been a C/C++ programmer for over 10 years
and have been working in .Net for the last two, but it has ALL be on
the desktop, I have very, very limited experience with web
development.  I am simply looking for the best, most flexible approach
possible.  In the short term, I am going to be keeping the HTML
generation in PHP, depending on how hard it is to do this module (it
is taking up a HUGE amount of time, though I am enjoying it) I would
like to port the HTML generation to the module, also.

With time the whole application will grow with complexity.  From a
HTML perspective, there is only two pages, one that displays indexes
of images, the other that displays a larger view of one image.  In
time, there will be shopping charts, admin pages, extra.

How do I want it all to tie together?  I really don't know, I have
never been able to find any good documentation on how to put together
a complex web application and keep it manageable, thus this is
ultimately the advise I am seeking.  I am completely open to how it
should all work.  Any suggestions?  (for now, assume that the whole
application will be in the apache module.)

Sam


Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-04 Thread Graham Dumpleton

On 05/04/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 4/4/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 3/27/07, Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 3/27/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
More importantly,  lets say my module is called mod_coolapp and when I
have it installed, you get to it at /coolapp.  I want /coolapp to be
the equivalent to the index.php and then have say, /coolapp/images be
the same as imageHandler.php.  Is there any trick to knowing which
page is being requested or is it simply a matter of doing a string
compare to see if the first part of the string passed the actual URL
(/coolapp/) is images?
   

You're going to want to parse/compare the string.  The Right Way(tm)

   to do this would probably be during the translate_name or possibly
   map_to_storage hooks to separate the URI mapping logic from the actual
   response processing logic.
 
  You totally lost me with the translate_name and map_to_storage, I
  will have to do some reading on it.

 Issac,

 I am not exactly sure how I would leverage either the translate_name
 hook or map_to_storage hook.  The best I can figure is that I should
 hook translate_name and this is the translation:

 /coolapp?params -- /coolapp?type=indexparams

 /coolapp/images?params -- /coolapp?type=imageparams

 Do I have the right idea?

I have been trying to move forward with the assumption that I am on
the right track and continue to run unknowns.  How do I identify
coolapp as the location?  In other words, I have this in my
httpd.conf:

Location /coolapp
SetHandler my_cool_app
/Location

Inside of the translate_name hook, how do I go about determining that
/coolapp is the location?


I missed out on the start of this conversion so really don't know what
you are trying to do, but look at the source code for mod_alias in
Apache as an example of how you can match a URI location to a specific
resource in a translate name handler. In the case of mod_alias it
matches it to a physical direction and applies different meanings to
it depend on whether you are using Alias or ScriptAlias style
directives.

BTW, if all you are wanting to do is translate stuff like:

 /coolapp?params -- /coolapp?type=indexparams

 /coolapp/images?params -- /coolapp?type=imageparams

why aren't you just using mod_rewrite?

Graham


Re: translate_name and/or map_to_storage hooks

2007-04-04 Thread Sam Carleton

On 4/4/07, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I missed out on the start of this conversion so really don't know what
you are trying to do


I have one module that does a few different things.

1: create a index html document of images
2: create a page html document of one image (when user clicks on an
image in the index)
3: Handle the image request that are in the HTML of #1 and #2 and send
out all the images.

Right now I have it all written in PHP, there is a index.php for #1
and #2 and an imageHandler.php for #3.  I am trying to understand the
best way to separate this logic within my one module.  Someone else
suggested I look at hooking translate_name.

I found my answer to how to determine the location, so I have been
playing with it since my post and when I set the r-filename =
images; and return OK, I get a 403 Forbidden.


why aren't you just using mod_rewrite?


This is going to be packaged software and I would, ideally, like to
keep it all self contained so that end users that decide to start
hacking things, cannot get too far.