+1 Reviewed the RFC. Looks like a promising direction to take. On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 9:26 AM sagar sumit <cod...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi devs, > > RFC-69 proposes some exciting features and in line with that vision, > I would like to propose support for multi-table transactions in Hudi. > > As the name suggests, this would enable transactional consistency > across multiple tables, i.e. a set of changes to multiple tables either > completely succeeds or completely fails. This could be helpful for use > cases such as updating details about a sales order that affects 2 or more > tables, deleting records for a customer across 2 or more tables, etc. > > Hudi already provides ACID guarantees on a single table and tunable > concurrency control. We would need to build additional orchestration or > consistency mechanisms on top of existing mechanisms. I would like to > put more details in a separate RFC. However, the high-level goal is to > provide the same guarantees as Hudi provides for a single table and > should work with both kinds of concurrency control OCC and MVCC. > > Looking forward to hearing some thoughts from you all. > > Regards, > Sagar >
