Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Juan]

+1 (binding)
Checked signature and checksums, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, and run jenkins against RC3, tests passed.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Henry Robinson  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran tests on private infra
> Checked signatures and hashes
>
> On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> > > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> > > patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
> > >
> > > Please vote today!
> > >
> > > P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> > > the Incubator PMC:
> > > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> > >> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so
> you
> > >> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
> > >>
> > >> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
> > >>
> > >> Tom
> > >>
> > >> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> > >>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> > >>> the PMC)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple 
> > wrote:
> > >>> > +1 (non-binding)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from
> the
> > >>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White 
> wrote:
> > >>> >> +1
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> > >>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source
> tag
> > >>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
> files,
> > >>> >> and built from source.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since
> it
> > has
> > >>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> > >>> >> though, so not a blocker.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Cheers,
> > >>> >> Tom
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple  >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating)
> > 2.7.0
> > >>> >>> release candidate 3.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> > >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.
> 0/RC3/
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> > >>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> > >>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> > >>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1
> votes
> > and
> > >>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If
> > the
> > >>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate
> with
> > the
> > >>> >>> Incubator PMC.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code
> package,
> > >>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on
> my
> > own
> > >>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> > >>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> > >>> release.html
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> > >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> > html#Releases
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or
> > "(non-binding)"
> > >>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members.
> Example:
> > >>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate
> are
> > >>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> > >>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
> > >>>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Robinson
> Software Engineer
> Cloudera
> 415-994-6679
>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Henry Robinson]

+1 (binding)

Ran tests on private infra
Checked signatures and hashes

On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> > patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
> >
> > Please vote today!
> >
> > P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> > the Incubator PMC:
> > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> >> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
> >> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
> >>
> >> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> >>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> >>> the PMC)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple 
> wrote:
> >>> > +1 (non-binding)
> >>> >
> >>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> >>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> >>> >> +1
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >>> >> and built from source.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it
> has
> >>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >>> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> Tom
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating)
> 2.7.0
> >>> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> >>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes
> and
> >>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If
> the
> >>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with
> the
> >>> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my
> own
> >>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> >>> release.html
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> html#Releases
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or
> "(non-binding)"
> >>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> >>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
> >>>
>



-- 
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Matthew Jacobs]

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
>
> Please vote today!
>
> P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> the Incubator PMC:
> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
>> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
>>
>> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
>>
>>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>>> the PMC)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >
>>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>>> >> and built from source.
>>> >>
>>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Tom
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>>> >>> release candidate 3.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>> >>>
>>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
>>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
>>> release.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
>>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Jim Apple]

OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/

Please vote today!

P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
the Incubator PMC:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc


On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
>
> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
>
> Tom
>
> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple"  wrote:
>
>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>> the PMC)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> >> and built from source.
>> >>
>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
>> wrote:
>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> >>> release candidate 3.
>> >>>
>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>> >>>
>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>> >>>
>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>> >>>
>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
>> release.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>> >>>
>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>> >>>
>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>> >>>
>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Tom White]

72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.

I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one

Tom

On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple"  wrote:

> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> the PMC)
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >> and built from source.
> >>
> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
> wrote:
> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>>
> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>>
> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>>
> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> release.html
> >>>
> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >>>
> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>>
> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>>
> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Tim Armstrong]

+1 (binding) I was able to run all the tests, build it locally, and use
Apache rat to audit the code. nice work!

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Tim Armstrong 
wrote:

> I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
> to finishing before giving +1
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>
>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>> the PMC)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> >> and built from source.
>> >>
>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
>> wrote:
>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> >>> release candidate 3.
>> >>>
>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>> >>>
>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.g
>> it;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>> >>>
>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>> >>>
>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/rele
>> ase.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.htm
>> l#Releases
>> >>>
>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>> >>>
>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>> >>>
>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Tim Armstrong]

I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
to finishing before giving +1

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:

> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> the PMC)
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >> and built from source.
> >>
> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple 
> wrote:
> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>>
> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>>
> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>>
> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> release.html
> >>>
> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >>>
> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>>
> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>>
> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Jim Apple]

It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
the PMC)

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> and built from source.
>>
>> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> though, so not a blocker.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>>> release candidate 3.
>>>
>>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>>
>>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>>> Incubator PMC.
>>>
>>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>>
>>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>
>>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>>
>>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>>
>>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>>
>>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>>> available at 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Jim Apple]

+1 (non-binding)

I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White  wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> and built from source.
>
> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> though, so not a blocker.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:
>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> release candidate 3.
>>
>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>
>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>
>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> Incubator PMC.
>>
>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>
>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>
>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>
>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>
>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>
>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> available at 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release

Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3

[Tom White]

+1

I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
and built from source.

BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
though, so not a blocker.

Cheers,
Tom

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple  wrote:
> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> release candidate 3.
>
> The artifacts for testing are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>
> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> Incubator PMC.
>
> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>
> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>
> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> "+1 (non-binding)"
>
> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> available at 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release