RE: [VOTE} Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2
hello konrad. release validates fine, however i found an issue testing it with my usual test project, details reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-556 stefan >-Original Message- >From: Konrad Windszus >Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:33 PM >To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE} Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 > >Hi, >A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.5.2/ > >The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault- >3.5.2/ > >The release notes can be found in JIRA at >https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRVLT/versions/12350211 > >The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is: >$ sh check-release.sh filevault 3.5.2 >c5bce16a7ba9ddc42d85ec4d297d4c3b981594d4 >(leveraging the script from >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/check-release.sh) > >A staged Maven repository is available for review at: > >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejackrabbit-1552 > >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2. >The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes >if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. >The vote fails if not enough votes are cast after 1 week (5 business days). > >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >Regards, >Konrad
[jira] [Created] (JCRVLT-556) jackrabbit-packagetype validator wrongly complains about OSGI configurations in tools/config path
Stefan Seifert created JCRVLT-556:
-
Summary: jackrabbit-packagetype validator wrongly complains about
OSGI configurations in tools/config path
Key: JCRVLT-556
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-556
Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
Issue Type: Bug
Components: validation
Affects Versions: 3.5.2
Reporter: Stefan Seifert
scenario: content package project
https://github.com/stefanseifert/filevault-package-maven-plugin-validation-issues/tree/master/content-packages/sample-content
compile package with filevault-package-maven-plugin 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT using
filevault 3.5.2
validation fails with:
{noformat}
[ERROR] ValidationViolation: "jackrabbit-packagetype: Package of type 'CONTENT'
is not supposed to contain OSGi bundles or configurations!",
filePath=jcr_root\content\filevaultsample\en\tools\config\.content.xml,
nodePath=/content/filevaultsample/en/tools/config, line=3
[ERROR] ValidationViolation: "jackrabbit-packagetype: Package of type 'CONTENT'
is not supposed to contain OSGi bundles or configurations!",
filePath=jcr_root\content\filevaultsample\en\tools\config\.content.xml,
nodePath=/content/filevaultsample/en/tools/config/jcr:content, line=8
{noformat}
but this is wrong, as the folder does not contain any OSGi configurations or
bundle. it simply has the name /config - but this surely is not enough to
"prove" it's illegal in a CONTENT package? any CMS user may create a path with
a name like this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[VOTE} Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2
Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/filevault/3.5.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/jackrabbit-filevault-3.5.2/ The release notes can be found in JIRA at https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JCRVLT/versions/12350211 The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is: $ sh check-release.sh filevault 3.5.2 c5bce16a7ba9ddc42d85ec4d297d4c3b981594d4 (leveraging the script from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/check-release.sh) A staged Maven repository is available for review at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejackrabbit-1552 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2. The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours during business days and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote fails if not enough votes are cast after 1 week (5 business days). [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Regards, Konrad
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #162: JCRVLT-522 check effect of filter rules on ACLs
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/162#issuecomment-910329342 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_coverage=list) [100.0% Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_coverage=list) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #162: JCRVLT-522 check effect of filter rules on ACLs
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/162#issuecomment-908251516 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=coverage=list) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault=162=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-552) Importer fails to detect jcr:mixinTypes being protected if package uses singlevalue property
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-552: --- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Fixed in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/commit/5f8f2e4ecc1784a9b88aa59847ea61ac55e9b30b. > Importer fails to detect jcr:mixinTypes being protected if package uses > singlevalue property > > > Key: JCRVLT-552 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-552 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Bug > Components: vlt >Reporter: Dominik Süß >Assignee: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.5.2 > > > When debugging a case where a package doesn't install on the headversion of > vault I found out that if the property jcr:mixinTypes is defined as single > valued property - the code properly detects and sets the mixin but > subsequently fails on detecting this property being protected and therefore > fails as it tries to set it in DocViewSaxImporter in the > setUnprotectedProperties method. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault] kwin merged pull request #161: JCRVLT-552 - check for matching property definition must match multivalue definitions for single values
kwin merged pull request #161: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/161 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Assigned] (JCRVLT-316) Add dedicated parameter to specify subPackageHandling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus reassigned JCRVLT-316:
--
Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Add dedicated parameter to specify subPackageHandling
> -
>
> Key: JCRVLT-316
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-316
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: package maven plugin
>Affects Versions: package-maven-plugin-1.0.1
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10
>
>
> Currently the {{subPackageHandling}} need to be specified as string value
> below the {{properties}} parameter. Similar to the {{accessControlHandling}}
> there should be a strongly typed parameter for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-555) Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408077#comment-17408077 ] Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-555: [~tripod] WDYT? > Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default > > > Key: JCRVLT-555 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-555 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: package maven plugin >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 > > > The goal "check-signature" is automatically executed for each content-package > project by default in phase "process-classes". As > - most embedded bundles are usually build within the same Maven reactor in a > dedicated Maven module where the signature check already happened or > - the mandatory "signature" parameter is not being set > this goal should only be executed if explicitly bound to a phase. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-555) Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-555: --- Description: The goal "check-signature" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As - most embedded bundles are usually build within the same Maven reactor in a dedicated Maven module where the signature check already happened or - the mandatory "signature" parameter is not being set this goal should only be executed if explicitly bound to a phase. was:The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently only included in the MANIFEST.MF but not evaluated by any tool (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/properties.html#Manifest_File), it should only be executed if explicitly configured. > Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default > > > Key: JCRVLT-555 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-555 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: package maven plugin >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 > > > The goal "check-signature" is automatically executed for each content-package > project by default in phase "process-classes". As > - most embedded bundles are usually build within the same Maven reactor in a > dedicated Maven module where the signature check already happened or > - the mandatory "signature" parameter is not being set > this goal should only be executed if explicitly bound to a phase. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Created] (JCRVLT-555) Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default
Konrad Windszus created JCRVLT-555: -- Summary: Don't bind "check-signature" goal by default Key: JCRVLT-555 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-555 Project: Jackrabbit FileVault Issue Type: Improvement Components: package maven plugin Reporter: Konrad Windszus Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently only included in the MANIFEST.MF but not evaluated by any tool (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/properties.html#Manifest_File), it should only be executed if explicitly configured. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-554) Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-554: --- Description: The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently only included in the MANIFEST.MF but not evaluated by any tool (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/properties.html#Manifest_File), it should only be executed if explicitly configured. (was: The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently not evaluated at all, it should only be executed if explicitly configured.) > Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default > > > Key: JCRVLT-554 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-554 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: package maven plugin >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 > > > The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package > project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently > only included in the MANIFEST.MF but not evaluated by any tool > (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/properties.html#Manifest_File), it > should only be executed if explicitly configured. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-554) Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17408076#comment-17408076 ] Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-554: [~tripod] WDYT? > Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default > > > Key: JCRVLT-554 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-554 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: package maven plugin >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 > > > The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package > project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently > only included in the MANIFEST.MF but not evaluated by any tool > (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/properties.html#Manifest_File), it > should only be executed if explicitly configured. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Created] (JCRVLT-554) Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default
Konrad Windszus created JCRVLT-554: -- Summary: Don't bind "analyze-classes" goal by default Key: JCRVLT-554 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-554 Project: Jackrabbit FileVault Issue Type: Improvement Components: package maven plugin Reporter: Konrad Windszus Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10 The goal "analyze-classes" is automatically executed for each content-package project by default in phase "process-classes". As the output is currently not evaluated at all, it should only be executed if explicitly configured. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] dulceanu merged pull request #350: 1.22
dulceanu merged pull request #350: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/350 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] dulceanu merged pull request #345: upgrading netty dependency to 4.1.66.final jira OAK-9539
dulceanu merged pull request #345: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/345 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] kwin merged pull request #58: Add test case for Classifier
kwin merged pull request #58: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/58 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: JCRVLT-316 dedicated parameter for subpackage handling
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/57#issuecomment-909736845 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=new_coverage=list) [78.3% Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=new_coverage=list) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg merged pull request #355: OAK-9562: Missing _bin when node is recreated after revision GC
mreutegg merged pull request #355: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/355 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] mreutegg closed pull request #356: OAK-9563: LastRevSingleNodeRecoveryTest fails in setUp()
mreutegg closed pull request #356: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/356 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault] kwin commented on pull request #162: JCRVLT-522 check effect of filter rules on ACLs
kwin commented on pull request #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/pull/162#issuecomment-909015727 > all ACLs not included in the filter but that are ancestors of the filtered items should be applied. I can follow your argument, but this is not how it works right now. I would like to first clarify how to deal with row 2 in the description table of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-522, before thinking about installing ACLs for more cases not contained in the filter. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] kwin merged pull request #59: Bugfix/validate classifier
kwin merged pull request #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/59 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #59: Bugfix/validate classifier
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/59#issuecomment-909760185 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=new_coverage=list) [66.7% Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=new_coverage=list) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin=59=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] reschke commented on pull request #293: OAK-9436 clean transient session storage after exceptions during import
reschke commented on pull request #293: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/293#issuecomment-909159248 Sorry; not working on Oak currently. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] kwin merged pull request #57: JCRVLT-316 dedicated parameter for subpackage handling
kwin merged pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/57 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-oak] dulceanu merged pull request #345: upgrading netty dependency to 4.1.66.final jira OAK-9539
dulceanu merged pull request #345: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/345 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (JCRVLT-553) Validate Package fails when using Classifier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus resolved JCRVLT-553.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/commit/f66b65ed34817bd62a9f89669d729aaad9d2e4a0.
> Validate Package fails when using Classifier
>
>
> Key: JCRVLT-553
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-553
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: package maven plugin
>Affects Versions: package-maven-plugin-1.1.8
>Reporter: Bryan Stopp
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10
>
>
> When adding a classifier to the configuration for the plugin, the
> _validate-package_ phase fails with the error:
>
>
> {code:java}
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.jackrabbit:filevault-package-maven-plugin:1.1.9-SNAPSHOT:validate-package
> (default-validate-package) on project package-plugin-test-pkg: The
> parameters 'packageFile' for goal
> org.apache.jackrabbit:filevault-package-maven-plugin:1.1.9-SNAPSHOT:validate-package
> are missing or invalid -> [Help 1]
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute
> goal
> org.apache.jackrabbit:filevault-package-maven-plugin:1.1.9-SNAPSHOT:validate-package
> (default-validate-package) on project package-plugin-test-pkg: The
> parameters 'packageFile' for goal
> org.apache.jackrabbit:filevault-package-maven-plugin:1.1.9-SNAPSHOT:validate-package
> are missing or invalid{code}
>
>
> Test case is [available
> here|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/compare/master...bstopp:bug/validate-classifier?expand=1].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] kwin merged pull request #59: Bugfix/validate classifier
kwin merged pull request #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/59 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-316) Add dedicated parameter to specify subPackageHandling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-316:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fixed in
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/commit/6e9ff847a5d78c735bd7a578474f0a076545d61d.
> Add dedicated parameter to specify subPackageHandling
> -
>
> Key: JCRVLT-316
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-316
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: package maven plugin
>Affects Versions: package-maven-plugin-1.0.1
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: package-maven-plugin-1.1.10
>
>
> Currently the {{subPackageHandling}} need to be specified as string value
> below the {{properties}} parameter. Similar to the {{accessControlHandling}}
> there should be a strongly typed parameter for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin] kwin merged pull request #57: JCRVLT-316 dedicated parameter for subpackage handling
kwin merged pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault-package-maven-plugin/pull/57 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
