[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-30 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16919464#comment-16919464
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4467:
-

trunk: [r1866144|http://svn.apache.org/r1866144]

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20, 2.19.5
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-28 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16917618#comment-16917618
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4467:
-

FWIW, the plan is to do this for 2.20; existing stable branches would not be 
affected. 2.20 would then be the first branch to support Java 14.

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-28 Thread Robert Munteanu (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16917527#comment-16917527
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on JCR-4467:
--

Yes, that is definitely an option. My preference would be to fix, if easy, 
otherwise to drop support.

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-28 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16917522#comment-16917522
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4467:
-

An alternative would be to just remove the RMI support in Sling (note that the 
Jackrabbit RMI support never made the switch to JCR 2.0).

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-28 Thread Robert Munteanu (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16917504#comment-16917504
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on JCR-4467:
--

[~reschke] - I took a quick look at the patch. The bump by itself can be 
problematic. It seems however that there is no usage of 
{{java.security.acl.Group}} in all of Sling, so we might be able to just widen 
the import ranges on the {{org.apache.sling.jcr.registration}} bundle and call 
it a day. I haven't done a test build though.

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)


[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4467) Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14

2019-08-27 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916737#comment-16916737
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-4467:
-

[~rombert] - this requires bumping up the versions for two packages from 3.1.0 
to 4.0.0 - on 
 I 
only see 

 as a user. Would the version bump be a problem for you?

> Remove all usage of java.security.acl.Group for Java 14
> ---
>
> Key: JCR-4467
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4467
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20
>
> Attachments: JCR-4467.diff
>
>
> Followup of OAK-7024 for the actual removal of the Group class from the 
> codebase to be java 14 compliant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)