[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #575: JENA-1718: Remove jena-spatial from the build
afs opened a new pull request #575: JENA-1718: Remove jena-spatial from the build URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/575 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[jira] [Created] (JENA-1718) Remove jena-spatial from the build
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1718: --- Summary: Remove jena-spatial from the build Key: JENA-1718 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1718 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: Task Affects Versions: Jena 3.12.0 Reporter: Andy Seaborne Assignee: Andy Seaborne Fix For: Jena 3.13.0 Now GeoSPARQL is released, we can start to retire jena-spatial. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
The vote passes with +1 from Andy, Adam and Bruno Thanks all, Andy On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0. This is the first proposed release candidate. The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
Re: Geosparql documentation
On 31/05/2019 20:48, Greg Albiston wrote: Hi Andy, It looks good. There are a few minor formatting issues I've listed below. Thanks, Greg Fixed. There is a real need for a standard, standard markup language! For the record, the Apache CMS does not do ``` blocks, which I keep forgetting about. There is also http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/geosparql/geosparql-fuseki Andy The website is in SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/site/trunk/content/documentation/geosparql * Getting Started - Maven dependency collapsed. * SPARQL Query Configuration - Example query formatting. * Querying Dataset & Models with SPARQL - Reference to Apache Jena as third party. * Querying Datasets & Models with SPARQL - Example query formatting. * Key Dependencies - Reference to Apache Jena. * Query Rewrite Extension - Query example duplicated. On 30/05/2019 18:41, Andy Seaborne wrote: Greg, I've put some documentation taken from your README files at: http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/geosparql/ (draft staging site) so we have something to link to in the announcement message. Is this satisfactory for the announcement? Andy
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Thanks! On 01/06/2019 13:13, ajs6f wrote: I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution builds and works. Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can vote: Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... +1 ajs6f On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please? Andy On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0. This is the first proposed release candidate. The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC Release changes: The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules. The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is: https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE Other JIRA: https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira == Updates JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086) Release Vote Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Please download and test the proposed release. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031 Proposed dist/ area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ Keys: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS Git commit (browser URL): https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9 Git Commit Hash: d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd Git Commit Tag: jena-3.12.0 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... This vote will be open until at least Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time and we can extend the vote period. Thanks, Andy Checking needed: + are the GPG signatures fine? + are the checksums correct? + is there a source archive? + can the source archive really be built? (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution builds and works. Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can vote: >> Please vote to approve this release: >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... +1 ajs6f > On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please? > >Andy > > On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> Hi, >> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0. >> This is the first proposed release candidate. >> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC >> Release changes: >> The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL >> modules. >> The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is: >> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE >> Other JIRA: >> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira >> == Updates >> JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086) >> Release Vote >> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >> Please download and test the proposed release. >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031 >> Proposed dist/ area: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ >> Keys: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >> Git commit (browser URL): >> https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9 >> Git Commit Hash: >> d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd >> Git Commit Tag: >> jena-3.12.0 >> Please vote to approve this release: >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >> This vote will be open until at least >> Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC >> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work >> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time >> and we can extend the vote period. >> Thanks, >> Andy >> Checking needed: >> + are the GPG signatures fine? >> + are the checksums correct? >> + is there a source archive? >> + can the source archive really be built? >> (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) >> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >> (both source and binary artifacts)? >> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? >>if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? >> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
On 01/06/2019 13:34, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: [x] +1 Approve the release Thank you! * only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I believe is not necessary, though harmless? Yes, harmless. I've removed them all from my release area copy of jena now and they are not in git. Must be left over from having to reset the version for Jena 3.11.0 RC2. Andy
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
[x] +1 Approve the release * only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I believe is not necessary, though harmless? Build from commit hash passing on Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00) Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4 Java version: 1.8.0_212, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre Default locale: en_NZ, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-50-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" with `mvn clean install -Pdev`. + are the GPG signatures fine? Looks good to me (checked dist area) + are the checksums correct? Looks good to me (checked dist area) + is there a source archive? Dist area contains source. Checked a few artefacts on Maven staging. All good. + can the source archive really be built? (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) Tested dist source, `mvn clean install -Pdev`. + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? Checked a few in the source from commit hash, and from dist area. + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? I think so (was lurking in some recent discussion, found nothing that I could tell was missing) + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? Not sure, sorry. Missed recent conversation about licenses regarding changes in this release. + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? Yup! Cheers Bruno On Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 8:48:41 pm NZST, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0. This is the first proposed release candidate. The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC Release changes: The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules. The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is: https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE Other JIRA: https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira == Updates JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086) Release Vote Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Please download and test the proposed release. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031 Proposed dist/ area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ Keys: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS Git commit (browser URL): https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9 Git Commit Hash: d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd Git Commit Tag: jena-3.12.0 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... This vote will be open until at least Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time and we can extend the vote period. Thanks, Andy Checking needed: + are the GPG signatures fine? + are the checksums correct? + is there a source archive? + can the source archive really be built? (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please? Andy On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0. This is the first proposed release candidate. The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC Release changes: The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules. The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is: https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE Other JIRA: https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira == Updates JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086) Release Vote Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Please download and test the proposed release. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031 Proposed dist/ area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ Keys: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS Git commit (browser URL): https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9 Git Commit Hash: d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd Git Commit Tag: jena-3.12.0 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... This vote will be open until at least Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time and we can extend the vote period. Thanks, Andy Checking needed: + are the GPG signatures fine? + are the checksums correct? + is there a source archive? + can the source archive really be built? (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
