Re: Setting better defaults for HTTP request

2020-12-19 Thread Philippe Mouawad 
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 5:40 PM Graham Russell  wrote:

> I think it's a good idea, as long as we make it very obvious how to change
> it in the UI and failure/error message.
>
Yes

>
> Would it affect existing scripts? I can imagine some existing (and indeed
> new) tests might start failing with a 60s read timeout due to some slow
> calls.
>

Yes that's the impact but if we clearly document this, do you think it  is
a problem ?

>
> Graham
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, 16:10 Philippe Mouawad, <
> p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Currently we don't set neither connect nor read timeout which means they
> > default to infinite.
> > I don't think those are good defaults and users frequently think JMeter
> is
> > hanging.
> >
> > Shouldn't we set better defaults ?
> >
> > - Connect  to 10s
> > - Read to 60s
> >
> > WDYT ?
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Regards
> > Philippe M.
> >
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Setting better defaults for HTTP request

2020-12-19 Thread Graham Russell 
I think it's a good idea, as long as we make it very obvious how to change
it in the UI and failure/error message.

Would it affect existing scripts? I can imagine some existing (and indeed
new) tests might start failing with a 60s read timeout due to some slow
calls.

Graham


On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, 16:10 Philippe Mouawad, 
wrote:

> Hello
>
> Currently we don't set neither connect nor read timeout which means they
> default to infinite.
> I don't think those are good defaults and users frequently think JMeter is
> hanging.
>
> Shouldn't we set better defaults ?
>
> - Connect  to 10s
> - Read to 60s
>
> WDYT ?
> Thanks
> --
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>

Setting better defaults for HTTP request

2020-12-19 Thread Philippe Mouawad 
Hello

Currently we don't set neither connect nor read timeout which means they
default to infinite.
I don't think those are good defaults and users frequently think JMeter is
hanging.

Shouldn't we set better defaults ?

- Connect  to 10s
- Read to 60s

WDYT ?
Thanks
-- 
Regards
Philippe M.

Jenkins build is back to normal : JMeter » JMeter Ubuntu #116

2020-12-19 Thread Apache Jenkins Server 
See

Jenkins build is back to normal : JMeter » JMeter-trunk #177

2020-12-19 Thread Apache Jenkins Server 
See

[GitHub] [jmeter] pmouawad commented on pull request #637: add: tcp record proxy

2020-12-19 Thread GitBox 


pmouawad commented on pull request #637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/637#issuecomment-748462622


   Thank you for taking into account the review.
   The tests are still failing.
   One of the issues I see is that you have not updated saveservice.properties 
(and SaveService.FILEVERSION once you'll get the id).
   Could you fix it ?
   Thank you



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [jmeter] pmouawad merged pull request #639: update xstreams to 1.4.15 (from 1.4.14)

2020-12-19 Thread GitBox 


pmouawad merged pull request #639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/639


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [Bug 64954] Critical Section Controller causes waiting threads not to stop

2020-12-19 Thread Philippe Mouawad 
Hello Felix,
Yes

Regards

On Saturday, December 19, 2020, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:

> Hi Philippe,
>
> why did you set version to 2.12? Is this to indicate, that the behaviour
> is known since 2.12?
>
> Regards
>
>  Felix
>
> Am 19.12.20 um 00:39 schrieb bugzi...@apache.org:
> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64954
> >
> > Philippe Mouawad  changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> > 
> 
> >Hardware|PC  |All
> >  OS||All
> >  CC|
> |p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.c
> >||om
> > Version|unspecified |2.12
> >
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: [Bug 64954] Critical Section Controller causes waiting threads not to stop

2020-12-19 Thread Felix Schumacher 
Hi Philippe,

why did you set version to 2.12? Is this to indicate, that the behaviour
is known since 2.12?

Regards

 Felix

Am 19.12.20 um 00:39 schrieb bugzi...@apache.org:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64954
>
> Philippe Mouawad  changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>Hardware|PC  |All
>  OS||All
>  CC||p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.c
>||om
> Version|unspecified |2.12
>