Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Philippe Mouawad]

Hello Felix,
Ok.
Well  we have to wait for Darklaf 2.4.10 as 2.4.9 fixed:
- https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/206
but introduced
- https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/210

Regards

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:

>
>
> Am 22. September 2020 23:16:59 MESZ schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support <
> supp...@ubikloadpack.com>:
> >Hello,
> >How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?
>
> It feels like a 5.3.1 to me. If you ask a tool for sem ver, it will tell
> you otherwise :)
>
> >
> >I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to
> >release
>
> I have nothing left on my list (except curating the changes.xml with our
> current changes)
>
> Felix
>
> >it.
> >Regards
> >
> >On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >> > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >> >>> Pending issues are:
> >> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
> >> >
> >> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has
> >a
> >> >>> patch
> >> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
> >> >>
> >> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did
> >the
> >> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
> >> >>
> >> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
> >>
> >> Committed
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
> >> freestyle
> >> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
> >> >>
> >> > Same for me, LGTM
> >>
> >> Committed
> >>
> >> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI
> >elements,
> >> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
> >> visible on MacOS, only.
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> And what about #593?
> >> >>
> >> > ok by me
> >> >
> >> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a
> >version
> >> >>> soon.
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> Felix
> >> >>
> >> >>> Thanks
> >> >
> >>
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Felix Schumacher]

Am 22. September 2020 23:16:59 MESZ schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support 
:
>Hello,
>How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?

It feels like a 5.3.1 to me. If you ask a tool for sem ver, it will tell you 
otherwise :) 

>
>I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to
>release

I have nothing left on my list (except curating the changes.xml with our 
current changes) 

Felix 

>it.
>Regards
>
>On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
>felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
>> > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>> >>>
>> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
>> >>> Pending issues are:
>> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>> >
>> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has
>a
>> >>> patch
>> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>> >>
>> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did
>the
>> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>> >>
>> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
>>
>> Committed
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
>> freestyle
>> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>> >>
>> > Same for me, LGTM
>>
>> Committed
>>
>> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI
>elements,
>> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
>> visible on MacOS, only.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> >
>> >> And what about #593?
>> >>
>> > ok by me
>> >
>> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a
>version
>> >>> soon.
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >
>>

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[UBIK LOAD PACK Support]

Hello,
How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?

I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to release
it.
Regards

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:

>
> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >>>
> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
> >>>
> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >>> Pending issues are:
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
> >
> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
> >>> patch
> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
> >>
> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
> >>
> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
>
> Committed
>
>
> >
> >
> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
> freestyle
> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
> >>
> > Same for me, LGTM
>
> Committed
>
> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI elements,
> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
> visible on MacOS, only.
>
> Felix
>
> >
> >> And what about #593?
> >>
> > ok by me
> >
> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
> >>> soon.
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> Thanks
> >
>


-- 

Regards
Ubik Load Pack  Team
Follow us on Twitter 


Cordialement
L'équipe Ubik Load Pack 
Suivez-nous sur Twitter 

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Felix Schumacher]

Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hello,
>>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>>>
>>> I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
>>>
>>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
>>> Pending issues are:
>>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>
>>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
>>> patch
>> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>>
>> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
>> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>>
> I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.

Committed


>
>
>> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle
>> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>>
> Same for me, LGTM

Committed

Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI elements,
as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
visible on MacOS, only.

Felix

>
>> And what about #593?
>>
> ok by me
>
>>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
>>> soon.
>> +1
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Thanks
>

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[UBIK LOAD PACK Support]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:

>
>
> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
> >Hello,
> >Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >
> >I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
> >
> >I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >Pending issues are:
> >- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>


> >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
> >patch
> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>
> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>
I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.


> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle
> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>
Same for me, LGTM

>
> And what about #593?
>
ok by me

>
> >
> >Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
> >soon.
>
> +1
>
> Felix
>
> >Thanks
>


-- 

Regards
Ubik Load Pack  Team
Follow us on Twitter 


Cordialement
L'équipe Ubik Load Pack 
Suivez-nous sur Twitter 

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Felix Schumacher]

Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad 
:
>Hello,
>Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>
>I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.
>
>I think we are ready for a release right ?
>Pending issues are:
>- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
>patch
>from Felix waiting for confirmation

Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the original 
implementation, if I recall correctly. 

Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle 
naming for samples recorded by the proxy. 

And what about #593? 

>
>Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
>soon.

+1

Felix 

>Thanks

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Philippe Mouawad]

Hello,
Oups previous mail was sent too fast.

I hope you're all fine and have spent  nice holidays if you did.

I think we are ready for a release right ?
Pending issues are:
- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a patch
from Felix waiting for confirmation

Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version soon.
Thanks

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.


>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Philippe Mouawad 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> Pending issues are:
> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Thanks for the answer.
>> Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf:
>>
>>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626
>>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
>>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
>>
>> The first one being a blocker for any release.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why not. The release process is fast.
>>>
>>> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?
>>> >
>>> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
>>> > Windows OS making it partly unusable.
>>> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
>>> > The workaround is to switch to system  LAF but users may not be aware
>>> of
>>> > this.
>>> >
>>> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but
>>> there
>>> > are still now issues.
>>> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one
>>> until we
>>> > have identified and fixed all issues.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Philippe
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Philippe Mouawad]

Hello,

I think we are ready for a release right ?
Pending issues are:
- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad 
wrote:

> Hello,
> Thanks for the answer.
> Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf:
>
>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626
>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
>
> The first one being a blocker for any release.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber  wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not. The release process is fast.
>>
>> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?
>> >
>> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
>> > Windows OS making it partly unusable.
>> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
>> > The workaround is to switch to system  LAF but users may not be aware of
>> > this.
>> >
>> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but
>> there
>> > are still now issues.
>> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until
>> we
>> > have identified and fixed all issues.
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Philippe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Philippe Mouawad]

Hello,
Thanks for the answer.
Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf:

   - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626
   - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
   - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453

The first one being a blocker for any release.

Regards

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber  wrote:

>
> Why not. The release process is fast.
>
> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?
> >
> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
> > Windows OS making it partly unusable.
> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
> > The workaround is to switch to system  LAF but users may not be aware of
> > this.
> >
> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but
> there
> > are still now issues.
> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until
> we
> > have identified and fixed all issues.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Milamber]

Why not. The release process is fast.

On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:

Hello,
Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?

The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
Windows OS making it partly unusable.
Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
The workaround is to switch to system  LAF but users may not be aware of
this.

There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but there
are still now issues.
I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until we
have identified and fixed all issues.


Regards
Philippe

Release a new version 5.3.1 ?

[Philippe Mouawad]

Hello,
Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?

The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
Windows OS making it partly unusable.
Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
The workaround is to switch to system  LAF but users may not be aware of
this.

There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but there
are still now issues.
I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until we
have identified and fixed all issues.


Regards
Philippe



-- 
Cordialement
Philippe M.
Ubik-Ingenierie