Re: Changing default template to Haddock

[Harry Metske]

+1
I am using the haddock template a long time already too.

Regards,
Harry


Op 23 jul. 2017 13:14 schreef "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it
> will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based
> templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that
> they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we
> should also rename the default template to clean template or something
> along those lines?
>
>
> br,
> jp
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer <
> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
> > folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
> > JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
> > tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> >
> > --
> > Dave Koelmeyer
> > http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
> > GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87
> >
> >
>

Changing default template to Haddock

[Dave Koelmeyer]

Hi All,

Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are
folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new
JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the
tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box.

Cheers,
Dave

-- 
Dave Koelmeyer
http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87