Re: [VOTE] 2.0.0 RC0

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding) Heroku has run our usual set of upgrade and performance
tests, and we haven't found any notable issues through that.

On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Built from source and ran quickstart successfully on Ubuntu (with Java 8
> and Java 9).
>
> Thanks Rajini!
> --Vahid
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-291: Have separate queues for control requests and data requests

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Lucas Wang  wrote:

> Hi Jun, Ismael,
>
> Can you please take a look when you get a chance? Thanks!
>
> Lucas
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Ted Yu  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Lucas Wang 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've addressed a couple of comments in the discussion thread for
> KIP-291,
> > > and
> > > got no objections after making the changes. Therefore I would like to
> > start
> > > the voting thread.
> > >
> > > KIP:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 291%3A+Have+separate+queues+for+control+requests+and+data+requests
> > >
> > > Thanks for your time!
> > > Lucas
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-278: Add version option to Kafka's commands

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> Thanks Toru-san, +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Jason Gustafson 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Manikumar 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:56 PM, zhenya Sun  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 building
> > > > > 在 2018年5月11日，上午9:51，Ted Yu  写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Sasaki Toru <
> > > sasaki...@oss.nttdata.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I would like to start the vote on KIP-278: Add version option to
> > > Kafka's
> > > > >> commands.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The link to this KIP is here:
> > > > >>  > > > >> +Add+version+option+to+Kafka%27s+commands>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The discussion thread is here:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Many thanks,
> > > > >> Sasaki
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Sasaki Toru(sasaki...@oss.nttdata.com) NTT DATA CORPORATION
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump in
version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
requirements and the deprecations contained.

Thanks

Tom Crayford
Heroku Kafka

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun  wrote:

> no-binding。 +1
>
>
>
>
>
> from my iphone！
> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
> Thx Ismael
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). TY!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Ismael.
> > > >
> > > > --Vahid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From:   Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya 
> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > Date:   04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > manikumar.re...@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > > > > steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <
> ism...@juma.me.uk
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of
> > the
> > > > > June
> > > > > > > 2018
> > > > > > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original
> > > > post:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a
> > > major
> > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > bump due to semantic versioning.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was
> > deprecated
> > > > > prior
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so
> > that
> > > > we
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > move faster.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a
> > > rolling
> > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients
> > > > haven't
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the
> > latest
> > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with
> no
> > > > loss
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > functionality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive
> during
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we
> can
> > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > if needed (of course).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > > apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > > =DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > > kjJc7uSVcviKUc=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8=
> > lBt342M2PM_
> > > 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo=
> > > >
> > > > > > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > > twitter.com_ConfluentInc=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > > xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU=
> > > > > | blog
> > > > > > > <
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > > confluent.io_blog=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_
> > > itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > > XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY=
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's RequestsPerSec metric

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ted Yu  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mickael Maison  >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Gwen Shapira  wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start voting for KIP-272:  Add API version tag to
> > broker's
> > >> RequestsPerSec metric.
> > >>
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > >> 272%3A+Add+API+version+tag+to+broker%27s+RequestsPerSec+metric
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Allen
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter  | blog
> > > 
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC2

[Thomas Crayford]

We (Heroku) have run our usual set of perf tests against 1.0 RC2 and found
no notable issues so far. Once RC3 is out we will test that too.

Thanks

Tom Crayford
Heroku Kafka

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the third candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0. The main PRs
> that gets merged in after RC1 are the following:
>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/dc6bfa553e73ffccd1e604963e076c
> 78d8ddcd69
>
> It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a different
> version protocol with three digits: *major.minor.bug-fix*
>
> Any and all testing is welcome, but the following areas are worth
> highlighting:
>
> 1. Client developers should verify that their clients can produce/consume
> to/from 1.0.0 brokers (ideally with compressed and uncompressed data).
> 2. Performance and stress testing. Heroku and LinkedIn have helped with
> this in the past (and issues have been found and fixed).
> 3. End users can verify that their apps work correctly with the new
> release.
>
> This is a major version release of Apache Kafka. It includes 29 new KIPs.
> See the release notes and release plan
> (*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=71764913
>  >*)
> for more details. A few feature highlights:
>
> * Java 9 support with significantly faster TLS and CRC32C implementations
> * JBOD improvements: disk failure only disables failed disk but not the
> broker (KIP-112/KIP-113)
> * Controller improvements: async ZK access for faster administrative
> request handling
> * Newly added metrics across all the modules (KIP-164, KIP-168, KIP-187,
> KIP-188, KIP-196)
> * Kafka Streams API improvements (KIP-120 / 130 / 138 / 150 / 160 / 161),
> and drop compatibility "Evolving" annotations
>
> Release notes for the 1.0.0 release:
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> *
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Friday, October 20, 8pm PT
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc2/
> *
>
> * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
>
> * Javadoc:
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc2/javadoc/
> *
>
> * Tag to be voted upon (off 1.0 branch) is the 1.0.0-rc2 tag:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kafka.git;a=tag;h=
> 51d5f12e190a38547839c7d2710c97faaeaca586
>
> * Documentation:
> Note the documentation can't be pushed live due to changes that will not go
> live until the release. You can manually verify by downloading
> http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc2/
> kafka_2.11-1.0.0-site-docs.tgz
>
> * Successful Jenkins builds for the 1.0.0 branch:
> Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-1.0-jdk7/40/
> System test: https://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka-1.0/6/
>
>
> /**
>
>
> Thanks,
> -- Guozhang
>

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

[Thomas Crayford]

Hi Ghouzang,

We have indeed started our performance testing at Heroku for RC1. However,
we are more than happy to retest once RC2 is available, especially given
larger amounts of time to do so.

Thanks

Tom Crayford
Heroku Kafka

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Ismael Juma  wrote:

> If you don't use the default Scala version, you have to set the
> SCALA_VERSION environment variable for the bin scripts to work.
>
> Ismael
>
> On 17 Oct 2017 1:30 am, "Vahid S Hashemian" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Guozhang,
>
> I'm not sure if this should be covered by "Java 9 support" in the RC note,
> but when I try to build jars from source using Java 9 (./gradlew
> -PscalaVersion=2.12 jar) even though the build reports as succeeded, it
> doesn't seem to have been successful:
>
> $ bin/zookeeper-server-start.sh config/zookeeper.properties
> Error: Could not find or load main class
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeerMain
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeerMain
>
> Please advise if I'm missing something.
>
> Thanks.
> --Vahid
>
>
>
>
> From:   Guozhang Wang 
> To: "dev@kafka.apache.org" ,
> "us...@kafka.apache.org" , kafka-clients
> 
> Date:   10/13/2017 01:12 PM
> Subject:[VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1
>
>
>
> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0.
>
> It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a different
> version protocol with three digits: *major.minor.bug-fix*
>
> Any and all testing is welcome, but the following areas are worth
> highlighting:
>
> 1. Client developers should verify that their clients can produce/consume
> to/from 1.0.0 brokers (ideally with compressed and uncompressed data).
> 2. Performance and stress testing. Heroku and LinkedIn have helped with
> this in the past (and issues have been found and fixed).
> 3. End users can verify that their apps work correctly with the new
> release.
>
> This is a major version release of Apache Kafka. It includes 29 new KIPs.
> See the release notes and release plan
> (*https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_
> confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D71764913=
> DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=
> tT9k0x5RvXtHEtLzp03BA1Y8DAgHzgCXD7UjqP7oiKE=
> <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.
> apache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-
> 3D71764913=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_
> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=
> tT9k0x5RvXtHEtLzp03BA1Y8DAgHzgCXD7UjqP7oiKE=
> >*)
> for more details. A few feature highlights:
>
> * Java 9 support with significantly faster TLS and CRC32C implementations
> (KIP)
> * JBOD improvements: disk failure only disables failed disk but not the
> broker (KIP-112/KIP-113)
> * Newly added metrics across all the modules (KIP-164, KIP-168, KIP-187,
> KIP-188, KIP-196)
> * Kafka Streams API improvements (KIP-120 / 130 / 138 / 150 / 160 / 161),
> and drop compatibility "Evolving" annotations
>
> Release notes for the 1.0.0 release:
> *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__home.apache.org_-
> 7Eguozhang_kafka-2D1.0.0-2Drc1_RELEASE-5FNOTES.html=
> DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=
> xopSUD2TETEI5y8kxHM4P-jUdUKUIiUig2xVwabgDq8=
> <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__home.
> apache.org_-7Eguozhang_kafka-2D1.0.0-2Drc1_RELEASE-5FNOTES.
> html=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=
> xopSUD2TETEI5y8kxHM4P-jUdUKUIiUig2xVwabgDq8=
> >*
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, October 13, 8pm PT
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__kafka.
> apache.org_KEYS=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_
> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_
> OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=FfLcWlN8ODpZ2m1KliMfp35duIxif3FNnptY5-9JKWU=
>
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__home.apache.org_-
> 7Eguozhang_kafka-2D1.0.0-2Drc1_=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_
> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc=VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_
> OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=bcWIqj27_tkoj-fnEzcLdP8uGXyAt6gS9KUy12WF1FE=
> <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__home.
> apache.org_-7Eguozhang_kafka-2D1.0.0-2Drc1_=DwIBaQ=jf_
> iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc=
> VyLkHrCpgoKOD8nDthZgGw_OWk2y2QfKYsXitTyAHHM=bcWIqj27_tkoj-
> fnEzcLdP8uGXyAt6gS9KUy12WF1FE=
> >*
>
> * Maven 

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

[Thomas Crayford]

Hi Guozhang,

This says the due date on the testing is October 13th, which was the day
this email was sent. Is that accurate, or is it meant to read October 17th,
which is next Tuesday?

I feel like this short a testing window for a 1.0 RC is a little low, as
1.0 is clearly a big announcement of stability, and folk should be given
enough time to do thorough testing.

Thanks

Tom

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Guozhang Wang  wrote:

> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0.
>
> It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a different
> version protocol with three digits: *major.minor.bug-fix*
>
> Any and all testing is welcome, but the following areas are worth
> highlighting:
>
> 1. Client developers should verify that their clients can produce/consume
> to/from 1.0.0 brokers (ideally with compressed and uncompressed data).
> 2. Performance and stress testing. Heroku and LinkedIn have helped with
> this in the past (and issues have been found and fixed).
> 3. End users can verify that their apps work correctly with the new
> release.
>
> This is a major version release of Apache Kafka. It includes 29 new KIPs.
> See the release notes and release plan
> (*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=71764913
>  >*)
> for more details. A few feature highlights:
>
> * Java 9 support with significantly faster TLS and CRC32C implementations
> (KIP)
> * JBOD improvements: disk failure only disables failed disk but not the
> broker (KIP-112/KIP-113)
> * Newly added metrics across all the modules (KIP-164, KIP-168, KIP-187,
> KIP-188, KIP-196)
> * Kafka Streams API improvements (KIP-120 / 130 / 138 / 150 / 160 / 161),
> and drop compatibility "Evolving" annotations
>
> Release notes for the 1.0.0 release:
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> *
>
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, October 13, 8pm PT
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc1/
> *
>
> * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
>
> * Javadoc:
> *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc1/javadoc/
> *
>
> * Tag to be voted upon (off 1.0 branch) is the 1.0.0-rc1 tag:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kafka.git;a=tag;h=
> 9424d29dbf0a3c538215b0b98b1e6b956481e4d5
>
> * Documentation:
> Note the documentation can't be pushed live due to changes that will not go
> live until the release. You can manually verify by downloading
> http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc1/
> kafka_2.11-1.0.0-site-docs.tgz
>
> * Successful Jenkins builds for the 1.0.0 branch:
> Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-1.0-jdk7/31/
> System test: https://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka-1.0/1/
>
>
> /**
>
>
> Thanks,
> -- Guozhang
>

Re: [VOTE] 0.11.0.1 RC0

[Thomas Crayford]

Heroku has vetted this through our typical performance and regression
testing, and everything looks good. +1 (non-binding) from us.

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Damian Guy  wrote:

> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 0.11.0.1.
>
> This is a bug fix release and it includes fixes and improvements from 49
> JIRAs (including a few critical bugs).
>
> Release notes for the 0.11.0.1 release:
> http://home.apache.org/~damianguy/kafka-0.11.0.1-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Saturday, September 9, 9am PT
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> http://home.apache.org/~damianguy/kafka-0.11.0.1-rc0/
>
> * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
>
> * Javadoc:
> http://home.apache.org/~damianguy/kafka-0.11.0.1-rc0/javadoc/
>
> * Tag to be voted upon (off 0.11.0 branch) is the 0.11.0.1 tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kafka.git;a=tag;h=
> a8aa61266aedcf62e45b3595a2cf68c819ca1a6c
>
>
> * Documentation:
> Note the documentation can't be pushed live due to changes that will not go
> live until the release. You can manually verify by downloading
> http://home.apache.org/~damianguy/kafka-0.11.0.1-rc0/
> kafka_2.11-0.11.0.1-site-docs.tgz
>
>
> * Protocol:
> http://kafka.apache.org/0110/protocol.html
>
> * Successful Jenkins builds for the 0.11.0 branch:
> Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/
> kafka-0.11.0-jdk7/298
>
> System tests:
> http://confluent-kafka-0-11-0-system-test-results.s3-us-
> west-2.amazonaws.com/2017-09-05--001.1504612096--apache--0.
> 11.0--7b6e5f9/report.html
>
> /**
>
> Thanks,
> Damian
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-188 - Add new metrics to support health checks

[Thomas Crayford]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Manikumar  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Rajini Sivaram 
> wrote:
>
> > All the suggestions on the discuss thread have been incorporated into the
> > KIP. Please let me know if you have any more concerns or else can we
> > proceed with voting for this KIP?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Rajini Sivaram  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to start the vote on KIP-188 that adds additional metrics
> to
> > > support health checks for Kafka Ops. Details are here:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 188+-+Add+new+metrics+to+support+health+checks
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Kafka 0.11.0.0

[Thomas Crayford]

0.11.0.0 is a brand new release, with a very large number of changes
compared to the previous stable release (0.10.2.1). As a thing that stores
data, I would not recommend you switch to it without a very large amount of
testing and validation, probably involving running a shadow setup of your
production alongside.

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Srikanth Sampath  wrote:

> Hi,
> We are currently on 0.8.2.2 in production and are planning on moving to the
> latest stable release which currently is 0.11.0.0.  Have a few questions:
>
> * Folks who are on 0.11.0.0 in production - can you comment on how stable
> is it?  Any problems?
>
> * Usually, I look for a maintenance release, is one planned for 0.11.x?  If
> so, is 0.11.0.1 or such planned - and when?
>
> * How is 0.10.2.1 in comparison?   Why would you recommend me or not to
> move to 0.11.0.0 on a practical note?
>
> Thanks a bunch in advance.
> -Srikanth
>