Re: [DISCUSS] Connect Jira component name
Hey Connect Developers, I have changed the Jira component name from "KafkaConnect" to "connect". Thanks Ismael and Matthias for your support! Greg On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:34 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > SGTM. > > I found it always odd that it's named `KafkaConnect` :) > > > -Matthias > > On 12/26/23 6:03 PM, Greg Harris wrote: > > Hi Connect Developers, > > > > I noticed recently that we had two Jira components: "KafkaConnect" and > > "connect", one with >1000 issues and one with 20 issues. I merged the > > two tags, leaving the one labeled "KafkaConnect". > > > > "KafkaConnect" doesn't follow the standard naming convention set by > > all of the other components, while "connect" does. Should we rename > > "KafkaConnect" to "connect" moving forward? > > > > Forgive me for bikeshedding, > > Greg
Re: [DISCUSS] Connect Jira component name
SGTM. I found it always odd that it's named `KafkaConnect` :) -Matthias On 12/26/23 6:03 PM, Greg Harris wrote: Hi Connect Developers, I noticed recently that we had two Jira components: "KafkaConnect" and "connect", one with >1000 issues and one with 20 issues. I merged the two tags, leaving the one labeled "KafkaConnect". "KafkaConnect" doesn't follow the standard naming convention set by all of the other components, while "connect" does. Should we rename "KafkaConnect" to "connect" moving forward? Forgive me for bikeshedding, Greg
Re: [DISCUSS] Connect Jira component name
+1. I don't think we need a full vote for a change like this btw. :) Ismael On Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 9:04 AM Greg Harris wrote: > Hi Connect Developers, > > I noticed recently that we had two Jira components: "KafkaConnect" and > "connect", one with >1000 issues and one with 20 issues. I merged the > two tags, leaving the one labeled "KafkaConnect". > > "KafkaConnect" doesn't follow the standard naming convention set by > all of the other components, while "connect" does. Should we rename > "KafkaConnect" to "connect" moving forward? > > Forgive me for bikeshedding, > Greg >
[DISCUSS] Connect Jira component name
Hi Connect Developers, I noticed recently that we had two Jira components: "KafkaConnect" and "connect", one with >1000 issues and one with 20 issues. I merged the two tags, leaving the one labeled "KafkaConnect". "KafkaConnect" doesn't follow the standard naming convention set by all of the other components, while "connect" does. Should we rename "KafkaConnect" to "connect" moving forward? Forgive me for bikeshedding, Greg