Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-10 Thread Ismael Juma 
+1 from me too.

Thanks to everyone that voted and participated in the discussion. The KIP
passed with 7 binding +1s (Sriram, Neha, Jason, Guozhang, Gwen, Jun,
myself) and 2 non-binding +1s (Rajini, Grant).

Ismael

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Jun Rao  wrote:

> Thanks for the writeup. +1.
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> >
> > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good
> first
> > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
> > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important
> to
> > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-08 Thread Jun Rao 
Thanks for the writeup. +1.

Jun

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
>
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good first
> step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
> [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important to
> mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Gwen Shapira 
+1 (binding)

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
>
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good first
> step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
> [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important to
> mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>



-- 
*Gwen Shapira*
Product Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter  | blog

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Guozhang Wang 
+1.

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jason Gustafson  wrote:

> +1 and thanks for the excellent write-up!
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Neha Narkhede  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78
> > Cluster
> > > > Id:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a
> > good
> > > > > first
> > > > > > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the
> > > messages
> > > > in
> > > > > > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's
> > > > important
> > > > > to
> > > > > > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> > > > > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%
> 2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajini
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Grant Henke
> > > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
> > >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Neha
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Jason Gustafson 
+1 and thanks for the excellent write-up!

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Neha Narkhede  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78
> Cluster
> > > Id:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> > > > >
> > > > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a
> good
> > > > first
> > > > > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the
> > messages
> > > in
> > > > > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's
> > > important
> > > > to
> > > > > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> > > > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Henke
> > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
> >
> --
> Thanks,
> Neha
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Neha Narkhede 
+1 (binding)

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> rajinisiva...@googlemail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster
> > Id:
> > > >
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> > > >
> > > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good
> > > first
> > > > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the
> messages
> > in
> > > > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's
> > important
> > > to
> > > > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> > > >
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> > > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Henke
> Software Engineer | Cloudera
> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>
-- 
Thanks,
Neha

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Grant Henke 
+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster
> Id:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> > >
> > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good
> > first
> > > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages
> in
> > > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's
> important
> > to
> > > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>



-- 
Grant Henke
Software Engineer | Cloudera
gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram 
+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian  wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> >
> > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good
> first
> > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
> > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important
> to
> > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.
> mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%
> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>



-- 
Regards,

Rajini

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-06 Thread Sriram Subramanian 
+1 binding

> On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
> 
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good first
> step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ismael
> 
> [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important to
> mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E

[VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-06 Thread Ismael Juma 
Hi all,

I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id

As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good first
step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.

Thanks,
Ismael

[1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important to
mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E