RE: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
+1 non-binding Hi, I faced a business requirement to update offsets for unproduced records. So I think it will be a good addon for Kafka Connect. Best regards, Andrei Rudkouski On 2023/08/02 11:07:36 Sagar wrote: > Hi All, > > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address > them. > > Thanks! > Sagar. >
RE: Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
+1 non-binding Hi, I faced a business requirement to update offsets for unproduced records. So I think it will be a good addon for Kafka Connect. Best regards, Andrei Rudkouski On 2024/06/06 14:07:16 Антон Левчук wrote: > +1 non-binding > > This will be a great addition to Kafka Connect > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:41 PM Sagar wrote: > > > > Hey All, > > > > Bumping the vote thread after a long time! > > > > Thanks! > > Sagar. > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:24 PM Sagar wrote: > > > > > Thanks Yash! > > > > > > I am hoping to have this released in 3.8 so it would be good to get the > > > remaining 2 votes. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Sagar. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:18 PM Yash Mayya wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Sagar, > > >> > > >> Thanks for the KIP and apologies for the extremely long delay here! I > > >> think > > >> we could do with some wordsmithing on the Javadoc for the new > > >> `SourceTask::updateOffsets` method but that can be taken care of in the > > >> PR. > > >> > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Yash > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:43 PM Sagar wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hey all, > > >> > > > >> > Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > Sagar. > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi All, > > >> > > > > >> > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open > > >> > questions > > >> > > have been answered. > > >> > > > > >> > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting > > >> > > process. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks! > > >> > > Sagar. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Hi All, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Bumping the voting thread again. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thanks! > > >> > >> Sagar. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Thanks! > > >> > >>> Sagar. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar > > >> > wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >> > Hi All, > > >> > > > >> > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a > > >> > reasonable > > >> > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would > > >> > address > > >> > them. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > Sagar. > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
+1 non-binding This will be a great addition to Kafka Connect On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:41 PM Sagar wrote: > > Hey All, > > Bumping the vote thread after a long time! > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:24 PM Sagar wrote: > > > Thanks Yash! > > > > I am hoping to have this released in 3.8 so it would be good to get the > > remaining 2 votes. > > > > Thanks! > > Sagar. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:18 PM Yash Mayya wrote: > > > >> Hi Sagar, > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP and apologies for the extremely long delay here! I > >> think > >> we could do with some wordsmithing on the Javadoc for the new > >> `SourceTask::updateOffsets` method but that can be taken care of in the > >> PR. > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Yash > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:43 PM Sagar wrote: > >> > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > Sagar. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi All, > >> > > > >> > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open > >> > questions > >> > > have been answered. > >> > > > >> > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting > >> > > process. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks! > >> > > Sagar. > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> > >> > >> Bumping the voting thread again. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Sagar. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: > >> > >>> > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Thanks! > >> > >>> Sagar. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a > >> > reasonable > >> > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would > >> > address > >> > them. > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > Sagar. > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hey All, Bumping the vote thread after a long time! Thanks! Sagar. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:24 PM Sagar wrote: > Thanks Yash! > > I am hoping to have this released in 3.8 so it would be good to get the > remaining 2 votes. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:18 PM Yash Mayya wrote: > >> Hi Sagar, >> >> Thanks for the KIP and apologies for the extremely long delay here! I >> think >> we could do with some wordsmithing on the Javadoc for the new >> `SourceTask::updateOffsets` method but that can be taken care of in the >> PR. >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Yash >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:43 PM Sagar wrote: >> >> > Hey all, >> > >> > Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Sagar. >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: >> > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open >> > questions >> > > have been answered. >> > > >> > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting >> > > process. >> > > >> > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Sagar. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi All, >> > >> >> > >> Bumping the voting thread again. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks! >> > >> Sagar. >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: >> > >>> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records >> > >>> >> > >>> Thanks! >> > >>> Sagar. >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar >> > wrote: >> > >>> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a >> > reasonable >> > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would >> > address >> > them. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Sagar. >> > >> > >>> >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Thanks Yash! I am hoping to have this released in 3.8 so it would be good to get the remaining 2 votes. Thanks! Sagar. On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:18 PM Yash Mayya wrote: > Hi Sagar, > > Thanks for the KIP and apologies for the extremely long delay here! I think > we could do with some wordsmithing on the Javadoc for the new > `SourceTask::updateOffsets` method but that can be taken care of in the PR. > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yash > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:43 PM Sagar wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. > > > > Thanks! > > Sagar. > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open > > questions > > > have been answered. > > > > > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting > > > process. > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Sagar. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> Bumping the voting thread again. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> Sagar. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: > > >>> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records > > >>> > > >>> Thanks! > > >>> Sagar. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar > > wrote: > > >>> > > Hi All, > > > > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a > > reasonable > > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would > > address > > them. > > > > Thanks! > > Sagar. > > > > >>> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hi Sagar, Thanks for the KIP and apologies for the extremely long delay here! I think we could do with some wordsmithing on the Javadoc for the new `SourceTask::updateOffsets` method but that can be taken care of in the PR. +1 (binding) Thanks, Yash On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 11:43 PM Sagar wrote: > Hey all, > > Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open > questions > > have been answered. > > > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting > > process. > > > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. > > > > Thanks! > > Sagar. > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Bumping the voting thread again. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Sagar. > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar wrote: > >> > >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Sagar. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar > wrote: > >>> > Hi All, > > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a > reasonable > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would > address > them. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > >>> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hey all, Bumping this vote thread again after quite a while. Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:58 PM Sagar wrote: > Hi All, > > Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open questions > have been answered. > > Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting > process. > > Thanks everyone for the great feedback. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Bumping the voting thread again. >> >> Thanks! >> Sagar. >> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar wrote: >> >>> Attaching the KIP link for reference: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Sagar. >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar wrote: >>> Hi All, Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address them. Thanks! Sagar. >>>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hi All, Based on the latest discussion thread, it appears as if all open questions have been answered. Hopefully now we are in a state where we can close out on the Voting process. Thanks everyone for the great feedback. Thanks! Sagar. On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:00 AM Sagar wrote: > Hi All, > > Bumping the voting thread again. > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar wrote: > >> Attaching the KIP link for reference: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records >> >> Thanks! >> Sagar. >> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable >>> design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address >>> them. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Sagar. >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hi All, Bumping the voting thread again. Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Sagar wrote: > Attaching the KIP link for reference: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records > > Thanks! > Sagar. > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable >> design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address >> them. >> >> Thanks! >> Sagar. >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Attaching the KIP link for reference: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-910%3A+Update+Source+offsets+for+Source+Connectors+without+producing+records Thanks! Sagar. On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:37 PM Sagar wrote: > Hi All, > > Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable > design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address > them. > > Thanks! > Sagar. >
[VOTE] KIP-910: Update Source offsets for Source Connectors without producing records
Hi All, Calling a Vote on KIP-910 [1]. I feel we have converged to a reasonable design. Ofcourse I am open to any feedback/suggestions and would address them. Thanks! Sagar.
