Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
+1 (binding). Thanks! --Vahid On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 1:00 AM Qichao Chu wrote: > Hi All, > > It would be nice if we could have more people to review and vote for this > KIP. > Many thanks! > > Qichao > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:43 PM Qichao Chu wrote: > > > @Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion. > > Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it? > > > > Best, > > Qichao Chu > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > >> This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says. > >> > >> Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion > >> down the line... > >> > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >> On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > >> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana < > >> satish.dugg...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks Qichao for the KIP. > >> >> > >> >> +1 (binding) > >> >> > >> >> ~Satish. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding) > >> >>> > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> Jorge. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya > > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it > >> in > >> >> its > >> current form. > >> > >> -- > >> Divij Vaidya > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput > >> >> Metrics. > >> > > >> > Please take a look here: > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Qichao Chu > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
Hi All, It would be nice if we could have more people to review and vote for this KIP. Many thanks! Qichao On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:43 PM Qichao Chu wrote: > @Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion. > Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it? > > Best, > Qichao Chu > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > >> This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says. >> >> Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion >> down the line... >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana < >> satish.dugg...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks Qichao for the KIP. >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> ~Satish. >> >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! >> >>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Jorge. >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> +1 (binding) >> >> I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it >> in >> >> its >> current form. >> >> -- >> Divij Vaidya >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > > >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput >> >> Metrics. >> > >> > Please take a look here: >> > >> > >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics >> > >> > Best, >> > Qichao Chu >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
@Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion. Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it? Best, Qichao Chu On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says. > > Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion > down the line... > > > -Matthias > > On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana > > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Qichao for the KIP. > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> ~Satish. > >> > >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Jorge. > >>> > >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya > >> wrote: > >>> > +1 (binding) > > I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in > >> its > current form. > > -- > Divij Vaidya > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput > >> Metrics. > > > > Please take a look here: > > > > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > > > > Best, > > Qichao Chu > > > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says. Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion down the line... -Matthias On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana wrote: Thanks Qichao for the KIP. +1 (binding) ~Satish. On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote: Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Jorge. On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya wrote: +1 (binding) I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its current form. -- Divij Vaidya On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu wrote: Hi all, I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics. Please take a look here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics Best, Qichao Chu
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks Qichao for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > ~Satish. > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya > wrote: > > > > Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Jorge. > > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in > its > > > current form. > > > > > > -- > > > Divij Vaidya > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput > Metrics. > > > > > > > > Please take a look here: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Qichao Chu > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
Thanks Qichao for the KIP. +1 (binding) ~Satish. On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote: > > Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Jorge. > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its > > current form. > > > > -- > > Divij Vaidya > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics. > > > > > > Please take a look here: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > > > > > > Best, > > > Qichao Chu > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal! +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Jorge. On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its > current form. > > -- > Divij Vaidya > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics. > > > > Please take a look here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > > > > Best, > > Qichao Chu > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
+1 (binding) I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its current form. -- Divij Vaidya On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics. > > Please take a look here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics > > Best, > Qichao Chu >
[VOTE] KIP-997: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics
Hi all, I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics. Please take a look here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics Best, Qichao Chu
