Re: Kafka KIP meeting Jan 26 at 11:00am PST
Jun, Can you send me an invite, please? Thank you... Regards, Rajini On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Jun Raowrote: > Hi, Everyone, > > We will have a Kafka KIP meeting tomorrow at 11:00am PST. If you plan to > attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. The following is > the agenda. > > Agenda: > > KIP-42: Add Producer and Consumer Interceptors > > Thanks, > > Jun >
Re: Kafka KIP meeting Jan 26 at 11:00am PST
The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion. - KIP-42: We agreed to leave the broker side interceptor for another KIP. On the client side, people favor the 2nd option in Anna's proposal. Anna will update the wiki accordingly. - KIP-43: We discussed whether there is a need to support multiple SASL mechanisms at the same time and what's the best way to implement this. Will discuss this in more details in the email thread. - Jiangjie brought up an issue related to KIP-32 (adding timestamp field in the message). The issue is that currently there is no convenient way for the consumer to tell whether the timestamp in a message is the create time or the server time. He and Guozhang propose to use a bit in the message attribute to do that. Jiangjie will describe the proposal in the email thread. The video will be uploaded soon in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals . Thanks, Jun On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jun Raowrote: > Hi, Everyone, > > We will have a Kafka KIP meeting tomorrow at 11:00am PST. If you plan to > attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. The following is > the agenda. > > Agenda: > > KIP-42: Add Producer and Consumer Interceptors > > Thanks, > > Jun >
Re: Kafka KIP meeting Jan 26 at 11:00am PST
I will send more detailed meeting notes regarding KIP-42 in the KIP-42 discussion thread. Thanks, Anna On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Jun Raowrote: > The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion. > > >- KIP-42: We agreed to leave the broker side interceptor for another >KIP. On the client side, people favor the 2nd option in Anna's proposal. >Anna will update the wiki accordingly. >- KIP-43: We discussed whether there is a need to support multiple SASL >mechanisms at the same time and what's the best way to implement this. > Will >discuss this in more details in the email thread. >- Jiangjie brought up an issue related to KIP-32 (adding timestamp field >in the message). The issue is that currently there is no convenient way > for >the consumer to tell whether the timestamp in a message is the create > time >or the server time. He and Guozhang propose to use a bit in the message >attribute to do that. Jiangjie will describe the proposal in the email >thread. > > > The video will be uploaded soon in > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals > . > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > We will have a Kafka KIP meeting tomorrow at 11:00am PST. If you plan to > > attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. The following > is > > the agenda. > > > > Agenda: > > > > KIP-42: Add Producer and Consumer Interceptors > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > >
Kafka KIP meeting Jan 26 at 11:00am PST
Hi, Everyone, We will have a Kafka KIP meeting tomorrow at 11:00am PST. If you plan to attend but haven't received an invite, please let me know. The following is the agenda. Agenda: KIP-42: Add Producer and Consumer Interceptors Thanks, Jun