Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-22 Thread Dongjin Lee 
Binding: 3 (John, Gwen, Mickael)
Non-binding: 2 (Dongjin, Brandon)

This KIP is now accepted. Thanks for participating!

Best,
Dongjin

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:52 PM Brandon Brown 
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> Brandon Brown
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:03 AM, Mickael Maison 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks
> >
> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Dongjin Lee  wrote:
> >>
> >> Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
> >> Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
> >>
> >> We need one more binding now.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dongjin
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> Makes sense, thank you.
> >>>
>  On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley  wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi all,
> 
>  KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread
> seem
> >>> to
>  be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
> 
> 
> 
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
>  <
> 
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> >
> 
>  Please take a look if you have time.
> 
>  Many thanks,
> 
>  Tom
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Dongjin Lee*
> >>
> >> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
> >> keybase:
> https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
> >> linkedin:
> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> >> speakerdeck:
> speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> >> *
>
-- 
*Dongjin Lee*

*A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*




*github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
*

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-22 Thread Brandon Brown 
+1 (non binding)

Brandon Brown
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:03 AM, Mickael Maison  wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Dongjin Lee  wrote:
>> 
>> Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
>> Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
>> 
>> We need one more binding now.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dongjin
>> 
>>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Makes sense, thank you.
>>> 
 On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi all,
 
 KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem
>>> to
 be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
 
 
 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
 <
 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> 
 
 Please take a look if you have time.
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Tom
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Dongjin Lee*
>> 
>> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
>> keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
>> linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
>> *

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-22 Thread Mickael Maison 
+1 (binding)
Thanks

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Dongjin Lee  wrote:
>
> Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
> Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
>
> We need one more binding now.
>
> Regards,
> Dongjin
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Makes sense, thank you.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem
> > to
> > > be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
> > > <
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> > > >
> > >
> > > Please take a look if you have time.
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>
>
>
>
> *github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
> keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
> linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> *

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-11 Thread Dongjin Lee 
Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)

We need one more binding now.

Regards,
Dongjin

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Makes sense, thank you.
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem
> to
> > be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
> > <
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> > >
> >
> > Please take a look if you have time.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Tom
> >
>


-- 
*Dongjin Lee*

*A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*




*github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
*

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-11 Thread Gwen Shapira 
+1 (binding)

Makes sense, thank you.

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> >
>
> Please take a look if you have time.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-10 Thread John Roesler 
+1 (binding)

Thanks for the KIP!
-John

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, at 05:57, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> +1. (Non-binding)
> 
> Thanks,
> Dongjin
> 
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:50 PM Tom Bentley  wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> > be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
> >
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
> > <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> > >
> >
> > Please take a look if you have time.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Dongjin Lee*
> 
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
> keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
> linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> *
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-676: Respect the logging hierarchy

2020-10-09 Thread Dongjin Lee 
+1. (Non-binding)

Thanks,
Dongjin

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:50 PM Tom Bentley  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-676%3A+Respect+logging+hierarchy?moved=true
> >
>
> Please take a look if you have time.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom
>


-- 
*Dongjin Lee*

*A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*




*github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
keybase: https://keybase.io/dongjinleekr
linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
*