[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raju Bairishetti updated LENS-1468:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.8)
2.7
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch, LENS-1468.02.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1468:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch, LENS-1468.02.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1468:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.8
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch, LENS-1468.02.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1468:
---
Attachment: LENS-1468.02.patch
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch, LENS-1468.02.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1468:
---
Attachment: LENS-1468.01.patch
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1468) Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1468:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress)
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> -
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
