Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #52
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/52/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-373) Query parts ending with a colon are handled badly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278614#comment-13278614
]
Jan Fruehwacht commented on LUCENE-373:
---
Do I understand it correct, that you say that it is bug when because there is
also a space before the xyz ? So it should be searched for ' xyz' under field ?
Am I right ? Or how do you expect that to work.
I totally understand the inconsistency described by Andrew.
Query parts ending with a colon are handled badly
-
Key: LUCENE-373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-373
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core/queryparser
Affects Versions: 1.4
Environment: Operating System: Windows 2000
Platform: PC
Reporter: Andrew Stevens
Priority: Minor
Labels: newdev
I'm using Lucene 1.4.3, running
Query query = QueryParser.parse(queryString, contents, new
StandardAnalyzer());
If queryString is search title: i.e. specifying a field name without a
corresponding value, I get a parsing exception:
Encountered EOF at line 1, column 8.
Was expecting one of:
( ...
QUOTED ...
TERM ...
PREFIXTERM ...
WILDTERM ...
[ ...
{ ...
NUMBER ...
If queryString is title: search, there's no exception. However, the parsed
query which is returned is title:search. If queryString is title:
contents:
text, the parsed query is title:contents and the text part is ignored
completely. When queryString is title: text contents: the above exception
is
produced again.
This seems inconsistent. Given that it's pointless searching for an empty
string (since it has no tokens), I'd expect both search title: title:
search to be parsed as search (or, given the default field I specified,
contents:search), and title: contents: text title: text contents: to
parse as text (contents:text) i.e. parts which have no term are ignored.
At
worst I'd expect them all to throw a ParseException rather than just the ones
with the colon at the end of the string.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #33
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/33/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4054) Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278637#comment-13278637 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4054: - Committed a fix for this. Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error. --- Key: LUCENE-4054 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Sub-task Components: general/build, general/test Reporter: Dawid Weiss Assignee: Dawid Weiss Priority: Trivial Fix For: 4.0 The only exceptions are setUp/ tearDown methods in LuceneTestCase, which are historically designed for overriding (and for which chaining is verified). Any other override of am instance hook method should just be banned as it is very likely a mistake. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-3468) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases)
Egor Pahomov created SOLR-3468: -- Summary: Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases) Key: SOLR-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.6 Reporter: Egor Pahomov Priority: Minor I have different stop-word dictionaries per field, but all these fields are captured by the single dynamic field i.e. single field type i.e. single analyser. I need a solution, in which I can get in every incrementToken() right name of the field I'm working with. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-3468) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov resolved SOLR-3468. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.4 3.6 Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases) -- Key: SOLR-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.6 Reporter: Egor Pahomov Priority: Minor Labels: analysis, attributes, dynamic, fields Fix For: 3.6, 3.4 Attachments: SOLR-3468.patch I have different stop-word dictionaries per field, but all these fields are captured by the single dynamic field i.e. single field type i.e. single analyser. I need a solution, in which I can get in every incrementToken() right name of the field I'm working with. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3468) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov updated SOLR-3468: --- Attachment: SOLR-3468.patch Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases) -- Key: SOLR-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.6 Reporter: Egor Pahomov Priority: Minor Labels: analysis, attributes, dynamic, fields Fix For: 3.4, 3.6 Attachments: SOLR-3468.patch I have different stop-word dictionaries per field, but all these fields are captured by the single dynamic field i.e. single field type i.e. single analyser. I need a solution, in which I can get in every incrementToken() right name of the field I'm working with. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3468) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov updated SOLR-3468: --- Attachment: (was: patch.diff) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases) -- Key: SOLR-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.6 Reporter: Egor Pahomov Priority: Minor Labels: analysis, attributes, dynamic, fields Fix For: 3.4, 3.6 Attachments: SOLR-3468.patch I have different stop-word dictionaries per field, but all these fields are captured by the single dynamic field i.e. single field type i.e. single analyser. I need a solution, in which I can get in every incrementToken() right name of the field I'm working with. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3468) Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov updated SOLR-3468: --- Attachment: patch.diff Getting access from analysers to the real field name (dynamic field cases) -- Key: SOLR-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3468 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.6 Reporter: Egor Pahomov Priority: Minor Labels: analysis, attributes, dynamic, fields Fix For: 3.4, 3.6 Attachments: SOLR-3468.patch I have different stop-word dictionaries per field, but all these fields are captured by the single dynamic field i.e. single field type i.e. single analyser. I need a solution, in which I can get in every incrementToken() right name of the field I'm working with. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #55
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/55/ -- [...truncated 10745 lines...] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVStrategyTest [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVParserTest [junit4] Completed in 0.05s, 23 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestSpanishLightStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkNodePropsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.43s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderElectionTest [junit4] Completed in 27.22s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest [junit4] Completed in 36.59s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest [junit4] Completed in 16.39s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPhoneticFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 13.83s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 16.67s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestJoin [junit4] Completed in 8.51s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 6.96s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 3.53s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.62s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715) [junit4] Completed in 2.42s, 3 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.58s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726) [junit4] Completed in 2.85s, 23 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreContainer [junit4] Completed in 2.98s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.DirectSolrSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.23s, 27 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.SortByFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 2.20s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.distance.DistanceFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XsltUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest [junit4] Completed in 1.13s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet [junit4] Completed in 0.92s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.01s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.29s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.BadComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 0.93s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest [junit4] Completed in 1.17s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.UpdateParamsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.16s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.ReturnFieldsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.28s, 10 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapanesePartOfSpeechStopFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestSolrCoreProperties [junit4] Completed in 0.38s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.DirectSolrConnectionTest [junit4] Completed in 0.56s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCollationKeyFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.05s, 5 tests
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #56
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/56/ -- [...truncated 10035 lines...] [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:821) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:669) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:695) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:56) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:605) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:551) [junit4] [junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=SoftAutoCommitTest -Dtests.method=testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeDelete -Dtests.seed=B8E0FD04B7078DCC -Dtests.locale=sq_AL -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Bahrain -Dargs=-Dfile.encoding=Cp1252 [junit4] 2 [junit4] (@AfterClass output) [junit4] 2 NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=sq_AL, timezone=Asia/Bahrain [junit4] 2 NOTE: Windows 7 6.1 amd64/Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_32 (64-bit)/cpus=2,threads=1,free=193813968,total=259588096 [junit4] 2 NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestStandardFactories, PrimitiveFieldTypeTest, LoggingHandlerTest, QueryParsingTest, TestPropInjectDefaults, SpellCheckCollatorTest, LeaderElectionIntegrationTest, TimeZoneUtilsTest, TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter, NotRequiredUniqueKeyTest, TestPortugueseMinimalStemFilterFactory, TestHindiFilters, TestCollationKeyFilterFactory, NodeStateWatcherTest, BadComponentTest, TestQuerySenderNoQuery, TestSuggestSpellingConverter, TestReplicationHandler, TestTrimFilterFactory, BadIndexSchemaTest, FastVectorHighlighterTest, TestDocSet, TestLatvianStemFilterFactory, SolrIndexConfigTest, UUIDFieldTest, TestDistributedGrouping, TestCJKTokenizerFactory, MinimalSchemaTest, TestCollationField, DocumentBuilderTest, TestNorwegianMinimalStemFilterFactory, TestRecovery, TestPorterStemFilterFactory, TestBinaryField, TestSlowSynonymFilter, TestDefaultSimilarityFactory, TestIndexingPerformance, TestThaiWordFilterFactory, IndexReaderFactoryTest, TestCollationKeyRangeQueries, CurrencyFieldTest, TestCoreContainer, FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorTest, TestRemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory, DirectSolrConnectionTest, TestCJKBigramFilterFactory, TestJapaneseBaseFormFilterFactory, ShowFileRequestHandlerTest, SolrCoreTest, TestIndonesianStemFilterFactory, FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest, TestReversedWildcardFilterFactory, TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory, PluginInfoTest, TestRealTimeGet, TestPatternReplaceCharFilterFactory, TestDFRSimilarityFactory, CommonGramsQueryFilterFactoryTest, TestUtils, TestPerFieldSimilarity, TestGreekStemFilterFactory, TestNGramFilters, SortByFunctionTest, TestTrie, SolrInfoMBeanTest, TestTypeTokenFilterFactory, TestExtendedDismaxParser,
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3457) Spellchecker always incorrectly spelled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Jelsma updated SOLR-3457:
Attachment: SOLR-3457-4.0-1.patch
Patch for trunk. It seems the isCorrectlySpelled flag is not correctly
initialized. In the example samsun is incorrectly spelled, has freqInfo and
zero suggestions so it's never set to true.
Spellchecker always incorrectly spelled
---
Key: SOLR-3457
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3457
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: spellchecker
Affects Versions: 4.0
Environment: solr-spec 4.0.0.2012.05.15.11.42.06
solr-impl 4.0-SNAPSHOT 1338601 - markus - 2012-05-15 11:42:06
lucene-spec 4.0-SNAPSHOT
lucene-impl 4.0-SNAPSHOT 1338601 - markus - 2012-05-15 10:51:02
Reporter: Markus Jelsma
Attachments: SOLR-3457-4.0-1.patch
correctlySpelled is always false with default configuration, example config
and example documents:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/browse?wt=xmlspellcheck.extendedResults=trueq=samsung
{code}
lst name=spellcheck
lst name=suggestions
bool name=correctlySpelledfalse/bool
/lst
/lst
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #57
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/57/ -- [...truncated 10081 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestLFUCache [junit4] Completed in 0.81s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestIrishLowerCaseFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.EchoParamsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.20s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPatternReplaceFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRecovery [junit4] Completed in 11.17s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.ResourceLoaderTest [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGalicianStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest [junit4] Completed in 51.26s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest [junit4] Completed in 14.64s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest [junit4] Completed in 10.08s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest [junit4] Completed in 11.73s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting [junit4] Completed in 18.14s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkControllerTest [junit4] Completed in 17.93s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 10.56s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 4.42s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.82s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 2.01s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreTest [junit4] Completed in 8.00s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.StandardRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.40s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.78s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 3.03s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreContainer [junit4] Completed in 3.46s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 1.04s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.81s, 27 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.SortByFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 2.28s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.UniqFieldsUpdateProcessorFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 0.94s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 1.56s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.distance.DistanceFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 1.16s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.75s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PolyFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.62s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.45s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.73s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.28s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorTest [junit4] Completed in 1.07s, 20 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest [junit4] Completed in 1.22s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet [junit4] Completed in 0.90s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.BadComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 0.92s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestExtendedDismaxParser [junit4] Completed in 10.65s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.38s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsingTest [junit4] Completed in 1.17s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorFactoryTest [junit4]
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-3454) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException while grouping via Solrj
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen resolved SOLR-3454. - Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk and 3.6 branch. ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException while grouping via Solrj --- Key: SOLR-3454 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3454 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: search Affects Versions: 3.5, 3.6, 4.0 Environment: Windows 7, Java 6 Reporter: ludovic Boutros Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1 Attachments: SOLR-3454.diff, SOLR-3454.patch When we try to use the grouping function at the end of a result via solrj with the parameter group.main=true, an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is raised. For instance, on a result containing 3 groups, if the start rows parameters are equal to 2 5 respectively. I will attach a patch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
SolrCloud use of bootstrap_conf versus bootstrap_confdir?
I was writing some unit tests to setup a traditional Master/Slave environment
as well as a new SolrCloud based environment. In playing around with code
based on TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap, I learned about the bootstrap_conf
system property which bootstraps your current configuration into ZK, and is a
boolean, versus bootstrap_confdir which is a string passing the name of the
directory.
Are they both needed? Seems like either both should always be there, or just
bootstrap_confdir. It seemed just a bit confusing, and very magical.
Also, if you just use bootstrap_conf, then the collection.configName
parameter is ignored, you always just get collection1. This is without a
predefined set of cores in solr.xml, which may make sense...?
@Test
public void testMultiCoreConfBootstrap() throws Exception {
// System.setProperty(bootstrap_conf, true);
System.setProperty(bootstrap_confdir,getSolrHome() + /conf);
System.setProperty(collection.configName,leads);
cores = new CoreContainer(home, new File(home, solr.xml));
SolrZkClient zkclient = cores.getZkController().getZkClient();
// zkclient.printLayoutToStdOut();
assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/leads/solrconfig.xml, true));
assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/leads/schema.xml, true));
// assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/core0/solrconfig.xml, true));
// assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/core1/schema.xml, true));
}
Eric
-
Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
Co-Author: Apache Solr 3 Enterprise Search Server available from
http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether
attachments are marked as such.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #36
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/36/ -- [...truncated 11042 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.TestSuggestSpellingConverter [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.86s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.22s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.ReturnFieldsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 10 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 39.10s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest [junit4] Completed in 68.98s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 29.44s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestGroupingSearch [junit4] Completed in 4.85s, 11 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 9.24s, 9 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 3.38s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedQueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 4.27s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreTest [junit4] Completed in 6.26s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715) [junit4] Completed in 2.59s, 3 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrRequestParserTest [junit4] Completed in 1.71s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.StandardRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726) [junit4] Completed in 3.59s, 23 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.SignatureUpdateProcessorFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 1.98s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy2 [junit4] Completed in 1.16s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestWriterPerf [junit4] Completed in 2.23s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 2.29s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 2.57s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestRemoteStreaming [junit4] Completed in 1.84s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.39s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.DocumentAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.11s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFoldingMultitermQuery [junit4] Completed in 1.43s, 18 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.TestOmitPositions [junit4] Completed in 1.12s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestQueryTypes [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestReversedWildcardFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.84s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.61s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.35s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PrimitiveFieldTypeTest [junit4] Completed in 1.58s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.00s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 0.95s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.MultiTermTest [junit4] Completed in 0.48s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestQuerySenderListener [junit4] Completed in 0.90s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestQuerySenderNoQuery [junit4] Completed in 0.85s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.NumericFieldsTest
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #58
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/58/changes Changes: [mvg] SOLR-3454: Exception when using result grouping with main=true and using wt=javabin -- [...truncated 10035 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestBrazilianStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest [junit4] Completed in 12.81s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestHindiFilters [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWikipediaTokenizerFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapaneseTokenizerFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.05s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.81s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 45.58s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderElectionTest [junit4] Completed in 45.12s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest [junit4] Completed in 58.63s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch [junit4] Completed in 33.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 29.16s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 21.93s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkControllerTest [junit4] Completed in 18.32s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 8.70s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 8.61s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 3.66s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 2.79s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedQueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 3.63s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.ConvertedLegacyTest [junit4] Completed in 3.77s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 1.72s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrRequestParserTest [junit4] Completed in 1.72s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 3.59s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.SignatureUpdateProcessorFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 1.49s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy2 [junit4] Completed in 0.98s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 1.05s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 1.85s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellCheckCollatorTest [junit4] Completed in 1.69s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DocumentBuilderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.10s, 11 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.26s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.DocumentAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy1 [junit4] Completed in 2.10s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.74s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestIndexSearcher [junit4] Completed in 2.67s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.BadComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.03s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestCSVResponseWriter [junit4] Completed in 1.14s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaTest [junit4] Completed in 1.61s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.FieldAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.33s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.TestCollationField [junit4] Completed in 0.62s, 8 tests [junit4]
Re: SolrCloud use of bootstrap_conf versus bootstrap_confdir?
They are for two different purposes.
- bootstrap_confdir: you pass it a directory to upload to zk with an optional
config name. Any initial collections are automatically linked to this config
set.
- bootstrap_conf: you pass it true and it reads solr.xml and uploads the conf
set for each SolrCore it finds, gives the conf set the name of the collection
and associates each collection with the same named config set.
So the first just lets you boot strap one collection easily...but what if you
start with a multi-core, multi-collection setup that you want to bootstrap into
SolrCloud? And they don't share a common config set? That's what the second
command is for. You can setup 30 local SolrCores in solr.xml and then just
bootstrap all 30 different config sets up and have them fully linked with each
collection just by passing bootstrap_conf=true.
On May 18, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Eric Pugh wrote:
I was writing some unit tests to setup a traditional Master/Slave environment
as well as a new SolrCloud based environment. In playing around with code
based on TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap, I learned about the bootstrap_conf
system property which bootstraps your current configuration into ZK, and is a
boolean, versus bootstrap_confdir which is a string passing the name of the
directory.
Are they both needed? Seems like either both should always be there, or just
bootstrap_confdir. It seemed just a bit confusing, and very magical.
Also, if you just use bootstrap_conf, then the collection.configName
parameter is ignored, you always just get collection1. This is without a
predefined set of cores in solr.xml, which may make sense...?
@Test
public void testMultiCoreConfBootstrap() throws Exception {
//System.setProperty(bootstrap_conf, true);
System.setProperty(bootstrap_confdir,getSolrHome() + /conf);
System.setProperty(collection.configName,leads);
cores = new CoreContainer(home, new File(home, solr.xml));
SolrZkClient zkclient = cores.getZkController().getZkClient();
// zkclient.printLayoutToStdOut();
assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/leads/solrconfig.xml, true));
assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/leads/schema.xml, true));
//assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/core0/solrconfig.xml, true));
//assertTrue(zkclient.exists(/configs/core1/schema.xml, true));
}
Eric
-
Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
Co-Author: Apache Solr 3 Enterprise Search Server available from
http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
whether attachments are marked as such.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #56
Just fails around trying to test auto commit - probably a losing battle to look at timestamps this closely at all in these types of tests. On May 18, 2012, at 7:45 AM, jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote: See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/56/ -- [...truncated 10035 lines...] [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:821) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:669) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:695) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4] at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:56) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:605) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4] at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:551) [junit4] [junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=SoftAutoCommitTest -Dtests.method=testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeDelete -Dtests.seed=B8E0FD04B7078DCC -Dtests.locale=sq_AL -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Bahrain -Dargs=-Dfile.encoding=Cp1252 [junit4] 2 [junit4] (@AfterClass output) [junit4] 2 NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=sq_AL, timezone=Asia/Bahrain [junit4] 2 NOTE: Windows 7 6.1 amd64/Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_32 (64-bit)/cpus=2,threads=1,free=193813968,total=259588096 [junit4] 2 NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestStandardFactories, PrimitiveFieldTypeTest, LoggingHandlerTest, QueryParsingTest, TestPropInjectDefaults, SpellCheckCollatorTest, LeaderElectionIntegrationTest, TimeZoneUtilsTest, TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter, NotRequiredUniqueKeyTest, TestPortugueseMinimalStemFilterFactory, TestHindiFilters, TestCollationKeyFilterFactory, NodeStateWatcherTest, BadComponentTest, TestQuerySenderNoQuery, TestSuggestSpellingConverter, TestReplicationHandler, TestTrimFilterFactory, BadIndexSchemaTest, FastVectorHighlighterTest, TestDocSet, TestLatvianStemFilterFactory, SolrIndexConfigTest, UUIDFieldTest, TestDistributedGrouping, TestCJKTokenizerFactory, MinimalSchemaTest, TestCollationField, DocumentBuilderTest, TestNorwegianMinimalStemFilterFactory, TestRecovery, TestPorterStemFilterFactory, TestBinaryField, TestSlowSynonymFilter, TestDefaultSimilarityFactory, TestIndexingPerformance, TestThaiWordFilterFactory, IndexReaderFactoryTest, TestCollationKeyRangeQueries, CurrencyFieldTest, TestCoreContainer, FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorTest, TestRemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory, DirectSolrConnectionTest, TestCJKBigramFilterFactory, TestJapaneseBaseFormFilterFactory, ShowFileRequestHandlerTest, SolrCoreTest, TestIndonesianStemFilterFactory, FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest, TestReversedWildcardFilterFactory, TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory, PluginInfoTest, TestRealTimeGet, TestPatternReplaceCharFilterFactory,
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #59
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/59/ -- [...truncated 10081 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudTest [junit4] Completed in 0.00s, 0 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.EchoParamsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.27s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestRemoteStreaming [junit4] Completed in 1.59s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestDelimitedPayloadTokenFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestWriterPerf [junit4] Completed in 1.78s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.43s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.PrimUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.06s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderElectionTest [junit4] Completed in 44.20s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderElectionIntegrationTest [junit4] Completed in 28.15s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest [junit4] Completed in 63.51s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler [junit4] Completed in 35.10s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 7.65s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap [junit4] Completed in 5.04s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 2.03s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.80s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.74s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 4.09s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 2.32s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.75s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DocumentBuilderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.69s, 11 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest [junit4] Completed in 3.50s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.75s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 2.07s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorTest [junit4] Completed in 1.54s, 20 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVPrinterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.00s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.FastVectorHighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.33s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 2.61s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestQueryTypes [junit4] Completed in 1.51s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 2.50s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.84s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestQueryUtils [junit4] Completed in 1.48s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestValueSourceCache [junit4] Completed in 1.52s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter [junit4] Completed in 1.53s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.SolrPluginUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.42s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.JsonLoaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.32s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest [junit4] Completed in 1.03s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir [junit4] Completed in 1.06s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.BinaryUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.03s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.07s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestLFUCache [junit4] Completed in 1.17s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestQuerySenderNoQuery
[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #492: POMs out of sync
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/492/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=80 closes=78 Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=80 closes=78 at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([111DF42C47545682]:0) at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93) at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.endTrackingSearchers(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:185) at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.afterClass(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:82) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor7.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1969) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:752) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:56) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:605) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:132) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:551) Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 15155 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
Martijn van Groningen created LUCENE-4068: - Summary: Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-4068: -- Attachment: LUCENE-4068.patch Added better description how to deal with updates. The javadoc also states that future merging might not preserves blocks. Currently this isn't the case. Is this still true for upcoming SegmentMerger implementations? Maybe when this will be the case then better protection should be in place. Like storing the document blocks in the index. Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
CPU usage increased with 3.4.0
Hello, I have wrote a crawling and indexing program using 3.0.3 version. It works fine. CPU usage remain around 30%. In November, 2011 I have upgraded Lucene 3.4.0 version, trying crawling and indexing with this version, it increased CPU usage to 100%. Can any one please help me out about decreasing CPU usage. What are the settings to be done in Lucene to decrease CPU usage. Thanks in Advance Neelam Sharma -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CPU-usage-increased-with-3-4-0-tp3984646.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4043) Add scoring support for query time join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-4043: -- Attachment: LUCENE-4043.patch Updated patch. * Started adding randomizing score mode in TestJoinUtil test class. * Made ScoreMode a public enum in join package. Add scoring support for query time join --- Key: LUCENE-4043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4043 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: modules/join Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Attachments: LUCENE-4043.patch, LUCENE-4043.patch Have similar scoring for query time joining just like the index time block join (with the score mode). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #37
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/37/changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4054) Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278865#comment-13278865 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4054: - Thanks Dawid - IntelliJ now shows an icon indicating the affected test is ignored, and no exception is printed. Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error. --- Key: LUCENE-4054 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Sub-task Components: general/build, general/test Reporter: Dawid Weiss Assignee: Dawid Weiss Priority: Trivial Fix For: 4.0 The only exceptions are setUp/ tearDown methods in LuceneTestCase, which are historically designed for overriding (and for which chaining is verified). Any other override of am instance hook method should just be banned as it is very likely a mistake. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278880#comment-13278880 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4068: Looks good! Maybe instead of . Also when documents inside a block are deleted say , even when child documents within a block are deleted? (Ie, one sentence not two, and add child since you cannot delete the parent w/o deleting all of its children). Also, can we not change the imports to wildcards? Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4069) Segment-level Bloom filters for a 2 x speed up on rare term searches
Mark Harwood created LUCENE-4069: Summary: Segment-level Bloom filters for a 2 x speed up on rare term searches Key: LUCENE-4069 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: core/index Affects Versions: 3.6 Reporter: Mark Harwood Priority: Minor Fix For: 3.6.1 An addition to each segment which stores a Bloom filter for selected fields in order to give fast-fail to term searches, helping avoid wasted disk access. Best suited for low-frequency fields e.g. primary keys on big indexes with many segments but also speeds up general searching in my tests. Overview slideshow here: http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/lucene-bloomfilteredsegments Benchmarks based on Wikipedia content here: http://goo.gl/X7QqU Patch based on 3.6 codebase attached. There are no API changes currently - to play just add a field with _blm on the end of the name to invoke special indexing/querying capability. Clearly a new Field or schema declaration(!) would need adding to APIs to configure the service properly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4069) Segment-level Bloom filters for a 2 x speed up on rare term searches
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-4069: - Attachment: MHBloomFilterOn3.6Branch.patch Initial patch Segment-level Bloom filters for a 2 x speed up on rare term searches Key: LUCENE-4069 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4069 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: core/index Affects Versions: 3.6 Reporter: Mark Harwood Priority: Minor Fix For: 3.6.1 Attachments: MHBloomFilterOn3.6Branch.patch An addition to each segment which stores a Bloom filter for selected fields in order to give fast-fail to term searches, helping avoid wasted disk access. Best suited for low-frequency fields e.g. primary keys on big indexes with many segments but also speeds up general searching in my tests. Overview slideshow here: http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/lucene-bloomfilteredsegments Benchmarks based on Wikipedia content here: http://goo.gl/X7QqU Patch based on 3.6 codebase attached. There are no API changes currently - to play just add a field with _blm on the end of the name to invoke special indexing/querying capability. Clearly a new Field or schema declaration(!) would need adding to APIs to configure the service properly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4054) Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278891#comment-13278891 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4054: - Yup, this time I checked ;) Thanks for testing. Overrides of @Before or @After hooks should cause a test error. --- Key: LUCENE-4054 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4054 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Sub-task Components: general/build, general/test Reporter: Dawid Weiss Assignee: Dawid Weiss Priority: Trivial Fix For: 4.0 The only exceptions are setUp/ tearDown methods in LuceneTestCase, which are historically designed for overriding (and for which chaining is verified). Any other override of am instance hook method should just be banned as it is very likely a mistake. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile and I got this: CHECKSUM FAILED for /SmileyDev/Search/lucene-solr_svn/solr/lib/commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar (expected: 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 was: fd968960d004ba8863a2e7b9c88f260aa588c22d) I thought the fix for this is supposedly: ant clean-jars resolve But it didn't fix the issue. Any ideas? ~ David
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-4068:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-4068.patch
{quote}
Maybe instead of . Also when documents inside a block are deleted say , even
when child documents within a block are deleted? (Ie, one sentence not two,
and add child since you cannot delete the parent w/o deleting all of its
children).
{quote}
Done.
bq. Also, can we not change the imports to wildcards?
Done. My IDE did this on the fly...
Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
Key: LUCENE-4068
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0
Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1
Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch
Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc.
Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-4068: -- Affects Version/s: 4.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Fix Version/s: 3.6.1 4.0 Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0 Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
I think this can happen when your Ivy cache gets corrupted, and can be fixed by clearing the Ivy cache, triggering a re-download. (To automate this, we could wrap the ivy:cleancache/ ant task: http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.2.0/use/cleancache.html.) Steve From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:49 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Dev Subject: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile and I got this: CHECKSUM FAILED for /SmileyDev/Search/lucene-solr_svn/solr/lib/commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar (expected: 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 was: fd968960d004ba8863a2e7b9c88f260aa588c22d) I thought the fix for this is supposedly: ant clean-jars resolve But it didn't fix the issue. Any ideas? ~ David
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #60
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/60/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
Maybe: target name=jar-checksums description=Recompute SHA1 checksums for all JAR files. -- Jack Krupansky From: Smiley, David W. Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:48 AM To: mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile and I got this: CHECKSUM FAILED for /SmileyDev/Search/lucene-solr_svn/solr/lib/commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar (expected: 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 was: fd968960d004ba8863a2e7b9c88f260aa588c22d) I thought the fix for this is supposedly: ant clean-jars resolve But it didn't fix the issue. Any ideas? ~ David
RE: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
I don't think so, because the expected checksum is the correct checksum (at least, that's what I get when I manually checksum the jar in question): 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 *commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar Steve From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar Maybe: target name=jar-checksums description=Recompute SHA1 checksums for all JAR files. -- Jack Krupansky From: Smiley, David W.mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:48 AM To: mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile and I got this: CHECKSUM FAILED for /SmileyDev/Search/lucene-solr_svn/solr/lib/commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar (expected: 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 was: fd968960d004ba8863a2e7b9c88f260aa588c22d) I thought the fix for this is supposedly: ant clean-jars resolve But it didn't fix the issue. Any ideas? ~ David
Re: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
Thanks Steve. What I ended up doing was removing this particular artifact from my ivy cache, which triggered a re-download. Now I'm all curious what precisely changed. ~ David On May 18, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: I think this can happen when your Ivy cache gets corrupted, and can be fixed by clearing the Ivy cache, triggering a re-download. (To automate this, we could wrap the ivy:cleancache/ ant task: http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.2.0/use/cleancache.html.) Steve From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:49 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.orgmailto:dev@lucene.apache.org Dev Subject: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile and I got this: CHECKSUM FAILED for /SmileyDev/Search/lucene-solr_svn/solr/lib/commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar (expected: 384faa82e193d4e4b0546059ca09572654bc3970 was: fd968960d004ba8863a2e7b9c88f260aa588c22d) I thought the fix for this is supposedly: ant clean-jars resolve But it didn't fix the issue. Any ideas? ~ David
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278913#comment-13278913
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4068:
--
bq. you cannot delete the parent w/o deleting all of its children
Atomic update seems a bit tricky...
Perhaps this
{code}
public void updateDocuments(Term delTerm, Iterable? extends Iterable?
extends IndexableField docs, Analyzer analyzer) throws CorruptIndexException,
IOException {
{code}
should be something like
{code}
public void updateDocuments(IterableTerm, Iterable? extends Iterable?
extends IndexableField docs, Analyzer analyzer) throws CorruptIndexException,
IOException {
{code}
or perhaps even more generic:
{code}
public void updateDocuments(Query delQuery, Iterable? extends Iterable?
extends IndexableField docs, Analyzer analyzer) throws CorruptIndexException,
IOException {
{code}
Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
Key: LUCENE-4068
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0
Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1
Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch
Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc.
Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3304) Add Solr support for the new Lucene spatial module
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278935#comment-13278935 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-3304: Another TODO: * in solr's example schema.xml add SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType and for that matter remove the old geohash one. Add Solr support for the new Lucene spatial module -- Key: SOLR-3304 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3304 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 4.0 Reporter: Bill Bell Assignee: David Smiley Labels: spatial Attachments: SOLR-3304_Solr_fields_for_Lucene_spatial_module.patch Get the Solr spatial module integrated with the lucene spatial module. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4063) FrenchLightStemmer performs abusive compression of (arbitrary) repeated characters in long tokens
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Rowe resolved LUCENE-4063. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 I agree with Robert, this is a design change, not a bug fix, so I won't backport to the 3.6 branch. FrenchLightStemmer performs abusive compression of (arbitrary) repeated characters in long tokens - Key: LUCENE-4063 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4063 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: modules/analysis Affects Versions: 3.4, 4.0 Reporter: Tanguy Moal Assignee: Steven Rowe Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.0 Attachments: LUCENE-4063.patch, SOLR-3463.patch, SOLR-3463.patch, SOLR-3463.patch FrenchLightStemmer performs aggressive deletions on repeated character sequences, even on numbers. This might be unexpected during full text search. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3983) HTMLCharacterEntities.jflex uses String.toUpperCase without Locale
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-3983:
Attachment: LUCENE-3983.patch
Patch removing runtime upcasing, as in my previous comment.
Committing shortly.
HTMLCharacterEntities.jflex uses String.toUpperCase without Locale
--
Key: LUCENE-3983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3983
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Steven Rowe
Priority: Minor
Attachments: LUCENE-3983.patch
Is this expected?
{code:java}
xi, \u03BE, yacute, \u00FD, yen, \u00A5, yuml, \u00FF,
zeta, \u03B6, zwj, \u200D, zwnj, \u200C
};
for (int i = 0 ; i entities.length ; i += 2) {
Character value = entities[i + 1].charAt(0);
entityValues.put(entities[i], value);
if (upperCaseVariantsAccepted.contains(entities[i])) {
entityValues.put(entities[i].toUpperCase(), value);
}
}
{code}
In my opinion, this should look like:
{code:java}
xi, \u03BE, yacute, \u00FD, yen, \u00A5, yuml, \u00FF,
zeta, \u03B6, zwj, \u200D, zwnj, \u200C
};
for (int i = 0 ; i entities.length ; i += 2) {
Character value = entities[i + 1].charAt(0);
entityValues.put(entities[i], value);
if (upperCaseVariantsAccepted.contains(entities[i])) {
entityValues.put(entities[i].toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH), value);
}
}
{code}
(otherwise in the Turkish locale, the entities containing i (like xi -
'\u03BE') will not be detected correctly).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278954#comment-13278954 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-4068: --- Yes... someone could delete a parent without deleting its children. I guess that this a responsibility of the application using Lucene. Right now for updating the deleteDocuments(query) method should be used, before using updateDocuments(...) / addDocuments(...) The updateDocuments method that uses the delQuery could include a ToChildBlockJoinQuery instance (as part of a boolean query) that would matches to the children documents (in case a parent document were to be deleted). However this logic would then still be the apps responsibility. Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0 Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3983) HTMLCharacterEntities.jflex uses String.toUpperCase without Locale
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved LUCENE-3983.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
Committed to trunk.
I don't think it's worth it to backport to the 3.6 branch, since the only
danger here was if the set of recognized uppercase variants of HTML character
entities ever grew, one of them might contain an i; since branch 3.6 is
bugfix-only, though, that set will never grow.
HTMLCharacterEntities.jflex uses String.toUpperCase without Locale
--
Key: LUCENE-3983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3983
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Steven Rowe
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0
Attachments: LUCENE-3983.patch
Is this expected?
{code:java}
xi, \u03BE, yacute, \u00FD, yen, \u00A5, yuml, \u00FF,
zeta, \u03B6, zwj, \u200D, zwnj, \u200C
};
for (int i = 0 ; i entities.length ; i += 2) {
Character value = entities[i + 1].charAt(0);
entityValues.put(entities[i], value);
if (upperCaseVariantsAccepted.contains(entities[i])) {
entityValues.put(entities[i].toUpperCase(), value);
}
}
{code}
In my opinion, this should look like:
{code:java}
xi, \u03BE, yacute, \u00FD, yen, \u00A5, yuml, \u00FF,
zeta, \u03B6, zwj, \u200D, zwnj, \u200C
};
for (int i = 0 ; i entities.length ; i += 2) {
Character value = entities[i + 1].charAt(0);
entityValues.put(entities[i], value);
if (upperCaseVariantsAccepted.contains(entities[i])) {
entityValues.put(entities[i].toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH), value);
}
}
{code}
(otherwise in the Turkish locale, the entities containing i (like xi -
'\u03BE') will not be detected correctly).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #38
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/38/ -- [...truncated 10997 lines...] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreTest [junit4] Completed in 7.43s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CharBufferTest [junit4] Completed in 0.06s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestExtendedDismaxParser [junit4] Completed in 10.72s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGermanLightStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.47s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGreekStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRecovery [junit4] Completed in 11.06s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest [junit4] Completed in 8.36s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 4.13s, 9 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap [junit4] Completed in 3.69s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.PeerSyncTest [junit4] Completed in 4.38s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 2.65s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 0.98s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 1.50s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 5.57s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715) [junit4] Completed in 2.60s, 3 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestWriterPerf [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 0.87s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.25s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.SortByFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 2.32s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XsltUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.92s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.98s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.32s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.26s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.52s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest [junit4] Completed in 1.28s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 2.68s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet [junit4] Completed in 1.93s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestReversedWildcardFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 1.11s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.84s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestQueryUtils [junit4] Completed in 1.76s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 1.14s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.36s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.AlternateDirectoryTest [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.40s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.UpdateParamsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.48s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.MultiTermTest [junit4] Completed in 0.81s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestLFUCache [junit4] Completed in 1.55s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite:
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278977#comment-13278977 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4068: -- bq. Right now for updating the deleteDocuments(query) method should be used, before using updateDocuments(...) / addDocuments(...) Sure - but my point is that isn't atomic. That's why the updateDocument* methods exist in the first place (as opposed to doing separate deletes and then adds). Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0 Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4068) Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13278991#comment-13278991 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-4068: --- True, that isn't atomic. Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc Key: LUCENE-4068 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4068 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0 Reporter: Martijn van Groningen Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.1 Attachments: LUCENE-4068.patch, LUCENE-4068.patch Improve IW#addDocuments(...) javadoc. Describer how blocks can be used regarding to index updates. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
And for those that are curious, the difference between the valid jar (as identified by the checksum sha1 in Solr) and the one I had with a different checksum, is that the bad one was built ~40 seconds earlier, as reflected in a comment date in META-INF/maven/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/pom.properties - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CHECKSUM-FAILED-for-commons-fileupload-1-2-1-jar-tp3984727p3984756.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-1725) Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-1725:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1725.patch
Updated patch that removes the Java 5 support (removing a lot of now
unnecessary code) and other fiddlings.
Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
--
Key: SOLR-1725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: update
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Uri Boness
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Labels: UpdateProcessor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: SOLR-1725-rev1.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch
A script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory (Uses JDK6 script engine
support). The main goal of this plugin is to be able to configure/write
update processors without the need to write and package Java code.
The update request processor factory enables writing update processors in
scripts located in {{solr.solr.home}} directory. The functory accepts one
(mandatory) configuration parameter named {{scripts}} which accepts a
comma-separated list of file names. It will look for these files under the
{{conf}} directory in solr home. When multiple scripts are defined, their
execution order is defined by the lexicographical order of the script file
name (so {{scriptA.js}} will be executed before {{scriptB.js}}).
The script language is resolved based on the script file extension (that is,
a *.js files will be treated as a JavaScript script), therefore an extension
is mandatory.
Each script file is expected to have one or more methods with the same
signature as the methods in the {{UpdateRequestProcessor}} interface. It is
*not* required to define all methods, only those hat are required by the
processing logic.
The following variables are define as global variables for each script:
* {{req}} - The SolrQueryRequest
* {{rsp}}- The SolrQueryResponse
* {{logger}} - A logger that can be used for logging purposes in the script
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-1725) Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279010#comment-13279010
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1725:
The latest patch also refactors the test case a bit, creating a common base
class for useful stuff borrowed from the field mutating update processor tests.
I'm having issues with the tests in the latest patches. Running ant
-Dtestcase=ScriptUpdateProcessorFactoryTest test I get, after it hangs for a
couple of minutes:
{code}
[junit4] ERROR 0.00s | ScriptUpdateProcessorFactoryTest (suite)
[junit4] Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: ERROR:
SolrIndexSearcher opens=3 closes=1
{code}
I've not yet figured out what is causing this, as the test class itself is
fairly straightforward.
Also, testMultipleScripts test case is a bit odd... setting one of the
factories to enabled=false (so it's not really testing multiple, though
awkwardly it actually is anyway for some reason).
Still fiddling, but figured I'd post an updated patch in case anyone else has
thoughts on these issues.
Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
--
Key: SOLR-1725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: update
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Uri Boness
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Labels: UpdateProcessor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: SOLR-1725-rev1.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch
A script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory (Uses JDK6 script engine
support). The main goal of this plugin is to be able to configure/write
update processors without the need to write and package Java code.
The update request processor factory enables writing update processors in
scripts located in {{solr.solr.home}} directory. The functory accepts one
(mandatory) configuration parameter named {{scripts}} which accepts a
comma-separated list of file names. It will look for these files under the
{{conf}} directory in solr home. When multiple scripts are defined, their
execution order is defined by the lexicographical order of the script file
name (so {{scriptA.js}} will be executed before {{scriptB.js}}).
The script language is resolved based on the script file extension (that is,
a *.js files will be treated as a JavaScript script), therefore an extension
is mandatory.
Each script file is expected to have one or more methods with the same
signature as the methods in the {{UpdateRequestProcessor}} interface. It is
*not* required to define all methods, only those hat are required by the
processing logic.
The following variables are define as global variables for each script:
* {{req}} - The SolrQueryRequest
* {{rsp}}- The SolrQueryResponse
* {{logger}} - A logger that can be used for logging purposes in the script
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #63
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/63/ -- [...truncated 10077 lines...] [junit4] Completed in 1.38s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestChineseFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.09s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestKeepFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCollationKeyFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestIndexSearcher [junit4] Completed in 2.02s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrXMLSerializer [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 38.12s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest [junit4] Completed in 36.57s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest [junit4] Completed in 18.42s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 15.65s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRecovery [junit4] Completed in 9.04s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 14.35s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting [junit4] Completed in 18.61s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 11.49s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 2.91s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 2.49s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFiltering [junit4] Completed in 7.12s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715) [junit4] Completed in 2.77s, 3 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy2 [junit4] Completed in 1.15s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 2.23s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.DirectSolrSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 2.06s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 4.65s, 27 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.distance.DistanceFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 1.56s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestBinaryResponseWriter [junit4] Completed in 2.41s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest [junit4] Completed in 3.02s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.DocumentAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.23s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.30s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CopyFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 0.91s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest [junit4] Completed in 1.25s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVPrinterTest [junit4] Completed in 0.76s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.30s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.31s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestExtendedDismaxParser [junit4] Completed in 8.56s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir [junit4] Completed in 1.08s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.AlternateDirectoryTest [junit4] Completed in 0.94s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.17s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.ReturnFieldsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.20s, 10 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SOLR749Test [junit4]
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-1725) Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-1725:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1725.patch
Updated patch, removing the enabled concept which wasn't working well for the
tests only. Also fixed up tests that were not decrementing searcher count
causing the test monitor to raise a red flag.
Script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
--
Key: SOLR-1725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: update
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Uri Boness
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Labels: UpdateProcessor
Fix For: 4.1
Attachments: SOLR-1725-rev1.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch,
SOLR-1725.patch, SOLR-1725.patch
A script based UpdateRequestProcessorFactory (Uses JDK6 script engine
support). The main goal of this plugin is to be able to configure/write
update processors without the need to write and package Java code.
The update request processor factory enables writing update processors in
scripts located in {{solr.solr.home}} directory. The functory accepts one
(mandatory) configuration parameter named {{scripts}} which accepts a
comma-separated list of file names. It will look for these files under the
{{conf}} directory in solr home. When multiple scripts are defined, their
execution order is defined by the lexicographical order of the script file
name (so {{scriptA.js}} will be executed before {{scriptB.js}}).
The script language is resolved based on the script file extension (that is,
a *.js files will be treated as a JavaScript script), therefore an extension
is mandatory.
Each script file is expected to have one or more methods with the same
signature as the methods in the {{UpdateRequestProcessor}} interface. It is
*not* required to define all methods, only those hat are required by the
processing logic.
The following variables are define as global variables for each script:
* {{req}} - The SolrQueryRequest
* {{rsp}}- The SolrQueryResponse
* {{logger}} - A logger that can be used for logging purposes in the script
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #63
From: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/63/testReport/junit/org.apache.solr.update/SoftAutoCommitTest/testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeMixedAdds/ soft529 occured too fast: 1337365513160 + 500 != 1337365513589 Is 'too fast' really an error? I thought the contract with commit times is that it happens within some amount of time too fast would be *before* we issue a request or am I missing something? ryan On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote: See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/63/ -- [...truncated 10077 lines...]  [junit4] Completed in 1.38s, 7 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestChineseFilterFactory  [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest  [junit4] Completed in 2.09s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestKeepFilterFactory  [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCollationKeyFilterFactory  [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 5 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestIndexSearcher  [junit4] Completed in 2.02s, 2 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrXMLSerializer  [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest  [junit4] Completed in 38.12s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest  [junit4] Completed in 36.57s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest  [junit4] Completed in 18.42s, 4 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest  [junit4] Completed in 15.65s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRecovery  [junit4] Completed in 9.04s, 8 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest  [junit4] Completed in 14.35s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting  [junit4] Completed in 18.61s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest  [junit4] Completed in 11.49s, 29 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest  [junit4] Completed in 2.91s, 4 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest  [junit4] Completed in 2.49s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFiltering  [junit4] Completed in 7.12s, 2 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration  [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload  [junit4]   Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715)  [junit4] Completed in 2.77s, 3 tests, 1 skipped  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy2  [junit4] Completed in 1.15s, 1 test  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields  [junit4] Completed in 2.23s, 13 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.DirectSolrSpellCheckerTest  [junit4] Completed in 2.06s, 2 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterTest  [junit4] Completed in 4.65s, 27 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.distance.DistanceFunctionTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.56s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestBinaryResponseWriter  [junit4] Completed in 2.41s, 2 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest  [junit4] Completed in 3.02s, 2 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.DocumentAnalysisRequestHandlerTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.23s, 4 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.30s, 5 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CopyFieldTest  [junit4] Completed in 0.91s, 6 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.25s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVPrinterTest  [junit4] Completed in 0.76s, 6 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.30s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.31s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest  [junit4] Completed in 1.27s, 3 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestExtendedDismaxParser  [junit4] Completed in 8.56s, 8 tests  [junit4]  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir Â
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #39
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/39/changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #43
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/43/changes Changes: [sarowe] LUCENE-3983: HTMLStripCharFilter: Stop upcasing HTML character entity names at class initialization time; instead, provide hard-coded upcased versions for a small set of them. -- [...truncated 15092 lines...] [junit4]at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([50074E0E5BCCA2F3:52482EA1B548BAF6]:0) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.util.TestHarness.update(TestHarness.java:260) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.util.TestHarness.checkUpdateStatus(TestHarness.java:304) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.util.TestHarness.validateUpdate(TestHarness.java:274) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.checkUpdateU(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:408) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.assertU(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:387) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.assertU(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:381) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.clearIndex(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:753) [junit4]at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSqlEntityProcessorDelta2.setUp(TestSqlEntityProcessorDelta2.java:68) [junit4]at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) [junit4]at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) [junit4]at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [junit4]at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1969) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:873) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:889) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleFieldCacheSanity$1.evaluate(TestRuleFieldCacheSanity.java:32) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:821) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:669) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:695) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) [junit4]
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3234) Remove contrib/dataimporthandler's webapp jsp
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279111#comment-13279111 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-3234: - After we got SOLR-3159 in, the jsp's will no longer work. i'd like to commit this, if we're missing features in the new ui i'll add time. Remove contrib/dataimporthandler's webapp jsp - Key: SOLR-3234 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3234 Project: Solr Issue Type: Task Reporter: Stefan Matheis (steffkes) Assignee: Stefan Matheis (steffkes) Priority: Minor Attachments: SOLR-3234.patch the contrib/dataimporthandler contains .jsp files which are copied to the main .war file using the [add-to-war|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/contrib/contrib-build.xml?view=markup#L34] target of solr/contrib/contrib-build.xml I guess the build-target is still okay, since it may be needed that additional files are deployed to the admin-area. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-3234) Remove contrib/dataimporthandler's webapp jsp
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279111#comment-13279111 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) edited comment on SOLR-3234 at 5/18/12 7:35 PM: -- After we got SOLR-3159 in, the jsp's will no longer work. i'd like to commit this, if we're missing features in the new ui i'll add them. was (Author: steffkes): After we got SOLR-3159 in, the jsp's will no longer work. i'd like to commit this, if we're missing features in the new ui i'll add time. Remove contrib/dataimporthandler's webapp jsp - Key: SOLR-3234 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3234 Project: Solr Issue Type: Task Reporter: Stefan Matheis (steffkes) Assignee: Stefan Matheis (steffkes) Priority: Minor Attachments: SOLR-3234.patch the contrib/dataimporthandler contains .jsp files which are copied to the main .war file using the [add-to-war|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/contrib/contrib-build.xml?view=markup#L34] target of solr/contrib/contrib-build.xml I guess the build-target is still okay, since it may be needed that additional files are deployed to the admin-area. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #64
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/64/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3457) Spellchecker always incorrectly spelled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279162#comment-13279162
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-3457:
--
I can reproduce this problem running the solr example. The fix looked
straighforward but unfortunately it causes 2 of the SpellCheckComponentTest
cases to fail. The code, unfortunately, is a bit squirrely here.
I'm going to take a look at SOLR-2585 to see if applying that fixes this issue
also. SOLR-2585 included rewritten logic for the correctlySpelled flag.
Spellchecker always incorrectly spelled
---
Key: SOLR-3457
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3457
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: spellchecker
Affects Versions: 4.0
Environment: solr-spec 4.0.0.2012.05.15.11.42.06
solr-impl 4.0-SNAPSHOT 1338601 - markus - 2012-05-15 11:42:06
lucene-spec 4.0-SNAPSHOT
lucene-impl 4.0-SNAPSHOT 1338601 - markus - 2012-05-15 10:51:02
Reporter: Markus Jelsma
Attachments: SOLR-3457-4.0-1.patch
correctlySpelled is always false with default configuration, example config
and example documents:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/browse?wt=xmlspellcheck.extendedResults=trueq=samsung
{code}
lst name=spellcheck
lst name=suggestions
bool name=correctlySpelledfalse/bool
/lst
/lst
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #65
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/65/ -- [...truncated 10044 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 22.22s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.SolrCmdDistributorTest [junit4] Completed in 2.44s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.16s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestGreekStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy1 [junit4] Completed in 1.59s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 41.07s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.03s | TestRealTimeGet.testStressRecovery [junit4] Assumption #1: FIXME: This test is horribly slow sometimes on Windows! [junit4] Completed in 16.74s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderElectionTest [junit4] Completed in 37.42s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest [junit4] Completed in 15.23s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 31.70s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRecovery [junit4] Completed in 16.58s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 9.70s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.BadIndexSchemaTest [junit4] Completed in 1.90s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.07s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726) [junit4] Completed in 4.00s, 23 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 3.34s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.60s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.UniqFieldsUpdateProcessorFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestRemoteStreaming [junit4] Completed in 1.40s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest [junit4] Completed in 2.04s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.74s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVPrinterTest [junit4] Completed in 0.62s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.41s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.09s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PrimitiveFieldTypeTest [junit4] Completed in 1.52s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestValueSourceCache [junit4] Completed in 1.06s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.RequiredFieldsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.83s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestExtendedDismaxParser [junit4] Completed in 8.21s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.FieldAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 0.88s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSolrQueryParser [junit4] Completed in 0.85s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 0.98s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsingTest [junit4] Completed in 1.00s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 0.85s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 0.86s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 0.74s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.MultiTermTest [junit4]
Jenkins build is back to normal : Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #44
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/44/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2585) Context-Sensitive Spelling Suggestions Collations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer updated SOLR-2585: - Attachment: SOLR-2585.patch Here's an updated version of this, synced to trunk. I would like to commit this new feature soon, unless there is a feeling out there that it needs improvement first. Context-Sensitive Spelling Suggestions Collations --- Key: SOLR-2585 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: spellchecker Affects Versions: 4.0 Reporter: James Dyer Priority: Minor Attachments: SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch, SOLR-2585.patch Solr currently cannot offer what I'm calling here a context-sensitive spelling suggestion. That is, if a user enters one or more words that have docFrequency 0, but nevertheless are misspelled, then no suggestions are offered. Currently, Solr will always consider a word correctly spelled if it is in the index and/or dictionary, regardless of context. This issue patch add support for context-sensitive spelling suggestions. See SpellCheckCollatorTest.testContextSensitiveCollate() for a the typical use case for this functionality. This tests both using IndexBasedSepllChecker and DirectSolrSpellChecker. Two new Spelling Parameters were added: - spellcheck.alternativeTermCount - The count of suggestions to return for each query term existing in the index and/or dictionary. Presumably, users will want fewer suggestions for words with docFrequency0. Also setting this value turns on context-sensitive spell suggestions. - spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest - The maximum number of hits the request can return in order to both generate spelling suggestions and set the correctlySpelled element to false. For example, if this is set to 5 and the user's query returns 5 or fewer results, the spellchecker will report correctlySpelled=false and also offer suggestions (and collations if requested). Setting this greater than zero is useful for creating did-you-mean suggestions for queries that return a low number of hits. I have also included a test using shards. See additions to DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest. In Lucene, SpellChecker.java can already support this functionality (by passing a null IndexReader and field-name). The DirectSpellChecker, however, needs a minor enhancement. This gives the option to allow DirectSpellChecker to return suggestions for all query terms regardless of frequency. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #40
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/40/ -- [...truncated 10949 lines...] [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleFieldCacheSanity$1.evaluate(TestRuleFieldCacheSanity.java:32) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:821) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:669) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:695) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:56) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:605) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:132) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:551) [junit4] [junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=SoftAutoCommitTest -Dtests.method=testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeDelete -Dtests.seed=670EFF5F4DF01E98 -Dtests.locale=ar_TN -Dtests.timezone=America/Barbados -Dargs=-Dfile.encoding=Cp1252 [junit4] 2 [junit4] (@AfterClass output) [junit4] 2 NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=ar_TN, timezone=America/Barbados [junit4] 2 NOTE: Windows 7 6.1 amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_04 (64-bit)/cpus=2,threads=1,free=126125904,total=291831808 [junit4] 2 NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestPluginEnable, TestCodecSupport, TestStemmerOverrideFilterFactory, TestGreekStemFilterFactory, SpellCheckComponentTest, TestBulgarianStemFilterFactory, XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest, TestSystemIdResolver, SampleTest, ReturnFieldsTest, DateMathParserTest, TestPorterStemFilterFactory, TestMergePolicyConfig, TestMultiWordSynonyms, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest, TestGermanNormalizationFilterFactory, DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest, TestHashPartitioner, TestFoldingMultitermQuery, RAMDirectoryFactoryTest, SolrInfoMBeanTest, QueryParsingTest, SearchHandlerTest, TestSuggestSpellingConverter, TestQuerySenderListener, OpenExchangeRatesOrgProviderTest, TestHungarianLightStemFilterFactory, SignatureUpdateProcessorFactoryTest, TestPortugueseStemFilterFactory, TestRussianFilters, TestPatternTokenizerFactory, NoCacheHeaderTest, SpellingQueryConverterTest, TestTrie, SuggesterWFSTTest,
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #66
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/66/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #41
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/41/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #67
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/67/ -- [...truncated 10045 lines...] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TestSystemIdResolver [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.SortByFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 2.39s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestBM25SimilarityFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.17s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestDictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestMergePolicyConfig [junit4] Completed in 0.99s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.85s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch [junit4] Completed in 24.23s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 14.47s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest [junit4] Completed in 8.99s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestJoin [junit4] Completed in 11.54s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting [junit4] Completed in 20.37s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 10.17s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 5.71s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRangeQuery [junit4] Completed in 6.10s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 4.94s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 2.37s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(timing problem? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715) [junit4] Completed in 3.01s, 3 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.StandardRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.59s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest [junit4] Completed in 1.46s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 4.23s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreContainer [junit4] Completed in 4.14s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 2.56s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestRemoteStreaming [junit4] Completed in 1.71s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 2.64s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 2.35s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestPropInject [junit4] Completed in 3.42s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.internal.csv.CSVPrinterTest [junit4] Completed in 0.93s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.49s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.77s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 2.11s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PrimitiveFieldTypeTest [junit4] Completed in 2.48s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.SolrPluginUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.55s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestCSVResponseWriter [junit4] Completed in 1.57s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.JSONWriterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.62s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.BinaryUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.39s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestQuerySenderListener [junit4] Completed in 1.47s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestXIncludeConfig [junit4] Completed in 1.18s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestBeiderMorseFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.43s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.UUIDFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSearchPerf [junit4]
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #68
See
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/68/
--
[...truncated 10757 lines...]
[junit4] 2at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method)
[junit4] 2at
java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:194)
[junit4] 2at
java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:145)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.util.FileUtils.copyFile(FileUtils.java:48)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.copyAFile(SnapPuller.java:661)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.copyIndexFiles(SnapPuller.java:698)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.fetchLatestIndex(SnapPuller.java:378)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.handler.ReplicationHandler.doFetch(ReplicationHandler.java:298)
[junit4] 2at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller$1.run(SnapPuller.java:176)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:317)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.runPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
[junit4] 2at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
[junit4] 2at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
[junit4] 2
[junit4] 1 replicate slave to master
[junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
-Dtestcase=TestReplicationHandler -Dtests.method=test
-Dtests.seed=ECF3B70861DA3D58 -Dtests.locale=es_MX -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT+0
-Dargs=-Dfile.encoding=Cp1252
[junit4] 1
[junit4] 2
[junit4] (@AfterClass output)
[junit4] 2 NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40,
sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=true,coord=true): {}, locale=es_MX,
timezone=Etc/GMT+0
[junit4] 2 NOTE: Windows 7 6.1 amd64/Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_32
(64-bit)/cpus=2,threads=1,free=40683264,total=187039744
[junit4] 2 NOTE: All tests run in this JVM:
[TestKeywordMarkerFilterFactory, TestPatternReplaceFilterFactory,
CurrencyFieldTest, TestFoldingMultitermQuery, IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest,
TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory, TestRealTimeGet, TestPluginEnable,
TestChineseFilterFactory, TestQuerySenderListener, TestSynonymMap,
FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorTest, BinaryUpdateRequestHandlerTest,
FastVectorHighlighterTest, TestTypeTokenFilterFactory,
FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest, SolrPluginUtilsTest, UUIDFieldTest,
JSONWriterTest, RequiredFieldsTest, HighlighterTest, CacheHeaderTest,
TestHindiFilters, TestNumberUtils, TestBrazilianStemFilterFactory,
TestDelimitedPayloadTokenFilterFactory, UniqFieldsUpdateProcessorFactoryTest,
TestThaiWordFilterFactory, IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest,
TestHunspellStemFilterFactory, NotRequiredUniqueKeyTest, TestMultiWordSynonyms,
TestNorwegianLightStemFilterFactory, HighlighterConfigTest, TestNGramFilters,
SystemInfoHandlerTest, TestJapaneseTokenizerFactory, ZkControllerTest,
TestMergePolicyConfig, TestHTMLStripCharFilterFactory, TestTrimFilterFactory,
CloudStateTest, TestSolrDeletionPolicy2, TestDFRSimilarityFactory,
TestSpanishLightStemFilterFactory, SampleTest, TestQuerySenderNoQuery,
DateMathParserTest, SolrCmdDistributorTest, TestPhraseSuggestions,
TestSuggestSpellingConverter, TestJapaneseBaseFormFilterFactory,
RequestHandlersTest, TestWriterPerf, TestRussianFilters,
SpellingQueryConverterTest, TestSynonymFilterFactory, TestDistributedGrouping,
PrimUtilsTest, TestRecovery, TestCapitalizationFilterFactory,
TestPortugueseStemFilterFactory, DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest,
TestBulgarianStemFilterFactory, SoftAutoCommitTest, TestXIncludeConfig,
EchoParamsTest, TestDictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilterFactory, TestUtils,
TestIndonesianStemFilterFactory, DirectUpdateHandlerTest, SimpleFacetsTest,
SpatialFilterTest, SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest, BasicZkTest,
IndexReaderFactoryTest, TestGroupingSearch, TestBadConfig,
TestReversedWildcardFilterFactory, TestHungarianLightStemFilterFactory,
CoreAdminHandlerTest, TestLuceneMatchVersion, TestUpdate, TestRangeQuery,
FileUtilsTest, TestCollationKeyFilterFactory, DOMUtilTest,
TestLMDirichletSimilarityFactory, TestSwedishLightStemFilterFactory,
TestCJKBigramFilterFactory, SolrInfoMBeanTest,
TestLMJelinekMercerSimilarityFactory, TestDefaultSimilarityFactory,
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #63
: From: : http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/63/testReport/junit/org.apache.solr.update/SoftAutoCommitTest/testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTimeMixedAdds/ : : soft529 occured too fast: 1337365513160 + 500 != 1337365513589 : : Is 'too fast' really an error? : : I thought the contract with commit times is that it happens within : some amount of time too fast would be *before* we issue a : request or am I missing something? I believe that my intent with that assert is that since this is a single threaded test, nothing else should be triggering any commits ... so if we see a softCommit happening before the softCommitWaitMillis has elapsed, it must have been triggered by something else, but there isn't suppose to be anything else that could have caused it, so it must be a bug. That said: i will not cry it you want to remove the assert. I wrote that test in a paranoia induced psychosis brought on by trying to recreate the functional logic of the previous auto commit test(s) while simultenously trying to avoid all of hte absurd assumptions that plauged those test(s). -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #42
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/42/ -- [...truncated 11710 lines...] [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestBM25SimilarityFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.21s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.TestPhraseSuggestions [junit4] Completed in 0.23s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.processor.URLClassifyProcessorTest [junit4] Completed in 0.04s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellPossibilityIteratorTest [junit4] Completed in 0.08s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 52.10s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s | TestRealTimeGet.testStressRecovery [junit4] Assumption #1: FIXME: This test is horribly slow sometimes on Windows! [junit4] Completed in 17.59s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest [junit4] Completed in 42.37s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch [junit4] Completed in 27.89s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPhoneticFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 17.42s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 38.59s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest [junit4] Completed in 10.58s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestHashPartitioner [junit4] Completed in 7.54s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap [junit4] Completed in 5.41s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.PeerSyncTest [junit4] Completed in 6.68s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedQueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 6.61s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 2.03s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.MoreLikeThisHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.65s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFiltering [junit4] Completed in 5.25s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestTrie [junit4] Completed in 2.12s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 7.80s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726) [junit4] Completed in 3.04s, 23 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreContainer [junit4] Completed in 2.84s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 0.93s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestLMDirichletSimilarityFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.17s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellCheckCollatorTest [junit4] Completed in 1.23s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestRemoteStreaming [junit4] Completed in 1.11s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PolyFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.43s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.21s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.95s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFoldingMultitermQuery [junit4] Completed in 2.46s, 18 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CurrencyFieldTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | CurrencyFieldTest.testPerformance [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore() [junit4] Completed in 1.52s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 1.77s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet [junit4] Completed in 0.75s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.04s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.BadComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 0.82s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest [junit4]
Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #46
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/46/ -- [...truncated 1321 lines...] [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51) [junit4]at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoStaticHooksShadowing.java:52) [junit4]at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:36) [junit4] [junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=TestPackedInts -Dtests.method=testIntOverflow -Dtests.seed=3653D428FC3E0591 -Dtests.locale=es_SV -Dtests.timezone=America/Costa_Rica -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs=-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 [junit4] 2 [junit4] (@AfterClass output) [junit4] 2 NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40, sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=es_SV, timezone=America/Costa_Rica [junit4] 2 NOTE: Linux 2.6.32-41-server amd64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_04 (64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=264913136,total=276824064 [junit4] 2 NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [TestByteArrayDataInput, TestFieldValueFilter, TestTermVectorsReader, TestTermsEnum, TestRollingBuffer, TestDocIdSet, TestArrayUtil, TestIndexFileDeleter, TestMinimize, TestTerm, Test2BTerms, TestNoMergeScheduler, TestMergeSchedulerExternal, TestParallelAtomicReader, TestNumericRangeQuery32, TestDocValuesScoring, TestTransactions, TestExplanations, TestIndexWriterConfig, TestCloseableThreadLocal, TestIndexInput, TestMatchAllDocsQuery, TestPerFieldPostingsFormat, TestSetOnce, TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex, TestLazyProxSkipping, Test10KPulsings, TestPayloadProcessorProvider, TestPositionIncrement, TestSurrogates, TestGraphTokenizers, TestDisjunctionMaxQuery, TestDocumentsWriterStallControl, TestQueryWrapperFilter, TestRegexpQuery, TestIndexWriterUnicode, TestNamedSPILoader, Nested, TestTransactionRollback, TestSimpleExplanations, TestCustomNorms, TestTimeLimitingCollector, TestBitVector, TestParallelCompositeReader, TestDirectoryReader, TestWildcard, TestIndexWriterWithThreads, TestCopyBytes, TestIdentityHashSet, TestDocBoost, TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy, TestDocumentsWriterDeleteQueue, TestRecyclingByteBlockAllocator, TestSimpleExplanationsOfNonMatches, TestForTooMuchCloning, TestRegexpRandom, TestFieldsReader, TestMultiMMap, TestImpersonation, TestVirtualMethod, TestSentinelIntSet, TestCachingWrapperFilter, TestAutomatonQuery, TestSpansAdvanced2, TestPagedBytes, TestPrefixRandom, TestSearcherManager, TestOpenBitSet, TestFileSwitchDirectory, TestPulsingReuse, TestAppendingCodec, TestSpansAdvanced, TestBytesRefHash, TestLookaheadTokenFilter, TestConsistentFieldNumbers, TestTermInfosReaderIndex, TestNeverDelete, TestTypePromotion, TestDateTools, TestStressIndexing, TestDeletionPolicy, TestConcurrentMergeScheduler, TestDateSort, TestSegmentReader, TestPayloads, TestLongPostings, TestNorms, TestIndexWriterLockRelease, TestPrefixFilter, Nested, Nested, TestMixedCodecs, TestSimpleAttributeImpl, TestCachingCollector, ThrowInUncaught, TestFieldCacheRangeFilter, Nested1, Nested2, Nested3, TestByteSlices, TestExternalCodecs, TestTopScoreDocCollector, TestSpecialOperations, TestMockAnalyzer, TestReaderClosed, TestCustomSearcherSort, TestNRTThreads, TestNGramPhraseQuery, TestLock, TestWindowsMMap, TestDateFilter, TestCrashCausesCorruptIndex, TestTermScorer, InBeforeClass, InAfterClass, InTestMethod, NonStringProperties, TestMultiThreadTermVectors, Test2BPostings, TestBasics, TestBackwardsCompatibility, TestSegmentTermDocs, TestIndexWriterExceptions, TestTopDocsMerge, TestAtomicUpdate, TestPackedInts] [junit4] 2 [junit4] Completed on J0 in 4.97s, 8 tests, 1 error FAILURES! [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.fst.TestFSTs [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | TestFSTs.testBigSet [junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly) [junit4] Completed on J1 in 68.38s, 17 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCompoundFile [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.77s, 17 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite:
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #69
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/69/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #47
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/47/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Jenkins build is back to normal : Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #43
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/43/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #71
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/71/ -- [...truncated 10883 lines...] [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.SortByFunctionTest [junit4] Completed in 2.69s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestHTMLStripCharFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestPortugueseMinimalStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.26s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.NumericFieldsTest [junit4] Completed in 0.70s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 14.58s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestFrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest [junit4] Completed in 44.22s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch [junit4] Completed in 48.33s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 33.28s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedSpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 22.75s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest [junit4] Completed in 14.27s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestGroupingSearch [junit4] Completed in 7.81s, 12 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest [junit4] Completed in 9.99s, 29 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 2.47s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.BadIndexSchemaTest [junit4] Completed in 1.91s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.67s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 3.50s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy2 [junit4] Completed in 1.40s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 1.87s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.ShowFileRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.47s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.DirectSolrSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.69s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 2.74s, 27 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 1.71s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.86s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PolyFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.71s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CopyFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.07s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFoldingMultitermQuery [junit4] Completed in 1.64s, 18 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 2.49s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.49s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PrimitiveFieldTypeTest [junit4] Completed in 1.80s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.DisMaxRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.44s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestCSVResponseWriter [junit4] Completed in 1.20s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.HighlighterConfigTest [junit4] Completed in 0.86s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.TestCollationField [junit4] Completed in 0.49s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchemaRuntimeFieldTest [junit4] Completed in 1.08s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsingTest [junit4] Completed in 1.02s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.MultiTermTest [junit4] Completed in 0.47s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestLFUCache [junit4] Completed in 1.01s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapanesePartOfSpeechStopFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4]
Build failed in Jenkins: Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 #44
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Windows-Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/44/ -- [...truncated 4 lines...] [junit4] Completed in 4.56s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestCJKBigramFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CurrencyFieldTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | CurrencyFieldTest.testPerformance [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore() [junit4] Completed in 1.60s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RAMDirectoryFactoryTest [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestMergePolicyConfig [junit4] Completed in 1.15s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.05s | TestRealTimeGet.testStressRecovery [junit4] Assumption #1: FIXME: This test is horribly slow sometimes on Windows! [junit4] Completed in 18.00s, 8 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler [junit4] Completed in 34.18s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch [junit4] Completed in 27.49s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedGrouping [junit4] Completed in 24.29s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 19.40s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest [junit4] Completed in 12.66s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 8.78s, 9 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryElevationComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 9.57s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestRangeQuery [junit4] Completed in 5.35s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery [junit4] Completed in 4.68s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSort [junit4] Completed in 5.15s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreTest [junit4] Completed in 6.98s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.BadIndexSchemaTest [junit4] Completed in 1.43s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726) [junit4] Completed in 3.36s, 23 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest [junit4] Completed in 1.22s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestWriterPerf [junit4] Completed in 1.41s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.TestIndexingPerformance [junit4] Completed in 0.94s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestPseudoReturnFields [junit4] Completed in 1.65s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponentTest [junit4] Completed in 1.25s, 13 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSurroundQueryParser [junit4] Completed in 1.24s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory [junit4] Completed in 1.64s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.13s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest [junit4] Completed in 1.67s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest [junit4] Completed in 1.48s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.highlight.FastVectorHighlighterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.46s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet [junit4] Completed in 1.35s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PrimitiveFieldTypeTest [junit4] Completed in 3.01s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.SolrPluginUtilsTest [junit4] Completed in 1.53s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.JsonLoaderTest [junit4] Completed in 1.31s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir [junit4] Completed in 1.46s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.JSONWriterTest [junit4] Completed in 1.48s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.FieldAnalysisRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.05s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.BinaryUpdateRequestHandlerTest [junit4] Completed in 1.51s, 1 test [junit4]
Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #289
See http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/289/ -- [...truncated 1359 lines...] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager [junit4] Completed on J0 in 15.70s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPagedBytes [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.05s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestNumericTokenStream [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCloseableThreadLocal [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermsEnum [junit4] Completed on J1 in 8.36s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestMultiMMap [junit4] Completed on J0 in 6.20s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.18s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDirectoryReaderReopen [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.84s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPersistentSnapshotDeletionPolicy [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.57s, 14 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMerging [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.85s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.94s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.99s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockAnalyzer [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.95s, 9 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLongPostings [junit4] Completed on J1 in 3.46s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSnapshotDeletionPolicy [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.32s, 8 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanations [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.27s, 31 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.66s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.28s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitTf [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.29s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentReader [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.55s, 6 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterNRTIsCurrent [junit4] Completed on J1 in 5.53s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiPhraseQuery [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s J1 | TestMultiPhraseQuery.testMultiSloppyWithRepeats [junit4] Cause: Annotated @Ignore() [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 16 tests, 1 skipped [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestDeterminism [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.73s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCrash [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.32s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressAdvance [junit4] Completed on J0 in 20.11s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCustomNorms [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.56s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestCopyBytes [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.84s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocumentsWriterDeleteQueue [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.11s, 5 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestConsistentFieldNumbers [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.78s, 4 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermVectors [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.21s, 11 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlex [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.09s, 2 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFilteredQuery [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.15s, 9 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocumentWriter [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.15s, 7 tests [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCrashCausesCorruptIndex [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.09s, 1 test [junit4] [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestFieldMaskingSpanQuery [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestFieldMaskingSpanQuery.testSimple2 [junit4] Assumption #1: Broken scoring: LUCENE-3723 [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestFieldMaskingSpanQuery.testSpans2 [junit4] Assumption #1: Broken scoring: LUCENE-3723 [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.69s, 11 tests, 2
