[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_20) - Build # 4284 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4284/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_20 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 56111 lines...] changes-to-html: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build\docs\changes [get] Getting: https://issues.apache.org/jira/rest/api/2/project/LUCENE [get] To: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build\docs\changes\jiraVersionList.json [exec] Bareword found where operator expected at (eval 1) line 3, near titleSystem [exec] (Missing operator before System?) [exec] Having no space between pattern and following word is deprecated at (eval 1) line 8. [exec] ERROR eval'ing munged JSON string ||html [exec] head [exec] titleSystem Maintenance/title [exec] /head [exec] body [exec] h1Maintenance in progress/h1 [exec] pThis system is currently down for maintenance. More details may be [exec] available from the a href='http://monitoring.apache.org/status/' [exec] ASF Public Network Status/a page./p [exec] /body [exec] /html [exec] ||: Can't find string terminator ' anywhere before EOF at (eval 1) line 8. [exec] BUILD FAILED C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:492: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:78: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:212: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:548: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:2443: exec returned: 255 Total time: 160 minutes 32 seconds Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure [description-setter] Description set: Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_20 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC Archiving artifacts Recording test results Email was triggered for: Failure - Any Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5894) Speed up high-cardinality facets with sparse counters
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116786#comment-14116786 ] Toke Eskildsen commented on SOLR-5894: -- Status update The code seems to be in working state for Solr 4.8 and 4.9 for Field Cache faceting (single- and multi-value) and DocValue faceting (single- and multi-value) for Strings. It really needs testing by someone else than me, so that the validity of the responses and the speed upc can be verified. I am willing to port this to trunk if a committer is willing to work on getting the patch into Solr, but until then I will stick to stable versions as that is what we use locally. Sparse faceting introduces some architectural changes that needs to be addressed. 1) The core sparse counting itself is surprisingly non-invasive. It could be a standalone patch. However, this only works really well in a non-distributed setting and has less effect in a distributed one. 2) Avoiding re-allocation of counter structures by maintaining a pool of structures lowers the minimum faceting time and lowers the need for GC. It is lowered quite a lot, I might add, as faceting is normally one of the big GC-triggers, so I would strongly recommend this feature. Such a pool is very much like a cache and as such must play nice with index updates and other caching structures in Solr. The current state of the counter pool is that it works well, but is implemented independently of the usual caches. It is probably better to latch on to the standard caching mechanisms in Solr, but I have no experience with that part of the code base. The code for the pool itself is fairly simple and can be implemented as an experimental feature by setting the default pool size to 0. 3) Fast distributed faceting is about speeding up the secondary phase of distrubuted faceting: The fine count for specific terms. This is achieved by replacing the normal search-for-each-requested-term approach by a full faceted count approach, where the counts for all terms are calculated but only the counts for the specified terms are returned. This requires either a separation of counting and extraction in stock Solr code or an extension to the count-extract code block so that is can handle both the case where top-X terms are wanted and where specific terms are requested. Currently the sparse code use the latter approach, but the former is a much cleaner architecture. Both solutions does require some re-factoring and are a bit tricky to get right. 4) A further speed up for distributed faceting can be achieved by upgrading the sparse pools to real caches, so that they contain a mix of empty counters (to avoid GC) and filled counters (caching of counts). As the counting part of the second phase is always exactly the same as for the first phase, cache hit-rate should be very high with distribution. This is not currently implemented and is a bit tricky to get to work well. I recommend that this improvement is postponed, in order to keep the current patch manageable. The sparse principle would also work for Field Cache per Segment faceting of Strings, but no code has been written for this yet. I recommend that this is also postponed, to get things moving. Speed up high-cardinality facets with sparse counters - Key: SOLR-5894 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5894 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: SearchComponents - other Affects Versions: 4.7.1 Reporter: Toke Eskildsen Priority: Minor Labels: faceted-search, faceting, memory, performance Attachments: SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894.patch, SOLR-5894_test.zip, SOLR-5894_test.zip, SOLR-5894_test.zip, SOLR-5894_test.zip, SOLR-5894_test.zip, author_7M_tags_1852_logged_queries_warmed.png, sparse_200docs_fc_cutoff_20140403-145412.png, sparse_500docs_20140331-151918_multi.png, sparse_500docs_20140331-151918_single.png, sparse_5051docs_20140328-152807.png Field based faceting in Solr has two phases: Collecting counts for tags in facets and extracting the requested tags. The execution time for the collecting phase is approximately linear to the number of hits and the number of references from hits to tags. This phase is not the focus here. The extraction time scales with the number of unique tags in the search result, but is also heavily influenced by the total number of unique tags in the facet as every counter, 0 or not, is visited by the extractor (at least for count order). For fields with millions of unique tag values this means 10s of milliseconds added to the minimum response
Re: Testing a custom distributed component
bq. so helper methods aren't there Yeah, it would be nice to pull those out so they can easily be used in both cases. -- - Mark http://about.me/markrmiller On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Steve Davids sdav...@gmail.com wrote: If you don't want to use the BaseDistributedSearchTestCase http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_0/solr-test-framework/org/apache/solr/BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.html you can utilize the newly introduced MiniSolrCloudCluster ( http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_0/solr-test-framework/org/apache/solr/cloud/MiniSolrCloudCluster.html) it works rather well. This class doesn't extend the base solr tests case so helper methods aren't there, instead you can use that class to spin up a CloudSolrServer to index/query to your liking within the test. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 30, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Yonatan Nakar snak...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to write unit tests for a search component of my own. My component is intended to run in a distributed setting only. The problem is that it seems like Solr's testing framework doesn't make it easy to write unit tests for distributed test components. What is the right way to test such a component? More details about my problem here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25586021/testing-a-solr-distributed-component
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4919) Allow setting ResponseParser and RequestWriter on LBHttpSolrServer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116807#comment-14116807 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-4919: The parser writer methods *are* there now. Apparently it got in as part of SOLR-3249 which landed in Solr 4.5. Time to close this issue? Allow setting ResponseParser and RequestWriter on LBHttpSolrServer -- Key: SOLR-4919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4919 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: clients - java Affects Versions: 4.3 Reporter: Shawn Heisey Assignee: Shawn Heisey Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.9, 5.0 Attachments: SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SOLR-4919.patch, SolrExampleJettyTest-testfail.txt, SolrExampleStreamingTest-failure-linux.txt, TestReplicationHandler-testfail.txt Patch to allow setting parser/writer on LBHttpSolrServer. Will only work if no server objects exist within. Part of larger issue SOLR-4715. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6456) SolrServer: add setRequestWriter and setParser
David Smiley created SOLR-6456:
--
Summary: SolrServer: add setRequestWriter and setParser
Key: SOLR-6456
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6456
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients - java
Reporter: David Smiley
Nearly every subclass of SolrServer supports setRequestWriter setParser.
It's crazy that if you have to cast your SolrServer to it's particular subclass
implementation. I want to have code like this without the cast:
{code:java}
if (useXml) {
solrServer.setRequestWriter(new RequestWriter());
solrServer.setParser(new XMLResponseParser());
} else {//javabin
solrServer.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
solrServer.setParser(new BinaryResponseParser());
}
{code}
EmbeddedSolrServer could simply log a warning... treating matters like this as
a hint.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6457) loadblance will not work when count Integer.MAX_VALUE
longkeyy created SOLR-6457: -- Summary: loadblance will not work when count Integer.MAX_VALUE Key: SOLR-6457 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6457 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: clients - java Affects Versions: 4.9, 4.8.1, 4.8, 4.7.2, 4.7.1, 4.7, 4.6.1, 4.6, 4.5.1, 4.5, 4.4, 4.3.1, 4.3, 4.2.1, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0 Reporter: longkeyy org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrServer line 442 int count = counter.incrementAndGet(); ServerWrapper wrapper = serverList[count % serverList.length]; when count Integer.MAX_VALUE count % serverList.length will loop by 0,-1,0,-1.. suggess to fixup it ,eg: //keep count is greater than 0 int count = counter.incrementAndGet() 0x7FF; -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1803 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/1803/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerStatusTest.testDistribSearch Error Message: reloadcollection the collection time out:180s Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException: reloadcollection the collection time out:180s at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5A92393B9AB95AF1:DB74B723EDE63ACD]:0) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.executeMethod(HttpSolrServer.java:550) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:210) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:206) at org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.invokeCollectionApi(AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.java:1744) at org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerStatusTest.doTest(OverseerStatusTest.java:103) at org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.testDistribSearch(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:869) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor36.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:836) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:738) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:772) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:783) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6458) SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z]
Mark Miller created SOLR-6458: - Summary: SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z] Key: SOLR-6458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458 Project: Solr Issue Type: Test Components: Tests Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark Miller Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6458) SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z]
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116824#comment-14116824 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6458: --- Commit 1621610 from [~markrmil...@gmail.com] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1621610 ] SOLR-6458: Hard coded ENGLISH locale for AbstractSolrMorphlineTestBase tests. SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z] --- Key: SOLR-6458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458 Project: Solr Issue Type: Test Components: Tests Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark Miller Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6458) SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z]
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116823#comment-14116823 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6458: --- Commit 1621609 from [~markrmil...@gmail.com] in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1621609 ] SOLR-6458: Hard coded ENGLISH locale for AbstractSolrMorphlineTestBase tests. SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z] --- Key: SOLR-6458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458 Project: Solr Issue Type: Test Components: Tests Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark Miller Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-5926) Add ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin to Ref Guide (cwiki)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson closed SOLR-5926. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 4.9) 4.10 Thanks Chris! I added a little (mostly took the existing Wiki page and edited). I think it's enough for now at least. Add ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin to Ref Guide (cwiki) --- Key: SOLR-5926 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5926 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: 4.7 Reporter: Ahmet Arslan Assignee: Erick Erickson Priority: Minor Labels: documentation Fix For: 5.0, 4.10 Documentation of http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ComplexPhraseQueryParser in the ref guide, Other Parsers section. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4351) JSON QParser integration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116827#comment-14116827 ] Manuel Lenormand commented on SOLR-4351: Is there any way to convert any Query object into a json representation instead of building it by my own? Is there any jsonQueryBuilder? Has anyone found bugs or unimplemented functionalities in this Jira before I get it into test environment? JSON QParser integration Key: SOLR-4351 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4351 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Yonik Seeley Attachments: SOLR-4351.patch Our QParser framework currently gets parameters from localParams. JSON integration would allow specifying parameters to the parsers in JSON. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-6458) SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z]
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller resolved SOLR-6458. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.11 5.0 SolrCellMorphlineTest.testSolrCellDocumentTypes2 fail: ignored_creation_date expected:[2007-10-01T16:13:56Z] but was:[1464-10-01T16:13:56Z] --- Key: SOLR-6458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6458 Project: Solr Issue Type: Test Components: Tests Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark Miller Priority: Minor Fix For: 5.0, 4.11 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-5896) Create and edit a CWiki page that describes UpdateRequestProcessors, especially FieldMutatingUpdateProcessors
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson closed SOLR-5896. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.10 Short descriptions are added to the Reference Guide. There's room for any supporting detail we need, but at least it lets users know these exists. Create and edit a CWiki page that describes UpdateRequestProcessors, especially FieldMutatingUpdateProcessors - Key: SOLR-5896 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5896 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: 4.8, 5.0 Reporter: Erick Erickson Assignee: Erick Erickson Fix For: 4.10 The capabilities here aren't really documented as a group anywhere I could see in the official pages, there are a couple of references to them but nothing that really serves draws attention. These need to be documented. Where does it make sense to put this? It doesn't really fit under Understanding Analyzers, Tokenizers, and Filters, except kinda since they can be used to alter how data gets indexed, think of the Parse[Date|Int|Float..] factories. Straw-man: add child pages to Understanding Analyzers, Tokenizers, and Filters for What is an UpdateRequestProcessor, UpdateRequestProcessors, and probably something like How to configure your UpdateRequestProcessor. Or??? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Odd test failures
It's because the exception is triggered in a static class
FaultyIndexInput (initialized in a static context
TestFieldsReader#beforeClass). When you ask for -Dtests.iters, only
the tests (methods) are duplicated, the static context remains the
same. So the count variable in FaultyIndexInput is actually
propagated from test to test and each repetition is not really atomic/
isolated from others (search for one of recent e-mail to Ryan, it
contains a deeper information on why and how this works).
You can repeat the failure if you repeat exactly the same seed for
each repetition (including test methods):
ant test -Dtestcase=TestFieldsReader
-Dtests.seed=DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867 -Dtests.slow=true
-Dtests.locale=sr_ME -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Kashgar
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Dtests.iters=10
This yields:
Tests with failures:
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#1
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#2
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#3
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#4
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#5
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#6
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#7
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#8
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#9
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
Note I included per-method seed in the -Dtests.seed. Also, #0
iteration *does pass*; the remaining ones fail because of what I said
above.
Dawid
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing the fairly easily-reproducible error below on trunk.
Unfortunately it doesn't reproduce with the seed. I'm wondering if anyone
has an inkling what's going on here?
I did manage to notice that I screwed up the command I was _intending_ and
actually issued the command below, although I have a hard time imagining
that's the problem, unless it's something like running tests.iters on the
full suite makes this happen. No wonder -Dtests.iters=100 didn't finish...
Siii.
ant -Dtestcasae=TestDistributedSearch -Dtests.iters=10 test
Note I spelled 'testcase' as 'testcasae'...
Stack trace:
[junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader
[junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=TestFieldsReader
-Dtests.method=testExceptions -Dtests.seed=DFB0B84C4D087DFD
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sr_ME -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Kashgar
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
[junit4] ERROR 0.10s J2 | TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#1
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
[junit4] Throwable #1: java.io.IOException: Simulated network outage
[junit4] at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]:0)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader$FaultyIndexInput.simOutage(TestFieldsReader.java:156)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader$FaultyIndexInput.readInternal(TestFieldsReader.java:161)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.refill(BufferedIndexInput.java:342)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedIndexInput.java:140)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedIndexInput.java:116)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedChecksumIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedChecksumIndexInput.java:49)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.DataInput.readString(DataInput.java:234)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.DataInput.readStringStringMap(DataInput.java:263)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene46.Lucene46FieldInfosReader.read(Lucene46FieldInfosReader.java:93)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.readFieldInfos(SegmentReader.java:216)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.init(SegmentReader.java:97)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:59)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:795)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:50)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:64)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions(TestFieldsReader.java:209)
[junit4] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
[junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce
Re: Odd test failures
Thanks Dawid! So my take-away is that this is just pilot error on my part,
not something intrinsic to the code.
Erick
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl
wrote:
It's because the exception is triggered in a static class
FaultyIndexInput (initialized in a static context
TestFieldsReader#beforeClass). When you ask for -Dtests.iters, only
the tests (methods) are duplicated, the static context remains the
same. So the count variable in FaultyIndexInput is actually
propagated from test to test and each repetition is not really atomic/
isolated from others (search for one of recent e-mail to Ryan, it
contains a deeper information on why and how this works).
You can repeat the failure if you repeat exactly the same seed for
each repetition (including test methods):
ant test -Dtestcase=TestFieldsReader
-Dtests.seed=DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867 -Dtests.slow=true
-Dtests.locale=sr_ME -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Kashgar
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Dtests.iters=10
This yields:
Tests with failures:
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#1
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#2
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#3
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#4
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#5
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#6
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#7
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#8
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
- org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#9
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
Note I included per-method seed in the -Dtests.seed. Also, #0
iteration *does pass*; the remaining ones fail because of what I said
above.
Dawid
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm seeing the fairly easily-reproducible error below on trunk.
Unfortunately it doesn't reproduce with the seed. I'm wondering if anyone
has an inkling what's going on here?
I did manage to notice that I screwed up the command I was _intending_
and
actually issued the command below, although I have a hard time imagining
that's the problem, unless it's something like running tests.iters on the
full suite makes this happen. No wonder -Dtests.iters=100 didn't
finish...
Siii.
ant -Dtestcasae=TestDistributedSearch -Dtests.iters=10 test
Note I spelled 'testcase' as 'testcasae'...
Stack trace:
[junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader
[junit4] 2 NOTE: reproduce with: ant test
-Dtestcase=TestFieldsReader
-Dtests.method=testExceptions -Dtests.seed=DFB0B84C4D087DFD
-Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sr_ME -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Kashgar
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
[junit4] ERROR 0.10s J2 | TestFieldsReader.testExceptions {#1
seed=[DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]}
[junit4] Throwable #1: java.io.IOException: Simulated network
outage
[junit4] at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DFB0B84C4D087DFD:1DE75618D1B7C867]:0)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader$FaultyIndexInput.simOutage(TestFieldsReader.java:156)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader$FaultyIndexInput.readInternal(TestFieldsReader.java:161)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.refill(BufferedIndexInput.java:342)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedIndexInput.java:140)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedIndexInput.java:116)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedChecksumIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedChecksumIndexInput.java:49)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.DataInput.readString(DataInput.java:234)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.store.DataInput.readStringStringMap(DataInput.java:263)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene46.Lucene46FieldInfosReader.read(Lucene46FieldInfosReader.java:93)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.readFieldInfos(SegmentReader.java:216)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.init(SegmentReader.java:97)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:59)
[junit4] at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:795)
[junit4] at
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6024) StatsComponent does not work for docValues enabled multiValued fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vitaliy Zhovtyuk updated SOLR-6024:
---
Attachment: SOLR-6024-trunk.patch
Patch based on latest added trunk patch.
Added stats calculation tests for docValues and multiValued fields of float and
integer numeric types, added calculate distinct count, added stats.facet query
on docValues field (leads to field type exception)
StatsComponent does not work for docValues enabled multiValued fields
-
Key: SOLR-6024
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6024
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SearchComponents - other
Affects Versions: 4.8
Environment: java version 1.7.0_45
Mac OS X Version 10.7.5
Reporter: Ahmet Arslan
Labels: StatsComponent, docValues, multiValued
Fix For: 4.9
Attachments: SOLR-6024-trunk.patch, SOLR-6024-trunk.patch,
SOLR-6024-trunk.patch, SOLR-6024-trunk.patch, SOLR-6024-trunk.patch,
SOLR-6024.patch, SOLR-6024.patch
Harish Agarwal reported this in solr user mailing list :
http://search-lucene.com/m/QTPaoTJXV1
It is east to re-produce with default example solr setup. Following types are
added example schema.xml. And exampledocs are indexed.
{code:xml}
field name=cat type=string indexed=true stored=true
docValues=true multiValued=true/
field name=popularity type=int indexed=true stored=false
docValues=true multiValued=true/
{code}
When {{docValues=true}} *and* {{multiValued=true}} are used at the same
time, StatsComponent throws :
{noformat}
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Type mismatch: popularity was indexed as SORTED_SET
at
org.apache.solr.request.UnInvertedField.init(UnInvertedField.java:193)
at
org.apache.solr.request.UnInvertedField.getUnInvertedField(UnInvertedField.java:699)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SimpleStats.getStatsFields(StatsComponent.java:319)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SimpleStats.getStatsCounts(StatsComponent.java:290)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent.process(StatsComponent.java:78)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:221)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1964)
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5914) More options for stored fields compression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116904#comment-14116904 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-5914: -- [~erickerickson] [~elyograg] Do you have pointers to emails/irc logs describing such issues? Maybe that is something that can be solved without disabling compression? By the way, the current patch already improves CPU usage in two cases: when doing random access since you can decompress a single document at a time, and also sequential access (typically used if you export your current dataset using stored fields, or internally by Lucene when merging mixed codecs) so maybe that would already help. [~rcmuir] I will change this. More options for stored fields compression -- Key: LUCENE-5914 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Fix For: 4.11 Attachments: LUCENE-5914.patch Since we added codec-level compression in Lucene 4.1 I think I got about the same amount of users complaining that compression was too aggressive and that compression was too light. I think it is due to the fact that we have users that are doing very different things with Lucene. For example if you have a small index that fits in the filesystem cache (or is close to), then you might never pay for actual disk seeks and in such a case the fact that the current stored fields format needs to over-decompress data can sensibly slow search down on cheap queries. On the other hand, it is more and more common to use Lucene for things like log analytics, and in that case you have huge amounts of data for which you don't care much about stored fields performance. However it is very frustrating to notice that the data that you store takes several times less space when you gzip it compared to your index although Lucene claims to compress stored fields. For that reason, I think it would be nice to have some kind of options that would allow to trade speed for compression in the default codec. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_20) - Build # 11017 - Failure!
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/11017/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_20 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC 6 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleBinaryTest.testChildDoctransformer Error Message: Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got text/html. html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1/ titleError 500 Server Error/title /head body h2HTTP ERROR: 500/h2 pProblem accessing /solr/collection1/select. Reason: preServer Error/pre/p hr /ismallPowered by Jetty:///small/i /body /html Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException: Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got text/html. html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1/ titleError 500 Server Error/title /head body h2HTTP ERROR: 500/h2 pProblem accessing /solr/collection1/select. Reason: preServer Error/pre/p hr /ismallPowered by Jetty:///small/i /body /html at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([EA23CFBE5BD580A8:99F9D024D7CDF7AE]:0) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.executeMethod(HttpSolrServer.java:512) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:210) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:206) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.QueryRequest.process(QueryRequest.java:91) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer.query(SolrServer.java:301) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleTests.testChildDoctransformer(SolrExampleTests.java:1373) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleFieldCacheSanity$1.evaluate(TestRuleFieldCacheSanity.java:51) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5914) More options for stored fields compression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116926#comment-14116926 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5914: - [~jpountz] well I just was curious about the motivation behind it. There are advantages and disadvantages to each way, but as separate formats each use case would really be able to proceed in its own direction in the future. With the current patch, BEST_COMPRESSION = Deflate, but what if we wanted to replace this with bzip later and still support the old indexes etc (which I think is a goal of this issue). So I think its better to have separate formats (if they want to share some code behind the scenes at the moment, thats ok). If we want to provide back compat on both options, then thats something we can decide to do here (IMO, there should be a price for the added complexity, such as moving all ancient codecs out of lucene/core, dropping 3.x index support, something to keep it all manageable). More options for stored fields compression -- Key: LUCENE-5914 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Adrien Grand Assignee: Adrien Grand Fix For: 4.11 Attachments: LUCENE-5914.patch Since we added codec-level compression in Lucene 4.1 I think I got about the same amount of users complaining that compression was too aggressive and that compression was too light. I think it is due to the fact that we have users that are doing very different things with Lucene. For example if you have a small index that fits in the filesystem cache (or is close to), then you might never pay for actual disk seeks and in such a case the fact that the current stored fields format needs to over-decompress data can sensibly slow search down on cheap queries. On the other hand, it is more and more common to use Lucene for things like log analytics, and in that case you have huge amounts of data for which you don't care much about stored fields performance. However it is very frustrating to notice that the data that you store takes several times less space when you gzip it compared to your index although Lucene claims to compress stored fields. For that reason, I think it would be nice to have some kind of options that would allow to trade speed for compression in the default codec. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_20) - Build # 4285 - Still Failing!
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4285/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_20 -server -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.ConcurrentUpdateSolrServerTest.testConcurrentUpdate Error Message: Expected no errors but got 1, due to: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: The target server failed to respond Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: Expected no errors but got 1, due to: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: The target server failed to respond at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([30B2572329F37260:C8B40ED8FDCB172B]:0) at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93) at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.ConcurrentUpdateSolrServerTest.testConcurrentUpdate(ConcurrentUpdateSolrServerTest.java:189) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:836) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:738) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:772) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:783) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 613 - Still Failing
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/613/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOutOfMemory.testBasics Error Message: TEST-TestIndexWriterOutOfMemory.testBasics-seed#[C4C9D7B4B9D5D290]: RefCount is 0 pre-decrement for file _2_2_Lucene410_0.dvd Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: TEST-TestIndexWriterOutOfMemory.testBasics-seed#[C4C9D7B4B9D5D290]: RefCount is 0 pre-decrement for file _2_2_Lucene410_0.dvd at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C4C9D7B4B9D5D290:F9117998813B8CE0]:0) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileDeleter$RefCount.DecRef(IndexFileDeleter.java:725) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileDeleter.decRef(IndexFileDeleter.java:611) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileDeleter.decRef(IndexFileDeleter.java:599) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.prepareCommitInternal(IndexWriter.java:2851) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.commitInternal(IndexWriter.java:2952) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.commit(IndexWriter.java:2919) at org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOutOfMemory.testBasics(TestIndexWriterOutOfMemory.java:215) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:836) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:738) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:772) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:783) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at
[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7 - Build # 4822 - Failure
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7/4822/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.TestLBHttpSolrServer.testReliability Error Message: No live SolrServers available to handle this request Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServers available to handle this request at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([AEC23B5D5F18357D:6F0AE61BFE7EE4D4]:0) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrServer.request(LBHttpSolrServer.java:525) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.QueryRequest.process(QueryRequest.java:91) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer.query(SolrServer.java:301) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.TestLBHttpSolrServer.testReliability(TestLBHttpSolrServer.java:222) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:836) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:738) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:772) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:783) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:43) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36) at
