[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11237) Admin UI replication tab iterations sorted in datetime order
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jesse McLaughlin updated SOLR-11237: Attachment: replication_tab.png SOLR-11237.patch > Admin UI replication tab iterations sorted in datetime order > > > Key: SOLR-11237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11237 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Affects Versions: master (8.0) >Reporter: Jesse McLaughlin >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: replication_tab.png, SOLR-11237.patch > > > The replication tab on the Solr Admin UI is not properly sorted by datetime > order. The code appears to want to sort it, but it doesn't work. > Attached a patch to fix this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11237) Admin UI replication tab iterations sorted in datetime order
Jesse McLaughlin created SOLR-11237: --- Summary: Admin UI replication tab iterations sorted in datetime order Key: SOLR-11237 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11237 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public) Affects Versions: master (8.0) Reporter: Jesse McLaughlin Priority: Trivial The replication tab on the Solr Admin UI is not properly sorted by datetime order. The code appears to want to sort it, but it doesn't work. Attached a patch to fix this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9176) Legacy Faceting Term Enum Method Regression
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15308770#comment-15308770 ] Jesse McLaughlin commented on SOLR-9176: Here's a representative, minimal patch that restores the old 4.x behaviour: https://github.com/nzjess/lucene-solr/commit/512298fc153738cc0d323dfc7aadbde241085d5b Haven't re-run the unit tests on this, but you get the idea... > Legacy Faceting Term Enum Method Regression > --- > > Key: SOLR-9176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: faceting >Affects Versions: 5.2, 5.2.1, 5.3, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.5, 5.5.1, > 6.0, 6.0.1 >Reporter: Alessandro Benedetti > > Starting from this commit : > LUCENE-5666: get solr started > git-svn-id: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene5666@1594254 > 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/1489085807cb10981a7ea5b5663ada4e3f85953e#diff-5ac9dc7b128b4dd99b764060759222b2 > It is not possible to use Term Enum as a faceting method, for numeric and > single valued fields ( org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets ) . > We personally verified that there are use cases when this is bringing a quite > big performance regression ( even with DocValues enabled) . > In the mailing list from time to time people complain about a regression > happening with the term enum method, but actually it is more likely to be the > automatic forcing of FCS. > Forcing FCS in co-op with the famous regression that happened in SOLR-8096 > could be confused as a term Enum regression. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
