[jira] [Created] (SOLR-7762) Missing background-color in admin interface

2015-07-07 Thread Philip Willoughby (JIRA)
Philip Willoughby created SOLR-7762:
---

 Summary: Missing background-color in admin interface
 Key: SOLR-7762
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7762
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Philip Willoughby
Priority: Minor


CSS in the sdmin interface sets color: #333, but no background-color; if the 
user has a dark default background set in their browser it is illegible.

Adding background-color: #fff; to the body, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, a, button, 
input, select, option, textarea, th, td rule in common.css fixes it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-247) Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)

2015-07-02 Thread Philip Willoughby (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14611625#comment-14611625
 ] 

Philip Willoughby commented on SOLR-247:


[~erickerickson] Yes, we could do that. We don't use the schema browser on this 
core because it crashes or locks up the browser. The underlying /admin/luke 
endpoint takes over 12 seconds to respond (with 20280 known fields already this 
is not surprising) so we wouldn't be able to meet our 100ms SLA without 
re-architecting our application so that it's no longer stateless, which is a 
big step we aren't willing to take.

We are working around this by using both indexing approaches I outlined above 
and mixing the facets together correctly in application logic.

 Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)
 --

 Key: SOLR-247
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Priority: Minor
  Labels: beginners, newdev
 Attachments: SOLR-247-FacetAllFields.patch, SOLR-247.patch, 
 SOLR-247.patch, SOLR-247.patch


 I don't know if this is a good idea to include -- it is potentially a bad 
 idea to use it, but that can be ok.
 This came out of trying to use faceting for the LukeRequestHandler top term 
 collecting.
 http://www.nabble.com/Luke-request-handler-issue-tf3762155.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-247) Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)

2015-06-30 Thread Philip Willoughby (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14608334#comment-14608334
 ] 

Philip Willoughby commented on SOLR-247:


We have a concrete use-case for which this facility is required. We have a 
requirement to add arbitrary tags in arbitrary groups to products, and to be 
able to filter by those tags in the same way as you can filter our documents by 
more-structured attributes (e.g. price, discount, size, designer, etc). The 
semantics we want are to ignore the filter on property X when faceting property 
X.

With our known-in-advance fields this is easy: taking the example of designers 
we add an fq={!tag=did}designer_id:## for filtering and add 
facet.field={!ex=did}designer_id when looking for designer facets.

With these unknown-in-advance fields it is hard: what we had hoped to do was 
use facet.field=arbitrary_tag_* to generate the tag group facets and then if 
someone filters to group X=Y we'd add fq={!tag=atX}arbitrary_tag_X:Y for the 
filter and pass facet.field={!ex=atX}arbitrary_tag_X to get the facets. Of 
course in this case we would also want to pass facet.field=arbitrary_tag_* to 
get the facets over the other tags which means faceting arbitrary_tag_X twice, 
and creates a precedence problem.

We want, I think, facet.field=arbitrary_tag_* to work, but to be disregarded 
for any field it would otherwise match which is explicitly named as a 
facet.field

The other model we have considered is to combine every group and tag into a 
string like group\u001Ftag, put them all into a field named tags and facet 
over that. But this means that we can't disregard the filters over group X when 
faceting group X while respecting them while faceting group Y etc without 
making multiple queries.

 Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)
 --

 Key: SOLR-247
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Priority: Minor
  Labels: beginners, newdev
 Attachments: SOLR-247-FacetAllFields.patch, SOLR-247.patch, 
 SOLR-247.patch, SOLR-247.patch


 I don't know if this is a good idea to include -- it is potentially a bad 
 idea to use it, but that can be ok.
 This came out of trying to use faceting for the LukeRequestHandler top term 
 collecting.
 http://www.nabble.com/Luke-request-handler-issue-tf3762155.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org