Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Ignacio, When you do the final release steps, please try out the updated addVersion.py here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8883 which generate more complete and consistent new version sections in CHANGES.txt for our next release. I should commit this. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:58 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: > > > +1 8 (5 binding) > > 0 0 > > -1 0 > > > This vote has PASSED > > > I am +1 to have a separate ANNOUNCE mail in Solr mailing list about the > bad default as this is not specific to this release. > > > >
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 8 (5 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED I am +1 to have a separate ANNOUNCE mail in Solr mailing list about the bad default as this is not specific to this release.
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Jason, I’ll not veto the release either. Propose to author an ANNOUNCE mail to solr-user@l.a.o and Solr website news that states the bad default and ask users of 8.1/8.2 to fix their config. Jason, would you be able to author and send such an email? I’m not at work until Monday.. PS: should the project have a security-announce list, RSS, slack channel or whatever that users could subscribe to for such notifications as well as CVE announcements? Jan Høydahl > 24. jul. 2019 kl. 17:18 skrev Jason Gerlowski : > > To throw my 2 cents in on SOLR-13647. > > Yes, users can fix the problem trivially by updating their solr.in.sh > _if_ they're aware of the issue. And we recommend all users examine > their config carefully when upgrading Solr versions, so users _should_ > be aware of the issue. But at the same time, the expectation/promise > in previous releases has been that solr.in.sh has no effect (is > entirely commented out) by default. So while we tell users to check > all config files for themselves, we also tell them elsewhere that > solr.in.sh is a bit of an exception out of the box. I think the "well > the users should have checked" stance is a little simplistic in this > case. > > I wouldn't be against a respin, though I won't scuttle the vote if no > one else feels strongly about it. But if there's no respin I think we > should make an effort to highlight this potential issue either in the > release announcement, release notes, or CHANGES.txt. > > Jason > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:36 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] >> >>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Adrien >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
To throw my 2 cents in on SOLR-13647. Yes, users can fix the problem trivially by updating their solr.in.sh _if_ they're aware of the issue. And we recommend all users examine their config carefully when upgrading Solr versions, so users _should_ be aware of the issue. But at the same time, the expectation/promise in previous releases has been that solr.in.sh has no effect (is entirely commented out) by default. So while we tell users to check all config files for themselves, we also tell them elsewhere that solr.in.sh is a bit of an exception out of the box. I think the "well the users should have checked" stance is a little simplistic in this case. I wouldn't be against a respin, though I won't scuttle the vote if no one else feels strongly about it. But if there's no respin I think we should make an effort to highlight this potential issue either in the release announcement, release notes, or CHANGES.txt. Jason On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:36 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] > > > On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > >> > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > >> > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:51:04.098987] > On 23 Jul 2019, at 14:01, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hi, Two issues have been raised: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647: This is something that has always been released (included in 8.1.0 and 8.1.1). It is a bad default parameter when starting Solr in Linux machines and can be easily corrected by a user by commenting out the default or changing the value. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545: As I understand this change has introduced some flakiness in a tests but has no practical impact to the users. I believe those issues are not affecting the functionality of Lucene / Solr and therefore I will continue with this vote without respin, otherwise someone state the opposite. I will be closing the vote tomorrow so please speak up before then if you have any concern. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:59 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Agree with you. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it >> triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to >> release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing >> to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 >> instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers >> now. >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 >> > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 >> just to unblock respin, WDYT? >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. >> I think it warrants a respin. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> >> >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : >> >> >> >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] >> >> >> >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is >> needed? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> >> (maybe non-binding) >> >> >> >> And Luke works fine. >> >> >> >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> >> >> >> >> >> Java 13 also worked. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Uwe Schindler >> >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >> here: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and >> index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also >> tri
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Agree with you. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it > triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to > release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing > to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 > instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers > now. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 > > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just > to unblock respin, WDYT? > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl > wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. > I think it warrants a respin. > >> > >> -- > >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >> > >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > >> > >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > >> > >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is > needed? > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden > wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > >> > >> Kevin Risden > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 (non binding) > >> > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> > >> > >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > >> (maybe non-binding) > >> > >> And Luke works fine. > >> > >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > >> > >> > >> Java 13 also worked. > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Uwe Schindler > >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > >> > >> > >> > >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > >> > >> > >> > >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > >> > >> > >> > >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > >> > >> > >> > >> So +1 to release this. > >> > >> > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> Uwe Schindler > >> > >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > >> > >> https://www.thetaphi.de > >> > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ignacio Vera > >> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > >> > >> > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > >> > >> > >> > >> You can run the smoke tester dir
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Does it have a practical impact to users, or is the fact that it triggers test failures the main annoyance? We have been trying to release what was 8.1.2 at the time since June 12th and kept postponing to the point that we decided to cancel 8.1.2 and focus on 8.2.0 instead. In my opinion we should set the bar very high for blockers now. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > Hello, > Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 > I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just to > unblock respin, WDYT? > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: >> >> Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I >> think it warrants a respin. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : >> >> I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] >> >> Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: >> >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> >> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> wrote: >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> (maybe non-binding) >> >> And Luke works fine. >> >> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> >> >> Java 13 also worked. >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> From: Uwe Schindler >> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> >> >> >> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> >> >> >> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index >> example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried >> to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: >> worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory >> backwards break was prevented. >> >> >> >> So +1 to release this. >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> From: Ignacio Vera >> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Atri >> Apache Concerted >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hello, Please be informed about BasicAuthIntegrationTest failures https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13545?focusedCommentId=16891389=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16891389 I'll check it today. I propose to revert SOLR-13545 from branch_8_2 just to unblock respin, WDYT? On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I > think it warrants a respin. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > > I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > > Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > > Kevin Risden > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > (maybe non-binding) > > And Luke works fine. > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [2:34:16.487011] On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 to release (non-binding) Tested Lucene with my dailyjob application. Regards, Martin On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 3:49 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Ignacio Vera > *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Are you sure? This already existed in 8.1, so its not a regression introduced by 8.2. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 12:43 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I think it warrants a respin. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com <http://www.cominvent.com> 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov mailto:msoko...@gmail.com> >: I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden mailto:kris...@apache.org> > wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] Kevin Risden On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma mailto:a...@apache.org> > wrote: +1 (non binding) +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand mailto:jpou...@gmail.com> > wrote: Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> > wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] (maybe non-binding) And Luke works fine. 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> >: Java 13 also worked. - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Uwe Schindler mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hmm, have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13647. I think it warrants a respin. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 22. jul. 2019 kl. 23:46 skrev Michael Sokolov : > > I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > > Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >>>> >>>> Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >>>>> (maybe non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> And Luke works fine. >>>>> >>>>> 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >>>>>> >>>>>> Java 13 also worked. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>> >>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >>>>>> here: >>>>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index >>>>>> example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also >>>>>> tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my >>>>>> customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the >>>>>> analysis factory backwards break was prevented. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So +1 to release this. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>> >>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Ignacio Vera >>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Adrien >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Atri >>> Apache Concerted >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
I keep getting ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] Maybe the system I am trying to run on is lacking a CA cert that is needed? On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] > > Kevin Risden > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> > >> > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] >> > > (maybe non-binding) >> > > >> > > And Luke works fine. >> > > >> > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : >> > > > >> > > > Java 13 also worked. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > >> > > > Uwe Schindler >> > > > >> > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > > > >> > > > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > From: Uwe Schindler >> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM >> > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see >> > > > here: >> > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and >> > > > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I >> > > > also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one >> > > > of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that >> > > > the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > So +1 to release this. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Uwe >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > >> > > > Uwe Schindler >> > > > >> > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> > > > >> > > > https://www.thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > From: Ignacio Vera >> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM >> > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe >> > > > >> > > > Here is my +1 >> > > > >> > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Atri >> Apache Concerted >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:37:46.956358] Kevin Risden On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:41 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > > > (maybe non-binding) > > > > > > And Luke works fine. > > > > > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, > see here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and > index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 (non binding) +1 SUCCESS! [1:17:24.828393] On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida > wrote: > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > > (maybe non-binding) > > > > And Luke works fine. > > > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see > > > here: > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > > > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also > > > tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > > > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the > > > analysis factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Non binding indeed, but we appreciate help with testing releases! On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:03 PM Tomoko Uchida wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] > (maybe non-binding) > > And Luke works fine. > > 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my > > customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis > > factory backwards break was prevented. > > > > > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > - > > > > Uwe Schindler > > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:31:37.834967] (maybe non-binding) And Luke works fine. 2019年7月21日(日) 21:52 Uwe Schindler : > > Java 13 also worked. > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: > > > > SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] > > > > (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console > > > > I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index > example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried > to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: > worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory > backwards break was prevented. > > > > So +1 to release this. > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Ignacio Vera > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe > > Here is my +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Java 13 also worked. - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:49 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Hi, I asked Policeman to run the smoke tester on my behalf, he responded: SUCCESS! [3:04:23.084427] (this was testing Java 8 and Java 9 module system). More details, see here: <https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/25/console I was also able to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 on Windows and index example documents. I also analyzed some Korean text, all fine. I also tried to run a custom plugin (query parsing and analysis) for one of my customers: worked. As I did not recompile it, it verifies that the analysis factory backwards break was prevented. So +1 to release this. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Ignacio Vera Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 8:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 RC1
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.2.0-RC1-rev31d7ec7bbfdcd2c4cc61d9d35e962165410b65fe Here is my +1 SUCCESS! [1:19:01.246595]
