[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14953084#comment-14953084
]
Jack Krupansky edited comment on LUCENE-6301 at 10/12/15 12:58 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I know this change has been in progress for awhile, but it just kind of sunk
for me finally and now I'm wondering what the impact on Solr will be. I mean,
wasn't Filter supposed to be a big performance win over a Query since it
eliminates the performance impact of scoring? If that was the case, is Lucene
proving some alternate method of achieving a similar performance improvement? I
think it is, but... not stated quite so explicitly. An example of the expected
migration would help a lot. I think the example should be in the Lucene Javadoc
- "To filter documents without the performance overhead of scoring, use the
following technique..." If I understand properly, one would simply wrap the
query in a BooleanQuery with a single clause that uses
BooleanQuery.Clause.FILTER and that would have exactly the same effect (and
performance gain) as the old Filter class. Is that statement 100% accurate? If
so, it would be good to make it explicit here in Jira, in the deprecation
comment in the the Filter class, and in BooleanQuery as well. Thanks!
was (Author: jkrupan):
I know this change has been in progress for awhile, but it just kind of sunk
for me finally in and now I'm wondering what the impact on Solr will be. I
mean, wasn't Filter supposed to be a big performance win over a Query since it
eliminates the performance impact of scoring? If that was the case, is Lucene
proving some alternate method of achieving a similar performance improvement? I
think it is, but... not stated quite so explicitly. An example of the expected
migration would help a lot. I think the example should be in the Lucene Javadoc
- "To filter documents without the performance overhead of scoring, use the
following technique..." If I understand properly, one would simply wrap the
query in a BooleanQuery with a single clause that uses
BooleanQuery.Clause.FILTER and that would have exactly the same effect (and
performance gain) as the old Filter class. Is that statement 100% accurate? If
so, it would be good to make it explicit here in Jira, in the deprecation
comment in the the Filter class, and in BooleanQuery as well. Thanks!
> Deprecate Filter
> ----------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6301
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6301
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Fix For: 5.2, Trunk
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6301.patch, LUCENE-6301.patch
>
>
> It will still take time to completely remove Filter, but I think we should
> start deprecating it now to state our intention and encourage users to move
> to queries as soon as possible?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
