[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5483) hunspell inaccuracies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14077830#comment-14077830 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5483: - Commit 1614388 from [~mikemccand] in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1614388 ] LUCENE-5483: IndexWriter now enforces max docs in one index hunspell inaccuracies - Key: LUCENE-5483 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.8, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-5483.patch, LUCENE-5483.patch I added a lot of tests and greatly refined this algorithm to match correct hunspell behavior. there were many bugs: * recursionLimit was a hack: this is actually specified by the dictionary to be twofold suffix + one prefix, or if COMPLEXPREFIXES is specified, twofold prefix + one suffix. This patch removes cursion limit * recursion didn't work correctly: it didnt validate multi-level continuation classes correctly. * add COMPLEXPREFIXES support. * probably other minor bugs fixed in the process. I validated all testing against hunspell -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5483) hunspell inaccuracies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14077880#comment-14077880 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5483: Woops, that commit message was meant for LUCENE-5843 instead... I corrected the svn log. hunspell inaccuracies - Key: LUCENE-5483 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.8, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-5483.patch, LUCENE-5483.patch I added a lot of tests and greatly refined this algorithm to match correct hunspell behavior. there were many bugs: * recursionLimit was a hack: this is actually specified by the dictionary to be twofold suffix + one prefix, or if COMPLEXPREFIXES is specified, twofold prefix + one suffix. This patch removes cursion limit * recursion didn't work correctly: it didnt validate multi-level continuation classes correctly. * add COMPLEXPREFIXES support. * probably other minor bugs fixed in the process. I validated all testing against hunspell -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5483) hunspell inaccuracies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13917260#comment-13917260 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-5483: +1 hunspell inaccuracies - Key: LUCENE-5483 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Attachments: LUCENE-5483.patch, LUCENE-5483.patch I added a lot of tests and greatly refined this algorithm to match correct hunspell behavior. there were many bugs: * recursionLimit was a hack: this is actually specified by the dictionary to be twofold suffix + one prefix, or if COMPLEXPREFIXES is specified, twofold prefix + one suffix. This patch removes cursion limit * recursion didn't work correctly: it didnt validate multi-level continuation classes correctly. * add COMPLEXPREFIXES support. * probably other minor bugs fixed in the process. I validated all testing against hunspell -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5483) hunspell inaccuracies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13917258#comment-13917258 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5483: - Commit 1573248 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1573248 ] LUCENE-5483: fix hunspell inaccuracies hunspell inaccuracies - Key: LUCENE-5483 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Attachments: LUCENE-5483.patch, LUCENE-5483.patch I added a lot of tests and greatly refined this algorithm to match correct hunspell behavior. there were many bugs: * recursionLimit was a hack: this is actually specified by the dictionary to be twofold suffix + one prefix, or if COMPLEXPREFIXES is specified, twofold prefix + one suffix. This patch removes cursion limit * recursion didn't work correctly: it didnt validate multi-level continuation classes correctly. * add COMPLEXPREFIXES support. * probably other minor bugs fixed in the process. I validated all testing against hunspell -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5483) hunspell inaccuracies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13917266#comment-13917266 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5483: - Commit 1573251 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1573251 ] LUCENE-5483: fix hunspell inaccuracies hunspell inaccuracies - Key: LUCENE-5483 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5483 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Robert Muir Fix For: 4.8, 5.0 Attachments: LUCENE-5483.patch, LUCENE-5483.patch I added a lot of tests and greatly refined this algorithm to match correct hunspell behavior. there were many bugs: * recursionLimit was a hack: this is actually specified by the dictionary to be twofold suffix + one prefix, or if COMPLEXPREFIXES is specified, twofold prefix + one suffix. This patch removes cursion limit * recursion didn't work correctly: it didnt validate multi-level continuation classes correctly. * add COMPLEXPREFIXES support. * probably other minor bugs fixed in the process. I validated all testing against hunspell -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
