[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889376#comment-16889376
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10377:
Commit 9d223b00b39f50f88411ea9857bca77e95ce0da9 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_8x from Munendra S N
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=9d223b0 ]
SOLR-10377: add debug.explain.structured to Admin UI
* This param would be displayed only if debugQuery is selected
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10377.patch, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.17
> PM.png, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.27 PM.png
>
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 =
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889374#comment-16889374
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10377:
Commit b5a190b57666c95e7e99e31925f1d220cfcfcf60 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from Munendra S N
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b5a190b ]
SOLR-10377: add debug.explain.structured to Admin UI
* This param would be displayed only if debugQuery is selected
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10377.patch, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.17
> PM.png, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.27 PM.png
>
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 =
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16887184#comment-16887184
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-10377:
-
[^SOLR-10377.patch]
This adds {{debug.explain.structured}} parameter in Admin UI. !Screenshot
2019-07-17 at 6.09.17 PM.png! !Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.27 PM.png!
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10377.patch, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.17
> PM.png, Screenshot 2019-07-17 at 6.09.27 PM.png
>
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> ',
> '1'=>'
> 3.545981 = sum of:
> 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
>
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16882580#comment-16882580
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-10377:
-
I really don't think everyone would like structured=true by default; I'm "meh"
at best. It's bulky. I dunno if there's a good solution here. I wonder if
maybe when the admin UI renders the JSON, it might insert literal carriage
returns after the occurrences of "\n" (actual backslash then 'n'). Or maybe
somehow we could insert a pop-up with it rendered correctly. Shrug... that's
the best I can think up right now. One way to ameliorate the situation is to
add debug.explain.structured=true to the admin UI so you could click it easily
and not have to know it exists. Maybe that's the best we can do that also
doesn't feel like a hack.
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16882221#comment-16882221
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-10377:
-
Should the behavior be changed to return structured response
debug.explain.structured=true was introduced in SOLR-1915. From then to now,
default format is changed to JSON and indent is set to on.
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> ',
> '1'=>'
> 3.545981 = sum of:
> 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16882004#comment-16882004
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-10377:
-
Thanks for the reminder of that obscure parameter. I think the main use-case
is the user using Solr's admin screen, defaulting to json, and choosing the
debugQuery checkbox to determine what happened with the score. When the
default wt (writer type / response format) was XML, the output was
understandable. With JSON it is not.
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> ',
> '1'=>'
> 3.545981 = sum of:
> 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0)
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16881720#comment-16881720
]
Munendra S N commented on SOLR-10377:
-
Passing *debug.explain.structured=true* with debug=true will return the
response with structured/indented explain. Sample output for some uniqueId.
{code:java}
{
"book1": {
"match": true,
"value": 1.1315503,
"description": "sum of:",
"details": [
{
"match": true,
"value": 1,
"description": "parent_b:*"
},
{
"match": true,
"value": 0.13155031,
"description": "FunctionQuery(query(parent_b:F,def=0.0)), product of:",
"details": [
{
"match": true,
"value": 0.13155031,
"description": "query(parent_b:F,def=0.0)=0.13155031"
},
{
"match": true,
"value": 1,
"description": "boost"
}
]
}
]
}
}
{code}
Also, if the user is using explain doctransformer, then to get
structured/indented response, style could be specified {{[explain style=nl]}}
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1)
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16881507#comment-16881507
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-10377:
-
The indentation problem has been a long-standing problem no matter what browser
I use. "the ordering" is fine. Using the techproducts data set with query
name:ddr I get this one-liner explanation for the first doc:
{{ "VS1GB400C3":"\n0.89796925 = weight(name:ddr in 1) [SchemaSimilarity],
result of:\n 0.89796925 = score(freq=2.0), product of:\n 1.8382795 = idf,
computed as log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) from:\n 3 = n, number of
documents containing term\n 21 = N, total number of documents with field\n
0.48848352 = tf, computed as freq / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * dl / avgdl))
from:\n 2.0 = freq, occurrences of term within document\n 1.2 = k1, term
saturation parameter\n 0.75 = b, length normalization parameter\n 15.0 = dl,
length of field\n 7.5238094 = avgdl, average length of field\n", }}
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 +
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10377) Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15944354#comment-15944354
]
Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-10377:
--
Looks like the ordering was messed up because of the JSONView plugin that I
had. Solr is returning the order correctly.
> Improve readability of the explain output for JSON format
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-10377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10377
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
>
> Today when I ask solr for the debug query output In json with indent I get
> this:
> {code}
> 1: " 3.545981 = sum of: 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity],
> result of: 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq +
> 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.54 = tfNorm, computed as (freq *
> (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 1.0 = fieldLength ",
> 2: " 7.4202514 = sum of: 7.4202514 = sum of: 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain
> in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount -
> docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b *
> fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength 2.7921112 =
> weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 2.7921112 =
> score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 2.3025851 = idf, computed
> as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq +
> k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2
> = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of: 1.8360289
> = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0 ), product of: 1.5141277 = idf,
> computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) / (docFreq + 0.5)) from: 5.0 =
> docFreq 24.0 = docCount 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) /
> (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 =
> termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 7.0 = avgFieldLength 4.0 =
> fieldLength "
> {code}
> When I run the same query with "wt=ruby" I get a much nicer output
> {code}
> '2'=>'
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 7.4202514 = sum of:
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:domain in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 2.7921112 = weight(name:name in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 2.7921112 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 2.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> 1.8360289 = weight(name:system in 1) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 1.8360289 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 1.5141277 = idf, computed as log(1 + (docCount - docFreq + 0.5) /
> (docFreq + 0.5)) from:
> 5.0 = docFreq
> 24.0 = docCount
> 1.2125984 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 -
> b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
> 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> 1.2 = parameter k1
> 0.75 = parameter b
> 7.0 = avgFieldLength
> 4.0 = fieldLength
> ',
> '1'=>'
> 3.545981 = sum of:
> 3.545981 = weight(name:dns in 0) [SchemaSimilarity], result of:
> 3.545981 = score(doc=0,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0
> ), product of:
> 2.3025851 = idf, computed as log(1 +
