[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8488) Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin

2016-01-07 Thread Ramkumar Aiyengar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15088100#comment-15088100
 ] 

Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on SOLR-8488:
-

I get that consistency with the normal phrase queries will be good, do keep in 
mind that cpq makes it even easier to shoot yourself in your foot, "*a *b *c" 
for example. Also enabling it by default would also be a compatibility break 
for 5x at least.

For trunk, fine, I am not too opinionated about the default, as long as there's 
an option to block it. And if we are looking to be consistent, should other 
parsers also honor this option?


> Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-8488
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.5, Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8488.patch, SOLR-8488.patch
>
>
> It would be useful to support leading wildcards in phrase searches as well. 
> Currently we support this query -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true}name:"Jo* Smith"{code}
> It would be useful to be support a query like -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true\}name:"*Jo* Smith"{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8488) Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin

2016-01-07 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15088019#comment-15088019
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8488:


For a common letter such as "a", each level may be 10 times more expensive than 
the last... while it may make sense to *allow* for that to be limited, I don't 
think it makes sense to hobble it by default.  Its also not necessarily that 
expensive compared to some other Solr operations like stats/facets on high 
cardinality fields (and pivoted multiplies this).

Solr has normally allowed leading wildcards by default, and we should continue 
that here.
For example, try:
http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/query?q=text:*olr


> Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-8488
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.5, Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8488.patch, SOLR-8488.patch
>
>
> It would be useful to support leading wildcards in phrase searches as well. 
> Currently we support this query -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true}name:"Jo* Smith"{code}
> It would be useful to be support a query like -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true\}name:"*Jo* Smith"{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8488) Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin

2016-01-06 Thread Ramkumar Aiyengar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15085188#comment-15085188
 ] 

Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on SOLR-8488:
-

Functionally looks okay, but this should be opted in. Leading wildcards can be 
very costly and the user should consciously opt in to allow them..

> Add support for leading wildcards to ComplexPhraseQParserPlugin
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-8488
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8488
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Varun Thacker
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.5, Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8488.patch
>
>
> It would be useful to support leading wildcards in phrase searches as well. 
> Currently we support this query -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true}name:"Jo* Smith"{code}
> It would be useful to be support a query like -
> {code}{!complexphrase inOrder=true\}name:"*Jo* Smith"{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org