[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-5605.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

NRQ is deprecated and was removed recently.

> Don't pass precisionStep directly to NRQ/NRF. Instead pass the FieldType
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5605
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5605
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently in our Field API we use the FieldType class that contains the 
> information about data type and stuff like the numeric precisionStep.
> Unfortunately in NumericRangeQuery/NumericRangeFilter, we still require the 
> precisionStep given in the query. For the user this is hard to understand, 
> leading to problems like passing a different precisionStep than the one which 
> was used for indexing. If we change that parameter in NRQ/NRF to take 
> FieldType, we can extract the precStep as an implementation detail. We just 
> have to check that the field type is a numeric one and is indexed. The user 
> cannot do anything wrong anymore, unless he creates a new, incompatible field 
> type.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to