[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-04-09 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4880:


Attachment: LUCENE-4880.patch

Attached is a fix with tests.

 Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and 
 one created by RAMDirectory
 

 Key: LUCENE-4880
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: core/index
Affects Versions: 4.2
 Environment: Windows 7 (probably irrelevant)
Reporter: Timothy Allison
 Attachments: LUCENE-4880.patch, 
 MemoryIndexVsRamDirZeroLengthTermTest.java


 MemoryIndex skips tokens that have length == 0 when building the index; the 
 result is that it does not increment the token offset (nor does it store the 
 position offsets if that option is set) for tokens of length == 0.  A regular 
 index (via, say, RAMDirectory) does not appear to do this.
 When using the ICUFoldingFilter, it is possible to have a term of zero length 
 (the \u0640 character separated by spaces).  If that occurs in a document, 
 the offsets returned at search time differ between the MemoryIndex and a 
 regular index.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-03-25 Thread Timothy Allison (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Timothy Allison updated LUCENE-4880:


Attachment: MemoryIndexVsRamDirZeroLengthTermTest.java

 Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and 
 one created by RAMDirectory
 

 Key: LUCENE-4880
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: core/index
Affects Versions: 4.2
 Environment: Windows 7 (probably irrelevant)
Reporter: Timothy Allison
 Attachments: MemoryIndexVsRamDirZeroLengthTermTest.java


 MemoryIndex skips tokens that have length == 0 when building the index; the 
 result is that it does not increment the token offset (nor does it store the 
 position offsets if that option is set) for tokens of length == 0.  A regular 
 index (via, say, RAMDirectory) does not appear to do this.
 When using the ICUFoldingFilter, it is possible to have a term of zero length 
 (the \u0640 character separated by spaces).  If that occurs in a document, 
 the offsets returned at search time differ between the MemoryIndex and a 
 regular index.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org