[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_31) - Build # 4495 - Still Failing!

2015-02-17 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4495/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_31 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testLazyLoad

Error Message:
Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.

Stack Trace:
java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6E1C11E3C9FC300B]:0)


FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores

Error Message:
Suite timeout exceeded (= 720 msec).

Stack Trace:
java.lang.Exception: Suite timeout exceeded (= 720 msec).
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6E1C11E3C9FC300B]:0)




Build Log:
[...truncated 9633 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores
   [junit4]   2 Creating dataDir: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2 1564253 T9269 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.buildSSLConfig Randomized ssl 
(false) and clientAuth (false)
   [junit4]   2 1564256 T9269 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.setUp ###Starting 
testCreateTransientFromAdmin
   [junit4]   2 1564311 T9269 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new 
SolrResourceLoader for directory: 
'C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\'
   [junit4]   2 1564335 T9269 oasc.CoreContainer.init New CoreContainer 
17882030
   [junit4]   2 1564335 T9269 oasc.CoreContainer.load Loading cores into 
CoreContainer 
[instanceDir=C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\]
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting socketTimeout to: 60
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting urlScheme to: null
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting connTimeout to: 6
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting maxConnectionsPerHost to: 20
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting maxConnections to: 1
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting corePoolSize to: 0
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting maximumPoolSize to: 2147483647
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting maxThreadIdleTime to: 5
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting sizeOfQueue to: -1
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting fairnessPolicy to: false
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oashc.HttpShardHandlerFactory.getParameter 
Setting useRetries to: false
   [junit4]   2 1564340 T9269 oasu.UpdateShardHandler.init Creating 
UpdateShardHandler HTTP client with params: 
socketTimeout=60connTimeout=6retry=true
   [junit4]   2 1564342 T9269 oasc.SolrCores.allocateLazyCores Allocating 
transient cache for 4 transient cores
   [junit4]   2 1564349 T9269 oasl.LogWatcher.createWatcher SLF4J impl is 
org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory
   [junit4]   2 1564349 T9269 oasl.LogWatcher.newRegisteredLogWatcher 
Registering Log Listener [Log4j (org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory)]
   [junit4]   2 1564349 T9269 oasc.CoreContainer.load Host Name: null
   [junit4]   2 1564356 T9270 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new 
SolrResourceLoader for directory: 
'C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\collection1\'
   [junit4]   2 1564356 T9271 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new 
SolrResourceLoader for directory: 
'C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\collection2\'
   [junit4]   2 1564357 T9272 oasc.SolrResourceLoader.init new 
SolrResourceLoader for directory: 
'C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\collection5\'
   [junit4]   2 1564386 T9271 oasc.SolrConfig.refreshRequestParams current 
version of requestparams : -1
   [junit4]   2 1564389 T9271 oasc.SolrConfig.init Using Lucene 
MatchVersion: 6.0.0
   [junit4]   2 1564392 T9272 oasc.SolrConfig.refreshRequestParams current 
version of requestparams : -1
   [junit4]   2 1564395 T9271 oasc.SolrConfig.init Loaded SolrConfig: 
solrconfig.xml
   [junit4]   2 1564395 T9271 oass.IndexSchema.readSchema Reading Solr Schema 
from 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.core.TestLazyCores
 6E1C11E3C9FC300B-001\tempDir-001\collection2\conf\schema.xml
   [junit4]   2 1564396 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_31) - Build # 4387 - Still Failing!

2015-02-17 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows/4387/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_31 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001\tempDir-002: java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001\tempDir-002
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001\tempDir-002: java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001\tempDir-002
   
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 CBBEBBC9769B8805-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([CBBEBBC9769B8805]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:294)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:170)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.test

Error Message:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: IOException occured when 
talking to server at: http://127.0.0.1:64355/repfacttest_c8n_1x3_shard1_replica2

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: IOException occured when 
talking to server at: http://127.0.0.1:64355/repfacttest_c8n_1x3_shard1_replica2
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.directUpdate(CloudSolrClient.java:575)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.sendRequest(CloudSolrClient.java:884)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:787)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:730)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.testRf3(ReplicationFactorTest.java:284)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.test(ReplicationFactorTest.java:112)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6251) Two-phase support on ConstantScorer, ReqOptScorer, ReqExclScorer, BoostedScorer

2015-02-17 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14323961#comment-14323961
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6251:
-

Commit 1660325 from [~jpountz] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1660325 ]

LUCENE-6251: Add two-phase support to ConstantScorer and most boolean scorers.

 Two-phase support on ConstantScorer, ReqOptScorer, ReqExclScorer, 
 BoostedScorer
 ---

 Key: LUCENE-6251
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6251
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: LUCENE-6251.patch


 Some of our scorers are mostly delegators and two-phase support should be 
 reasonably easy to implement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6251) Two-phase support on ConstantScorer, ReqOptScorer, ReqExclScorer, BoostedScorer

2015-02-17 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-6251.
--
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.1
   Trunk

 Two-phase support on ConstantScorer, ReqOptScorer, ReqExclScorer, 
 BoostedScorer
 ---

 Key: LUCENE-6251
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6251
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Assignee: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk, 5.1

 Attachments: LUCENE-6251.patch


 Some of our scorers are mostly delegators and two-phase support should be 
 reasonably easy to implement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7117) AutoAddReplicas should have a cluster wide property for controlling number of cores hosted on each node

2015-02-17 Thread Varun Thacker (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Varun Thacker updated SOLR-7117:

Attachment: SOLR-7117.patch

Thanks Mark for reviewing the patch.

bq. There is some class that makes it easy to quickly test what nodes are 
chosen for failover.

Yeah I saw {{SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverUtilsTest}} . It's super cool!

New patch which adds a test for this property.

Couple of other changes I made - 

- Modified a live node in {{testGetBestCreateUrlMultipleCollections()}}. I 
believe it was intended to be node2 and node1 in the first place.

- In this should the check be only for node3 since node2 is already hosting the 
replica. Unless r2-4 meant node2 or node4

{code}
result = buildClusterState(csr1R*r2-4sr3r4r5, NODE1, NODE2, NODE3);
createUrl = 
OverseerAutoReplicaFailoverThread.getBestCreateUrl(result.reader, 
result.badReplica, null);
assertTrue(createUrl.equals(NODE2_URL) || createUrl.equals(NODE3_URL));
{code}


Should we keep the property name maxCoresPerNode or something else?



 AutoAddReplicas should have a cluster wide property for controlling number of 
 cores hosted on each node
 ---

 Key: SOLR-7117
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7117
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Varun Thacker
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk, 5.1

 Attachments: SOLR-7117.patch, SOLR-7117.patch


 Currently when finding the best node to host the failed replicas, we respect 
 the maxShardsPerNode property. This is not an ideal solution as it's a per 
 collection property and we need a cluster wide property. Also using 
 maxShardsPerNode can lead to unequal distribution of replicas across nodes.
 We should just let users use the CLUSTERPROP API to set the max number of 
 cores to be hosted on each node and use that value while picking the node the 
 replica will be hosted on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6250) Approximations on Spans

2015-02-17 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14324071#comment-14324071
 ] 

Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6250:
--

bq. fails because SpanScorer.score() is called while it is still at docID -1, 
and I am stuck trying to figure this out.

I just tried out the seed and I think I understand why: approximations are 
supposed to be a view and advancing the approximation should advance the scorer 
and vice-versa. Yet SpanScorer caches the current doc ID (the 'doc' variable) 
so when you advance the approximation, SpanScorer.doc is still -1 so when you 
call score() it tries to get the norm for doc ID -1.

bq. When I started investigating this test case I was confused by BooleanWeight 
creating an unused SpansScorer while trying to create a BooleanScorer. Shall I 
open another issue to separate the condition to actually use a BooleanScorer 
from the creation of the BooleanScorer (in BooleanWeight)?

I agree this would be nicer!

bq. Can the TestFilterSpans class be removed? It only checks that all abstract 
Span methods are implemented.

I never used spans, but looking at 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5933 this seems important in order 
to make sure that FilterSpans delegate everything from the wrapped instance?

 Approximations on Spans
 ---

 Key: LUCENE-6250
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6250
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Paul Elschot
 Attachments: ApproxSpans-20150216a.patch


 Approximate spans using existing conjunction/disjunction approximations



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0.pdf

2015-02-17 Thread Varun Thacker
It would be good if this comment was fixed -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API?focusedCommentId=51810687#comment-51810687

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:


 Please vote to release the following artifacts as the Solr 5.0 Ref Guide...

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-
 guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0-RC1/




 -Hoss
 http://www.lucidworks.com/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-- 


Regards,
Varun Thacker
http://www.vthacker.in/


[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6246) Fix DocsEnum - PostingsEnum transition

2015-02-17 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14324145#comment-14324145
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6246:
-

Commit 1660366 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1660366 ]

LUCENE-6246: Fix DocsEnum - PostingsEnum transition (phase 1)

 Fix DocsEnum - PostingsEnum transition
 ---

 Key: LUCENE-6246
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6246
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Robert Muir
 Attachments: LUCENE-6246-trunk.patch


 The current back compat introduced in LUCENE-4524, does not really help the 
 users calling e.g. LeafReader.termDocsEnum() or 
 LeafReader.termPositionsEnum(), because the former's return value changes to 
 PostingsEnum, its superclass, and the latter got removed.
 It also does not help users using TermsEnum.docs() or 
 TermsEnum.docsAndPositions() which got removed and just replaced with 
 postings().
 DocsEnum is different, but not deprecated, instead only used by some codecs 
 as a convenience class. DocsAndPositionsEnum is removed.
 I think we can do this a little better. First, we need to fix trunk to work 
 the way we want it to look. I think we should have LeafReader.postings() and 
 TermsEnum.postings(), and everything should use PostingsEnum. This is 
 simplest.
 But in 5.x, I think we should have DocsEnum and DocsAndPositionsEnum which 
 are deprecated, to help guide the user.
 The sugar methods on LeafReader that exist in 5.0 (termDocsEnum(), 
 termPositionsEnum()) should be deprecated (with message to use postings()) 
 and final, and can just wrap PostingsEnum. There is no reuse and flags here 
 so this is very simple.
 On TermsEnum its more complicated, but i dont think impossible. We should add 
 back deprecated and final termDocsEnum() and termPositionsEnum() (with 
 message to use postings()) and these deprecated ones can have an instanceof 
 check, unwrapping back to PostingsEnum before they invoke postings behind the 
 scenes. 
 For the 2 remaining ones on TermsEnum that take flags, thats the most tricky. 
 I actually think we shouldn't change the existing constant values when we 
 dont have to. And I don't think the names FLAG_FREQS are special, i'd rather 
 these just be constants like FREQS. I looked thru JDK constants 
 (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/constant-values.html) and only one 
 class uses this FLAG_xxx prefix. 
 So I think we should have PostingsEnum.FREQS etc with new values, not 
 conflicting with the old FLAG_FREQS etc values (which we can add back, 
 deprecated, to DocsEnum and DocsAndPositionsEnum). We can even add a check to 
 the deprecated methods that only valid values are passed.
 This just means we have contained back compat, only for deprecated and final 
 sugar methods in LeafReader and TermsEnum, and the 2 deprecated classes. I 
 think we can live with that and it would save users pain.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_31) - Build # 4494 - Still Failing!

2015-02-17 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4494/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_31 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test

Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001\tempDir-002: java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001\tempDir-002
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001 

Stack Trace:
java.io.IOException: Could not remove the following files (in the order of 
attempts):
   
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001\tempDir-002: java.nio.file.AccessDeniedException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001\tempDir-002
   
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001: java.nio.file.DirectoryNotEmptyException: 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\solr\build\solr-core\test\J0\temp\solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test
 853CD4074A5D9AA6-001

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([853CD4074A5D9AA6]:0)
at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.rm(IOUtils.java:286)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.afterAlways(TestRuleTemporaryFilesCleanup.java:170)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.TestRuleAdapter$1.afterAlways(TestRuleAdapter.java:31)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:43)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.test

Error Message:
org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: The target server failed to respond

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: 
org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: The target server failed to respond
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:865)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:730)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.testRf3(ReplicationFactorTest.java:284)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ReplicationFactorTest.test(ReplicationFactorTest.java:112)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1618)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:877)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:940)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:915)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53)
at 

<    1   2