Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
heh, I don't have any.  think the 'How to Release' page on mahout.apache.org
is good enuf to get started.
There are a few corner cases that need to be handled when things go kaput
and are not listed on the page.

Its best to shadow me when the next release happens.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Andrew Palumbo  wrote:

> if I can get a copy of your notes :)
>
> 
> From: Andrew Palumbo 
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:17 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.
>
> I can be the Release Manager for this..
>
> 
> From: Suneel Marthi 
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:15 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.
>
> ...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi 
> wrote:
>
> > For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
> > for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.
> >
> > Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that
> > should suffice as scope for 0.12.1.
> >
> > I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet,
> > but we can start working on that in a separate branch.
> >
> > If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
> > 0.12.1 that would be great.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that
> should
> >> help us with the following issues:
> >>
> >>
> >> FlinkOpABt:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
> >>
> >>
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750>
> >>
> >> Flink Dals error:
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
> >>
> >>
> >> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
> >> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may
> not
> >> be addressed until a later release.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be
> >> addressed?  Or anything else in general?
> >>
> >
> >
>


Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Andrew Palumbo
if I can get a copy of your notes :)


From: Andrew Palumbo 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:17 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

I can be the Release Manager for this..


From: Suneel Marthi 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:15 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi 
wrote:

> For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
> for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.
>
> Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that
> should suffice as scope for 0.12.1.
>
> I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet,
> but we can start working on that in a separate branch.
>
> If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
> 0.12.1 that would be great.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo 
> wrote:
>
>> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should
>> help us with the following issues:
>>
>>
>> FlinkOpABt:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
>>
>>
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750>
>>
>> Flink Dals error:
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
>>
>>
>>
>> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
>>
>>
>> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
>> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not
>> be addressed until a later release.
>>
>>
>> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be
>> addressed?  Or anything else in general?
>>
>
>


Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
very well, please get started by generating ur gpg keys and posting them to
id.apache.org.

Setup ur RSA keys and add that to your apache profile on id.apache.org

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Andrew Palumbo  wrote:

> I can be the Release Manager for this..
>
> 
> From: Suneel Marthi 
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:15 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.
>
> ...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi 
> wrote:
>
> > For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
> > for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.
> >
> > Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that
> > should suffice as scope for 0.12.1.
> >
> > I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet,
> > but we can start working on that in a separate branch.
> >
> > If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
> > 0.12.1 that would be great.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that
> should
> >> help us with the following issues:
> >>
> >>
> >> FlinkOpABt:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
> >>
> >>
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750>
> >>
> >> Flink Dals error:
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
> >>
> >>
> >> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
> >> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may
> not
> >> be addressed until a later release.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be
> >> addressed?  Or anything else in general?
> >>
> >
> >
>


Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Andrew Palumbo
I can be the Release Manager for this..


From: Suneel Marthi 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:15 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi 
wrote:

> For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
> for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.
>
> Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that
> should suffice as scope for 0.12.1.
>
> I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet,
> but we can start working on that in a separate branch.
>
> If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
> 0.12.1 that would be great.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo 
> wrote:
>
>> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should
>> help us with the following issues:
>>
>>
>> FlinkOpABt:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
>>
>>
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750>
>>
>> Flink Dals error:
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
>>
>>
>>
>> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
>>
>>
>> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
>> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not
>> be addressed until a later release.
>>
>>
>> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be
>> addressed?  Or anything else in general?
>>
>
>


Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
...and work for 0.12.1 would be on master branch

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Suneel Marthi 
wrote:

> For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
> for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.
>
> Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that
> should suffice as scope for 0.12.1.
>
> I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet,
> but we can start working on that in a separate branch.
>
> If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
> 0.12.1 that would be great.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo 
> wrote:
>
>> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should
>> help us with the following issues:
>>
>>
>> FlinkOpABt:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> Flink Dals error:
>> 
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
>>
>>
>>
>> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
>>
>>
>> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
>> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not
>> be addressed until a later release.
>>
>>
>> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be
>> addressed?  Or anything else in general?
>>
>
>


Re: [Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
For 0.12.1, the 2 issues below along with a Jira to polish the scaladocs
for Flink backend that pretty much don't exist now.

Also the Scaladocs for 0.12.1 to be published with the release, that should
suffice as scope for 0.12.1.

I agree Flink shell should be differed to 0.13.0 as its not stable yet, but
we can start working on that in a separate branch.

If someone from the PMC could volunteer to be the Release Manager for
0.12.1 that would be great.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo  wrote:

> Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should
> help us with the following issues:
>
>
> FlinkOpABt:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750
>
>
> 
>
> Flink Dals error:
> 
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818
>
>
>
> As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831
>
>
> Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new
> feature and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not
> be addressed until a later release.
>
>
> Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be addressed?
> Or anything else in general?
>


[Discussion] Scope of the mahout 0.12.1 release.

2016-04-18 Thread Andrew Palumbo
Flink will soon be releasing 1.0.2, which includes a kryo fix that should help 
us with the following issues:


FlinkOpABt:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1750




Flink Dals error:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1818



As well we may be able to work the Flink Shell in along with these:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1831


Though that might be better to save for Mahout 0.13 as it is both a new feature 
and I've noticed that Flink has some issues with this that may not be addressed 
until a later release.


Is there anything on the Spark side of things that needs to be addressed?  Or 
anything else in general?