Re: [VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0
+1 sob., 2 mar 2024, 10:48 użytkownik Guillaume Nodet napisał: > I've staged release candidates for maven-filtering-3.3.2 and > maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0 at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2067 > > JIRA release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MSHARED/versions/12353084 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MRRESOURCES/versions/12353591 > > Note that m-remote-resources-p depends on the release of > maven-filtering, hence the single vote. > > Please review and vote ! > > -- > > Guillaume Nodet > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0
I don't see any blockers with either of these. However, the maven-remote-resources-plugin repo is currently broken because it depends on the new maven-filtering. I would prefer to vote on and release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and only then vote on and release maven-remote-resources-plugin- 3.2.0. On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 9:48 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've staged release candidates for maven-filtering-3.3.2 and > maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0 at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2067 > > JIRA release notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MSHARED/versions/12353084 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MRRESOURCES/versions/12353591 > > Note that m-remote-resources-p depends on the release of > maven-filtering, hence the single vote. > > Please review and vote ! > > -- > > Guillaume Nodet > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elh...@ibiblio.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
Le 2024-03-02 à 18 h 55, Jeremy Landis a écrit :
You should be able to use @code in same way now without the java upgrade.
Yes I know. But Maven source code currently uses , and if we were
to spent an effort for changing that, it would have been more economical
to go directly to {@snippet} instead of changing to {@code} and changing
again later.
But anyway, thanks.
Martin
RE: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
You should be able to use @code in same way now without the java upgrade.
*
* {@code
*
* -Xmaxerrs
* 1000
* -Xlint
* -J-Duser.language=en_us
*
* }
*
Something like that anyways and all the ugly escapes can go now.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Desruisseaux
Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2024 11:55 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
Just realized since I'm working on the Maven compiler plugin, upgrading to Java
21 instead of 17 would allow us to replace currently hard-to-read Javadoc like
this:
*
* compilerArgs
* arg-Xmaxerrs/arg
* arg1000/arg
* arg-Xlint/arg
* arg-J-Duser.language=en_us/arg
* /compilerArgs
*
by:
* {@snippet lang="xml" :
*
* -Xmaxerrs
* 1000
* -Xlint
* -J-Duser.language=en_us
*
* }
However it may not a sufficient reason for restarting a new vote. I'm just
mentioning that for info.
Martin
Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
Just realized since I'm working on the Maven compiler plugin, upgrading
to Java 21 instead of 17 would allow us to replace currently
hard-to-read Javadoc like this:
*
* compilerArgs
* arg-Xmaxerrs/arg
* arg1000/arg
* arg-Xlint/arg
* arg-J-Duser.language=en_us/arg
* /compilerArgs
*
by:
* {@snippet lang="xml" :
*
* -Xmaxerrs
* 1000
* -Xlint
* -J-Duser.language=en_us
*
* }
However it may not a sufficient reason for restarting a new vote. I'm
just mentioning that for info.
Martin
[RESULT][VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
Hi all, the vote has passed with the following result: PMC +1: Anders Hammar, Arnaud Héritier, Benjamin Marwell, Guillaume Nodet, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Konrad Windszus, ,Maarten Mulders, Olivier Lamy, Romain Manni-Bucau, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák PMC majority quorum: reached. Community results: +1: A.J. Jarmoniuk, Bernd Eckenfels, Brian Demers, Ceki Gulcu, Christian Stein, Christoph Läubrich, David Jencks, Dirk Olmes, Enrico Olivelli, Frederik Boster, Gary Gregory, Giacomo Boccardo, Jacques Etienne Beaudet, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Jeremy Landis, Jesper Udby, John Neffenger, Jorge Solórzano, Joseph Kesselman, Kemal Soysal, Kévin Buntrock, Lasse Lindqvist, Manfred Moser, Mantas Gridinas, Manuel Dahmen, Mark Eggers, Martin Desruisseaux, Mateusz Gajewski, Matthias Bünger, Michael Bien, Niels Basjes, Robert Dean, Rodrigo Bourbon, Slawomir Jaranowski, Stephane Nicoll, Thomas Matthijs, Thorsten Heit, Tim te Beek, Van Hoa Phan, Xeno Amess, Yeikel Santana, zhongming hua -1: Elliotte Rusty Harold We will proceed with the transition of Maven 4 to a Java 17 baseline. Plugins will also get a "plugin history" page where it will be documented which version requires which Java version. As a general rule, we will keep 3.x plugins on Java 8 (notable exception is the m-jlink-p for obvious reasons). Thanks everyone for voting and all your voices in the preceding discussions! - Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4. > > This is a procedural majority vote [1*]: > You can also vote with fractions and negative votes are not vetoes. > > Please also notice: > * Maven 3 will stay at Java 8 no matter what. > * We may raise Maven 4 to JDK 21 later if we feel like it (depending > on the release date). > This is not part of this vote. > * The linked PR is not part of this vote (this is not a code vote). > But you may take a look at it to understand the intended change. > > PR: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1430 > > Maven-Parent will not be raised with this vote, the other PR is not > part of this vote. > > Please refrain from starting discussions in this thread, but do > include a reasoning on downvotes and feel free to start a new > discussion on the mailing list, or comment on the existing ones. > > --- > > Vote open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 (set JDK17 min version for Maven 4.x) > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 (please include reasoning) > > --- > > - Ben > > [1*]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 08:31 Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4. > > This is a procedural majority vote [1*]: > You can also vote with fractions and negative votes are not vetoes. > > Please also notice: > * Maven 3 will stay at Java 8 no matter what. > * We may raise Maven 4 to JDK 21 later if we feel like it (depending > on the release date). > This is not part of this vote. > * The linked PR is not part of this vote (this is not a code vote). > But you may take a look at it to understand the intended change. > > PR: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1430 > > Maven-Parent will not be raised with this vote, the other PR is not > part of this vote. > > Please refrain from starting discussions in this thread, but do > include a reasoning on downvotes and feel free to start a new > discussion on the mailing list, or comment on the existing ones. > > --- > > Vote open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 (set JDK17 min version for Maven 4.x) > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 (please include reasoning) > > --- > > - Ben > > [1*]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >
Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
+1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4. > > This is a procedural majority vote [1*]: > You can also vote with fractions and negative votes are not vetoes. > > Please also notice: > * Maven 3 will stay at Java 8 no matter what. > * We may raise Maven 4 to JDK 21 later if we feel like it (depending > on the release date). > This is not part of this vote. > * The linked PR is not part of this vote (this is not a code vote). > But you may take a look at it to understand the intended change. > > PR: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1430 > > Maven-Parent will not be raised with this vote, the other PR is not > part of this vote. > > Please refrain from starting discussions in this thread, but do > include a reasoning on downvotes and feel free to start a new > discussion on the mailing list, or comment on the existing ones. > > --- > > Vote open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 (set JDK17 min version for Maven 4.x) > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 (please include reasoning) > > --- > > - Ben > > [1*]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[VOTE] Release maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0
I've staged release candidates for maven-filtering-3.3.2 and maven-remote-resources-plugin-3.2.0 at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2067 JIRA release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MSHARED/versions/12353084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MRRESOURCES/versions/12353591 Note that m-remote-resources-p depends on the release of maven-filtering, hence the single vote. Please review and vote ! -- Guillaume Nodet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
