[GitHub] maven pull request: Improved visibility of collections and variabl...
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68561294 @jvanzyl My ant build says BUILD SUCCESS. I saw your TODO comments moreless related to immutable objects. Currently the code is not ready for immutable objects and therefore it was simple toapply *concurrent* collections. One way or another immutable objects: + improve code clarity + safe enough in multiple-threads env + every s/w is spaghetti code, but using immutable objects you simply put the barriers between parts of the code and then the contributors are willing to make bigger changes and spend their spare time + if this speeds up the development, you have chance to push the compettitors away I am watching Maven Dev Hangout. Will be glag if you talk about Maven stability. The method `#getMetadataList()` returns unmodifiable collection, but It can be changed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven pull request: Improved visibility of collections and variabl...
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68568625 The link should be in README.md. Look at README file @ JUnit and JavaHamcrest projects, where the most important is build status @ CloudBees and Travis https://github.com/junit-team/junit/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/hamcrest/JavaHamcrest Why such important projet does not have privilegies in CloudBees and free account? On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Jason van Zyl notificati...@github.com wrote: Ant build? The ITs are in a separate repository. This may be helpful: http://takari.io/2014/06/01/contributing-to-maven-core.html There are are 700+ integration tests that need to pass for any change. â Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68562504. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven pull request: Improved visibility of collections and variabl...
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68440499 @jvanzyl That's clear we must not break current users. You kow my problem is, as always when i design any API, how much open the interfaces should be. Here I tried to make final fields handling concurrent collections, but after breaking two tests I had to break idea with my code ideas. So it's hard to make perfect thread visibility, because here you have to use concurrent collections everywhere, break the shared collection instances and copy them everywhere, and run the tests million times by every single change with instance variable. As I did in JUnit, the same regarding thread visibility, I had to struggle with another developer and it was really pain to talk with him due to he did not understand what i tried to explain what really happens in memory and so that theory is nice only on the paper. You know, api with immutable model snapshots and modifiable services is much easier for making deterministic behavior. `private ProviderMavenProject provider;` `private Service service;` `MavenProject currentSnapshot = provider.get();` `String pomProperty = currentSnapshot.getProperty(my-key);// only getters` `service.setProperty(my-key, new property value);` The snapshot instance (umodifiable) is not the same as the internal one in project which is modifiable. Wasn't you thinking about some kind of API emulator or adapter in Maven 4? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven pull request: Improved visibility of collections and variabl...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34 Improved visibility of collections and variables across multiple threads Upon our discussion with Karl in http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-Commit-3b671d07340b002e13775883d09e7f7e0d9a3c49-td5821660.html i have improved MavenProject.java and surrounding code. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-1 master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #34 commit 82ac1110d79fa4fd0428694bd694b094718c0a4f Author: Tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-12-30T22:34:27Z Improved visibility of collections and variables across multiple threads --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven pull request: Improved visibility of collections and variabl...
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68410326 I wante to have final field o `MavenProject#dependencyArtifacts`, but in that case two tests would fail due to `DefaultProjectDependenciesResolver#process()` iterates over empty collection. The solution for the first test would be to compare hashCodes of collections in `DependencyContext#isResolutionRequiredForCurrentProject()`. Generally the domain model is excellent, but the implementation is totally open and really terrible. The worst is that open implementation can change the status of objects by any plugin, it can set any collection and share the instance in whole Maven. The collections are not thread-safe. The methods hashCode/equals are not autogenerated and we have to compare collections by identity `==`. The models should be immutable and plugins should inject services modifying the models with no setters. The setters should be in separate interface as a hint used by binternal builders as a hint over a constructor with thousands of params. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1131] Remove obsolete maven...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/78 [SUREFIRE-1131] Remove obsolete maven profiles Remove maven profiles jdk1.3 and jdk 1.4. Inline testng dependency into ordinal dependencies from profile jdk15. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/78.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #78 commit 3c662f89cc7005450e037f5f4210268320a494d6 Author: Tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-12-28T09:13:03Z [SUREFIRE-1131] Remove obsolete maven profiles --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold +1 (non binding): Andreas Gudian I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Cheers Tibor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
The surefire build maven-2.2.1 is successful again: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire-mvn-2.2.1/ https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/ The windows surefire build still fails with java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire-windows - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5821225.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Hi Karl, Fails again but now only with two ITs. Let's redirect our discussion in JIRA https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1133 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5821244.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1128] Fix mvn 2.2.1 build p...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/76 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1129] JDK 5 should be the m...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/77 [SUREFIRE-1129] JDK 5 should be the min requirements in surefire project updating maven-plugin-plugin configuration with requirements.jdk=1.5 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/77.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #77 commit 9a5f87c60128cdeaadb6823c86e0d47c102fc5f7 Author: Tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-12-26T15:52:19Z JDK 5 should be the min requirements in surefire project --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Hi Herve, I have fixed the JDK version, please see https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1129 Should the change be move into other SVN repo as well? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5821133.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Karl, my goal is to make happy user after 2.18. As I said this release is a legal fix for the blocker appeared in 2.18. The issue appeared 25-50% of plugin's lifetime. Pls see my comments SUREFIRE-1128. If you guys find more issues, feel free to post comments in JIRA. I am going to push the first code fixes in 2.19-SNAPSHOT related to SUREFIRE-1128. I can fix everything in code since i have the rights there, but other issues like memory settings and Reports directory is missing seems to be related to VM settings and there i don't have right to fix as it seems. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5820965.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1128] Fix mvn 2.2.1 build p...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/76 [SUREFIRE-1128] Fix mvn 2.2.1 build process https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/maven-surefire-mvn-2.2.1 Fixed annoying issue related to JDK5/7 mvn verify -pl maven-failsafe-plugin -P run-its tested with java.home jdk5 [INFO] --- maven-invoker-plugin:1.9:run (integration-test) @ maven-failsafe-plugin --- [INFO] Building: jetty-war-test-failing\pom.xml [INFO] ..SKIPPED due to JRE version [INFO] Building: jetty-war-test-passing\pom.xml [INFO] ..SKIPPED due to JRE version [INFO] Building: multiple-summaries\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.7 s) [INFO] Building: multiple-summaries-failing\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.6 s) [INFO] Building: working-directory\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.4 s) [INFO] - [INFO] Build Summary: [INFO] Passed: 3, Failed: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2 [INFO] - tested with java.home jdk7 [INFO] --- maven-invoker-plugin:1.9:run (integration-test) @ maven-failsafe-plugin --- [INFO] Building: jetty-war-test-failing\pom.xml [INFO] run script verify.bsh.bsh [INFO] ..SUCCESS (7.5 s) [INFO] Building: jetty-war-test-passing\pom.xml [INFO] run script verify.bsh.bsh [INFO] ..SUCCESS (6.9 s) [INFO] Building: multiple-summaries\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.6 s) [INFO] Building: multiple-summaries-failing\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.7 s) [INFO] Building: working-directory\pom.xml [INFO] ..SUCCESS (3.4 s) [INFO] - [INFO] Build Summary: [INFO] Passed: 5, Failed: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] - You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/76.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #76 commit 00d88516aa5f401db12eff800ae93d189d398e79 Author: unknown digana.ti...@sk-za-04278.vsb Date: 2014-12-25T22:03:27Z [SUREFIRE-1128] Fix mvn 2.2.1 build process https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/maven-surefire-mvn-2.2.1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: problem to git reset hash at git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
Yes I supposed last few commits won't be able undo other way. Next time this will not happen, we will make safe commitments first. What branches were introduced? The apache branch had master and surefire-954-test only. The whole problem was with maven-release-plugin:2.2.1 and some other with SSLv3 and not-generated MD5 in Nexus repository. We were unable to deploy release versions. Thus the team decided to use the latest maven-parent and apache POM which means that now we use maven-release-plugin:2.5.1 working with git client 1.9.5. Since we have quite urgent fixes in surefire I will call a vote. The people reported next two major issues only, so we have 98 major, and after surefire 2.19 the number of issues should decrease again. Then we will have let's say more stable code and API to prepare for surefire 3.0. Since the rest of the issues are a lot of features, after fixing them in 2.19, we will get better imagination of what API the people would like to customize in 3.0 instead of plugin's pom configuration. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/problem-to-git-reset-hash-at-git-wip-us-apache-org-repos-asf-tp5820756p5820822.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Hi, We solved 13 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=20814 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1110 https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1110/content/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire/2.18.1/surefire-2.18.1-source-release.zip Source release checksum(s): surefire-2.18.1-source-release.zip sha1: 59a04c54118e796ca3729b0376a71891d299ed9b Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/maven-failsafe-plugin/index.html http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/maven-surefire-report-plugin/index.html Guide to testing staged releases: http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Good question, this was our problem whole year. I was asking Kristian about the same, and AFAIK this was related to the machine itself. One can see OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space As this wasn't my priviledge to fix the system setup, i was not able to make more here. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5820864.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
The tests in failsafe-plugin wasn't touched in 2.18 and 2.18.1. The IT jetty-war-test-failing you have picked up was improved 5 months ago which survived previous release too. https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commits/master/maven-failsafe-plugin/src/it/jetty-war-test-failing/pom.xml The last one seems to be misleading, but it is legal, since it is supposed to interrupt the JUnit test execution - we are searching expected message finished abruptly after timeout of 2.5 seconds in log. Entire code is compiled by javac 1.5. Already reported JIRA @ 2.19 https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1128 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5820873.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18.1
Upon the users pressure and frequent bug SUREFIRE-1121, the Surefire 2.18.1 release fixed the blocker SUREFIRE-1121, and other important major fixes SUREFIRE-1114, SUREFIRE-1112. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-1-tp5820843p5820878.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
problem to git reset hash at git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
I need a help with reseting the master git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/surefire. I did like this: git reset --hard f7558cb8ff087d5aaf114ec291babac31896bef3 git commit git push -u https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-surefire.git master GitHub is telling me: remote: Rewinding refs/heads/master is forbidden. Is there another way to reset the HEAD to another hash? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-855] Allow failsafe to use ...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/72 [SUREFIRE-855] Allow failsafe to use actual jar file instead of target/classes The failsafe-plugin using artifact file instead of target/classes. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/72.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #72 commit 3d9f2b360c5d9902635e872896635139069bd388 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-11-30T15:31:09Z [SUREFIRE-855] Allow failsafe to use actual jar file instead of target/classes --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[Question] Do we have an artifact with EAR, WAR, ... ClassLoaders in Maven project?
Hi All, I have a question. Do we have an artifact with EAR, WAR, JAR, ... ClassLoaders in Maven project? Thx, Tibor - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Question-Do-we-have-an-artifact-with-EAR-WAR-ClassLoaders-in-Maven-project-tp5817500.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1120] Improved Warning mess...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/71 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Idle bug handling approach
Hi Michael, I've seen that you are closing the issues in SUREFIRE according to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/The+Great+JIRA+Cleanup+of+2014 Do you want to make any new regulations in closing the bugs or you suppose this mail discussion is closed by then? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Idle-bug-handling-approach-tp5815394p5817003.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Idle bug handling approach
Michaelo, Due to we have a lot of open issues in SUREFIRE I have decided to ask the Reporter for closing in JIRA. So I have created a list of closable JIRA bugs and opened a discussion in Maven mailing list last week. This way the list was visible to all developers and everybody could argue to not close them. After one week we got a consensus, there wasn't any objection from committers and PMC to not close ALL of them, and thus I closed them. Except for one bug where I made an exception which will be categorized as an improvement possibly in a new JIRA ticket. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Idle-bug-handling-approach-tp5815394p5815645.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Jigsaw early-access builds updated (JDK 9 build 40)
@Rory Would it mean that the Maven is going to die after Java 9 ? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Jigsaw-early-access-builds-updated-JDK-9-build-40-tp581p5815558.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
How to setup SVN for HTML content of published site?
I want to deploy the site to SVN repo. How to configure the SVN server so that the path in particular repository would be provided like a web content? We are using CollabNet SubversionEdge. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/How-to-setup-SVN-for-HTML-content-of-published-site-tp5815564.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Jigsaw early-access builds updated (JDK 9 build 40)
@Rory The Maven should provide built-support for Jigsaw modules. Has this activity already started? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Jigsaw-early-access-builds-updated-JDK-9-build-40-tp581p5815585.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] List of simple issues to fix
Closed 6 issues SUREFIRE-1001, SUREFIRE-904, SUREFIRE-595, SUREFIRE-1054, SUREFIRE-620, SUREFIRE-1118 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-List-of-simple-issues-to-fix-tp5814089p5815160.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: New logo?
This looks really funny, not bad :) http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-21-in-context.png What I like the way how you created the title from pictures. It's a bit crazy picture but still better than a pure picture standing in front of the title. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/New-logo-tp5778560p5814976.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: New logo?
The background picture can be something what represents Maven project. The sitting person with a computer might be changed to something like this (as a vision): http://www.posterus.sk/burza_prace.png I can see a flow of phases in life cycle, unique structures and project or POM. Some kind of these words in white loop in the picture, so that the men is pointing to one phase. Perhaps something like this, i guess. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/New-logo-tp5778560p5814980.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Only one POM with dependencyManagement for entire company
Hi Anders, thx for your hint. Just only a remark that i am not using jBoss poms because i am trying to be independent in java code. Instead i am using javax:javaee-api:7.0 which works very well + other artifacts with scope: provided. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Only-one-POM-with-dependencyManagement-for-entire-company-tp5814669p5814769.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Only one POM with dependencyManagement for entire company
Hi All, I would like to get your help. I am still trying to explain that very large commercial company (don't mean ASF) should not have one hotspot POM with only one dependencyManagement (DM). One DM is too weak rule, i would say. My arguments are that one DM section will not fit to the needs of 4 departments having many applications in each and much more Maven modules in each app. They want to override a dependency versions in each leaf in dependency section. I am calling this strategy an evil because it would stick to the dependencies forever and it would be very hard to change dependencies in all applications at once. Would you mind to explain the strategies for creating a successful corporative hierarchy of POMs? My proposal was to build a dependency tree between departments, which is very easy. Currently there are only two levels in the hierarchy. So I did this way and created BOM files with dependencyMgmt for internal and external artifacts in each level. Those artifacts are not duplicated in the first and second level. Is it good or wrong? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Only-one-POM-with-dependencyManagement-for-entire-company-tp5814669.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Only one POM with dependencyManagement for entire company
Thx Paull This I am basically trying to explain them as well. They are newbies and the funny thing is that they are ignoring us. My proposal was to serve a contact of Maven PMC experts so that they would pay for new environment, build process, POM structures, and CI systems setup but again with no interest. :( - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Only-one-POM-with-dependencyManagement-for-entire-company-tp5814669p5814678.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-757] Project encoding prope...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/71
[SUREFIRE-757] Project encoding properties is not checked
Only added a hint to setup property referenced by
${project.reporting.outputEncoding}.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/71.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #71
commit 3f6f499239c001797ffc3f0b3d04a8bcb7827ce9
Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com
Date: 2014-11-18T21:44:58Z
[SUREFIRE-757] Project encoding properties is not checked
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] List of simple issues to fix
Thx Bernd for your feedback. All this cleanup in JIRA in surefire project was started with purpose. I believe that the growing bugs should be cut down and fixed one by one; otherwise we wouldn't be able to track those and the image of maven would become worse. These are the reasons why I am asking the JIRA reporters to provide a patch. At least one patch per release from a user would be helpful. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-List-of-simple-issues-to-fix-tp5814089p5814392.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] List of simple issues to fix
A new issue SUREFIRE-1118 was open this morning. I have handled it and proposed closing it because it's a duplicate to SUREFIRE-514. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-List-of-simple-issues-to-fix-tp5814089p5814398.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release ASF Parent POM 16, Maven Parent POM 26, Maven Plugins Parent POM 27
That's pity that you haven't update MPOM-61 to the latest surefire 2.18. Both MPOM-61 and surefire-2.18 were released in Nov 08. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-ASF-Parent-POM-16-Maven-Parent-POM-26-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-27-tp5813919p5814416.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1036] Tests using MockitoJU...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/68 [SUREFIRE-1036] Tests using MockitoJUnitRunner are always run regardless of membership in specified group Fix for Groups filter. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/68.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #68 commit 17198eb651d9a52ebbea3f69e061bbf8a54eb4b7 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-11-15T21:56:36Z [SUREFIRE-1036] Tests using MockitoJUnitRunner are always run regardless of membership in specified group --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] List of simple issues to fix
It makes sense to me to close these bugs without a fix. I will wait one week for a response. If somebody want to prevent from closing them, let me know. SUREFIRE-1001, SUREFIRE-904, SUREFIRE-595, SUREFIRE-1054, SUREFIRE-620, SUREFIRE-757 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-List-of-simple-issues-to-fix-tp5814089p5814342.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Is Expression Language Supported in Maven POM?
Is it possible to use EL in POM, something like this? http://www.w3.org/TR/xexpr/#id-0042 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-Expression-Language-Supported-in-Maven-POM-tp5814057.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[SUREFIRE] List of simple issues to fix
I went through the JIRA in surefire project and prepared a list of issues which can be either closed or apply the provided patches or easy to fix. I have assigned other issues waiting for response from Reporter to close. There is 150 open bugs and therefore we can improve the statistics by fixing these: SUREFIRE-650 SUREFIRE-620 SUREFIRE-1054 SUREFIRE-1052 SUREFIRE-1036 SUREFIRE-994 SUREFIRE-995 SUREFIRE-917 SUREFIRE-893 SUREFIRE-854 SUREFIRE-850 SUREFIRE-840 SUREFIRE-833 SUREFIRE-830 (add a warning for wrong threadCount) SUREFIRE-781 SUREFIRE-779 SUREFIRE-778 SUREFIRE-713 SUREFIRE-632 SUREFIRE-601 SUREFIRE-587 SUREFIRE-468 (retest) SUREFIRE-524 SUREFIRE-383 SUREFIRE-269 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-List-of-simple-issues-to-fix-tp5814089.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Toolchains Plugin 1.1 Released
The toolchain.xsd schema seems to be unaccessible according to header and xsd storage on maven-apache. http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.1/maven-core/toolchains.html http://maven.apache.org/xsd/ - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/ANN-Apache-Maven-Toolchains-Plugin-1-1-Released-tp5814209p5814245.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-987] and [SUREFIRE-1109]
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/67 [SUREFIRE-987] and [SUREFIRE-1109] Added surefire/failsafe property for parameters runOrder and suiteXmlFiles. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/67.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #67 commit 336ef00fb65a7595673a4091376c282cc75de73d Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-11-09T22:37:36Z [SUREFIRE-987] and [SUREFIRE-1109] --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1112] Remove uneccessary ne...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/66 [SUREFIRE-1112] Remove uneccessary newlines in console output for test results with no error A fix for JIRA issue in SUREFIRE 2.19. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/66.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #66 commit 20df935b74d902bd4b91525ff6db6e0835e4dc7d Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-11-06T23:04:59Z [SUREFIRE-1112] Remove uneccessary newlines in console output for test results with no error --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
SUREFIRE Configurable Providers
I would like to configure surefire's providers in the plugin configuration.
My problem is that the aggregator POM defines surefire version in
pluginManagement, and the surefire's dependency has to declare the same
version.
This can be done via property ${surefire.version} antipattern. Then the
pluginManagement lost its own purpose.
Other solution is to declare the provider in the plugin's dependency in the
pluginManagement. The problem here is that you cannot exclude it in children
because the dependency is global.
I would like to have a new parameter providers declaring
[groupId:]artifactId.
I think the users will appreciate because of simple configuration.
No need for provider version because it's inherited from the plugin.
One can declare other provider per plugin execution section.
Pls let me know the pros/cons and problems if you are facing any with new
parameter.
-
BR, tibor17
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Configurable-Providers-tp5812529.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18 - Take 2
+1 on committer side - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-Take-2-tp5812277p5812407.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18 - Take 2
Karl, the README.txt will force the users to prepare for Maven 3. IMHO the SUREFIRE 3.0 would completely switch to Maven 3. Then we can use prerequisites with enforcer declaring the same min version of Maven dist. We will have chance to use Java Generics instead of using java.lang.Object in public API, remove jdk-1.3 and 1.4 profiles, declare surefire|failsafe property prefixes, use JDK 6 and Java 1.6 API, and break the backwards compatibility. The Java 6 is not maintained by the Oracle. It would be nice to see the Maven running on the top of Java 8 in the near future. I am not sure if we would have any bigger benefits from JDK 7 except for NIO and GC improvements. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-Take-2-tp5812277p5812412.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Proposal: Ease the usage of Failsafe
The difference is in the lifecycle. The jar/war bundle may contain modified resources other than the classpath. So testing the bundle is more closely to realistic testing of the entire application. If I have to test the WAR or whole web application with arquillian + selenius + maven resolver + startup the Tomcat before the tests, then I would use failsafe or invoker. Definitelly i wouldn't prolong the execution of unit tests/surefire with something like starting the Tomcat and testing the UI. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Ease-the-usage-of-Failsafe-tp5811232p5812480.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: ApacheCon EU 2014, Budapest
I like red wine, but who is paying? -:) - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Re-ApacheCon-EU-2014-Budapest-tp5811661p5812094.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
Your right Andreas, the page now is available. I'll have a look. Thx - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5811947.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
Hi Andreas, Do we have chance to update the site? One little issue with a title which appears in html ul unordered list on this site fork-options-and-parallel-execution.apt.vm - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5811955.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
Grzegorz Slowikowski-2 is right. This page http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-2.18/ really contains backslashes in page source code: SureFire JUnitCore Runner surefire-providers\surefire-junit47/index.html IE 11 and Firefox work fine with that. Who will fix it and how? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5811970.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
Great job Hevre and Andreas. Here is my voice. +1 - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5812029.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
I am going to report two issues in MPIR. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5812050.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
I found a bit ugly line in IT logs: [ERROR] null I found the reason, the JUnit passed null String in Description in Suite runner. Nothing is broken, only the lines are not nice with null. I'd like to prevent from users reporting new JIRA issue. I am pushing to ASF now... - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5811773.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.18
The staging is not available http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-2.18/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html Should not it be instead? http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/maven-surefire-2.18/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Surefire-Plugin-version-2-18-tp5811871p5811883.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1053] Suppress warning mess...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/63 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1108] Surefire should print...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/64 [SUREFIRE-1108] Surefire should print parallel tests in progress been stopped after elapsed timeout An improvement for SUREFIRE-1108 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/64.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #64 commit 23b2d3a5dcbcecbacab7c57ba9d530c0227151b1 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-29T20:49:01Z [SUREFIRE-1108] Surefire should print parallel tests in progress been stopped after elapsed timeout --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
The CloudBees want me to pay after long time of using it. So I would rather discard the account. So now the builds take 45 min to complete on laptop. Do we have Committers or PMC working for CloudBees who can provide us with free accounts? Since the build system is built on the top of Maven we should have such privilegies. It would speed up my development. Last time I had to re-fix the project and rebuild locally which is better than breaking the ASF build watched by all eyes. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5811585.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
Hi Andreas Thx for your patience. It looks like we can start making the release. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5811601.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: + documentation in fork-options-and-p...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/65 + documentation in fork-options-and-parallel-execution.apt.vm Few words about parameters in SUREFIRE documentation: parallelTestsTimeoutInSeconds parallelTestsTimeoutForcedInSeconds You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/65.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #65 commit df06e2f06239d7967f59341708049989b3d77629 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-29T23:44:47Z + documentation in fork-options-and-parallel-execution.apt.vm --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1053] Suppress warning mess...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/63 [SUREFIRE-1053] Suppress warning message if file.encoding is set using argLine Fix for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1053 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/63.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #63 commit b87adf91c91d9811d857dcab0c07658995a7b4ef Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-29T00:51:38Z [SUREFIRE-1053] Suppress warning message if file.encoding is set using argLine --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
Hi Andreas, I am going to push SUREFIRE-649. No, actually i will fix SUREFIRE-1053 and open a new minor improvement which takes me very short time to fix. IMHO i can fix these issues till Wed. Is that acceptable date for you? Do you want to make the release on Friday? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5811058.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
The build succeedded after SUREFIRE-649 but the deployment failed Failed to transfer file: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/maven/surefire/common-java5/maven-metadata.xml. Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5811070.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-649] empty strings in syste...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/62 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Updated documentation in SUREFIRE-104...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/61 Updated documentation in SUREFIRE-1047 and SUREFIRE-1097 Documentation for argLine and includes/excludes section. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/61.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #61 commit 870d1881f30467b3ac1382ce6692eb9019424892 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-26T10:40:07Z Updated documentation in SUREFIRE-1047 and SUREFIRE-1097 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
Hi All, Let's discuss the release of SUREFIRE 2.18. Initially we wanted to release surefire 2.18 by the EO October. (Previously I wanted to wait and make more bugfixes but nowadays it does not make sense to postpone the release date and wait for next weeks.) Current situation is quite good. All together we are going to release 20 bug fixes, 5 improvements and 2 new features. We have only one issue to complete SUREFIRE-1017 and one formal issue been already fixed in SUREFIRE-1090 and waiting to be pushed to ASF from GitHub PR #44. https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE/fixforversion/20175 BR, Tibor - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
I would like to commit one more improvement in 2.18 which does not block us at all. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5810744.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Release Plan for SUREFIRE 2.18
I am going to fix the following in surefire 2.18 SUREFIRE-649 and SUREFIRE-1053 Thus we will have same nullable/empty-string behavior with environment variables. Then I will open improvement in JIRA and improve text in printed warnings with shutdown after elapsed timeout in parallel execution. In 2.19 I want to release improvement of runOrder. Currently runOrder=balanced makes sense for parallel=classes. I need to enable for all parallel and thus all kinds of thread-counts would be taken into account. Then SUREFIRE-1037 in 2.19 which I think can be fixed together with simplified the RunListener so that the start and end of test class would be recognized directly from JUit Runners bypassing notifications from JUnit RunListener. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Release-Plan-for-SUREFIRE-2-18-tp5810740p5810936.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-649] empty strings in syste...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/62 [SUREFIRE-649] empty strings in systemPropertyVariables element The fix for https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-649 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/62.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #62 commit 7046430fbf9269334dbe971cd0487d5baca0f68a Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-26T23:59:46Z [SUREFIRE-649] empty strings in systemPropertyVariables element --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
@stephenc Maybe another alternative to solve this issue. The developers should be able to launch build in their own branch. The workspace can be downloaded only from developer's account in builds.apache.org. Additionally this would prevent from breaking the build in trunk. Do we have limited resources on the build machine or such restrictions that the devs are untrusted? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5810349.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Multiple lines with T E S T S in l...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/60 Multiple lines with T E S T S in log. Related to JIRA issue. This line is printed multiple times in log: --- T E S T S --- You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/60.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #60 commit 2e62ff47277afe3f8445699a96343fcb3f72efac Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-21T22:14:24Z Multiple lines with T E S T S in log. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
@stephenc thx, downloaded Tell me how are we going to solve this issue next time. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5810098.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
ok, i am going to trigger the build. Let's see what will happen if workspcase zip would be downloadable. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5809941.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
I've got this problem now: Access Denied tibordigana is missing the Job/Workspace permission https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/ws https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/ws/*zip*/maven-surefire.zip - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5809973.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Important Notice for all users of the parallel build feature
Hi Kristian, Nice fix. There are several plugins using plexus-interpolation like resources, dependency, war... Would all of these patched maven plugins been planned in the next Maven (components and default-bindings) release as well? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Important-Notice-for-all-users-of-the-parallel-build-feature-tp5809947p5810008.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
SUREFIRE Logger in prinited summary
A surefire user reported an issue that maven-surefire should use logger in printed summary. It would help to filter out lines with failed tests. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1107 I cannot say yes or no, as I explained in JIRA, this would need a discussion in the community because the prefixes like [ERROR] in stdout may break current build systems. Therefore broken compatibility should not appear in current 2.x. If you can estimate the criticality of this fix, we can discuss it. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Logger-in-prinited-summary-tp5810018.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
Our IT tests fail in maven-surefire project. More specifically I need to access files under module surefire-integration-tests/target for analysis. Is this possible? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-817] JUnit 4.7+ Provider an...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/59 [SUREFIRE-817] JUnit 4.7+ Provider and behavior of System Exit proved by ITs Surefire817SystemExitIT.java Test.java pom.xml You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/59.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #59 commit 40b4b48a323c46e1b2ace3d5acb4add183b12d02 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-16T21:18:51Z [SUREFIRE-817] JUnit 4.7+ Provider and System Exit proved by ITs --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?
Unlike Workspace menu item in CloudBees, here in https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/1325/ I don't see such menu item. Is it older Jenkins? - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5809618.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1095] NPE in JUnit 4.x RunL...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/58 [SUREFIRE-1095] NPE in JUnit 4.x RunListener + Refactoring Fix of SUREFIRE-1095 + refactoring. https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1095 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/58.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #58 commit bfd413cc01e528706417428aadcb86169b1175cb Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-15T19:44:38Z [SUREFIRE-1095] NPE in JUnit 4.x RunListener + Refactoring --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1105] Surefire build should...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/57 [SUREFIRE-1105] Surefire build should check Java 1.5 API signatures with JDK version 5 The Maven Surefire project should use animal-sniffer-maven-plugin to check Java 1.5 API signatures. It has advantages where JDK 8 speeds up the build, however the Java classes are properly compiled to *.class 1.5. It is going to fix the Jenkins build with currently minimal JDK version 1.5: [Maven Surefire] $ /opt/jdk/jdk1.5.0_22/bin/java -Xmx1196m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file I have extended pluginManagement and plugins section in parent POM. plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdanimal-sniffer-maven-plugin/artifactId version1.11/version executions execution idsignature-check/id goals goalcheck/goal /goals /execution /executions configuration signature groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo.signature/groupId artifactIdjava15/artifactId version1.0/version /signature /configuration /plugin You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/57.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #57 commit 5c793434a61d957f304d2af481701ab00cc3e6e3 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-11T22:05:02Z [SUREFIRE-1105] Surefire build should check Java 1.5 API signatures with JDK version 5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1080] Use parallel and fork...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/56 [SUREFIRE-1080] Use parallel and fork together run some tests multiple times Fix for SUREFIRE-1080. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1080 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/56.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #56 commit f961485fe305b5f13f00468ef0dedc9fa380c994 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-10T21:47:37Z [SUREFIRE-1080] Use parallel and fork together run some tests multiple times --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-797] Parallel junit does no...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/54 [SUREFIRE-797] Parallel junit does not run in parallel when a Suite is used at the top level This is not a fix. Commit only IT. The IT proves expected behavior in [SUREFIRE-797] since of 2.16. The IT asserts execution time with parallel=classes or parallel=mehods on test=**/TestSuite.java. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/54.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #54 commit 3cecbd360e74aff19b838e4c8d86bc99c4ad2bee Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-08T18:36:33Z [SUREFIRE-797] Parallel junit does not run in parallel when a Suite is used at the top level --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Fixed build process
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/55 Fixed build process Fixed failing build process after submitted SUREFIRE-1082. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/55.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #55 commit ec230ae25a91009433305fbf94b6077cdcf47730 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-08T21:26:22Z Fixed build process --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE-1101 Surefire does not shutd...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/51 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1082] Parallelization does ...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/52 [SUREFIRE-1082] Parallelization does not work as expected when using jUn... ...it Parameterized This is not a fix. Commit only IT. The IT proves expected behavior in [SUREFIRE-1082]. The JIRA issue was reported with user error. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/52.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #52 commit 1c2698a7527401a4a68a97e905886075fe6c4efa Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-07T22:34:53Z [SUREFIRE-1082] Parallelization does not work as expected when using jUnit Parameterized --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE-1101 Surefire does not shutd...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/51 SUREFIRE-1101 Surefire does not shutdown thread-pools programatically af... ...ter test run has finished. The threads executing tests in parallel should be shutdown after the test run has finished. We had a significant number of Threads exhausting the resources in the integration tests. This will shutdown these threads after junit Computer exits. Now the Computer waits until these threads are gone. The same happens after timeout for parallel execution is elapsed. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/51.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #51 commit 3994ad15cf72b99f68cc2d00683e5b6f84cc6ba5 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-10-06T22:53:17Z SUREFIRE-1101 Surefire does not shutdown thread-pools programatically after test run has finished. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1098] Fix runOrder=balanced...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/49 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-1098] Fix runOrder=balanced...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/49 [SUREFIRE-1098] Fix runOrder=balanced is not working Fix for #48 with IT. Updated documentation for runOrder parameter. Added ststem property for runOrder. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s3 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/49.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #49 commit 7a553254739421947e910581b662390581235996 Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-09-28T14:59:45Z [SUREFIRE-1098] Fix runOrder=balanced is not working --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: The module surefire-setup-integration...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/50 The module surefire-setup-integration-tests fails with Maven 3.2.3 The module surefire-setup-integration-tests which fails with Maven 3.2.3 due to https://jira.codehaus.org/i#browse/MPH-101 The fix is to upgrade maven-help-plugin to the version 2.2 from 2.1. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/50.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #50 commit af96520ef488d91cbe1b25c1d69461e932c550ef Author: tibordigana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-09-28T21:29:34Z surefire-setup-integration-tests fails with Maven 3.2.3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE-1028 Unable to run single te...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/46 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Exceptional parallel execution on @No...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/45 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE-1028 Unable to run single te...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/46 SUREFIRE-1028 Unable to run single test (junit) Fix for a critical bug: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1028 Fixed in subclass `FilterFactory.MethodFilter`. The nested children need to be scanned with filtering conditions. The PC uses aggregared structure of JUnit Runners and therefore filtered test methods should be scanned in whole hierarchy. Problem of this bug: No tests to execute while parallel execution is triggered on filtered test method (see single-test.apt.vm). `mvn test -Dtest=SomeTest#test` Plugin configuration: parallel='classes', useUnlimitedThreads=true You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/46.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #46 commit e10efc4b12befb132f01faa4dfe847a143160882 Author: Tibor Digana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-08-28T17:57:03Z SUREFIRE-1028 Unable to run single test (junit) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Exceptional parallel execution on @No...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/45 Exceptional parallel execution on @NotThreadSafe type. We want to execute tests in parallel. In some cases some tests want to be executed in a single Thread instance. For instance I am using Embedded Container OpenEJB which is singleton, thus does not support parallelism. Other tests want to be executed in parallel anyway. This simple principle avoids parallel execution in an elegant way in src/test/java. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/45.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #45 commit 396a8ede083c701a73b24afee4a5a158dd9b7faf Author: Tibor Digana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-08-26T22:59:29Z Exceptional parallel execution on @NotThreadSafe type. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Exceptional parallel execution on @No...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/43 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Exceptional parallel execution on @No...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/43 Exceptional parallel execution on @NotThreadSafe type. We want to execute tests in parallel. In some cases some tests want to be executed in a single Thread instance. For instance I am using Embedded Container OpenEJB which is singleton, thus does not support parallelism. Other tests want to be executed in parallel anyway. This simple principle avoids parallel execution in an elegant way in src/test/java. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/43.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #43 commit c3b3a3f673ff104a6488f927f0c9a697209c1b22 Author: Tibor Digana tibo...@lycos.com Date: 2014-08-13T01:20:47Z Exceptional parallel execution on @NotThreadSafe type. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE [1048] Surefire does not use...
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/34 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE [1048] Surefire does not use...
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/34 SUREFIRE [1048] Surefire does not use the total amount of threads specif... ...ied by threadCount This is optimization of thread counts limited to the real number of parallel JUnit Runners. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/34.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #34 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
