Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Let's continue the discussion on website in #17497 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#issuecomment-595544177
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] New Branches for MXNet 1.x, 1.7.x, and 2.x (#17701)
Closed #17701. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17701#event-3103498526
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)
@gigasquid Yeah, you can view the download statistics from https://repository.apache.org/#central-stat. -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595522607
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)
Is there anyway to get the stats on downloads of the maven central scala/clojure jars to see how much current use there is? If the numbers are high or low and what trend is can help shape the decision -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595511949
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)
@gigasquid @zachgk Since the Scala API are built a while ago, I can see some of the deprecated sections: Module, DataparallelGroup, Symbol ... Most of the training component would be invalid. There can be three approaches: - upgrade/rewrite Scala API and bring up MXNet 2.0 features. - drop Scala API - adopt DJL (DeepJavaLibrary) to be the Java/Scala/Clojure backend. I am not sure which way works the best, please leave any thoughts you have. -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595380125
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)
Further thinking this through - since the Scala language binding currently provides the base for both Java and Clojure, I would be nice to know what the future plans for the Scala language binding is. Whether or not that path is supported will determine the other JVM langs. -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595256200
Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)
If I understand this correctly, since the Scala, Java, and Clojure bindings use symbol and ndarray exclusively, this will also mean that they will be effectively deprecated as well. This is fine if what the community decides upon, but it should be called out explicitly. cc @lanking520 @nswamy @kedarbellare -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17676#issuecomment-595245038
