Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
If possible it would be good to maintain Release Status page [1] so that anybody who is planning activities around 1.6 release could refer to it and find proper and actual dates on it. [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+Plan+and+Status -- Thanks, Denis On 1/13/20, 10:51 PM, "PrzemysÅ≠aw TrÄ˙dak" wrote: Dear MXNet community, I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 13 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes * Zhi Zhang / binding * Qing Lan / binding * Markus Weimer / binding * Haibin Lin / binding * Jun Wu / binding * Lin Yuan * Lai Wei * Xinyu Chen * Guanxin Qiao * Ciyong Chen * Chaitanya Bapat * Karan Jariwala * Hao Jin 0 votes * No votes -1 votes * No votes Vote thread can be found here [1]. The list of members can be found here [2]. I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement will follow soon. Best regards, Przemyslaw Tredak [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ae98b5449459f40b536af12bfe4b701305a28071fe7bd2173465d8%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html
[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
Dear MXNet community, I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 13 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes * Zhi Zhang / binding * Qing Lan / binding * Markus Weimer / binding * Haibin Lin / binding * Jun Wu / binding * Lin Yuan * Lai Wei * Xinyu Chen * Guanxin Qiao * Ciyong Chen * Chaitanya Bapat * Karan Jariwala * Hao Jin 0 votes * No votes -1 votes * No votes Vote thread can be found here [1]. The list of members can be found here [2]. I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement will follow soon. Best regards, Przemyslaw Tredak [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ae98b5449459f40b536af12bfe4b701305a28071fe7bd2173465d8%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? Apache projects generally do not provide binaries as "signed off" release artifacts. That being said, binaries are commonly provided and marked as "convenience binaries". Hence, no vote is necessary on them, nor are they "official" releases. Markus
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? Apache projects generally do not provide binaries as "signed off" release artifacts. That being said, binaries are commonly provided and marked as "convenience binaries". Hence, no vote is necessary on them, nor are they "official" releases. Markus On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 4:17 PM Hao Jin wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Built from source and ran all the latest d2l notebooks without problems. > Hao > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:03 PM Jun Wu wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Built from source. Ran all the GPU tests and test_numpy*.py cpu tests > > without problems. > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM Skalicky, Sam > > wrote: > > > > > We can enable building nightlys for feature branches too. > > > > > > Sam > > > > > > > On Jan 10, 2020, at 7:48 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > > > > > We can release one cpu-mkl and one CUDA wheel for testing various > > > > applications. Other people can build from source if they want other > > > flavors > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karan Jariwala < > > > karankjariw...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of > > > pip > > > >> wheel. > > > >> > > > >> MKL/ without MKL > > > >> CUDA/ no CUDA > > > >> Linux/windows/Mac > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Karan > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? > > > >>> > > > >>> Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from > > > >> source > > > >>> also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for > > > >> users > > > >>> who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. > > > >>> > > > >>> Best, > > > >>> Haibin > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > +1 > > > > > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit > > tests > > > >> and > > > they passed. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala < > > > >> karankjariw...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod > > > >>> 0.18.2. > > > > No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running > > > >>> horovod_MXNet > > > > integration test. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Karan > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > > >> > > > >> Tested: > > > >> * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > > > >> * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > > > >> * SHA512 of the archive > > > >> > > > >> Not tested: > > > >> * Language bindings > > > >> * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > > > >> * LICENSE and compliance status > > > >> * Signature of the archive > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 (binding) Built from source and ran all the latest d2l notebooks without problems. Hao On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:03 PM Jun Wu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Built from source. Ran all the GPU tests and test_numpy*.py cpu tests > without problems. > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM Skalicky, Sam > wrote: > > > We can enable building nightlys for feature branches too. > > > > Sam > > > > > On Jan 10, 2020, at 7:48 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > > > We can release one cpu-mkl and one CUDA wheel for testing various > > > applications. Other people can build from source if they want other > > flavors > > > > > > Lin > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karan Jariwala < > > karankjariw...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of > > pip > > >> wheel. > > >> > > >> MKL/ without MKL > > >> CUDA/ no CUDA > > >> Linux/windows/Mac > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Karan > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? > > >>> > > >>> Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from > > >> source > > >>> also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for > > >> users > > >>> who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Haibin > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > +1 > > > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit > tests > > >> and > > they passed. > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala < > > >> karankjariw...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod > > >>> 0.18.2. > > > No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running > > >>> horovod_MXNet > > > integration test. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Karan > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > >> > > >> Tested: > > >> * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > > >> * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > > >> * SHA512 of the archive > > >> > > >> Not tested: > > >> * Language bindings > > >> * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > > >> * LICENSE and compliance status > > >> * Signature of the archive > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 (binding) Built from source. Ran all the GPU tests and test_numpy*.py cpu tests without problems. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM Skalicky, Sam wrote: > We can enable building nightlys for feature branches too. > > Sam > > > On Jan 10, 2020, at 7:48 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > We can release one cpu-mkl and one CUDA wheel for testing various > > applications. Other people can build from source if they want other > flavors > > > > Lin > > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karan Jariwala < > karankjariw...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of > pip > >> wheel. > >> > >> MKL/ without MKL > >> CUDA/ no CUDA > >> Linux/windows/Mac > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Karan > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? > >>> > >>> Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from > >> source > >>> also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for > >> users > >>> who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Haibin > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin > >>> wrote: > >>> > +1 > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests > >> and > they passed. > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala < > >> karankjariw...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod > >>> 0.18.2. > > No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running > >>> horovod_MXNet > > integration test. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Karan > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer > >>> wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > >> > >> Tested: > >> * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > >> * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > >> * SHA512 of the archive > >> > >> Not tested: > >> * Language bindings > >> * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > >> * LICENSE and compliance status > >> * Signature of the archive > >> > > > > >>> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
We can enable building nightlys for feature branches too. Sam > On Jan 10, 2020, at 7:48 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > We can release one cpu-mkl and one CUDA wheel for testing various > applications. Other people can build from source if they want other flavors > > Lin > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karan Jariwala >> wrote: >> >> Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of pip >> wheel. >> >> MKL/ without MKL >> CUDA/ no CUDA >> Linux/windows/Mac >> >> Thanks, >> Karan >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin >> wrote: >> >>> Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? >>> >>> Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from >> source >>> also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for >> users >>> who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. >>> >>> Best, >>> Haibin >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin >>> wrote: >>> +1 Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests >> and they passed. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala < >> karankjariw...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod >>> 0.18.2. > No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running >>> horovod_MXNet > integration test. > > > Thanks, > > Karan > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer >>> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. >> >> Tested: >> * Built from source using the instructions here [0] >> * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` >> * SHA512 of the archive >> >> Not tested: >> * Language bindings >> * CUDA or other GPU acceleration >> * LICENSE and compliance status >> * Signature of the archive >> > >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
We can release one cpu-mkl and one CUDA wheel for testing various applications. Other people can build from source if they want other flavors Lin On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karan Jariwala wrote: > Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of pip > wheel. > > MKL/ without MKL > CUDA/ no CUDA > Linux/windows/Mac > > Thanks, > Karan > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin > wrote: > > > Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? > > > > Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from > source > > also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for > users > > who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. > > > > Best, > > Haibin > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests > and > > > they passed. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala < > karankjariw...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod > > 0.18.2. > > >> No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running > > horovod_MXNet > > >> integration test. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Karan > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 (binding) > > >> > > > >> > I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > >> > > > >> > Tested: > > >> > * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > > >> > * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > > >> > * SHA512 of the archive > > >> > > > >> > Not tested: > > >> > * Language bindings > > >> > * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > > >> > * LICENSE and compliance status > > >> > * Signature of the archive > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
Yes, agree with your point. But we will be requiring many flavors of pip wheel. MKL/ without MKL CUDA/ no CUDA Linux/windows/Mac Thanks, Karan On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Haibin Lin wrote: > Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? > > Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from source > also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for users > who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. > > Best, > Haibin > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests and > > they passed. > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala > > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod > 0.18.2. > >> No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running > horovod_MXNet > >> integration test. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Karan > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer > wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > > >> > I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > >> > > >> > Tested: > >> > * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > >> > * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > >> > * SHA512 of the archive > >> > > >> > Not tested: > >> > * Language bindings > >> > * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > >> > * LICENSE and compliance status > >> > * Signature of the archive > >> > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
Shall we provide pip wheels for later release votes? Not everyone knows how to build MXNet from source (and building from source also takes very long). Providing a pip wheel would lower the bar for users who wants to test MXNet and participate in voting. Best, Haibin On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:50 PM Haibin Lin wrote: > +1 > > Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests and > they passed. > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod 0.18.2. >> No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running horovod_MXNet >> integration test. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Karan >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. >> > >> > Tested: >> > * Built from source using the instructions here [0] >> > * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` >> > * SHA512 of the archive >> > >> > Not tested: >> > * Language bindings >> > * CUDA or other GPU acceleration >> > * LICENSE and compliance status >> > * Signature of the archive >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Built from source with USE_CUDA=1 on Ubuntu. Run gluon-nlp unit tests and they passed. On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Karan Jariwala wrote: > +1 > > Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod 0.18.2. > No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running horovod_MXNet > integration test. > > > Thanks, > > Karan > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > > > Tested: > > * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > > * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > > * SHA512 of the archive > > > > Not tested: > > * Language bindings > > * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > > * LICENSE and compliance status > > * Signature of the archive > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Tested MXNet with and without MKL-DNN on Ubuntu 16.04 with Horovod 0.18.2. No regression seen between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0.rc1 when running horovod_MXNet integration test. Thanks, Karan On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. > > Tested: > * Built from source using the instructions here [0] > * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` > * SHA512 of the archive > > Not tested: > * Language bindings > * CUDA or other GPU acceleration > * LICENSE and compliance status > * Signature of the archive >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 (binding) I tested on Ubuntu 18.04 on the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Tested: * Built from source using the instructions here [0] * Ran the tests in `./build/tests/mxnet_unit_tests` * SHA512 of the archive Not tested: * Language bindings * CUDA or other GPU acceleration * LICENSE and compliance status * Signature of the archive
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 (binding) Built 1.6.0.rc1 on my Mac with MKLDNN Scala build/test passed. Thanks, Qing From: Chaitanya Bapat Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 12:21 To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1 +1 Built from the dist [1] on Ubuntu 16.04 DL AMI for CPU + MKLDNN Tested 1. OpPerf (benchmark utility) - Promising results (faster forward times for certain ops compared to 1.4.0 and 1.5.1) 2. Large tensor support (used the USE_INT64_TENSOR_SIZE = ON flag while building) : Tests pass Thanks Przemyslaw for leading 1.6.0! It's taken long. But we're close to the finish line! Awesome work! Thanks Chai [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 22:05, Chen, Ciyong wrote: > +1 > > Build from source on CentOS 7.6 with GCC 4.8.5 with MKLDNN. > Unit tests passed and imagenet examples (with MKL-DNN subgraph backend) > looked good on performance and accuracy in both FP32 and INT8 mode, RNN > training worked. > > Thanks, > -Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Lai Wei > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 8:56 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1 > > +1 > Build from source on Ubuntu with CUDA/CUDNN/MKLDNN and tested with > keras-mxnet. > Unit tests passed and example works on CPU/GPU. > > > Best Regards > > Lai > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04 > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified > > > it works with Horovod 0.18.2 > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Dear MXNet community, > > >> > > >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. > > >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > > >> > > >> Link to release notes: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+not > > >> es > > >> > > >> Link to release candidate: > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > > >> > > >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > > >> > > >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > > >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick > > >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > > >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 > > >> to > > >> 1.6 branch (#17213)) > > >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators > > >> (Interleaved MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > > >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > > >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names > > >> in > > the > > >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > > >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > > >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the > > reason > > >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in > > >> sum of squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport > > >> #17002, #17068 > > and > > >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) > > >> > > >> > > >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > > >> +1 = approve > > >> +0 = no opinion > > >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > >> > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Przemyslaw Tredak > > >> > > > > > > -- *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat* *+1 (973) 953-6299* [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat] <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image: https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Built from the dist [1] on Ubuntu 16.04 DL AMI for CPU + MKLDNN Tested 1. OpPerf (benchmark utility) - Promising results (faster forward times for certain ops compared to 1.4.0 and 1.5.1) 2. Large tensor support (used the USE_INT64_TENSOR_SIZE = ON flag while building) : Tests pass Thanks Przemyslaw for leading 1.6.0! It's taken long. But we're close to the finish line! Awesome work! Thanks Chai [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 22:05, Chen, Ciyong wrote: > +1 > > Build from source on CentOS 7.6 with GCC 4.8.5 with MKLDNN. > Unit tests passed and imagenet examples (with MKL-DNN subgraph backend) > looked good on performance and accuracy in both FP32 and INT8 mode, RNN > training worked. > > Thanks, > -Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Lai Wei > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 8:56 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1 > > +1 > Build from source on Ubuntu with CUDA/CUDNN/MKLDNN and tested with > keras-mxnet. > Unit tests passed and example works on CPU/GPU. > > > Best Regards > > Lai > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04 > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified > > > it works with Horovod 0.18.2 > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Dear MXNet community, > > >> > > >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. > > >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > > >> > > >> Link to release notes: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+not > > >> es > > >> > > >> Link to release candidate: > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > > >> > > >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > > >> > > >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > > >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick > > >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > > >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 > > >> to > > >> 1.6 branch (#17213)) > > >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators > > >> (Interleaved MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > > >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > > >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names > > >> in > > the > > >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > > >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > > >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the > > reason > > >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in > > >> sum of squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport > > >> #17002, #17068 > > and > > >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) > > >> > > >> > > >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > > >> +1 = approve > > >> +0 = no opinion > > >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > >> > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Przemyslaw Tredak > > >> > > > > > > -- *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat* *+1 (973) 953-6299* [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat] <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image: https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Build from source on CentOS 7.6 with GCC 4.8.5 with MKLDNN. Unit tests passed and imagenet examples (with MKL-DNN subgraph backend) looked good on performance and accuracy in both FP32 and INT8 mode, RNN training worked. Thanks, -Ciyong -Original Message- From: Lai Wei Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 8:56 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1 +1 Build from source on Ubuntu with CUDA/CUDNN/MKLDNN and tested with keras-mxnet. Unit tests passed and example works on CPU/GPU. Best Regards Lai On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04 > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified > > it works with Horovod 0.18.2 > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak > > > > wrote: > > > >> Dear MXNet community, > >> > >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. > >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > >> > >> Link to release notes: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+not > >> es > >> > >> Link to release candidate: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > >> > >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > >> > >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick > >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 > >> to > >> 1.6 branch (#17213)) > >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators > >> (Interleaved MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names > >> in > the > >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the > reason > >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in > >> sum of squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport > >> #17002, #17068 > and > >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) > >> > >> > >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > >> +1 = approve > >> +0 = no opinion > >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Przemyslaw Tredak > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
On 2020/01/07 17:55:15, Przemys��aw Tr��dak wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. Voting > starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > > Link to release notes: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes > > Link to release candidate: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > > The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick MKL-DNN > Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to 1.6 > branch (#17213)) > * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved MHA > for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in the > estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the reason of > -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of squares > operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 and #17114 to > 1.6 branch (#17137)) > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > +1 = approve > +0 = no opinion > -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > > Best regards, > Przemyslaw Tredak > +1 Built from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN. Inference worked well without speed/accuracy drop. Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Build from source on CentOS 7.6 with MKL/DNNL on and verified it works with DNNL backend for fp32/int8 inference. Both functionality and performance are great Thanks Xinyu On 2020/1/8, 1:55 AM, "Przemysław Trędak" wrote: Dear MXNet community, This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. Link to release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes Link to release candidate: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to 1.6 branch (#17213)) * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in the estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the reason of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 and #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: +1 = approve +0 = no opinion -1 = disapprove (provide reason) Best regards, Przemyslaw Tredak
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 built from source and passed gluoncv unittests Thanks, Zhi On 2020/01/07 17:55:15, Przemys��aw Tr��dak wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. Voting > starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > > Link to release notes: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes > > Link to release candidate: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > > The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick MKL-DNN > Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to 1.6 > branch (#17213)) > * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved MHA > for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in the > estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the reason of > -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of squares > operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 and #17114 to > 1.6 branch (#17137)) > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > +1 = approve > +0 = no opinion > -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > > Best regards, > Przemyslaw Tredak >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Build from source on Ubuntu with CUDA/CUDNN/MKLDNN and tested with keras-mxnet. Unit tests passed and example works on CPU/GPU. Best Regards Lai On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04 > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified it > > works with Horovod 0.18.2 > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak > > wrote: > > > >> Dear MXNet community, > >> > >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. > >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > >> > >> Link to release notes: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes > >> > >> Link to release candidate: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > >> > >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > >> > >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick > >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to > >> 1.6 branch (#17213)) > >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved > >> MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in > the > >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the > reason > >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of > >> squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 > and > >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) > >> > >> > >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > >> +1 = approve > >> +0 = no opinion > >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Przemyslaw Tredak > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04 On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > +1 > > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified it > works with Horovod 0.18.2 > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak > wrote: > >> Dear MXNet community, >> >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. >> >> Link to release notes: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes >> >> Link to release candidate: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 >> >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ >> >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to >> 1.6 branch (#17213)) >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved >> MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in the >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the reason >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of >> squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 and >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) >> >> >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: >> +1 = approve >> +0 = no opinion >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason) >> >> >> Best regards, >> Przemyslaw Tredak >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
+1 Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified it works with Horovod 0.18.2 On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0. > Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST. > > Link to release notes: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes > > Link to release candidate: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1 > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/ > > The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0: > * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick > MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225)) > * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to 1.6 > branch (#17213)) > * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved > MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211)) > * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149)) > * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in the > estimator api (#17051) (#17162)) > * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193)) > * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the reason > of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of > squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068 and > #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137)) > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > +1 = approve > +0 = no opinion > -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > > Best regards, > Przemyslaw Tredak >
