[Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi,

should we always start with this package ?

org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2

or

org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven

than

-plugin.wagon
-plugin.jdev
-plugin.faces
-plugin.javascript

that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;

not really sure on maven vs maven2

thx!
Matthias

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org


Re: [Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Manfred Geiler
maven2 is ok I think

at least it makes sure we have a namespace for incompatible maven3
plugins in the future...  ;-)

--Manfred


On 12/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 should we always start with this package ?

 org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2

 or

 org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven

 than

 -plugin.wagon
 -plugin.jdev
 -plugin.faces
 -plugin.javascript

 that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;

 not really sure on maven vs maven2

 thx!
 Matthias

 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 further stuff:
 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org



-- 
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
Development and Courses in English and
German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


Re: [Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Robinson
+0.5 on maven

I am a bit indifferent, but I think that a package should be version
agnostic, and only be used for area of functionality. The JAR should
be version specific.

Don't you think that it would be invalid to import maven1 and maven2
jars at the same time?

So I would see as the package:
org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven

And the release as something like:
apache-myfaces-maven1-1.x.x with dependency on maven 1 and
apache-myfaces-maven2-1.x.x with dependency on maven 2 and
apache-myfaces-maven3-1.x.x with dependency on maven 3.

So the artifact ID would have the maven version somewhere in it.

-Andrew

On Dec 21, 2007 6:48 AM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 maven2 is ok I think

 at least it makes sure we have a namespace for incompatible maven3
 plugins in the future...  ;-)

 --Manfred



 On 12/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  should we always start with this package ?
 
  org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2
 
  or
 
  org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven
 
  than
 
  -plugin.wagon
  -plugin.jdev
  -plugin.faces
  -plugin.javascript
 
  that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks;
 
  not really sure on maven vs maven2
 
  thx!
  Matthias
 
  --
  Matthias Wessendorf
 
  further stuff:
  blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
  sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
  mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
 


 --
 http://www.irian.at
 Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
 Development and Courses in English and
 German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces