Re: [MyFaces 1.2.1] question on trunk and tag

2008-01-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Jan 20, 2008 9:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 two questions.

 1)
 There is a 1.2.1 TAG:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/tags/1_2_1_RC/

 that uses Trinidad's 1.2.6 plugins.
 Why?
 There was no release of that. Currently there is one on the vote (ends today)
 so, to me it is not clear if the used maven-faces-plugin is *really*
 this particular one.


this problem is solved now.
The 1.2.6 plugins are mirrored world-wide


 2)
 The trunk says 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT.
 In case we use the above mentioned TAG, shouldn't it say 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT 
 already?

 Thanks!
 Matthias


 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 further stuff:
 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org


[MyFaces 1.2.1] question on trunk and tag

2008-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi,

two questions.

1)
There is a 1.2.1 TAG:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/tags/1_2_1_RC/

that uses Trinidad's 1.2.6 plugins.
Why?
There was no release of that. Currently there is one on the vote (ends today)
so, to me it is not clear if the used maven-faces-plugin is *really*
this particular one.

2)
The trunk says 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT.
In case we use the above mentioned TAG, shouldn't it say 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT already?

Thanks!
Matthias


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org


Re: [MyFaces 1.2.1] question on trunk and tag

2008-01-20 Thread Manfred Geiler
On Jan 20, 2008 6:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 2)
 The trunk says 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT.
 In case we use the above mentioned TAG, shouldn't it say 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT 
 already?

No, I think 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk is ok as long as there is no release.

The 1_2_1_RC (normally) is a working copy branch(!) that is used to
prepare the release without disturbing concurrent development.
BTW, why is 1_2_1_RC a tag? It should be a branch of course.

Leaving the version on trunk unchanged gives the release manager the
chance to throw away this working copy branch and start over with a
new copy from the trunk.

textbook example:
As soon as the release is out, all important fixes and changes on this
branch (including the pom updates to 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT) will be merged
back to the trunk.

--Manfred


Re: [MyFaces 1.2.1] question on trunk and tag

2008-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi,

I don't know why it is a TAG.
TAG means (to me) something more serious/final.
and... that all 1.2.1 related fixes go into that as well.
New features not.

That's why I asked, why is trunk still 1.2.1 (and not 1.22)

-M

On Jan 20, 2008 1:29 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Jan 20, 2008 6:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  2)
  The trunk says 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT.
  In case we use the above mentioned TAG, shouldn't it say 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT 
  already?

 No, I think 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk is ok as long as there is no release.

 The 1_2_1_RC (normally) is a working copy branch(!) that is used to
 prepare the release without disturbing concurrent development.
 BTW, why is 1_2_1_RC a tag? It should be a branch of course.

 Leaving the version on trunk unchanged gives the release manager the
 chance to throw away this working copy branch and start over with a
 new copy from the trunk.

 textbook example:
 As soon as the release is out, all important fixes and changes on this
 branch (including the pom updates to 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT) will be merged
 back to the trunk.

 --Manfred




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org