Re: Remove (experimental) from FlatLaf Dark
Hi, when FlatLaf Dark is used and code coverage is displayed, then background color of both covered and uncovered lines makes code hard to read. Similar problem was also reported for Darcula plugin: https://github.com/Revivius/nb-darcula/issues/131 Thanks to all for your work on making NetBeans looking and working great. With regards, Tomáš Procházka - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF?
As the suggestion is phrased, "turn off netbeans.org", I cannot support it. It has to be clearer. Will that TLD cease to exist? Or what exactly do you mean by "turn off" ? Summary: Things to consider which are hosted (or redirected from) netbeans.org: - NetBeans WWW (the page you arrive at when doing netbeans.org) - NetBeans Maven. (i.e. bits.netbeans.org/maven2 --> bits-adc.netbeans.org) - Sonatype Nexus Maven Repo. - NetBeans downloads (netbeans.org/downloads), download of NetBeans IDE up until v8.2 - NetBeans Wiki (wiki.netbeans.org) - NetBeans API Docs - NetBeans Plugin Portal - NetBeans Mercurial (hg.netbeans.org) (all of it legacy of course) In particular for the legacy NetBeans Maven repo I think we as a community have an OBLIGATION to make that available "forever", or at least to place somewhere which (we think) won't go away anytime soon. We need to salvage the artifacts and make them available somewhere else. We cannot assume that Oracle will take on that resp. I'll be happy to work on that. I understand it cannot be affiliated with the Apache NetBeans project. GitHub can act as a Maven Repo so that may be a simple solution. Bintray Jcenter is another. But as people have mentioned there are also the other things on the list above to consider, besides the Maven repo. Suggestion for structured way forward: Is the list above exhaustive? If so, a Jira Ticker for each of them where we track decommissioning. For some of them that may already exist. An overall Jira "netbeans.org" ticket too which links to the individual tickets. Then we work from that from that Jira plan. my 2c. Lars On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:32 PM Ernie Rael wrote: > > Absolutely, it's a good looking replacement for the old portal. I'll be > happy to see the new portal's catalog available automatically in NB. > > -ernie > > On 1/14/2020 12:52 AM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > > And the NETBEANS-3569 issue has been implemented. > > > > In my opinion, the new NetBeans Plugin Portal 3.0 is ready to replace > > the old one. I hope you agree Ernie. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jirka > > > > Dne 07. 01. 20 v 19:43 Ernie Rael napsal(a): > >> On 1/3/2020 1:05 AM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > >>> Hi Antonio, > >>> > >>>in my opinion the new Plugin Portal 3.0 [1] is ready for usage > >> > >> I believe that until [NETBEANS-3569] is resolved, the portal is not > >> ready for general usage. > >> > >> It's fine for creating the update center catalog, but not for user > >> browsing or downloading. > >> > >> -ernie > >> > >> [NETBEANS-3569] > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_NETBEANS-2D3569=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=JtwSZNx7C6MpXY_FtzO1piKcWAiPBHKIgKmiz_ZmjyA= > >> > >> unsuitable/failed-verification plugin not indicated as such > >> by plugin portal > >> > >> > >>> and if anyone would like to access the old plugins s/he can use the > >>> snapshot [2] hosted on Emilian's private VM. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__netbeans-2Dvm.apache.org_pluginportal_=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=ycECpvpGMDj68vnP0CmMChRDhTv4phmlQ6xMelh3WdQ= > >>> [2] > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Where-2Bto-2Bdownload-2Bplugins-2Bfor-2BNetBeans-2B10.0-2Band-2Bearlier=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=2vTtGB--cbv4J6m1nT5VG8YKDKAQT6UvJXfJtuBSoLo= > >>> > >>> -Jirka > >>> > >>> Dne 02. 01. 20 v 19:03 antonio napsal(a): > >>> > Hi Jirka, > > There's an open issue here > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_INFRA-2D17245-3FfocusedCommentId-3D16876231-26page-3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels-253Acomment-2Dtabpanel-23comment-2D16876231=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=B0m3fYY_FOJ17cE4dm9zTb8IiDQ0AvbFt5IaLPe8lBg= > > It seems the plugin portal will stop working. Don't know if the new > plugin portal is a substitute. > > Cheers, > Antonio > > El 2/1/20 a las 16:56, Jiří Kovalský escribió: > > Hello folks, > > > > as many of you know we have successfully matured to a top > > level Apache project in 2019. How about turning netbeans.org > > domain in 2020? > > > > Can we identify parts which still need to be migrated? Is > > anyone aware of something which prevents decommissioning of Oracle > > infrastructure hosting the legacy services? > > > > Are there any Mercurial repositories [1] worth their backup before > >
[POLL] Defaults for Binary to Source Resolution
Dear all, Please tell me how the IDE shall be working, regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3115 Summary: When two otherwise independent Gradle projects has declared dependency over a released artifact through a repository, shall sources loaded from the available released sources.jar in the repository, or shall we try to open the source form the opened project? Right now the Gradle plugin behaves semantically correct as it is opening the source from the released source jar file from the local repository cache. Creating a composite build of these projects could help. See: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1861 However I have another implementation which does not need the include build (as that might be side effects). My question is the following. Shall the resolving the third party source against opened projects be the default behavior or shall it be put behind a switch and if it is behind the switch what shall be the default behavior. Let me do a poll on this, so reply with the following if you care,: - enabled - switch, enabled - switch, disabled The poll will be open for at least 3 days. Thank you! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
RE: NetBeans icon patch
Hi, John. Welcome!
That would be a useful patch. As you say, the challenge is to make sure it does
not break the icon on other platforms.
Since calling setIconImages with more variants should normally be the right
thing to do, removing the lower-resolution images should only be done on the
specific platform where this is required. Instead of commenting out the lines,
I would put them in an "if" statement, and only exclude them if the system is
running on the KDE Plasma desktop. Perhaps you could also try another window
manager (in particular, whichever one is used by Ubuntu, which is pretty
popular), and see if that one requires the patch as well.
If all the common Linux window managers require (or work with) the patch, then
maybe the condition should be " Utilities.isUnix() && !Utilities.isMac()"
(using org.openide.util.Utilities). But if it's only the KDE Plasma desktop,
then it might be worth seeing if there is an way to detect this specific case.
-- Eirik
-Original Message-
From: John Elliot V | ProgClub
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 10:09 PM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: NetBeans icon patch
Hi there.
My name's John. I'm new. :)
I just wanted to tender a patch for an issue I've been having with the NetBeans
icon when displayed on my KDE Plasma desktop running under Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS.
The problem is that I have my Task Manager widget set at about 200px high.
There's no problem when I have heaps of windows open, because in that case each
application gets an icon on a 'row'; but when there's only one 'row' the
application icons are huge, and when the application icons are huge the
NetBeans icon looks terrible.
I've taken some screen shots to illustrate the problem and my solution over
here:
https://www.jj5.net/file/2020-01-09-135528/netbeans-icon/
The patch that works well enough for me is to comment out low resolution images
from the initFrameIcons() method in:
platform/core.windows/src/org/netbeans/core/windows/view/ui/MainWindow.java
as:
static void initFrameIcons(Frame f) {
List currentIcons = f.getIconImages();
if( !currentIcons.isEmpty() )
return; //do not override icons if they have been already provided
elsewhere (JDev)
f.setIconImages(Arrays.asList(
// 2020-01-09 jj5 - OLD: removed low resolution icons...
//ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_16, true),
//ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_32, true),
//ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_48, true),
// 2020-01-09 jj5 - END
ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_256, true),
ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_512, true),
ImageUtilities.loadImage(ICON_1024, true))); }
It is conceivable this patch will create an issue in other environments (I'm
not sure) but it worked okay for me on Ubuntu.
Regards,
John Elliot V
--
|_|O|_| ProgClub
|_|_|O| Because every programmer needs a good club!
|O|O|O| https://www.progclub.org/
Re: NetBeans Logo on the Welcome Screen
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 16:43, Eirik Bakke wrote: > > See https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1246 . That PR hit for 11.1 as far as I know. Out of interest, do you know what else landed between then and 11.2 related to splash that might be causing the duplicate dock icon problem? I'll try and look further into this. Thanks, Neil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
RE: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF?
Hi Jirka Very late to the thread. Is there a way to backup wiki.netbeans.org ? We migrate a few page, but I see missing one linked from apidoc. If I'm right, turning off netbeans.org will also remove the following: apidoc from 5.5 to 8.2 nexus for netbeans and visualvm (the maven artefacts from 5.5 to 8.2) some documentation in platform.netbeans.org or some .netbeans.org Best Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Jiří Kovalský Envoyé : mardi 14 janvier 2020 09:53 À : dev@netbeans.apache.org Objet : Re: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF? And the NETBEANS-3569 issue has been implemented. In my opinion, the new NetBeans Plugin Portal 3.0 is ready to replace the old one. I hope you agree Ernie. Thanks, -Jirka Dne 07. 01. 20 v 19:43 Ernie Rael napsal(a): > On 1/3/2020 1:05 AM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: >> Hi Antonio, >> >>in my opinion the new Plugin Portal 3.0 [1] is ready for usage > > I believe that until [NETBEANS-3569] is resolved, the portal is not > ready for general usage. > > It's fine for creating the update center catalog, but not for user > browsing or downloading. > > -ernie > > [NETBEANS-3569] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org > _jira_browse_NETBEANS-2D3569=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIr > MUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyN > Tb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=JtwSZNx7C6MpXY_FtzO1piKcWAiPBHKI > gKmiz_ZmjyA= > > unsuitable/failed-verification plugin not indicated as such > by plugin portal > > >> and if anyone would like to access the old plugins s/he can use the >> snapshot [2] hosted on Emilian's private VM. >> >> [1] >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__netbeans-2Dvm.apa >> che.org_pluginportal_=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65e >> apI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7to >> hclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=ycECpvpGMDj68vnP0CmMChRDhTv4phmlQ6xM >> elh3WdQ= >> [2] >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org >> _confluence_display_NETBEANS_Where-2Bto-2Bdownload-2Bplugins-2Bfor-2B >> NetBeans-2B10.0-2Band-2Bearlier=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv >> 7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_u >> KKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=2vTtGB--cbv4J6m1nT5VG8YKDK >> AQT6UvJXfJtuBSoLo= >> >> -Jirka >> >> Dne 02. 01. 20 v 19:03 antonio napsal(a): >> >>> Hi Jirka, >>> >>> There's an open issue here >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.o >>> rg_jira_browse_INFRA-2D17245-3FfocusedCommentId-3D16876231-26page-3D >>> com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels-253Acomment-2Dtabpan >>> el-23comment-2D16876231=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB >>> 65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP >>> 0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=B0m3fYY_FOJ17cE4dm9zTb8IiDQ0Avb >>> Ft5IaLPe8lBg= >>> >>> It seems the plugin portal will stop working. Don't know if the new >>> plugin portal is a substitute. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Antonio >>> >>> El 2/1/20 a las 16:56, Jiří Kovalský escribió: Hello folks, as many of you know we have successfully matured to a top level Apache project in 2019. How about turning netbeans.org domain in 2020? Can we identify parts which still need to be migrated? Is anyone aware of something which prevents decommissioning of Oracle infrastructure hosting the legacy services? Are there any Mercurial repositories [1] worth their backup before we turn the servers off or we are ready? [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hg.netbeans.or g=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0S KeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_ Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=gil4WTW5pj9CeCyxwrfhlTSaoQ2ivvww-rMgjfqITAw= -Jirka --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.o rg_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCX CgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz4 0jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=IEDIT Jn8CNAf6_VOAHFgdg7yhfzPA7RhhvBAocNUS6U= >>> >>> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org >>> >>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.or >>> g_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCg >>>
Re: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF?
And the NETBEANS-3569 issue has been implemented. In my opinion, the new NetBeans Plugin Portal 3.0 is ready to replace the old one. I hope you agree Ernie. Thanks, -Jirka Dne 07. 01. 20 v 19:43 Ernie Rael napsal(a): On 1/3/2020 1:05 AM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: Hi Antonio, in my opinion the new Plugin Portal 3.0 [1] is ready for usage I believe that until [NETBEANS-3569] is resolved, the portal is not ready for general usage. It's fine for creating the update center catalog, but not for user browsing or downloading. -ernie [NETBEANS-3569] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_NETBEANS-2D3569=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=JtwSZNx7C6MpXY_FtzO1piKcWAiPBHKIgKmiz_ZmjyA= unsuitable/failed-verification plugin not indicated as such by plugin portal and if anyone would like to access the old plugins s/he can use the snapshot [2] hosted on Emilian's private VM. [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__netbeans-2Dvm.apache.org_pluginportal_=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=ycECpvpGMDj68vnP0CmMChRDhTv4phmlQ6xMelh3WdQ= [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Where-2Bto-2Bdownload-2Bplugins-2Bfor-2BNetBeans-2B10.0-2Band-2Bearlier=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=2vTtGB--cbv4J6m1nT5VG8YKDKAQT6UvJXfJtuBSoLo= -Jirka Dne 02. 01. 20 v 19:03 antonio napsal(a): Hi Jirka, There's an open issue here https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_INFRA-2D17245-3FfocusedCommentId-3D16876231-26page-3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels-253Acomment-2Dtabpanel-23comment-2D16876231=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=B0m3fYY_FOJ17cE4dm9zTb8IiDQ0AvbFt5IaLPe8lBg= It seems the plugin portal will stop working. Don't know if the new plugin portal is a substitute. Cheers, Antonio El 2/1/20 a las 16:56, Jiří Kovalský escribió: Hello folks, as many of you know we have successfully matured to a top level Apache project in 2019. How about turning netbeans.org domain in 2020? Can we identify parts which still need to be migrated? Is anyone aware of something which prevents decommissioning of Oracle infrastructure hosting the legacy services? Are there any Mercurial repositories [1] worth their backup before we turn the servers off or we are ready? [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hg.netbeans.org=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=gil4WTW5pj9CeCyxwrfhlTSaoQ2ivvww-rMgjfqITAw= -Jirka - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=IEDITJn8CNAf6_VOAHFgdg7yhfzPA7RhhvBAocNUS6U= - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists=DwIDBA=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=72SLBuSzP0_CuN7qTUrzwH7aLpJT_Y8-1iiDGVYwxNc=IEDITJn8CNAf6_VOAHFgdg7yhfzPA7RhhvBAocNUS6U= - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4=X_uKKOyNTb7tohclZEA6JBX7srFlL_Hrd7Ucd2g1bCc=ZvxS3JmA30bstIEDjI0KCUG1tS1zc7Mtfyv6rFGA_CE= - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about
