Hi Geertjan, > On Nov 9, 2016, at 5:01 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > [Q1] The first question I have about this is: "What if people are added to > the list of committers from Oracle, i.e., I already know others from Oracle > are interested in being involved and will provide their ICLA and will need > to be voted in since they weren't in the initial list of committers in the > NetBeans Proposal. However, does that mean that we need to update the CCLA > whenever someone else from Oracle joins in? Or, if not, how can additional > Oracle employees be backed up by a CCLA if we're not going to be updating > Schedule A in the CCLA that we're now working on?”
The CCLA is not strictly required since the ICLA contains the wording “ 4. You represent that you are legally entitled to grant the above license. If your employer(s) has rights to intellectual property that you create that includes your Contributions, you represent that you have received permission to make Contributions on behalf of that employer, that your employer has waived such rights for your Contributions to the Foundation, or that your employer has executed a separate Corporate CLA with the Foundation. ”. So the CCLA is just an explicit affirmation of the above. [A1] The CCLA schedule A can be updated simply by sending email to secretary. Preferably from the person identified as the contact for the CCLA. Regards, Craig Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
