Re: Git Toolbar into NetBeans

[Tomas Poledny]

Hi, Why this git actions (create branch ...) are not simple available in
customize toolbar?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 07:34 Laszlo Kishalmi  Dear Benno, Team,
>
> I'm wandering if we can add the Git Toolbar Plugin to the 11.0 release.
> https://github.com/markiewb/nb-git-toolbar
>
> I find this plugin quite useful, as even the most common Git actions are
> 2-3 level deep in submenu-s, so for me most of the times it is easier to
> deal with the command line tools, rather than using the IDE Git
> integration. This plugin changes that.
>
> The original author announced that the project is dead and seeking for
> maintenance takeover. Well, actually the essence of this plugin is a
> simple layer.xml which we can easily put into our existing Git module
> without any hustle.
>
> Can we simply do that, mentioning Benno somewhere?
>
>
> Laszlo Kishalmi
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Re: What to do with features for EARs and EJBs?

[Tomas Poledny]

NetBeans had the best support of JEE from all IDE. Support for Spring is
very poor. I think remove of support part of JEE is suicide for NetBeans.
This is main reason why I am using NetBeans.
Tomas

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 22:24 Brett Ryan  It’s always a sensitive topic whenever considering to remove something,
> however; I am in favour for removing classic JavaEE support in favour of
> concentrating on modern java web technologies such as spring and Jakarta.
>
> It becomes an enormous task to support everything. We can always provide
> support in the form of a plugin though I feel that those using classic Java
> EE may not benefit from the additions being added to NetBeans IDE and may
> continue to use 8.2.
>
> > On 29 Jan 2019, at 06:05, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Especially to Java/Jakarta EE people out there, e.g., Ivar, Josh, David,
> at
> > least -- please advise what should be done with the EAR and EJB support,
> as
> > described here:
> >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/enterprise-cluster-integrated-into-apache
> >
> > And, hurray, thanks Matthias especially, and Vikas, Arunava, Sarvesh, and
> > Reema, for a lot of work on relicensing, for getting the enterprise
> cluster
> > integrated!
> >
> > Gj
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Re: What to do with features for EARs and EJBs?

[Tomas Poledny]

+1 to keep. I am using it on my current project.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 20:54 Gary Bello  +1 for ejb/ear support
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:52 AM Andreas Ernst  wrote:
>
> > +1 to keep the EAR and EJB support. YES, please.
> >
> > Am 28.01.19 um 20:42 schrieb Gaurav Gupta:
> > > +1 to keep the EAR and EJB support.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 1:07 AM, Antonio  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Last year I had to help out a customer that was stuck in Java 6 /
> > >> WebLogic 8. NetBeans was of great help for me.
> > >>
> > >> I'd try to keep the EAR/EJB functionality. Don't know if as a plugin
> or
> > >> bundled in the IDE, though.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe it saves the day to somebody else in the future.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Antonio
> > >>
> > >> El 28/1/19 a las 20:05, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Especially to Java/Jakarta EE people out there, e.g., Ivar, Josh,
> > David,
> > >> at
> > >>> least -- please advise what should be done with the EAR and EJB
> > support,
> > >> as
> > >>> described here:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/enterprise-cluster-integrated-into-apache
> > >>>
> > >>> And, hurray, thanks Matthias especially, and Vikas, Arunava, Sarvesh,
> > and
> > >>> Reema, for a lot of work on relicensing, for getting the enterprise
> > >> cluster
> > >>> integrated!
> > >>>
> > >>> Gj
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > > Thanks and kind regards,
> > > Gaurav Gupta
> > >   
> > > 
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ae | Andreas Ernst | IT Spektrum
> > Postfach 5, 65612 Beselich
> > Schupbacher Str. 32, 65614 Beselich, Germany
> > Tel: +49-6484-91002 Fax: +49-6484-91003
> > a...@ae-online.de | www.ae-online.de
> > www.tachyon-online.de
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11

[Tomas Poledny]

0

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 04:52 Laszlo Kishalmi  0
>
> On 1/25/19 7:50 PM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Well, it is time to finalize out version scheme for a while. There
> > will be three voting threads created on this topic with subjects:
> >
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11.0
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 2019.03
> >
> > Everyone from the community can cast his/her own vote  on each thread as:
> >
> > +1  I like it, let's do this way
> > 0I'm Ok with it, does not particularly like it, but won't mind it
> > -1   I do not like it at all.
> >
> > Each thread is going to be open for 72+ hours and going to be closed
> > at the same time. Regardless from the number of votes, that version
> > number would win which has the greatest sum of the vote values.
> >
> > Voting is a community event! Be a proud community member and cast your
> > vote!
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> >
> > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 11
> >
> > P.S.: Please keep this thread for voting only!
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11.0

[Tomas Poledny]

+1

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 05:54 Vano Beridze  +1
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 7:51 AM Laszlo Kishalmi  wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Well, it is time to finalize out version scheme for a while. There will
> > be three voting threads created on this topic with subjects:
> >
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11.0
> >   * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 2019.03
> >
> > Everyone from the community can cast his/her own vote  on each thread as:
> >
> > +1  I like it, let's do this way
> > 0I'm Ok with it, does not particularly like it, but won't mind it
> > -1   I do not like it at all.
> >
> > Each thread is going to be open for 72+ hours and going to be closed at
> > the same time. Regardless from the number of votes, that version number
> > would win which has the greatest sum of the vote values.
> >
> > Voting is a community event! Be a proud community member and cast your
> > vote!
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> >
> > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 11.0
> >
> > P.S.: Please keep this thread for voting only!
> >
> >
>

Re: Apache NetBeans 11 or 11.0 ?

[Tomas Poledny]

Hi,
I don't like calendar versioning. I have problem with remember it. It is
more easy to remember 11 or 11.0 than 2019.03. What will be next version
2019.02 or 2019.03 or 2019.04 and what was previous version?

So +1 for 11.0
Tomas


On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:09 AM Daniel Gruno  wrote:

> On 1/25/19 9:48 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Are you saying you're against Emilian's proposal, i.e., 2019.03, calendar
> > versioning?
>
> I'm not against it at all :)
> My only suggestion or opinion would be that it should be something where
> users can quickly see whether version A is newer or older than version
> B. Both numerical and calendar versioning solve that. Using nicknames
> would complicate matters, even if just slightly.
>
> >
> > No, we're not going to start any vote at all, until we've seen whether we
> > can reach consensus. Emilian's proposal is completely new. I like it, a
> > lot. Let's see what others say first and then if we cannot reach
> consensus,
> > we'll do a vote. But I have a feeling we're able to reach consensus
> around
> > calendar versioning.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:32 AM Daniel Gruno 
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/25/19 9:30 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> >>> I think whatever is super simple and clear is what we should do and
> >>> therefore I really like Emilian's suggestion.
> >>
> >> I think (hope?!) some of these suggestions were in jest.
> >> Let's keep it simple - version numbers are free, 1,2,3,4,5,6I could
> >> continue for quite a while before I run out :)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> We spend more time and energy discussing release numbering than
> anything
> >>> else and the sooner that can stop the better. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Gj
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:28 AM Christian Lenz  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  And for the codenames, I mean 2019.03 could have also a moon chemical
>  thing like Natrium or whatever. For me it is more to say and, instead
> >> of or.
> 
> 
>  Cheers
> 
>  Chris
> 
> 
> 
>  Von: Kenneth Fogel
>  Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2019 20:44
>  An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>  Betreff: RE: Apache NetBeans 11 or 11.0 ?
> 
>  We could use seemingly random words like Eclipse does so that no one
> >> knows
>  what the most recent version is. For example, we could use the names
> of
> >> the
>  63 moons of Jupiter, the planet with the most moons. Also, select them
>  randomly, users will catch on if we do it alphabetically. Here are the
> >> 51
>  named moons:
> 
>  AdrasteaErinome Isonoe  Sponde
>  Aitne   Euanthe KaleTaygete
>  AmaltheaEukeladeKallichore  Thebe
>  Ananke  Euporie Kalyke  Thelxinoe
>  Aoede   Europa  KoreThemisto
>  Arche   EurydomeLedaThyone
>  Autonoe GanymedeLysithea
>  Callirrhoe  Harpalyke   Megaclite
>  CallistoHegemoneMetis
>  Carme   Helike  Mneme
>  Carpo   HermippeOrthosie
>  ChaldeneHerse   Pasiphae
>  Cyllene Himalia Pasithee
>  Dia Io  Praxidike
>  Elara   Iocaste Sinope
> 
>  There are about 12 more moons with numeric names awaiting formal
> names.
> 
>  Ken
> 
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>