Re: Re: Does Apache NiFi 1.19.1 works on RHEL 9.1?
Nifi is a Java based application and so the underlying OS is irrelevant as long as you're; a) using a supported JVM version (8-17 LTS should be fine, I believe release is built using 11) b) reading the release notes of your JVM on your OS to comprehend any local issues, which you can take up with Redhat and/or your JVM provider if you're using a 3rd party JVM On Fri, May 26, 2023, 21:18 Martin Fong wrote: > Jim > We are upgrading our OS from RH7 to RH9 so wanted to make sure it is > compatible as I couldn't find the certified/supported OS page for NiFi. > Thanks! > > On 2023/05/26 11:04:36 Jim Halfpenny wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > Apache NiFi is Java-based so there's no reason why it shouldn't work on > RHEL 9.1. Did you have any specific concerns or was your question around > which OS versions are supported? > > > > > Kind regards, > > Jim > > > > > On 26 May 2023, at 11:43, Martin Fong wrote: > > > > > > Does Apache NiFi 1.19.1 works on RHEL 9.1? > > > > > > Please advise, > > > Martin Fong > > > Enterprise Technical Support Specialist, Infrastructure & Platform > (IAG) > > > Technology Services Division, Technology Infrastructure Services > > > City of Toronto > > > 703 Don Mills Road, 2nd Floor > > > Toronto, ON > > > M3C 3N3 > > > Tel: 416-397-7565 > > > e-mail: martin.f...@toronto.ca > > > > > > This e-mail message is confidential and subject to copyright. Any > unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this > email and are not the intended recipient, please advise and delete it. > Thank you. > > > > > > > > >
Re: [discuss] nifi 1.22 looking worthy at this point
I see NIFI-11392 has already been taken care of. Thank you Joe and markap14 On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:07:45 AM EDT, Joe Witt wrote: Thanks Michael and Nissim. Will flag both for follow up as part of 1.22. On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:35 PM Michael Moser wrote: > Team, > > I observed something wonky with the UI in 1.22.0-SNAPSHOT (using the latest > support/nifi-1.x branch) and I wrote NIFI-11560 [1] for it. I would be > sad if we release 1.22.0 and then decide this is significant, so any extra > eyes on it beforehand would be appreciated. > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11560 > > Thanks, > -- Mike > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:13 PM Nissim Shiman > wrote: > > > Joe and team, > > > > Thank you for the coming release. > > I am hoping someone can review/commit > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11392for this as well. > > This resolves an issue where nifi gets hung on shutdown. > > I have reviewed and tested this and it looks good. > > > > (and thank you very much markap14 and mosermw for previous recent > > reviews/merging of tickets I was working on) > > Thanks, > > Nissim Shiman > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 12:57:42 PM EDT, David Handermann < > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Joe, > > > > Thanks for initiating the discussion, I agree that the number of bug > fixes, > > dependency upgrades, and other improvements warrants a new 1.22.0 release > > version. This would also incorporate some additional deprecations, which > > will be helpful as we continue making progress on NiFi 2.0 goals. > > > > The system tests have had sporadic failures recently, so it seems best to > > wrap up NIFI-11591 [1] before proceeding. > > > > Regards, > > David Handermann > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11591 > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:39 AM Joe Witt wrote: > > > > > Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.22.0 > > > > > > It appears NiFi 1.22 has enough weight to be worth kicking out a > release. > > > 120+ JIRAs included several performance enhancers, bug fixes, a few new > > > features like ModifyCompression, PutGCP, etc.. > > > > > > Anything we're specifically waiting on? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > >
Re: [discuss] nifi 1.22 looking worthy at this point
Thanks Michael and Nissim. Will flag both for follow up as part of 1.22. On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:35 PM Michael Moser wrote: > Team, > > I observed something wonky with the UI in 1.22.0-SNAPSHOT (using the latest > support/nifi-1.x branch) and I wrote NIFI-11560 [1] for it. I would be > sad if we release 1.22.0 and then decide this is significant, so any extra > eyes on it beforehand would be appreciated. > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11560 > > Thanks, > -- Mike > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:13 PM Nissim Shiman > wrote: > > > Joe and team, > > > > Thank you for the coming release. > > I am hoping someone can review/commit > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11392for this as well. > > This resolves an issue where nifi gets hung on shutdown. > > I have reviewed and tested this and it looks good. > > > > (and thank you very much markap14 and mosermw for previous recent > > reviews/merging of tickets I was working on) > > Thanks, > > Nissim Shiman > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 12:57:42 PM EDT, David Handermann < > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Joe, > > > > Thanks for initiating the discussion, I agree that the number of bug > fixes, > > dependency upgrades, and other improvements warrants a new 1.22.0 release > > version. This would also incorporate some additional deprecations, which > > will be helpful as we continue making progress on NiFi 2.0 goals. > > > > The system tests have had sporadic failures recently, so it seems best to > > wrap up NIFI-11591 [1] before proceeding. > > > > Regards, > > David Handermann > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11591 > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:39 AM Joe Witt wrote: > > > > > Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.22.0 > > > > > > It appears NiFi 1.22 has enough weight to be worth kicking out a > release. > > > 120+ JIRAs included several performance enhancers, bug fixes, a few new > > > features like ModifyCompression, PutGCP, etc.. > > > > > > Anything we're specifically waiting on? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > >
