Ciao Pierre,
I can spend some hours tomorrow looking deep in the invokeHTTP implementation
and figure out a way to properly support Multipart messages, then write back in
the ML asking for feedback before implementing it.
@Andre in case you have already some code or ideas I'll be glad to follow it!
Best regards
Damiano
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Villard [mailto:pierre.villard...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:25 AM
To: dev <dev@nifi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: About NIFI-3620: Multipart support in invokeHTTP.java
Hey Damiano,
Andre will correct me in case I'm wrong but he is not working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3620 at the moment. If you want to
give it a try, that would be more than appreciated.
Pierre
2017-12-11 18:01 GMT+01:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>:
> Hello
>
> Sounds great. I think i might have dropped the ball on that review by
> commenting on it and then it made others who might be able to help
> avoid it. Just commented on the PR again but we're of course happy to
> work with you to improve as needed.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Damiano Giampaoli
> <dami...@searchink.com> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > We are planning to move from our in-house-built workflow engine to
> NiFi... needless to say, we love this project.
> >
> > We created a PoC of some our production workflows using NiFi but in
> order to move entirely to NiFi we need a full multipart support in
> order to be able to invoke some of our internal microservices.
> >
> >
> > I saw there is already a pending PR for the ListenHTTP multipart
> > support<
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1795> and an issue already opened
> about the InvokeHTTP<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3620>
> which is marked as in progress.
> >
> >
> > We are willing to contribute to the developments starting from
> > adding
> the multipart support but before we would like to ensure that there
> are no other developers who are already working on this, in case we
> can provide support in testing, complete or bugfix a work not ready
> yet to be merged in the master branch.
> >
> >
> >
> > We are looking forward to hearing from you!
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Damiano
> >
> >
> >
> > SearchInk
> >
> >
> >
> > Damiano Giampaoli
> >
> > Software Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> > mobile: +49 1719956912
> >
> > email: <mailto:diah...@searchink.com>
> > <mailto:dami...@searchink.com>
> dami...@searchink.com<mailto:dami...@searchink.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > #execcircle17<http://searchink.com/ecircle> event: Connecting
> Innovators & Insurers
> >
> > Join our team: searchink.com/careers<http://searchink.com/careers>
> >
> >
> >
> > Koppenplatz 10, D-10115 Berlin
> > +49 30 220 560 730
> >
> > www.searchink.com<http://www.searchink.com/>
> >
> >
> >
> > HRB 171236 B, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin | UID: DE302404693
> >
> > This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may be
> > legally
> privileged. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure,
> reproduction, copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete
> this mail.
> >
> > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free
> > as
> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
> accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission or changes to
> transmitted date not specifically approved by the sender.
> >
> > If this e-mail or attached files contain information which do not
> > relate
> to our professional activity we do not accept liability for such
> information.
> >
>
