Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient
In branch 1.4 at first. It should be easy to port to trunk however. You're more than welcome to contribute. On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote: Hi, Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread: Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies org.apache.gora#gora- hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not building or pushing deps around :) Agreed . Which branch would this go into, since I would like to pitch into the same and start contributing as well. Cheers, just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I see that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation / test upgradation a bit more simpler ? On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira. plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13088871#c omment-13088871] Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086: -- Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.
Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient
Hi, Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread: Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies org.apache.gora#gora- hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not building or pushing deps around :) Cheers, just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I see that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation / test upgradation a bit more simpler ? On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira. plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13088871#c omment-13088871] Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086: -- Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.
Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote: Hi, Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread: Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies org.apache.gora#gora- hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not building or pushing deps around :) Agreed . Which branch would this go into, since I would like to pitch into the same and start contributing as well. Cheers, just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I see that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation / test upgradation a bit more simpler ? On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira. plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13088871#c omment-13088871] Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086: -- Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.
