Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX 9.1 RC1

[Adam Feuer]

More time sounds good, I'll retest on Saturday.

-adam

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:47 PM Nathan Hartman 
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:48 PM Brennan Ashton 
> wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> > There were several bugs found on the RC0 so we will not be moving forward
> > with that release candidate and will be creating RC1.  I had suggested a
> > few days ago creating the release today, but as we merged some changes
> > yesterday that seems to be rushed.
> >
> > I'm proposing that we move forward cutting the RC1 on Sunday 28th. I
> would
> > encourage everyone to test with the fixes that have been backported
> already
> > to the releases/9.1 branch. I know there is an outstanding bug report
> that
> > was sent to the list but this is not even in master yet.
> >
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rbb1f85b5f2dba9ee221548fcc5f99d49ef55522c487b99c1549c3a52@%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
> Yes, more time for testing sounds good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan
>


-- 
Adam Feuer 

Re: NuttX supported boards web page?

[Adam Feuer]

Greg,

Thank you! That is exactly what I was looking for!

-adam

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:02 PM Gregory Nutt  wrote:

> On 6/26/2020 3:43 PM, Adam Feuer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There used to be a web page that listed NuttX supported boards– but I
> can't
> > find it on the new nuttx.apache.org website. Does anyone know where that
> > page is?
> >
> > cheers
> > adam
>
> Got https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Nuttx
>
> Follow the link "Complete List".
>
>

-- 
Adam Feuer 

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX 9.1 RC1

[Nathan Hartman]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:48 PM Brennan Ashton 
wrote:

> Hey everyone,
> There were several bugs found on the RC0 so we will not be moving forward
> with that release candidate and will be creating RC1.  I had suggested a
> few days ago creating the release today, but as we merged some changes
> yesterday that seems to be rushed.
>
> I'm proposing that we move forward cutting the RC1 on Sunday 28th. I would
> encourage everyone to test with the fixes that have been backported already
> to the releases/9.1 branch. I know there is an outstanding bug report that
> was sent to the list but this is not even in master yet.
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rbb1f85b5f2dba9ee221548fcc5f99d49ef55522c487b99c1549c3a52@%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>


Yes, more time for testing sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Nathan

Re: NuttX supported boards web page?

[Gregory Nutt]

On 6/26/2020 3:43 PM, Adam Feuer wrote:

Hi,

There used to be a web page that listed NuttX supported boards– but I can't
find it on the new nuttx.apache.org website. Does anyone know where that
page is?

cheers
adam


Got https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Nuttx

Follow the link "Complete List".

NuttX supported boards web page?

[Adam Feuer]

Hi,

There used to be a web page that listed NuttX supported boards– but I can't
find it on the new nuttx.apache.org website. Does anyone know where that
page is?

cheers
adam
-- 
Adam Feuer 

Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX 9.1 RC1

[Alin Jerpelea]

Thanks Brennan,

I'll retest everything tomorrow

//Alin


On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 20:48 Brennan Ashton 
wrote:

> Hey everyone,
> There were several bugs found on the RC0 so we will not be moving forward
> with that release candidate and will be creating RC1.  I had suggested a
> few days ago creating the release today, but as we merged some changes
> yesterday that seems to be rushed.
>
> I'm proposing that we move forward cutting the RC1 on Sunday 28th. I would
> encourage everyone to test with the fixes that have been backported already
> to the releases/9.1 branch. I know there is an outstanding bug report that
> was sent to the list but this is not even in master yet.
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rbb1f85b5f2dba9ee221548fcc5f99d49ef55522c487b99c1549c3a52@%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E
>
>
> Thanks,
> Brennan
>

[DISCUSS] NuttX 9.1 RC1

[Brennan Ashton]

Hey everyone,
There were several bugs found on the RC0 so we will not be moving forward
with that release candidate and will be creating RC1.  I had suggested a
few days ago creating the release today, but as we merged some changes
yesterday that seems to be rushed.

I'm proposing that we move forward cutting the RC1 on Sunday 28th. I would
encourage everyone to test with the fixes that have been backported already
to the releases/9.1 branch. I know there is an outstanding bug report that
was sent to the list but this is not even in master yet.

https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rbb1f85b5f2dba9ee221548fcc5f99d49ef55522c487b99c1549c3a52@%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E


Thanks,
Brennan

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

[Nathan Hartman]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jerpelea, Alin 
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> I can confirm that the latest branch looks good
> We should create RC1 wih the fixes included to start the testing and
> voting for RC1


What about the bug report about mm_realloc() reported by a user on 24 Jun:

https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rbb1f85b5f2dba9ee221548fcc5f99d49ef55522c487b99c1549c3a52@%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E

Is it worth to apply that fix and backport to RC1?

Nathan

Sv: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

[Jerpelea, Alin]

Hi Justin,

I can confirm that the latest branch looks good
We should create RC1 wih the fixes included to start the testing and voting for 
RC1

Regards
Alin


Från: Justin Mclean 
Skickat: den 26 juni 2020 14:40
Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

HI,

> I confirmed that the latest releases/9.1 branch fixes the problems.

A vote need to be on a static code base / a release artefact not what is in a 
branch. It can’t change as the hashes and signatures would be different for 
starters.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

[Brennan Ashton]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, 5:40 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> HI,
>
> > I confirmed that the latest releases/9.1 branch fixes the problems.
>
> A vote need to be on a static code base / a release artefact not what is
> in a branch. It can’t change as the hashes and signatures would be
> different for starters.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin



Yes sorry Justin if it was not clear in an earlier email in the thread, we
are going to create an RC1.  Just want to get as much testing on this RC as
possible before we do that.

--Brennan

Re: QuickLogic Open Source MCU + FPGA

[Erdem MEYDANLI]

Hmm. #/pull/6  looks
good to me. :)


I wish I could support porting efforts, but haven't received any updates
about the order yet. I just sent QuickLogic an email. Let's see what they
say.

I am looking forward to playing with the board!

Erdem

Brennan Ashton , 25 Haz 2020 Per, 19:57
tarihinde şunu yazdı:

> Yes I have two of them as of last night and started the port. The start is
> here but it really is just getting structure in place so don't judge the
> quality yet :p .
> https://github.com/btashton/incubator-nuttx/pull/6
>
> Also the company is engaged along with other people in the community.
> https://twitter.com/btashton/status/1275900896111517697?s=19
>
> --Brennan
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 10:51 AM Erdem MEYDANLI  wrote:
>
> > @Brennan: Have you received the dev board from QuickLogic? I also ordered
> > one last week. However, when I check from my account, I see that the
> order
> > is still being processed.
> >
> > Erdem
> >
> > Adam Feuer , 18 Haz 2020 Per, 23:10 tarihinde şunu
> yazdı:
> >
> > >- 80 MHz ARM Cortex M4-F
> > >- UART only, no USB
> > >- FPGA has 2400 logic cells
> > >- Open Source software for development
> > >
> > > It's pretty low-power, but that last part is amazing– it would be great
> > to
> > > have an RTOS+FPGA that was programmable by all open source software.
> > >
> > > I will have to think of something I can do with it. My next project
> will
> > > probably have an largish FPGA on it... this one is too small for that.
> > >
> > > -adam
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:11 AM Erdem MEYDANLI 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It looks like a promising platform, but the shipping cost to the EU
> is
> > > > unbelievable. :). I want to support porting efforts, but let's see
> > first
> > > if
> > > > I can receive it via a freight-forwarder service.
> > > >
> > > > Erdem
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Adam Feuer 
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> I confirmed that the latest releases/9.1 branch fixes the problems.

A vote need to be on a static code base / a release artefact not what is in a 
branch. It can’t change as the hashes and signatures would be different for 
starters.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

[Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES)]

+1

I confirmed that the latest releases/9.1 branch fixes the problems.

Masayuki


From: Brennan Ashton 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 14:17
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
Cc: Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:10 PM Xiang Xiao  wrote:
>
> Here is the fix we sent two days ago:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/303
>
Backports PRs are available for both this and the RISCV elf bug

https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1306
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/309

--Brennan