Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
For a more detailed discussion on why the current RC is canceled, please head to https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/1363 I created the PRs to backport all the necessary commits. Brennan, if you've got some time to take a look and cut RC2 tonight, that would be great. Thanks in advance! On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > Yes this was basically cancelled already sorry I did not announce it. This > has been resolved as of yesterday but I need backport two more patches to > cut the release tonight. > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, 11:16 AM Adam Feuer wrote: > > > Hi, I need to change my vote to -1 for 9.1.0-RC1. > > > > I updated the checkrelease.sh script to build sim:nsh as suggested by > > Xiang. (No PR yet, but here's the script on my branch: checkrelease.sh.) > > > > I discovered that the RC1 release candidate appears to be missing this > > file: > > > > boards/sim/sim/sim/src/etc/init.d/rcS > > > > The script can build a git checkout from HEAD just fine. On the release > > candidate, it doesn't build, and gives this error: > > > > make[2]: Entering directory > > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > > dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'etc/init.d/rcS', needed by > > 'etctmp/etc/init.d/rcS'. Stop. > > make[2]: Leaving directory > > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > > dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' > > Makefile:326: recipe for target '.depend' failed > > make[1]: *** [.depend] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > > dist.apache.org/nuttx/arch/sim/src' > > tools/Makefile.unix:441: recipe for target 'pass2dep' failed > > make: *** [pass2dep] Error 2 > > > > If you add the file, the build is ok. > > > > This seems to indicate a problem with the release candidate— for some > > reason the rcS file is not being included properly. Or am I getting > > something wrong...? > > > > -adam > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:25 AM Nathan Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:12 PM Nathan Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > Summary: > > > > +1 to release > > > > > > > > Development system: Linux > > > > > > > > Verified: > > > > * Signatures (note GPG reports the key is expired) > > > > > > Correction, follow-up: I re-imported the key. GPG no longer reports > > > the key as expired. My vote remains +1. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nathan > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adam Feuer > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Yes this was basically cancelled already sorry I did not announce it. This has been resolved as of yesterday but I need backport two more patches to cut the release tonight. On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, 11:16 AM Adam Feuer wrote: > Hi, I need to change my vote to -1 for 9.1.0-RC1. > > I updated the checkrelease.sh script to build sim:nsh as suggested by > Xiang. (No PR yet, but here's the script on my branch: checkrelease.sh.) > > I discovered that the RC1 release candidate appears to be missing this > file: > > boards/sim/sim/sim/src/etc/init.d/rcS > > The script can build a git checkout from HEAD just fine. On the release > candidate, it doesn't build, and gives this error: > > make[2]: Entering directory > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' > make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'etc/init.d/rcS', needed by > 'etctmp/etc/init.d/rcS'. Stop. > make[2]: Leaving directory > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' > Makefile:326: recipe for target '.depend' failed > make[1]: *** [.depend] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory > '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ > dist.apache.org/nuttx/arch/sim/src' > tools/Makefile.unix:441: recipe for target 'pass2dep' failed > make: *** [pass2dep] Error 2 > > If you add the file, the build is ok. > > This seems to indicate a problem with the release candidate— for some > reason the rcS file is not being included properly. Or am I getting > something wrong...? > > -adam > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:25 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:12 PM Nathan Hartman > > wrote: > > > Summary: > > > +1 to release > > > > > > Development system: Linux > > > > > > Verified: > > > * Signatures (note GPG reports the key is expired) > > > > Correction, follow-up: I re-imported the key. GPG no longer reports > > the key as expired. My vote remains +1. > > > > Cheers, > > Nathan > > > > > -- > Adam Feuer >
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Hi, I need to change my vote to -1 for 9.1.0-RC1. I updated the checkrelease.sh script to build sim:nsh as suggested by Xiang. (No PR yet, but here's the script on my branch: checkrelease.sh.) I discovered that the RC1 release candidate appears to be missing this file: boards/sim/sim/sim/src/etc/init.d/rcS The script can build a git checkout from HEAD just fine. On the release candidate, it doesn't build, and gives this error: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'etc/init.d/rcS', needed by 'etctmp/etc/init.d/rcS'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ dist.apache.org/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src' Makefile:326: recipe for target '.depend' failed make[1]: *** [.depend] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/adam/src/nuttx/nuttx-sama5d3-xplained/nuttx/tools/tmp1/ dist.apache.org/nuttx/arch/sim/src' tools/Makefile.unix:441: recipe for target 'pass2dep' failed make: *** [pass2dep] Error 2 If you add the file, the build is ok. This seems to indicate a problem with the release candidate— for some reason the rcS file is not being included properly. Or am I getting something wrong...? -adam On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:25 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:12 PM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > Summary: > > +1 to release > > > > Development system: Linux > > > > Verified: > > * Signatures (note GPG reports the key is expired) > > Correction, follow-up: I re-imported the key. GPG no longer reports > the key as expired. My vote remains +1. > > Cheers, > Nathan > -- Adam Feuer
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:12 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Summary: > +1 to release > > Development system: Linux > > Verified: > * Signatures (note GPG reports the key is expired) Correction, follow-up: I re-imported the key. GPG no longer reports the key as expired. My vote remains +1. Cheers, Nathan
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:58 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time > to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final > release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC > replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring > the voting period. Summary: +1 to release Development system: Linux Verified: * Signatures (note GPG reports the key is expired) * SHA-512 sums * Incubating in artifact names * LICENSE, NOTICE, README.txt, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both tarballs * Build and run b-g474e-dpow1:nsh configuration successfully (new in NuttX-9.1) Dependencies: * gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major * kconfig-conf from NuttX tools repository Other dependencies from Debian packages: * binutils-dev 2.31.1-16 * bison 2:3.3.2.dfsg-1 * flex 2.6.4-6.2 * gperf 3.1-1 * libelf-dev 0.176-1.1 * libgmp-dev 2:6.1.2+dfsg-4 * libisl-dev 0.20-2 * libmpc-dev 1.1.0-1 * libmpfr-dev 4.0.2-1 * libncurses5-dev 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2 * libusb-1.0-0-dev 2:1.0.22-2 * libusb-dev 2:0.1.12-32 * texinfo 6.5.0.dfsg.1-4+b1 Thanks to everyone for making this release (candidate) possible! Cheers, Nathan
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Comparing with V9.0: NuttX 9.0 $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx textdata bss dec hex filename 68624 1042496 71224 11638 nuttx NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.0.0 nsh> free total used freelargest Umem: 192976 7536 185440 125248 nsh> -- NuttX 9.1 RC1 $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx text data bss dec hex filename 694681042476 72048 11970 nuttx NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.1.0 nsh> free total used freelargest Umem: 192992 7536 185456 125264 nsh> So the FLASH footprint still grew by about 800 bytes. If that trend continues indefinitely it will be quite a large OS in the future. Although that is still quite a lot is is more palatable than before.
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Hi Brennan, My vote: +1 Tested on STM32F4Discovery. Comparing with V9.0: NuttX 9.0 $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx textdata bss dec hex filename 68624 1042496 71224 11638 nuttx NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.0.0 nsh> free total used freelargest Umem: 192976 7536 185440 125248 nsh> -- NuttX 9.1 RC1 $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx textdata bss dec hex filename 69468 1042476 72048 11970 nuttx NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-9.1.0 nsh> free total used freelargest Umem: 192992 7536 185456 125264 nsh> Good work guys! BR, Alan On 6/30/20, Brennan Ashton wrote: > Hello all, > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time > to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final > release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC > replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring > the voting period. > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > involved in the build process. Two starting points: > * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is > extensive. > * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently > unofficial >opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [5]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [5]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Brennan Ashton > > SCM Information: > Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC1 > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > 201f920c3b5de64e0eb8c8a76a50ae2fcc4f6a2e > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > d483748923d4ad77e0d1f98158548b75f65b9a77 > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC1/ > [2] > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > [4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [5] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
+1 Ran through the release checklist, SHAs ok, GPG sigs ok, required files there. I built nuttx for SAMA5D2-XULT (SAMA5D27) and loaded it, it boots and works ok. -adam On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:41 AM Jerpelea, Alin wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me > > * > hashes match > * > LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist > * > build spresense board and seems ok > > > > Från: Abdelatif Guettouche > Skickat: den 1 juli 2020 14:35 > Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org > Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release > > Hi, > +1 for me, I checked: > - Incubating in name > - Signatures and hashes for both TARs are OK > - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist > - Can build from source. > > Thank you for your work, Brennan! > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:58 AM Brennan Ashton > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time > > to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final > > release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC > > replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring > > the voting period. > > > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > > involved in the build process. Two starting points: > > * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is > > extensive. > > * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently > > unofficial > >opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers. > > > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > > are required to pass. > > > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4] > > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > > our project wiki and can be found here [5]. > > > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > > items in [5]) > > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > > Thank you all, > > Brennan Ashton > > > > SCM Information: > > Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC1 > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > > 201f920c3b5de64e0eb8c8a76a50ae2fcc4f6a2e > > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > > d483748923d4ad77e0d1f98158548b75f65b9a77 > > > > [1] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC1_=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=Y0tSVm2CF-YebYBa823UNd7hJ2Vi2A5SUAyhWnv7Gdw= > > [2] > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__raw.githubusercontent.com_apache_incubator-2Dnuttx_nuttx-2D9.1.0-2DRC1_ReleaseNotes=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=kEH1URCIGyAHMk5iogYe3ClMSPUc9tZeH3Itlo6qoec= > > [3] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nuttx-2Dcompanion.readthedocs.io_en_latest_=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=iQ6KKFX9DmtiP-AEudIAsYhxIJScMFaP4WIMfF1PL08= > > [4] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.apache.org_dev_release.html-23approving-2Da-2Drelease=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=g0xT5Mh8tFdW2MrZsQqjGDm15xIH7hxFJuVD1BZXQjg= > > [5] > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NUTTX_Validating-2Ba-2Bstaged-2BRelease=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=VeCYBTgAJpnIOqLZJYfNtIinMUYYiApT3UWeP91kuxs= > > > -- Adam Feuer
Sv: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Hi, +1 from me * hashes match * LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist * build spresense board and seems ok Från: Abdelatif Guettouche Skickat: den 1 juli 2020 14:35 Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release Hi, +1 for me, I checked: - Incubating in name - Signatures and hashes for both TARs are OK - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist - Can build from source. Thank you for your work, Brennan! On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:58 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > Hello all, > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time > to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final > release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC > replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring > the voting period. > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > involved in the build process. Two starting points: > * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is > extensive. > * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently > unofficial >opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [5]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [5]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Brennan Ashton > > SCM Information: > Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC1 > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > 201f920c3b5de64e0eb8c8a76a50ae2fcc4f6a2e > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > d483748923d4ad77e0d1f98158548b75f65b9a77 > > [1] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC1_=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=Y0tSVm2CF-YebYBa823UNd7hJ2Vi2A5SUAyhWnv7Gdw= > [2] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__raw.githubusercontent.com_apache_incubator-2Dnuttx_nuttx-2D9.1.0-2DRC1_ReleaseNotes=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=kEH1URCIGyAHMk5iogYe3ClMSPUc9tZeH3Itlo6qoec= > [3] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nuttx-2Dcompanion.readthedocs.io_en_latest_=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=iQ6KKFX9DmtiP-AEudIAsYhxIJScMFaP4WIMfF1PL08= > [4] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.apache.org_dev_release.html-23approving-2Da-2Drelease=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=g0xT5Mh8tFdW2MrZsQqjGDm15xIH7hxFJuVD1BZXQjg= > [5] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NUTTX_Validating-2Ba-2Bstaged-2BRelease=DwIBaQ=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE=wCjDPfVu4jsGF5DRTbrxss5BggITyWdmP3EyHlWz9GA=VeCYBTgAJpnIOqLZJYfNtIinMUYYiApT3UWeP91kuxs= >
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Hi, +1 for me, I checked: - Incubating in name - Signatures and hashes for both TARs are OK - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist - Can build from source. Thank you for your work, Brennan! On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:58 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > Hello all, > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time > to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final > release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC > replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring > the voting period. > > Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity > involved in the build process. Two starting points: > * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is > extensive. > * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently > unofficial >opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [5]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [5]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Brennan Ashton > > SCM Information: > Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC1 > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > 201f920c3b5de64e0eb8c8a76a50ae2fcc4f6a2e > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > d483748923d4ad77e0d1f98158548b75f65b9a77 > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC1/ > [2] > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > [4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [5] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release >
[VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
Hello all, Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. This RC replaces RC0 which was never released due to several bugs found durring the voting period. Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity involved in the build process. Two starting points: * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is extensive. * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently unofficial opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers. A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are required to pass. The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4] "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." A document to walk through some of this process has been published on our project wiki and can be found here [5]. [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM items in [5]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) Thank you all, Brennan Ashton SCM Information: Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC1 Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: 201f920c3b5de64e0eb8c8a76a50ae2fcc4f6a2e Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: d483748923d4ad77e0d1f98158548b75f65b9a77 [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC1/ [2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes [3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ [4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release [5] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release