[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6971) Remove dead imports
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218820#comment-15218820 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6971: -- No, Pierre, I don't think so. That might be another issue to work on... > Remove dead imports > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Michael Brohl >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6971_remove_dead_imports.patch > > > Remove all unnecessary import statements in all java files. Taken from the > Refactor ToDo list at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6971) Remove dead imports
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218814#comment-15218814 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6971: - Does it also check and clean-up groovy files? There might be some redundant classes in there too. > Remove dead imports > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Michael Brohl >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6971_remove_dead_imports.patch > > > Remove all unnecessary import statements in all java files. Taken from the > Refactor ToDo list at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6972) Fix resource leaks in CommonServices.java
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6972: - Attachment: OFBIZ-6972_Fix_resource_leaks_in_CommonServices.patch The patch for this issue > Fix resource leaks in CommonServices.java > - > > Key: OFBIZ-6972 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6972 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Michael Brohl >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6972_Fix_resource_leaks_in_CommonServices.patch > > > File1 and file2 should be fixed by closing them in byteBufferTest. Taken from > refactor todo list at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6972) Fix resource leaks in CommonServices.java
Michael Brohl created OFBIZ-6972: Summary: Fix resource leaks in CommonServices.java Key: OFBIZ-6972 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6972 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch Reporter: Michael Brohl Assignee: Michael Brohl Priority: Minor Fix For: Trunk File1 and file2 should be fixed by closing them in byteBufferTest. Taken from refactor todo list at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6971) Remove dead imports
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218773#comment-15218773 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6971: -- Not much to do here if I can rely on Eclipse clean up feature, it only finds 8 classes with unused imports?! > Remove dead imports > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Michael Brohl >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6971_remove_dead_imports.patch > > > Remove all unnecessary import statements in all java files. Taken from the > Refactor ToDo list at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6971) Remove dead imports
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-6971: - Attachment: OFBIZ-6971_remove_dead_imports.patch > Remove dead imports > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Michael Brohl >Assignee: Michael Brohl >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6971_remove_dead_imports.patch > > > Remove all unnecessary import statements in all java files. Taken from the > Refactor ToDo list at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6971) Remove dead imports
Michael Brohl created OFBIZ-6971: Summary: Remove dead imports Key: OFBIZ-6971 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6971 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch Reporter: Michael Brohl Assignee: Michael Brohl Priority: Trivial Fix For: Trunk Remove all unnecessary import statements in all java files. Taken from the Refactor ToDo list at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6970) Tree showing categories has empty labels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-6970. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 15.12.01 Upcoming Branch 14.12.01 Thanks James, I missed those in r1705427 Your patch is in trunk r1737156 R15.12 r1737158 R14.12 r1737159 > Tree showing categories has empty labels > > > Key: OFBIZ-6970 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: james yong >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 14.12.01, Upcoming Branch, 15.12.01 > > Attachments: OFBIZ-6970.jpg, OFBIZ-6970.patch > > > Problem > === > Go to https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/ > There are missing labels in the categories section -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6970) Tree showing categories has empty labels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-6970: -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Tree showing categories has empty labels > > > Key: OFBIZ-6970 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: james yong >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-6970.jpg, OFBIZ-6970.patch > > > Problem > === > Go to https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/ > There are missing labels in the categories section -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6970) Tree showing categories has empty labels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] james yong updated OFBIZ-6970: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-6970.patch > Tree showing categories has empty labels > > > Key: OFBIZ-6970 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: james yong >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-6970.jpg, OFBIZ-6970.patch > > > Problem > === > Go to https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/ > There are missing labels in the categories section -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6970) Tree showing categories has empty labels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] james yong updated OFBIZ-6970: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-6970.jpg > Tree showing categories has empty labels > > > Key: OFBIZ-6970 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: james yong >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-6970.jpg > > > Problem > === > Go to https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/ > There are missing labels in the categories section -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6970) Tree showing categories has empty labels
james yong created OFBIZ-6970: - Summary: Tree showing categories has empty labels Key: OFBIZ-6970 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6970 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: james yong Priority: Minor Problem === Go to https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/ There are missing labels in the categories section -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6969) webpage products without catalog assigned
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217922#comment-15217922 ] Shrenik Bhura commented on OFBIZ-6969: -- Bringing in my comments from the [ML thread|https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/Zkbi7qaaulwe37r] I agree that there is a need to have a simple method to somehow enlist all products that are not assigned to any category and thus a catalog. As per my current understanding, I think it is possible to achieve this filtering if you choose the Advanced Search in the Search Products. Thereafter, Category: Include sub-categories? Yes Select Exclude. This should enlist all products not associated to any category under the root category of the catalog you are concerned with. Then there is provision to perform several mass actions on the results right at the bottom of the screen. Provision for further search refinement is needed to exclude variant products as they should not be mapped to any category. It does work in as much as you can search for all products without a category and thereafter can choose and assign categories to the chosen products. It may not be with all the convenience that one would prefer. > webpage products without catalog assigned > - > > Key: OFBIZ-6969 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6969 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce > Environment: catalog manager >Reporter: Heidi Dehaes >Priority: Minor > > An ecommerce inputter needs a page where all products are listed which where > entered in the database once. Now is the moment to view that page and add the > product to the right catalog in an easy and fast way. > This kind of page is not available in ofbiz ecommerce catalog manager. > Should be created . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6969) webpage products without catalog assigned
Heidi Dehaes created OFBIZ-6969: --- Summary: webpage products without catalog assigned Key: OFBIZ-6969 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6969 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Environment: catalog manager Reporter: Heidi Dehaes Priority: Minor An ecommerce inputter needs a page where all products are listed which where entered in the database once. Now is the moment to view that page and add the product to the right catalog in an easy and fast way. This kind of page is not available in ofbiz ecommerce catalog manager. Should be created . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6967) JSON renderer for Screens and Forms
done Olagos bvba Heidi Dehaes Kerkstraat 34 2570 Duffel Belgium Tel. : 015/31 53 04 GSM :0485/22 35 80 E-mail : info.ola...@gmail.com http://www.olagos.eu http://www.olagos.com http://www.olagos.be http://www.olagos.nl 2016-03-30 13:49 GMT+02:00 Jacques Le Roux : > Hi Eric, > > As ever, better to comment in the Jira issue ;) > > Jacques > > > Le 29/03/2016 21:40, Heidi Dehaes - Olagos a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> This is also very very interesting if we like to implement for example a >> commercial Prestashop template above ofbiz. The shopcart is with ajax and >> javascript built. The outcome of the shopcart is sent to the backend by >> json . >> >> This kind of techniques are necessary because of speed of reactions on the >> frontend. >> >> It are not the only adaptations needed for implementing a Prestashop >> template to ofbiz but it is already a part. >> >> My ofbiz on www.olagos.com has a Prestashop template but it is not yet >> fully running. >> >> An extra controller above the ofbiz one is also needed. >> >> On www.olagos.eu is a prestashop template implemented on a Prestashop >> ecommerce backend. >> >> Regards, >> Eric >> >> Olagos bvba >> Heidi Dehaes >> Kerkstraat 34 >> 2570 Duffel >> Belgium >> Tel. : 015/31 53 04 >> GSM :0485/22 35 80 >> E-mail : info.ola...@gmail.com >> http://www.olagos.eu >> http://www.olagos.com >> http://www.olagos.be >> http://www.olagos.nl >> >> >> >> 2016-03-29 21:06 GMT+02:00 Anil K Patel (JIRA) : >> >> Anil K Patel created OFBIZ-6967: >>> --- >>> >>> Summary: JSON renderer for Screens and Forms >>> Key: OFBIZ-6967 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967 >>> Project: OFBiz >>>Issue Type: Improvement >>>Components: framework >>> Reporter: Anil K Patel >>> Assignee: Anil K Patel >>> Priority: Trivial >>> >>> >>> Apache OFBiz Forms are interesting objects. They allow developers to >>> focus >>> on semantics of the document and not worry about the details of rendering >>> document for the clients. The view renderers take care of all the >>> platform >>> specific details and deliver the document as HTML or PDF or CSV. >>> >>> With time the browser client technologies have evolved to a point where >>> HTML view rendered by OFBiz are not meeting the user expectations. >>> >>> We plan to develop and contribute a HTML view renderer that will allow >>> user to request content as JSON instead of HTML. >>> >>> Such JSON content can be consumed by various client e.g Mobile >>> applications or browser based SPA. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>> (v6.3.4#6332) >>> >>>
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6967) JSON renderer for Screens and Forms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217880#comment-15217880 ] Heidi Dehaes commented on OFBIZ-6967: - Perhaps also interesting is to foresee a second controller which can handle the format of commercial Prestashop url's always based on \index.php?some-parameters in order to implement also Prestashop themes on top of backend ofbiz. > JSON renderer for Screens and Forms > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6967 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Anil K Patel >Assignee: Anil K Patel >Priority: Trivial > > Apache OFBiz Forms are interesting objects. They allow developers to focus on > semantics of the document and not worry about the details of rendering > document for the clients. The view renderers take care of all the platform > specific details and deliver the document as HTML or PDF or CSV. > With time the browser client technologies have evolved to a point where HTML > view rendered by OFBiz are not meeting the user expectations. > We plan to develop and contribute a HTML view renderer that will allow user > to request content as JSON instead of HTML. > Such JSON content can be consumed by various client e.g Mobile applications > or browser based SPA. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6967) JSON renderer for Screens and Forms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217876#comment-15217876 ] Heidi Dehaes commented on OFBIZ-6967: - Should be interesting and of modern art also to use a javascript shopcart on the client level which communicates with the ofbiz backend via json. Commercial high level Prestashop themes contain a javascript shopcart which handles the shopcart completely at the client level and sends throufh the outcome via JSON to the backend. > JSON renderer for Screens and Forms > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-6967 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Reporter: Anil K Patel >Assignee: Anil K Patel >Priority: Trivial > > Apache OFBiz Forms are interesting objects. They allow developers to focus on > semantics of the document and not worry about the details of rendering > document for the clients. The view renderers take care of all the platform > specific details and deliver the document as HTML or PDF or CSV. > With time the browser client technologies have evolved to a point where HTML > view rendered by OFBiz are not meeting the user expectations. > We plan to develop and contribute a HTML view renderer that will allow user > to request content as JSON instead of HTML. > Such JSON content can be consumed by various client e.g Mobile applications > or browser based SPA. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6967) JSON renderer for Screens and Forms
Hi Eric, As ever, better to comment in the Jira issue ;) Jacques Le 29/03/2016 21:40, Heidi Dehaes - Olagos a écrit : Hello, This is also very very interesting if we like to implement for example a commercial Prestashop template above ofbiz. The shopcart is with ajax and javascript built. The outcome of the shopcart is sent to the backend by json . This kind of techniques are necessary because of speed of reactions on the frontend. It are not the only adaptations needed for implementing a Prestashop template to ofbiz but it is already a part. My ofbiz on www.olagos.com has a Prestashop template but it is not yet fully running. An extra controller above the ofbiz one is also needed. On www.olagos.eu is a prestashop template implemented on a Prestashop ecommerce backend. Regards, Eric Olagos bvba Heidi Dehaes Kerkstraat 34 2570 Duffel Belgium Tel. : 015/31 53 04 GSM :0485/22 35 80 E-mail : info.ola...@gmail.com http://www.olagos.eu http://www.olagos.com http://www.olagos.be http://www.olagos.nl 2016-03-29 21:06 GMT+02:00 Anil K Patel (JIRA) : Anil K Patel created OFBIZ-6967: --- Summary: JSON renderer for Screens and Forms Key: OFBIZ-6967 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6967 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: framework Reporter: Anil K Patel Assignee: Anil K Patel Priority: Trivial Apache OFBiz Forms are interesting objects. They allow developers to focus on semantics of the document and not worry about the details of rendering document for the clients. The view renderers take care of all the platform specific details and deliver the document as HTML or PDF or CSV. With time the browser client technologies have evolved to a point where HTML view rendered by OFBiz are not meeting the user expectations. We plan to develop and contribute a HTML view renderer that will allow user to request content as JSON instead of HTML. Such JSON content can be consumed by various client e.g Mobile applications or browser based SPA. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4090) Add Support For Compound Screen Widget XML Files
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217791#comment-15217791 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4090: That would be great, but I'm not sure of the status currently. I think at least it misses some lines in (now in trunk) simple-methods.xsd and even if we get the same than Adrian did, he said he crossed issues with auto-completion in Eclipse. Anyway trying will enlight us for sure! > Add Support For Compound Screen Widget XML Files > > > Key: OFBIZ-4090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4090 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Adrian Crum >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: CompoundWidgetFiles.patch, CompoundWidgetFiles.patch, > OFBIZ-4090.patch > > > Add the ability to include screen widgets, form widgets, menu widgets, and > simple methods in a single XML file. This approach could be used in > situations where the widgets share a logical grouping - so they can be kept > in one place. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217788#comment-15217788 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6810: Yes, right place indeed > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4090) Add Support For Compound Screen Widget XML Files
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217783#comment-15217783 ] james yong commented on OFBIZ-4090: --- This feature is useful. I am interested to refactor some screens like EditQuote with it. > Add Support For Compound Screen Widget XML Files > > > Key: OFBIZ-4090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4090 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Adrian Crum >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: CompoundWidgetFiles.patch, CompoundWidgetFiles.patch, > OFBIZ-4090.patch > > > Add the ability to include screen widgets, form widgets, menu widgets, and > simple methods in a single XML file. This approach could be used in > situations where the widgets share a logical grouping - so they can be kept > in one place. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217769#comment-15217769 ] Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-6810: - I think we can add best practice here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/C4B2 > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Current Re-Factor To Do List
Hi All I've noticed that some general refactoring work has already ready started which is great. One of the action points from our Skype call on re-factoring was to put together a list of tasks that people can use to identify the work that needs to be done (especially if they are not sure where to start). The list has a mix of complexity so there are easy, moderate and difficult tasks. To help manage it, I've created a new wiki page (see link below) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Re-Factor+To-Do+List Please take a look to see if you can help.We are encouraging people to feel free to pick up any task that they are interested in or feel that they can do. Thanks Sharan -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Current-Re-Factor-To-Do-List-tp4678621.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217739#comment-15217739 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6810: - Yes, the wiki (or somewhere else). I feel confident a placeholder can be found. ;-) > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.03
+1 Thanks Sharan -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RELEASE-Apache-OFBiz-13-07-03-tp4678515p4678619.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.06
+1 Best regards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ skype: pranay.pandey cell: +91 982.603.5576 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > > Michael > http://www.ecomify.de > > Am 29.03.16 um 11:05 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the >> release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" will >> supersede all the previous releases from the same branch and it will be >> the >> last release of the 12.06 series. >> >> The release files can be downloaded from here: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ >> >> and are: >> >> * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip >> >> * KEYS: text file with keys >> >> * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file >> >> * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.sha: hashes >> >> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions >> on testing the signatures see >> http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). >> >> Vote: >> >> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 >> >> [ -1] do not release >> >> This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. >> >> For more details about this process please read >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> > >
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.03
+1 Best regards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ skype: pranay.pandey cell: +91 982.603.5576 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the > release13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.03", will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > > and are: > > * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip > > * KEYS: text file with keys > > * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.asc: the detached signature file > > * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.sha: hashes > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > ). > > Vote: > > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 13.07.03 > > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217734#comment-15217734
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6810:
{quote}
somewhere in the pages.
{quote}
?
> Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12
>Reporter: Pierre Smits
>Assignee: Nicolas Malin
>
> This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding
> the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of
> .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files.
> See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217725#comment-15217725 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6810: - Of course. But IMO and the likes doesn't work always. It is better to have it somewhere in the pages. > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217721#comment-15217721 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-6810 at 3/30/16 9:29 AM: - +1! long awaited here ;) Actually I'd like to have the same for every source files (ie not files like LICENSE, etc.) I don't see the point of inconsistency in filenames, shoud be a no brainner! was (Author: jacques.le.roux): +1! long awaited here ;) > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217724#comment-15217724 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6810: It needs maybe some work, but it's worth it! > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217722#comment-15217722 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6810: - Unfortunately the naming convention for Freemarker template files didn't get persisted in the minds of the various contributors. Hence the variations we have in current code bases. > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217721#comment-15217721 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6810: +1! long awaited here ;) > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
Actually not only your comments but our minds crossed somewhere. I had the same thoughts before reading you here :) Jacques Le 30/03/2016 11:06, Deepak Dixit a écrit : Hi Tahar, our comments crossed on wire :) Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: Hi everyone, I'm not sure if everyone agrees with this, but I would suggest a more final solution is perhaps to do the following: - delete simple-methods.xsd - rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd - fix all references accordingly This is to avoid confusing useless names like v2 which add no value to the developers Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml I agree with Jacques Jacopo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi Dev, I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file altogether. It seems useless in trunk now Jacques Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jleroux Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 New Revision: 1737078 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev Log: Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minil ang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff = = --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar +++ 30 06:00:25 2016 @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. - http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" />
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
Thanks Jacopo, Done with r1737086 and r1737087 Note: that you might need to update your local minilang-catalog.xml (if you refer to something external to trunk HEAD) Jacques Le 30/03/2016 10:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : I agree with Jacques Jacopo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi Dev, I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file altogether. It seems useless in trunk now Jacques Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jleroux Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 New Revision: 1737078 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev Log: Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff == --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" />
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.03
+1 Thanks, Michael http://www.ecomify.de Am 29.03.16 um 11:42 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.03", will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.sha: hashes Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 13.07.03 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.06
+1 Thanks, Michael http://www.ecomify.de Am 29.03.16 um 11:05 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch and it will be the last release of the 12.06 series. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.sha: hashes Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
yup, agreed and +1 On Wednesday, 30 March 2016, Deepak Dixit wrote: > Hi Tahar, our comments crossed on wire :) > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > slidingfilame...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm not sure if everyone agrees with this, but I would suggest a more > > final solution is perhaps to do the following: > > > > - delete simple-methods.xsd > > - rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd > > - fix all references accordingly > > > > This is to avoid confusing useless names like v2 which add no value to > the > > developers > > > > Taher Alkhateeb > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com > ] > > Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 > > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > > > > I agree with Jacques > > > > Jacopo > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com > wrote: > > > > > Hi Dev, > > > > > > I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file > > > altogether. It seems useless in trunk now > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : > > > > > >> Author: jleroux > > >> Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 > > >> New Revision: 1737078 > > >> > > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev > > >> Log: > > >> Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used > > >> > > >> Modified: > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > > >> > > >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > > >> URL: > > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minil > > >> ang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff > > >> > > >> = > > >> = > > >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > > >> (original) > > >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar > > >> +++ 30 > > >> 06:00:25 2016 > > >> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. > > >> > > >> > > >> -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; > > >> uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> > > >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; > > >> uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" /> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
+1 Le 30/03/2016 11:01, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Hi everyone, I'm not sure if everyone agrees with this, but I would suggest a more final solution is perhaps to do the following: - delete simple-methods.xsd - rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd - fix all references accordingly This is to avoid confusing useless names like v2 which add no value to the developers Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml I agree with Jacques Jacopo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Hi Dev, I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file altogether. It seems useless in trunk now Jacques Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jleroux Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 New Revision: 1737078 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev Log: Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minil ang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff = = --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar +++ 30 06:00:25 2016 @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" />
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
Hi Tahar, our comments crossed on wire :) Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm not sure if everyone agrees with this, but I would suggest a more > final solution is perhaps to do the following: > > - delete simple-methods.xsd > - rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd > - fix all references accordingly > > This is to avoid confusing useless names like v2 which add no value to the > developers > > Taher Alkhateeb > > -Original Message- > From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] > Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > > I agree with Jacques > > Jacopo > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > Hi Dev, > > > > I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file > > altogether. It seems useless in trunk now > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : > > > >> Author: jleroux > >> Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 > >> New Revision: 1737078 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used > >> > >> Modified: > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > >> > >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > >> URL: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minil > >> ang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff > >> > >> = > >> = > >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > >> (original) > >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar > >> +++ 30 > >> 06:00:25 2016 > >> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. > >> > >> > >> -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; > >> uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> > >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; > >> uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" /> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217693#comment-15217693 ] Deepak Dixit edited comment on OFBIZ-6810 at 3/30/16 9:03 AM: -- we can define FTL file naming convention and can rename ftl as per naming convention. IMO we have to use Upper camel case pattern for file naming. was (Author: deepak.dixit): we can define the FTL file naming convention and can rename ftl file in current approach. IMO we need to use Upper camel case pattern for file naming. > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6810) Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217693#comment-15217693 ] Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-6810: - we can define the FTL file naming convention and can rename ftl file in current approach. IMO we need to use Upper camel case pattern for file naming. > Refactor components regarding groovy and freemarker file locations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-6810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 15.12 >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Nicolas Malin > > This is a placeholder issue to capture all tasks and related issues regarding > the refactoring of the directory structure with respect to the location of > .groovy and .ftl (freemarker templates) files. > See related discussion: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/25dse4jke2fp64mx -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
RE: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
Hi everyone, I'm not sure if everyone agrees with this, but I would suggest a more final solution is perhaps to do the following: - delete simple-methods.xsd - rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd - fix all references accordingly This is to avoid confusing useless names like v2 which add no value to the developers Taher Alkhateeb -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: 30 March 2016 11:33 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml I agree with Jacques Jacopo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Dev, > > I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file > altogether. It seems useless in trunk now > > Jacques > > > Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : > >> Author: jleroux >> Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 >> New Revision: 1737078 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev >> Log: >> Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used >> >> Modified: >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml >> >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minil >> ang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff >> >> = >> = >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml >> (original) >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar >> +++ 30 >> 06:00:25 2016 >> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. >> >> >> -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; >> uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; >> uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" /> >> >> >> >> >>
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
I think we can remove all simple-methods.xsd file and can rename simple-methods-v2.xsd to simple-methods.xsd Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > I agree with Jacques > > Jacopo > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > Hi Dev, > > > > I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file > > altogether. It seems useless in trunk now > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : > > > >> Author: jleroux > >> Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 > >> New Revision: 1737078 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used > >> > >> Modified: > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > >> > >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml > >> URL: > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff > >> > >> > == > >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml (original) > >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar 30 > >> 06:00:25 2016 > >> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. > >> > >> > >> -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; > >> uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> > >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; > >> uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" /> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
Re: svn commit: r1737078 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml
I agree with Jacques Jacopo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Dev, > > I wonder about this, should we not remove the simple-methods.xsd file > altogether. It seems useless in trunk now > > Jacques > > > Le 30/03/2016 08:00, jler...@apache.org a écrit : > >> Author: jleroux >> Date: Wed Mar 30 06:00:25 2016 >> New Revision: 1737078 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737078&view=rev >> Log: >> Removes simple-methods.xsd from the catalog, it's no longer used >> >> Modified: >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml >> >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml?rev=1737078&r1=1737077&r2=1737078&view=diff >> >> == >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml (original) >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/dtd/minilang-catalog.xml Wed Mar 30 >> 06:00:25 2016 >> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ under the License. >> >> >> -http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods.xsd"; >> uri="simple-methods.xsd" /> >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/simple-methods-v2.xsd"; >> uri="simple-methods-v2.xsd" /> >> >> >> >> >>
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 13.07.03
+1 Le 29/03/2016 11:42, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release13.07 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 13.07.03", will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-13.07.03.zip.sha: hashes Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 13.07.03 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 12.04.06
+1 Le 29/03/2016 11:05, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the release12.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 12.04.06" will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch and it will be the last release of the 12.06 series. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-12.04.06.zip.sha: hashes Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 12.04.06 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for approximately 5 days. For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
