Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jackrabbit20120501/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Regards,

Jacopo


(*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/

Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
Hi Jacopo,

I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
already done on it.

Taher Alkhateeb

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:

 What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
 branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

 Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

 • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
 • 20111205EmailHandling/
 • 20120209RemoveBsh/
 • 20120329_portletWidget/
 • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
 • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
 • addbirt/
 • executioncontext20090716/
 • executioncontext20090812/
 • executioncontext20091231/
 • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
 • htmlfive_20110529/
 • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
 • jackrabbit20100709/
 • jackrabbit20120501/
 • jquery/
 • multitenant20100310/
 • webhelp-2012-12-07/

 Regards,

 Jacopo


 (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/


Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Pierre Smits
Re: jacrabbit branches

A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when
Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this.

Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23
This is still ongoing.



Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services  Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail  Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi Jacopo,

 I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
 useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
 into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
 already done on it.

 Taher Alkhateeb

 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:

  What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
  branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
 
  Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
 
  • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
  • 20111205EmailHandling/
  • 20120209RemoveBsh/
  • 20120329_portletWidget/
  • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
  • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
  • addbirt/
  • executioncontext20090716/
  • executioncontext20090812/
  • executioncontext20091231/
  • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
  • htmlfive_20110529/
  • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
  • jackrabbit20100709/
  • jackrabbit20120501/
  • jquery/
  • multitenant20100310/
  • webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
  Regards,
 
  Jacopo
 
 
  (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Adrian Crum

executioncontext20091231

is a working copy of the security redesign:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign

I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jackrabbit20120501/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Regards,

Jacopo


(*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Ok, here is the list of candidates for removal updated (I have removed the 2 
branches mentioned by Taher and Pierre):

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Jacopo


On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:

 Re: jacrabbit branches
 
 A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when
 Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this.
 
 Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23
 This is still ongoing.
 
 
 
 Pierre Smits
 
 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com
 
 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jacopo,
 
 I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be
 useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking
 into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was
 already done on it.
 
 Taher Alkhateeb
 
 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato 
 jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
 
 What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental
 branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
 
 Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
 
• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jackrabbit20120501/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
 Regards,
 
 Jacopo
 
 
 (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
 



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
New list after Adrian's feedback:

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Jacopo

On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com 
wrote:

 executioncontext20091231
 
 is a working copy of the security redesign:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign
 
 I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.
 
 Adrian Crum
 Sandglass Software
 www.sandglass-software.com
 
 On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
 What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
 branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
 
 Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
 
  • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
  • 20111205EmailHandling/
  • 20120209RemoveBsh/
  • 20120329_portletWidget/
  • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
  • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
  • addbirt/
  • executioncontext20090716/
  • executioncontext20090812/
  • executioncontext20091231/
  • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
  • htmlfive_20110529/
  • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
  • jackrabbit20100709/
  • jackrabbit20120501/
  • jquery/
  • multitenant20100310/
  • webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
 Regards,
 
 Jacopo
 
 
 (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
 



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Deepak Dixit
We can remove jquery branch for sure, as we merged moved to jquery library 
completely.


Thanks  Regards
—
Deepak Dixit

On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:

 New list after Adrian's feedback:
 
   • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
   • 20111205EmailHandling/
   • 20120209RemoveBsh/
   • 20120329_portletWidget/
   • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
   • addbirt/
   • executioncontext20090716/
   • executioncontext20090812/
   • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
   • htmlfive_20110529/
   • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
   • jackrabbit20100709/
   • jquery/
   • multitenant20100310/
   • webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
 Jacopo
 
 On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com 
 wrote:
 
 executioncontext20091231
 
 is a working copy of the security redesign:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign
 
 I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.
 
 Adrian Crum
 Sandglass Software
 www.sandglass-software.com
 
 On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
 What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
 branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
 
 Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
 
 • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
 • 20111205EmailHandling/
 • 20120209RemoveBsh/
 • 20120329_portletWidget/
 • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
 • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
 • addbirt/
 • executioncontext20090716/
 • executioncontext20090812/
 • executioncontext20091231/
 • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
 • htmlfive_20110529/
 • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
 • jackrabbit20100709/
 • jackrabbit20120501/
 • jquery/
 • multitenant20100310/
 • webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
 Regards,
 
 Jacopo
 
 
 (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
 
 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux

I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to 
merge it when I will get enough continuous time.
Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather 
ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released
I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about 
dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.
I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP?
I'm sure jquery can be dropped
For the rest I have no clear ideas.

Jacques

Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jackrabbit20120501/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Regards,

Jacopo


(*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Nicolas Malin

Inline
Le 30/09/2014 10:01, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
Initialized by me, but the gap is really important with the trunk, I 
prefer restart from scratch

• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/

I just ask before.

• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
I just check what contains exactly before delete it, I will interesting 
by continue HMTL5 implantation

• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/




Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com 
wrote:

 I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to 
 merge it when I will get enough continuous time.

Got it.

 Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather 
 ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released

Got it.

 I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about 
 dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.

I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 
3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies.

 I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP?
 I'm sure jquery can be dropped
 For the rest I have no clear ideas.
 
 Jacques
 
 Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
 What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
 branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.
 
 Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):
 
  • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
  • 20111205EmailHandling/
  • 20120209RemoveBsh/
  • 20120329_portletWidget/
  • 2013_RemoveJavolution/
  • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
  • addbirt/
  • executioncontext20090716/
  • executioncontext20090812/
  • executioncontext20091231/
  • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
  • htmlfive_20110529/
  • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
  • jackrabbit20100709/
  • jackrabbit20120501/
  • jquery/
  • multitenant20100310/
  • webhelp-2012-12-07/
 
 Regards,
 
 Jacopo
 
 
 (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
 



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Nicolas,

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Nicolas Malin nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr wrote:

  • 20120329_portletWidget/
 I just ask before.

do you mean that we should keep it?

Jacopo



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Jacopo Cappellato

On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato 
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:

 I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about 
 dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO.
 
 I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 
 3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies.

I was wrong (got confused with the executionframework): there are 2 jackrabbit 
instances.

Jacopo



Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Nicolas Malin

Hi jacopo

• 20120329_portletWidget/

I just ask before.

do you mean that we should keep it?

Or delete it, I will ask to people has been worked on it before :)


Jacopo





Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches

2014-09-30 Thread Olivier Heintz

 20120329_portletWidget and  webhelp-2012-12-07 have been migrated as addon on 
ofbizextra so you can remove its.
They are available for trunk and 13.07.

Olivier



Le 30/09/2014 10:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

New list after Adrian's feedback:

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Jacopo

On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com 
wrote:


executioncontext20091231

is a working copy of the security redesign:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign

I still hope there will be some interest in it some day.

Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com

On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental 
branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep.

Here is the current list of experimental branches (*):

• 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/
• 20111205EmailHandling/
• 20120209RemoveBsh/
• 20120329_portletWidget/
• 2013_RemoveJavolution/
• OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/
• addbirt/
• executioncontext20090716/
• executioncontext20090812/
• executioncontext20091231/
• frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/
• htmlfive_20110529/
• improved-entityengine-features-20120528/
• jackrabbit20100709/
• jackrabbit20120501/
• jquery/
• multitenant20100310/
• webhelp-2012-12-07/

Regards,

Jacopo


(*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/