Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Hi Jacopo, I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was already done on it. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Re: jacrabbit branches A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this. Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23 This is still ongoing. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jacopo, I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was already done on it. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
executioncontext20091231 is a working copy of the security redesign: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign I still hope there will be some interest in it some day. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Ok, here is the list of candidates for removal updated (I have removed the 2 branches mentioned by Taher and Pierre): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Jacopo On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Re: jacrabbit branches A lot of work was put in there, and functionality was fairly complete when Sascha couldn't find the time anymore to work on this. Re: OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23 This is still ongoing. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jacopo, I am not sure how much work was done on jackrabbit, but I think it would be useful to keep the jackrabbit20120501 branch. We were considering looking into the jcr component for integration with our system given that work was already done on it. Taher Alkhateeb On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
New list after Adrian's feedback: • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Jacopo On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote: executioncontext20091231 is a working copy of the security redesign: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign I still hope there will be some interest in it some day. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
We can remove jquery branch for sure, as we merged moved to jquery library completely. Thanks Regards — Deepak Dixit On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: New list after Adrian's feedback: • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Jacopo On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote: executioncontext20091231 is a working copy of the security redesign: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign I still hope there will be some interest in it some day. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to merge it when I will get enough continuous time. Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO. I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP? I'm sure jquery can be dropped For the rest I have no clear ideas. Jacques Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Inline Le 30/09/2014 10:01, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ Initialized by me, but the gap is really important with the trunk, I prefer restart from scratch • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ I just ask before. • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ I just check what contains exactly before delete it, I will interesting by continue HMTL5 implantation • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: I update OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ every week, and plan to merge it when I will get enough continuous time. Got it. Also I'd like to keep webhelp-2012-12-07 as long as a Neogia (now rather ofbiz.fr) addon will not be officially released Got it. I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO. I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies. I don't know if 2013_RemoveJavolution is still a WIP? I'm sure jquery can be dropped For the rest I have no clear ideas. Jacques Le 30/09/2014 09:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Hi Nicolas, On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Nicolas Malin nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr wrote: • 20120329_portletWidget/ I just ask before. do you mean that we should keep it? Jacopo
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
On Sep 30, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: I think we should keep the 2 jackrabbit branches except if we are sure about dropping the older one. The late one should be kept IMO. I have already removed from the list the newest jackrabbit branch (there are 3): the two ones you see in this list are two older copies. I was wrong (got confused with the executionframework): there are 2 jackrabbit instances. Jacopo
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
Hi jacopo • 20120329_portletWidget/ I just ask before. do you mean that we should keep it? Or delete it, I will ask to people has been worked on it before :) Jacopo
Re: Housekeeping of the OFBiz svn tree: removing some old/unused experimental branches
20120329_portletWidget and webhelp-2012-12-07 have been migrated as addon on ofbizextra so you can remove its. They are available for trunk and 13.07. Olivier Le 30/09/2014 10:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : New list after Adrian's feedback: • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Jacopo On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote: executioncontext20091231 is a working copy of the security redesign: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Redesign I still hope there will be some interest in it some day. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/30/2014 8:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: What do you think about removing some old and no more active experimental branches? Please let me know what are the ones we should keep. Here is the current list of experimental branches (*): • 2015ScreenWidgetRedesign/ • 20111205EmailHandling/ • 20120209RemoveBsh/ • 20120329_portletWidget/ • 2013_RemoveJavolution/ • OFBIZ-5312-ofbiz-ecommerce-seo-2013-10-23/ • addbirt/ • executioncontext20090716/ • executioncontext20090812/ • executioncontext20091231/ • frontendNewTheme2013-05-10/ • htmlfive_20110529/ • improved-entityengine-features-20120528/ • jackrabbit20100709/ • jackrabbit20120501/ • jquery/ • multitenant20100310/ • webhelp-2012-12-07/ Regards, Jacopo (*) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/