concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer
When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc. because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have openoffice. Looking forward to improvements :) Cheers, Yuk
Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 16:42:04 +0800 Y Chan teresacha...@gmail.com wrote: When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc. because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have openoffice. Looking forward to improvements :) Cheers, Yuk There is no immediate fix for this. It is best to use the defined styles for footnotes, the styles modified if necessary to suit your need, rather than to individually (directly) format each footnote to suit your requirements. You can use a portable version of OpenOffice which will run off a USB key. I'm sorry, I haven't an up-to-date link for this version. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer
Hi all, 2013/6/8 Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 16:42:04 +0800 Y Chan teresacha...@gmail.com wrote: When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc. because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have openoffice. Looking forward to improvements :) Cheers, Yuk There is no immediate fix for this. It is best to use the defined styles for footnotes, the styles modified if necessary to suit your need, rather than to individually (directly) format each footnote to suit your requirements. You can use a portable version of OpenOffice which will run off a USB key. I'm sorry, I haven't an up-to-date link for this version. http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1341 A+ -- gw
Re: Handlers Drawing - Desing of the nodes.
Hi Alan, Alan Eduardo Puc Pech schrieb: Hi Armin Where I find that folder --- wntmsci12? because you told me to copy the following link: - copy these (from main\solver\400\wntmsci12\**workdir\ResTarget\svxen-US.**res) to your office installation (search there). But I don't find wntmsci12 I use ubuntu 12.04. If you use a Linux, then it will not be wnt... but likely unx... Simple open solver\400\ and you will find it. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles
On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote: --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\ --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1\ --with-dmake-url= http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 --with-epm-url=http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz\ --enable-pch \ --disable-atl \ Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly. E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM URL is outdated. If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it. And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in): ... --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1 \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --enable-pch \ ... (the mailing list may break it, but it's 4 lines, each beginning with -- and ending in \; of course, ... means that you should leave the remaining lines unchanged). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: concerning footnotes when using openoffice writer
Hi Y Chan, you may export as PDF and print from PDF viewer -- ALG (iPad) Am 08.06.2013 um 10:42 schrieb Y Chan teresacha...@gmail.com: When using openoffice writer to write thesis, I find the footnotes often disrupted when converted into doc. Say, the lines are shifted and there are redundant numbering bullets. It is hard to avoid converting into doc. because I don't have a printer, and all the computers at school dont have openoffice. Looking forward to improvements :) Cheers, Yuk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?
On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to have a canonical response we can point people to. It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved can do so. It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for example: a link to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets would help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource leading to it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are unofficial, but hiding them too much does not help either, especially when the release comes closer. Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?
On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to have a canonical response we can point people to. It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved can do so. It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for example: a link to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets would help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource leading to it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are unofficial, but hiding them too much does not help either, especially when the release comes closer. We can discuss developer snapshots on list, but I think it is outside of ASF policy to publish URLs elsewhere - like in Blog posts. We should point those interested in development to the dev ML and then on the ML point them to development resources ad hoc. Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html Definitely. Regards, Dave Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
New Volunteer
Hi, Sup?! I have added my info to the directory of volunteers. I will finish my B.Sc. in a month. This summer before starting my master studies I am thinking of doing sth useful. I hope it can be a starting point to get me involved with open source. :) Here's a little info about my past experiences; I was part of a team in my university who developed a Rule-Based machine translation system for English to Persian text translation. This team has previously developed a Persian spell checker extension for Microsoft Word. I am also familiar with machine learning techniques and their application in natural language processing. I have attached my CV (in case u're interested to know more about me!) :) Bests, -- Mahdi Soleimani - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discuss][Wiki]Synchronizing (or not) localized wiki sites [was: Fwd: [UserGuide]My roadmap]
(top posting, because I'm not answering any particular post) At this point, I think we all agree that we have a bit of a license mess that needs to be fixed in order to clarify the documentation project. So here is one possible idea: 1- Move the current /Documentation page to /Documentation-OLD or /Documentation-LEGACY(1), indicating at the begining that the content is outdated 2- Create a new portal page on the old url with the characteristic described bellow Characteristics for the new portal * Introduction to the project, how to contact the group and participate, pending tasks lists, etc. * Links to the new, Apache licensed documentation (user guide, building guide, etcetera) indicating that it's a work in progress and that new contributors are welcomed. * Add a section that points to the legacy page. Something like Apache OpenOffice inherited not only the code from former OpenOffice.org project, but also a huge amount of documentation. Some of those documents are still valid, some don't, but you can find all of them here. Once this new structure is in place for the main EN site, propagate it to other languages will be easier than fixing current PDL licensed pages. What do you think? (1) Maybe it's better to first create the new portal on /Documentation-AOO, when that new page is ready move /Documentation to /Documentation-Legacy, then move /Documentation-AOO to /Documentation Regards Ricardo 2013/6/5 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org I don't believe the ASF iCLA I filed stipulates anything about ALv2, although it certainly stipulates what my contributions grant to the ASF and to anyone who receives my contribution via the ASF. (Note that the grant to recipients is directly from me, via the iCLA, no matter what the ALv2 says.) My comment is mainly with respect to pages on the wiki that are covered by licenses other than the ALv2 and what contributing any modifications to them entails, no matter what the ASF gets from me under the terms of my iCLA. Of course, a click-through registration that asserts ALv2 for contributions is fine, although the ASF and recipients still have more rights than that for any contribution I make. The current statement about treating materials not under the default license still applies and I suspect a form of that has to remain in any click-through on registration. The iCLA doesn't (and can't) alter that situation. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 01:24 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: l...@openoffice.apache.org; d...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss][Wiki]Synchronizing (or not) localized wiki sites [was: Fwd: [UserGuide]My roadmap] On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: +1 I prepared my response before I saw this one. There is still need to be careful around this: However, when we create new material, including enhancements Of existing material, then we need to respect the ICLA which says our contributions are made under ALv2. This might mean that going forward that modified content is covered by multiple licenses. 1. When enhancing existing materials, the existing license must be honored. How additional licensing works depends on the specific Conditions. It should not be automatically assumed possible. 2. Since our having accounts on the wiki are subject to the rules for The wiki, I'm not sure the ICLA governs (1). As committers, we certainly shouldn't be asserting any other license, but the current license on the work is going to determine whether and how the ALv2 can be introduced. The ICLA says: Contribution shall mean any original work of authorship, including any modifications or additions to an existing work, that is intentionally submitted by You to the Foundation for inclusion in, or documentation of, any of the products owned or managed by the Foundation (the Work). For the purposes of this definition, submitted means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Foundation or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Foundation for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by You as Not a Contribution. So I think that covers wiki contributions as well since that is documentation of, yes? -Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:28 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: l...@openoffice.apache.org; d...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss][Wiki]Synchronizing (or not) localized
Re: Apache licence and derivated work
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rob, 2013/6/8 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I would know what has to be written on a derivated *documentation* work (modified or translated) based on an original work published with an Apache licence. Is the original work a work published by an Apache project? Or is it a 3rd party work from outside Apache that you are modifying? And is the destination of the modified work for publication by this project? Or is it for independent publication outside of the project. (In other words, where is it coming from and where is it going?) Although the license is the same in these cases, there are differences in Apache policy. If you can give more details we can give a more specific answer. Many thanks for your answer. Here are some clarifications. It concerns my own docs, published with an ALV2 license. I could have the opportunity to work on it with a group, a little as ODFAuthors do. So, the different chapters would be released with a list of authors/contributors and the copyright name would be the name of the group. The licence is still ALv2.0. I would insert a notice in the files, with clear instructions for third parties (companies, schools, administrations, editors, etc.) which would reuse and modify the work, so that they know exactly how to do, if they modify the work to fit it to their own specific needs and distribute it on their own Intranet or in a printed version. I would avoid to receive too much questions, and would try to solve this issue in a clear notice explaining the procedure. It's also important for people who will join to this effort of documentation. I think they have the right to understand clearly how the work they will produce could be reused to decide whether they participate or not. OK. So this is entirely 3rd party and Apache policy does not apply. Section 4 of the ALv2 explains what is required by someone who modifies and redistributes a work under Apache license: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html That is the official requirement. But let's look at your specific questions now and see how this applies: #1. The title of the derivated document has to be different. Section 4b of the license says: You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files. Changing the title could be part of that. But the license does not specify the exact way in which you indicate that you changed the files. #2. The author of the modified version has to add its own copyright notice. This is also not required. The only requirement is to preserve any copyright notices that are already there. Section 4c of the license: You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; #3. The licence of the derivated work has to be obligatory the Apache licence or not ? I'd encourage using the Apache license for derived works, but it is not required. Section 4 of the license says (with my emphasis): You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and ***may provide additional or different license terms*** and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided ***Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License***. So you may apply a different license provided it is compatible with the Apache License. But in most cases it is simplest just to use the Apache License. #4. If yes in #3, the APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work has to be added to the derivated work. Section 4a of the license says that you must include a copy of the license, so that would include the Appendix as well. #5. Has the author of the derivated work to write a notice giving credit to the author(s) and contributor(s) of the original version on which he has based his work ? Is a link to the original work obligatory or not ? If the original work had a copyright statement, then that must be preserved. If the original version had a NOTICE text file (see section 4d of the license) then that must be preserved. You can see the NOTICE file for AOO itself here, to get an idea of what kinds of things are in it: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/NOTICE In any case, you should probably decide whether you are looking for hard legal constraints on what people do with the documentation, or soft social norming that guides them to reasonable behavior. For example, if you had a page in the documentation that listed the contributors and invited authors of derived versions to add their
Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles
Hi, Andrea Pescetti schrieb: On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote: --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\ --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1\ --with-dmake-url= http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 --with-epm-url=http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz\ --enable-pch \ --disable-atl \ Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly. E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM URL is outdated. If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it. And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in): ... --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1 \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ I have no line --with-epm-url at all. Kind regards Regina Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Handlers Drawing - Desing of the nodes.
Hi Regina Thanks I found, but now I am building the module packimages, but I have this error: packimages: parsing '/home/alan/aoo/main/solver/400/ unxlngi6.pro/res/img/wzien-US.ilst' ... packimages: parsing '/home/alan/aoo/main/solver/400/ unxlngi6.pro/res/img/xsltdlgen-US.ilst' ... packimages: parsing '../unxlngi6.pro/res/img/commandimagelist.ilst' ... packimages: assemble image list ... packimages: creating image archive ... packimages: sorting from ../unxlngi6.pro/res/img/sorted.lst ... packimages: done sort ... *Can't call method desiredCompressionLevel on an undefined value at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 249.* *dmake: Error code 2, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/bin/images.zip'* *ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/alan/aoo/main/packimages/pack* * * I think it's related to my version of perl. but I would like to know your opinion. regards. 2013/6/8 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de Hi Alan, Alan Eduardo Puc Pech schrieb: Hi Armin Where I find that folder --- wntmsci12? because you told me to copy the following link: - copy these (from main\solver\400\wntmsci12\workdir\ResTarget\svxen-US.res) to your office installation (search there). But I don't find wntmsci12 I use ubuntu 12.04. If you use a Linux, then it will not be wnt... but likely unx... Simple open solver\400\ and you will find it. Kind regards Regina --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New Volunteer
mehdi soleimani nasab wrote: Here's a little info about my past experiences; I was part of a team in my university who developed a Rule-Based machine translation system for English to Persian text translation. This team has previously developed a Persian spell checker extension Welcome! The easiest way to help immediately is to contribute to the Persian translation, due in about 10 days. Please add a comment to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122287 stating that you are available to help, so that you can coordinate with other volunteers vie private e-mail or directly on the issue page. I have attached my CV (in case u're interested to know more about me!) :) Attachments are removed, but we don't need a CV, we will hopefully learn more about you from your contributions! Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Location for logo source?
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Chris R. sent me the logo source, including additional application notes, links to the font, etc. Where should this go? On the one hand we store the live version of the logo bitmaps on the website here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/ But there are also other copies in other location, in the product tree, in the site tree, and outside of SVN on forums, wiki, etc. So I think we want a more central location where we can store this material, since it cuts across product, website and externally. Maybe a new root SVN folder, /openoffice/artwork ? That could grow to contain things like CD labels, etc. I'm sure someone will suggest the MWiki. That allows some kinds of attachments, yes? But does it version attachments? I think we want full version control on logo source changes. Regards, -Rob There is a subarea in images that had been set up for this -- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/ with svg directory for source, and renderings in the main logos area. Could we continue to use this area? Possibly. The side effect would be that the logo source gets published to the website. What would that mean to visitors? My preference would be to make it clear that the logo is not something that we just want people grabbing and reusing for any purpose. I would suggest all other items -- notes, a rendering -- be placed in http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/ I like this area more. Maybe the images/AOO_logos is better for the concrete website PNG image, and the marketing/art/galleries area could be for the source, etc.? We can then set expectations/permissible uses, etc., on the existing web pages. -Rob Yes, this makes sense. And, I didn't realize there was already some appropriate links to SVG there. This is a good choice. a ps. I can use these to work on new logo use for web sites soonish -- Monday, PDT? -- and supply mockup pages. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK You can't believe one thing and do another. What you believe and what you do are the same thing. -- Leonard Peltier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK You can't believe one thing and do another. What you believe and what you do are the same thing. -- Leonard Peltier -- MzK You can't believe one thing and do another. What you believe and what you do are the same thing. -- Leonard Peltier
Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles
I remove the new lines and I wrote it in just one line. sh ./configure --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0/VC/ --with-mspdb-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0/Common7/IDE --with-asm-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0/VC/bin --with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0/SDK/v3.5 --with-frame-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1 --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1 --with-midl-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1/bin --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02 --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.1 --with-dmake-url= http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2; --with-epm-url=http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz; --enable-pch --disable-atl --disable-binfilter --without-junit and i got this error: checking the Microsoft C/C++ Compiler... found (/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~2/MICROS~3.0/VC/bin/cl.exe) checking the Version of Microsoft C/C++ Compiler... found Compiler version in /cygdrive/c/PROGRA~2/MICROS~3.0/VC/bin/cl.exe: error while loading shared libraries: mspdb110.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ./configure: line 8138: test: : integer expression expected configure: error: Compiler too old. Use Microsoft C/C++ .NET 2008. I'm using MSVC 2012, (i don't want to install MSVC 2008 :() What do i have to do? 2013/6/8 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de Hi, Andrea Pescetti schrieb: On 07/06/2013 Ivan Fuentes wrote: --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/**Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0_02\ --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/**apache-ant-1.9.1\ --with-dmake-url= http://dmake.apache-extras.**org.codespot.com/files/dmake-**4.12.tar.bz2http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 --with-epm-url=http://ftp.**easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.** 7-source.tar.gz\http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz%5C --enable-pch \ --disable-atl \ Whatever shell/interpreter you are using, it seems that, as Juergen wrote, you are not passing the dmake URL properly. E-mail breaks it, but it seems that: you don't have a \ to terminate the dmake configuration option and tell the interpreter that the command continues on the next line; the dmake URL is on another line; the EPM URL is outdated. If you copied the EPM URL from a wiki page, please fix it on the wiki page. Or at least give us the link so that we can fix it. And try changing that section as follows (unless someone else with more experience than me in enjoying Windows builds steps in): ... --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/**apache-ant-1.9.1 \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.**apache-extras.org.codespot.** com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.**msweet.org/files/project2/epm-** 3.7-source.tar.gzhttp://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz\ I have no line --with-epm-url at all. Kind regards Regina Kind regards Regina --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- P.D. Por fa confirma de recibido ;) ... and to make the darkness bright paint the sky with stars [Iván Fuentes]
[DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4
I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version, new directory + filename structure). If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast as the time is running. 1. I'm working with the following directory structure: .../aoo/4.0.0/source/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/ 2. I'm working with the following filename structure: (especially @Juergen + Ariel) aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe 3. I'm testing with my Apache people account: http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/... However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like the following: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download http://www.apache.org/dist/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ source/ aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Need QA (test) volunteers on Ubuntu 64bit
Hi Yu, I am generally free next week. I can spare two to three hours everyday next week. I have ubuntu installation on virtual, and my own windows 7 home. Please let me know if I can contribute. Thanks and regards, Anna On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We have achieved the exeution target on full regression testing, as every QA assignee continues to do their assignments or retest for failed test cases when related defects have been resolved, We now have another work with more higher priority, that is to do a quick go through with latest dev snapshot build(contains stlport change) by end of next week (*June 14*). We're looking for people who can spend a few time over next week to run pre-defined checklist on their Ubuntu 64bit, and to enter Bugzilla issues for any failed test functions, as well as to highlighter the critical bugs in the report. If you have interest on it, please let me know as soon as possible, I will send you the general testing list. Thanks! Regards, Yu Zhen
[AOO 4.0] [DEVTOOLS] setting toolbar name in Addons.xcu
Hi All, I have committed a change to Netbeans plugin trunk for AOO 4.0 for setting toolbar name in Addons.xcu and setting to AOO 4.0. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122055 I have attached to the issue an example Addons.xcu created with the plugin and a older developer snapshot AOO350m1(Build:9611) - Rev. 1400866 I've been really busy with work and will be away from email a few weeks so I wanted to get this in. If anyone can look at the Addons.xcu file and let me know if there is any issues I'd appreciate it. Also If there is a schema I can validate against, I can work on it when I get back. Best regards, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0
On 01/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote: Crazy idea. What if we just made a sub domain for each release? Or equivalently a path under ooo-site. Then we could have hard-coded standard paths in the code and other systems like: www.openoffice.org/release/version/README Could also do LICENSE, release notes, even the update notification XML files Sounds like a very good idea. I'm not sure we will be able to implement it in time for OpenOffice 4 (translations get in the way), but it could be setup with some basic information already for version 4 (and, if the hard-coded URLs in version 4 are different and cannot be changed at this stage, we could redirect them appropriately). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4
I've updated the test area in staging: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it might be just a missing language. ;-) And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty. For the first troubleshooting the following could help: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved. Thanks in advance. Marcus Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version, new directory + filename structure). If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast as the time is running. 1. I'm working with the following directory structure: .../aoo/4.0.0/source/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/ 2. I'm working with the following filename structure: (especially @Juergen + Ariel) aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe 3. I'm testing with my Apache people account: http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/... However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like the following: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download http://www.apache.org/dist/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ source/ aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Location for logo source?
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/ I like this area more. Maybe the images/AOO_logos is better for the concrete website PNG image, and the marketing/art/galleries area could be for the source, etc.? We can then set expectations/permissible uses, etc., on the existing web pages. Seems good. Actually, we could even shorten it to http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/logos/ for better reachability in SVN (art would still be meaningful, but galleries seems misleading). This is just a minor preference of course. I checked it in earlier just so those who are interested in helping with it can access it: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/marketing/art/galleries/logos/aoo-working/ I'd like to clean up the /marketing tree in general, to move the old logo(s) to a history page, etc. This whole area of the website is in need of a cleanup. Or maybe migration into the wiki? Most of the project-facing marketing work is probably better done on the wiki than in static pages. In the end I'd only want things like logos, where we do not want to give public write-access, to be in SVN. Make sense? Yes +1. Thanks for your leadership on this. Regards, Dave Regards, -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4
Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to do some semi-live testing. I could think of the following: http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror: http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/... PS: Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start the download? Thanks in advance. Marcus Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): I've updated the test area in staging: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it might be just a missing language. ;-) And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty. For the first troubleshooting the following could help: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved. Thanks in advance. Marcus Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version, new directory + filename structure). If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast as the time is running. 1. I'm working with the following directory structure: .../aoo/4.0.0/source/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/ 2. I'm working with the following filename structure: (especially @Juergen + Ariel) aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe 3. I'm testing with my Apache people account: http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/... However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like the following: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download http://www.apache.org/dist/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ binaries/ en-US/ Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/ aoo/ 4.0.0/ source/ aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4
Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've updated the test area in staging: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest looks very good: * Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links. 1. I'm working with the following directory structure: .../aoo/4.0.0/source/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/ Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place there. But it is just a matter of preference. 2. I'm working with the following filename structure: (especially @Juergen + Ariel) aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Since this is our most official package, I would name it apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 or Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I would prefer to see both Apache and OpenOffice present in full in the package name. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Draft blog post: When will OpenOffice version X be released?
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote: https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to have a canonical response we can point people to. It's good but I'd add pointers so that people who want to get involved can do so. It is time to give more visibility to development snapshots, for example: a link to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsetswould help in getting more feedback. Or a link to any QA resource leading to it. We don't want to make them too visible since they are unofficial, but hiding them too much does not help either, especially when the release comes closer. We can discuss developer snapshots on list, but I think it is outside of ASF policy to publish URLs elsewhere - like in Blog posts. yes...I think we have told this a few times...no public announcements of development products We should point those interested in development to the dev ML and then on the ML point them to development resources ad hoc. Same for translations. It would be good to include a link to http://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html Definitely. Regards, Dave Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK You can't believe one thing and do another. What you believe and what you do are the same thing. -- Leonard Peltier
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:35 AM, build...@apache.org wrote: Hi! , The aoo-win7 builder has just completed a run STATUS: Failure Build revision 1490123 on branch openoffice/trunk Snapshot results at: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Build using the ASF buildslave: bb-win7 Build results at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/642 Build reason was: The Nightly scheduler named 'aoo-win7-nightly' triggered this build C:/Progra~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/include\../../VC/include/unordered_set(64) : error C2065: '_Hash_compare' : undeclared identifier the bot might be suffering from the issue described here: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vcgeneral/thread/eaf24519-84e3-442e-ac7d-adab82a81ede If you're using the original Feature Pack, you may want to install the Feature Pack Refresh instead. If you installed the Windows SDK after installing the Feature Pack, it overwrites a few headers and you need to repair VS to get the Feature Pack headers back (this is documented in the Feature Pack release notes). If repairing does not work, install Visual C++ 2008 Feature Pack Release from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=6922 Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Logo next steps
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Chris! Ok girls and guys, I've already made a dent in documenting where the logo appears in the different sections: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO4+-+Application+And+Launcher I don't have sizes, but I want to review those sections and document new sizes with some wireframes what it would look like. Some of the layout could use some polishing which I could help with. I could generate the smaller images, fav icons, etc. once we have the SVG. I could check out and in changes, both code and resource files like images. A quick thought on the workflow. Abstractly we'll probably want a master image SVG file and then a set of defined steps (a recipe) that gets us from the master SVG to each of bitmap images we'll need. This is probably not something that can be entirely automated, but we could have steps in a text file stored parallel to the source, or on the wiki. For example, to produce the website logo from the master: 1) Remove the version number from the master logo 2) Crop to specified aspect ratio, with specified centering of the logo 3) Export to PNG, with alpha transparency, with specified dimensions Something like that (with the details specified, obviously) That way, if we ever need to tweak the logo master SVG we can consistently generate the derived versions. -Rob Samer On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Now that the core decision making process is over, what are the next steps? Good, congratulations to Chris and it's good to see that the outcome was basically the ratification of the preferences 5000+ people had expressed in the survey. 1) I've sent Chris a note requesting the latest SVG. Once I receive it I'll check it in. Thanks, and I assume you will also take care of all licensing and paperwork. At a certain point in future we will claim this new logo as our trademark and I trust all appropriate steps are being taken in this respect too. 2) We should make an inventory of places where this logo should go. What sizes are needed, formats, background color (or alpha transparency), border requirements, location in SVN, etc. I would just add to your list: a square 100x100 icon for social media. Ideally, we should have it in place when OpenOffice 4 is released. Note: Previously it was mentioned that the number 4 had unlucky connotations in some cultures. So we need to include the version number as part of the logo in the splash screen and about box? We'd need to hear from them, but I would find it quite odd if we didn't include a 4 in the about box (and in the splash screen too). If this was version 13 (which is unlucky in other cultures), I would find equally odd to omit the 13 from the about box. Regards, Andrea. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4
Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've updated the test area in staging: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest looks very good: * Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule? * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links. Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak about Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries and delete the link in the nav sidebar. I've concentrated on the DL links. Thanks for looking right and left. ;-) Updated. 1. I'm working with the following directory structure: .../aoo/4.0.0/source/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/ .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/ Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place there. But it is just a matter of preference. Yes, me too. However, we had this discussion last year and some wanted to have SDK on the same level as the languages. Because we save one complexity level I can live with this very well. We shouldn't forget that this is just the structure on the mirrors. Nearly nobody will see or take care about this. ;-) 2. I'm working with the following filename structure: (especially @Juergen + Ariel) aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 Since this is our most official package, I would name it apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 or Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2 if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I would prefer to see both Apache and OpenOffice present in full in the package name. Good idea. @Juergen: As you are producing the source packages, please can you take this into account? Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: problem opening older Word 6 doc with 4.0
Kay, Could you please share the bug ID when you reported it? It sounds like a ship stopper candidate if can be confirmed. Thanks! - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/6/7 Max Merbald max.merb...@gmx.de Thank you! Since there still are quite a few older files around AOo 4 should be able to open them. Am 06.06.2013 18:25, schrieb Kay Schenk: 4.0 is giving me this message when trying to open an older Word 6 version document... Read-Error . This is not a WinWord 97 file. This is an old document I downloaded from a public server quite some time ago. it was readable in 3.4.1, but not now. I will file a bug and upload it. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
